Stefan Küchemann and Jochen Kuhn
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010001 (2026) - Published 27 March, 2026
The Focused Collection on AI in PER includes publications across a spectrum of topics.
Liam Doyle, Fargol Seifollahi, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010101 (2026) - Published 5 January, 2026
An interview study reveals differing perspectives on the current state of quantum computing and future directions.
Karl Henrik Fredly, Tor Ole B. Odden, and Benjamin M. Zwickl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010103 (2026) - Published 20 January, 2026
As students move from novice to expert in computation they experience two transitions in expertise.
Yossi Ben-Zion, Turhan K. Carroll, Colin G. West, Jesse Wong, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010109 (2026) - Published 26 January, 2026
Students in E&M who generated simulations with AI had larger learning gains than those working with physical equipment.
Dennys Gahrmann, Irene Neumann, and Andreas Borowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010110 (2026) - Published 28 January, 2026
A large-scale study reveals no significant changes in scores on a diagnostic test of preparation for university physics over a ten-year period.
Judith M. Schmid, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010118 (2026) - Published 13 February, 2026
New instrument identifies state and development of mental models around light polarization.
Avital Pelakh, Melanie L. Good, Eric Kuo, Michael Tumminia, Nabila Jamal-Orozco, Amy Adelman, Jordann Antoan, Brian Galla, and Timothy J. Nokes-Malach
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010123 (2026) - Published 25 February, 2026
Interviews with students who report negative experiences with physics classes show that they appreciated peer interactions and class activities, but negative experiences with classes, course structure, and instructors.
Florian Budimaier, Matthias Fasching, Anna Reumann, and Esmeralda Campos
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010136 (2026) - Published 24 April, 2026
Teachers use AI differently in lesson planning according to their needs and experience teaching physics.
Ian Descamps, Roger Tobin, Paul Wagoner, David Hammer, N. G. Holmes, and Rachel E. Scherr
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010137 (2026) - Published 27 April, 2026
Differing perspectives on expectations, motivations, goals, and theoretical commitments yield differently designed lab activities.
Tom Reshef-Israeli and Shulamit Kapon
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010141 (2026) - Published 13 May, 2026
A novel methodology provides a time-resolved account of collaborative modeling by small groups and offers insights for supporting modeling-rich physics learning.
Liam Doyle, Fargol Seifollahi, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010101 (2026) - Published 5 January, 2026
An interview study reveals differing perspectives on the current state of quantum computing and future directions.
Michael M. Hull, Alexandra Jansky, and Martin Hopf
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010102