Andrew Heckler, Rachel Henderson, Eric Kuo, Jayson Nissen, Tim Stelzer, and Bethany Wilcox
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020001 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
Briley L. Lewis
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020146 (2025) - Published 20 November, 2025
An online survey of preparation for writing in physics indicates uneven preparation for disciplinary writing, drawing heavily on prior experience such as K-12 classes.
Paul Tschisgale, Holger Maus, Fabian Kieser, Ben Kroehs, Stefan Petersen, and Peter Wulff
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020115 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
ChatGPT 4o outperformed humans on problem solving on German Physics Olympiad problems.
Simon Zacharias Lahme, Dominik Dorsel, Heidrun Heinke, Pascal Klein, Andreas Müller, Christoph Stampfer, and Sebastian Staacks
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020110 (2025) - Published 22 July, 2025
After implementing nine smartphone based researchers found students to have better affective outcomes and increased agency as compared to those who went through programming tasks.
Molly Griston and Bethany R. Wilcox
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020113 (2025) - Published 30 July, 2025
Three case studies of students making homework corrections indicate that students see the benefits, but also struggled to identify their errors.
Abolaji R. Akinyemi, Michael E. Loverude, and John R. Thompson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020114 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Evaluating introductory physics student solution checking, the authors find that mostly students do not use evaluation strategies, but when they do, they use three primary strategies.
Yushan Xiong, Jialan Liu, Jiejie Lai, Tongyi Zheng, Xuhuai Qu, Qiuye Li, Yi Zhong, Lei Bao, and Shaona Zhou
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020120 (2025) - Published 5 September, 2025
Novice problem solvers are shown to have longer reaction times in problem solving settings, suggesting effortful inhibitory control over misconceptions.
Yessi Affriyenni, Helen Georgiou, and Noah Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020124 (2025) - Published 9 September, 2025
A study of the adoption of Research-Based Instructional Strategies offers new insights into the interplay of personal agency, collaborative teaching structures, and systemic influences and suggests that instructional change frameworks should address institutional inertia and structural barriers to reform.
Zachary Richards and Angela M. Kelly
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020127 (2025) - Published 16 September, 2025
Drawing on interviews with astronomy students the authors establish an astronomy identity framework with six constructs.
A. R. Piña, Shams El-Adawy, Mike Verostek, Brett T. Boyle, Mateo Cacheiro, Matt Lawler, Namitha Pradeep, Ella Watts, Colin G. West, H. J. Lewandowski, and Benjamin M. Zwickl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020131 (2025) - Published 16 October, 2025
A national survey characterizes the state of Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) and finds prevalent courses, programs, and opportunities to engage in QISE.
Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020132 (2025) - Published 21 October, 2025
The APOS theory (action, process, object, schema) from mathematics education research illuminates the interplay of mathematics and physics in the context of the 2D heat equation.
Emma Teresa Booth, Virginia J. Flood, and Benedikt W. Harrer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020136 (2025) - Published 27 October, 2025
Four forms of representational gesture are commonly used in student discussions of problem solving to capture instantaneity.
Yajun Wei
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020141 (2025) - Published 5 November, 2025
Features such as color matching, spatial layout, and numbering sequences within written instruction eased cognitive load among students.
Kristóf Tóth, Sergej Faletič, Marisa Michelini, Gesche Pospiech, Andrea Betti, Marco Nicolini, Marco Parmiggiani, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020142 (2025) - Published 5 November, 2025
In a randomized study of instructional methods for teaching quantum using two state systems those taught using photon polarization and the double-well potential significantly outperformed those following the which-path encoded single-photon approach.
Molly N. Simon and Janelle M. Bailey
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020601 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
This updated review of Astronomy Education Research over the last 20 years identifies 7 broad categories, with studies of instruction as the most prominent.
Gerd Kortemeyer, Marina Babayeva, Giulia Polverini, Ralf Widenhorn, and Bor Gregorcic
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020101 (2025) - Published 8 July, 2025
GPT-4o outperforms students on multilingual physics assessments, though it struggles with lab skills and questions that require image interpretation.
Md Sanyat Rabby and Charles Henderson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020102 (2025) - Published 11 July, 2025
Interviews with introductory physics instructors reveal limited awareness and inconsistent use of inclusive teaching strategies, especially those addressing student identity.
Tong Wan, Juliette Pimbert, Reshawna L. Chapple, Ying Cao, and Pierre-Philippe A. Ouimet
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020104 (2025) - Published 9 July, 2025
Deaf or hard of hearing students in a physics lab were found to have differing levels of engagement.
Masaki Goda, Shinichi Kishizawa, and Yamato Hasegawa
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020105 (2025) - Published 10 July, 2025
After constructing and transforming a score-state vector for FCI scores, two different profiles emerge representing novices and experts.
Zeynep Dulger and Feral Ogan-Bekiroglu
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020106 (2025) - Published 17 July, 2025
This study of problem-solving with Turkish students reveal that high school students do not use the meta-cognitive skills that experts rely on, particularly planning and evaluation.
A. Gasparini, A. Müller, F. Stern, and L. Weiss
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020107 (2025) - Published 18 July, 2025
A newly developed course on Cosmology for secondary students showed increased conceptual understanding as well as positive affective shifts.
Charlotte Zimmerman, Alexis Olsho, Trevor I. Smith, Philip Eaton, and Suzanne White Brahmia
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020108 (2025) - Published 18 July, 2025
A new instrument measures the extent to which students who have not taken calculus learn to reason quantitatively as a result of taking physics courses.
Dina Zohrabi Alaee and Benjamin M. Zwickl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020109 (2025) - Published 21 July, 2025
This interview study of students choosing to major in physics identified a number of factors that pulled students into physics.
Simon Zacharias Lahme, Dominik Dorsel, Heidrun Heinke, Pascal Klein, Andreas Müller, Christoph Stampfer, and Sebastian Staacks
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020110 (2025) - Published 22 July, 2025
After implementing nine smartphone based researchers found students to have better affective outcomes and increased agency as compared to those who went through programming tasks.
Derya Kaltakci-Gurel
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020111 (2025) - Published 24 July, 2025
Gender and achievement level independently exerted significant effects on students’ scores on epistemological beliefs as measured by the CLASS survey.
Yiting Wang, Xiumei Feng, Yuchen Jiang, Li Xie, Min Xia, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020112 (2025) - Published 28 July, 2025
In an eye-tracking study of particles in force fields, students did well in uniform fields, but struggled in cases of non-uniform field.
Molly Griston and Bethany R. Wilcox
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020113 (2025) - Published 30 July, 2025
Three case studies of students making homework corrections indicate that students see the benefits, but also struggled to identify their errors.
Abolaji R. Akinyemi, Michael E. Loverude, and John R. Thompson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020114 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Evaluating introductory physics student solution checking, the authors find that mostly students do not use evaluation strategies, but when they do, they use three primary strategies.
Paul Tschisgale, Holger Maus, Fabian Kieser, Ben Kroehs, Stefan Petersen, and Peter Wulff
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020115 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
ChatGPT 4o outperformed humans on problem solving on German Physics Olympiad problems.
Geraldine L. Cochran, Corey Ptak, Jenna Tempkin, Téa Boone, Stella F. Nelson, Sabrina R. Henige, and Diana Sachmpazidi
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020116 (2025) - Published 22 August, 2025
Graduate student experiences in bridge programs highlight how recognizing familial capital can improve physics graduate education policies.”
Yajun Wei, Xinting Peng, Yi Zhong, Feipeng Pi, Yanfang Zhai, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020117 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Teachers saw contextualized physics problems as essential for enhancing interest and motivation among students, but students expressed a clear preference for de-contextualized physics problems and generally disagreed that CPP increased their interest in physics.
E. B. Merki, S. I. Hofer, A. Vaterlaus, and A. Lichtenberger
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020118 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Introducing a new instrument for investigating student understanding of Galilean transformations.
Sebastian Kilde-Westberg, Andreas Johansson, and Jonas Enger
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020119 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Effectiveness of high school students’ use of ChatGPT during a physics laboratory is significantly influenced prior physics knowledge and teacher guidance plays a crucial role.
Yushan Xiong, Jialan Liu, Jiejie Lai, Tongyi Zheng, Xuhuai Qu, Qiuye Li, Yi Zhong, Lei Bao, and Shaona Zhou
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020120 (2025) - Published 5 September, 2025
Novice problem solvers are shown to have longer reaction times in problem solving settings, suggesting effortful inhibitory control over misconceptions.
Clausell Mathis, Sherry A. Southerland, and Lama Z. Jaber
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020121 (2025) - Published 8 September, 2025
A year-long study of one teacher’s practice identified three forms of care expressed for students: social, epistemic, and academic, which contributed to differential opportunities for learning.
Benjie Wang, Wei Han, Qingdian Kong, Huanxia Wang, and Yingjie Zhang
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020122 (2025) - Published 8 September, 2025
A study proposing a cognitive model of frictional forces among high school students and then evaluating the model with a new diagnostic instrument.
Clausell Mathis, Jomo Mutegi, Turhan Carroll, Maya Patel, and Andrea Wooley
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020123 (2025) - Published 8 September, 2025
Qualitative study suggesting that teachers with clearer senses of identity also have more comprehensive understandings of equity.
Yessi Affriyenni, Helen Georgiou, and Noah Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020124 (2025) - Published 9 September, 2025
A study of the adoption of Research-Based Instructional Strategies offers new insights into the interplay of personal agency, collaborative teaching structures, and systemic influences and suggests that instructional change frameworks should address institutional inertia and structural barriers to reform.
Jaya Shivangani Kashyap and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020125 (2025) - Published 10 September, 2025
Case study of an upper division student solving problems reveals that the student did not have global coherence in approach, but sought local coherence.
Minghui Wang, Meagan Sundstrom, Karen Nylund-Gibson, and Marsha Ing
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020126 (2025) - Published 15 September, 2025
Mixture models offer statistical tools for choosing the optimal number of subgroups and account for classification errors.
Zachary Richards and Angela M. Kelly
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020127 (2025) - Published 16 September, 2025
Drawing on interviews with astronomy students the authors establish an astronomy identity framework with six constructs.
Trà Huỳnh, Amy D. Robertson, Lauren C. Bauman, and Rachel E. Scherr
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020128 (2025) - Published 19 September, 2025
Teachers who participated in an equity workshop focused physics students’ access to physics, achievement, and identities, but less on changing power dynamics in physics.
Paula Fehlinger, Sebastian Becker-Genschow, and Bianca Watzka
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020129 (2025) - Published 23 September, 2025
An eye tracking and interview study of 10th grade students in two contexts finds that students used two strategies, one comparing individual points and another comparing the graphs themselves.
Soyeon Kim, Pyung Kang Jung, and Jung Bog Kim
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020130 (2025) - Published 9 October, 2025
Pre-service physics teachers in Korea showed enhanced conceptual understanding of wavefunctions and the uncertainty principle after using Quantum Interactive Learning Tutorials.
A. R. Piña, Shams El-Adawy, Mike Verostek, Brett T. Boyle, Mateo Cacheiro, Matt Lawler, Namitha Pradeep, Ella Watts, Colin G. West, H. J. Lewandowski, and Benjamin M. Zwickl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020131 (2025) - Published 16 October, 2025
A national survey characterizes the state of Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) and finds prevalent courses, programs, and opportunities to engage in QISE.
Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020132 (2025) - Published 21 October, 2025
The APOS theory (action, process, object, schema) from mathematics education research illuminates the interplay of mathematics and physics in the context of the 2D heat equation.
Emily Bolger, Marius Nwobi, and Marcos D. Caballero
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020133 (2025) - Published 21 October, 2025
Social Network Analysis of PICUP community identifies structure of community with some users as very active and others primarily lurking.
David J. Webb and Cassandra A. Paul
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020134 (2025) - Published 21 October, 2025
A study in introductory physics suggests high-stakes exams are causing a gender gap, rather than measuring it.
Shaona Zhou, Qiuye Li, Yi Zhong, Sihang Liang, Yongxuan Li, Yifeng Ou, and Xianqiu Wu
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020135 (2025) - Published 24 October, 2025
Competition may speed up task completion, but this study suggests that noncompetitive settings support more careful thinking and slightly higher accuracy in physics tasks.
Emma Teresa Booth, Virginia J. Flood, and Benedikt W. Harrer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020136 (2025) - Published 27 October, 2025
Four forms of representational gesture are commonly used in student discussions of problem solving to capture instantaneity.
Yossi Ben-Zion, Roni Segal, Jianqiang Liu, Chun-Ming Wang, Atanu Rajak, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020137 (2025) - Published 27 October, 2025
In a study spanning four different countries and various educational systems, most students struggled to identify the necessity of radians in pure mathematical contexts, but performed better when encountering the same concept in concrete physical situations.
Amy D. Robertson, Lisa M. Goodhew, Lauren C. Bauman, Anne T. Alesandrini, and Paula R. L. Heron
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020138 (2025) - Published 27 October, 2025
Study detailing the development and assessment of instructional materials for Attending to Conceptual Resources in Physics.
Jun-ichiro Yasuda, Michael M. Hull, Naohiro Mae, and Kentaro Kojima
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020139 (2025) - Published 3 November, 2025
Chained Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory can reduce the number of questions needed to efficiently diagnose student understanding.
Xian Wu, Yaoguang Li, and N. Sanjay Rebello
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020140 (2025) - Published 5 November, 2025
An exploratory factor analysis of the Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey reveals an interpretable factor structure.
Yajun Wei
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020141 (2025) - Published 5 November, 2025
Features such as color matching, spatial layout, and numbering sequences within written instruction eased cognitive load among students.
Kristóf Tóth, Sergej Faletič, Marisa Michelini, Gesche Pospiech, Andrea Betti, Marco Nicolini, Marco Parmiggiani, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020142 (2025) - Published 5 November, 2025
In a randomized study of instructional methods for teaching quantum using two state systems those taught using photon polarization and the double-well potential significantly outperformed those following the which-path encoded single-photon approach.
Giulia Termini, Onofrio R. Battaglia, Ilaria Grazia, and Claudio Fazio
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020143 (2025) - Published 6 November, 2025
Thematic analysis indicates how different modeling approaches impact conceptual understanding, intellectual growth, and scientific habits of mind regarding surface phenomena in liquids.
Shams El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, Benjamin M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020144 (2025) - Published 10 November, 2025
Interviews with educators engaged in QISE highlight the importance of strengthening industry-academia connections to prepare students for the quantum workforce.
Ramesh Dhungana
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020145 (2025) - Published 12 November, 2025
Comparison of face-to-face and remote, synchronous instruction shows better outcomes from the face-to-face version of the course.
Briley L. Lewis
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020146 (2025) - Published 20 November, 2025
An online survey of preparation for writing in physics indicates uneven preparation for disciplinary writing, drawing heavily on prior experience such as K-12 classes.
Nathan D. Davis and Eric Burkholder
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020147 (2025) - Published 24 November, 2025
This study uses social network analysis to show that the strength and role of students’ connections, rather than their number, is related to their sense of belonging in physics classrooms.
Yavuz Dinc, Sarah Malone, Verena Ruf, Steffen Steinert, Stefan Küchemann, and Jochen Kuhn
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020148 (2025) - Published 26 November, 2025
Extending prior work, the authors find that student’s gaze during conceptual tests more accurately predicts performance than during a learning phase.
Sarah Wildbichler, Markus Obczovsky, Florian Budimaier, Martin Hopf, and Thomas Schubatzky
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020149 (2025) - Published 2 December, 2025
Students find certain visualizations of infrared radiation, radiation absorption, and molecules more intuitively comprehensible.
Jill A. Marshall, Bernard G. David, and Pablo Durán Oliva
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020150 (2025) - Published 4 December, 2025
A five year study of current and future STEM teachers in a makerspace revealed no conceptual differences, however, qualitative differences appear to be meaningful.
Qiaoyi Liu and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020151 (2025) - Published 5 December, 2025
Even a single week of open-ended lab activities improves post-instruction E-CLASS scores, especially for those starting with lower scores.
Jonathan D. Perry, Toni Sauncy, Susan White, Rachel L. Ivie, John Tyler, and Tatiana Erukhimova
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020152 (2025) - Published 10 December, 2025
Students engaged in informal physics outreach report greater confidence explaining physics, enhanced career skills, and a stronger sense of belonging and growth mindset.
Martina Caramaschi and Tor Ole B. Odden
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020153 (2025) - Published 10 December, 2025
A thematic analysis of over 50 years of articles on physics teaching reveals changes over time and differences in content based on where the article was published.
Magdalena Micoloi, Lana Ivanjek, Mieke De Cock, Thomas Schubatzky, Sarah Wildbichler, Rainer Wackermann, and Gesche Pospiech
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020154 (2025) - Published 15 December, 2025
A new instrument, the Critical Thinking for Climate Change assessment, is described and shown to be useful with high school students.
Lachlan McGinness and Peter Baumgartner
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020155 (2025) - Published 15 December, 2025
Current LLMs are unable to accurately extract and translate equations from typed student responses into a standardized format.
Paulo Victor Santos Souza, Claudiano Ferreira, Jorge Simões de Sá Martins, and Fábio Ferreira Monteiro
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020156 (2025) - Published 16 December, 2025
A study indicating that integrating project-based learning with reverse engineering led to greater science literacy among 8th grade students.
Philipp Bitzenbauer, Malte S. Ubben, Daria Anttila, Maria Bondani, Maria Luisa Chiofalo, Sergej Faletic, Simon Goorney, Franziska Greinert, Rainer Müller, Zdeňka Koupilová, Massimiliano Malgieri, Avraham Merzel, Henk J. Pol, Gesche Pospiech, Heike Kirsten Elisabeth Stadermann, Efraim Yehuda Weissman, and Kim Krijtenburg-Lewerissa
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020157 (2025) - Published 16 December, 2025
Experts in a Delphi study agree that core quantum concepts, including superposition, interference, and measurement, should be taught conceptually in secondary school.
Christian D. Solorio, Elizabeth Gire, and David Roundy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020158 (2025) - Published 16 December, 2025
An interview study with students who participated in a ‘spins first’ quantum course found that computational activities help students understand the transition from discreet to continuous measures.
Wenting Hong, Tong Li, Li Wang, Rui Dai, Lei Bao, Keke Yu, and Yang Xiao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020159 (2025) - Published 19 December, 2025
Inhibitory control helps students overcome inappropriate evaluations of data.
Jonas Bley, Eva Rexigel, Alda Arias, Lars Krupp, Steffen Steinert, Nikolas Longen, Paul Lukowicz, Stefan Küchemann, Jochen Kuhn, Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, and Artur Widera
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020160 (2025) - Published 19 December, 2025
A pilot study of student understanding of quantum information examines responses to tasks that feature the mathematical-symbolic Dirac Notation alone and others that use it in combination with dimensional circle notation.
Kaitlin Gili, Kyle Heuton, Astha Shah, David Hammer, and Michael C. Hughes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020161 (2025) - Published 22 December, 2025
A machine-learning-based tool analyzes students’ mechanistic sensemaking.
Jesse Kruse, Molly Griston, and Bethany R. Wilcox
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020162 (2025) - Published 30 December, 2025
A survey of quantum mechanics instructors reveals that while most use lecture a variety of instructional practices and pedagogical tools are being employed.
Molly N. Simon and Janelle M. Bailey
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020601 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
This updated review of Astronomy Education Research over the last 20 years identifies 7 broad categories, with studies of instruction as the most prominent.
Elina Palmgren, Tommi Kokkonen, and Jesper Bruun
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020602 (2025) - Published 18 September, 2025
This systematic review identifies eight thematic categories, examines theoretical frameworks, and outlines six roles of mathematics in physics, highlighting research gaps in advanced topics and opportunities for future study.
Chase Hatcher, Lily Donis, Adrienne Traxler, Madison Swirtz, Camila Amaral, Justin Gutzwa, Charles Henderson, and Ramón Barthelemy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020603 (2025) - Published 29 September, 2025
A novel approach to social network analysis that coordinates quantitative and qualitative data.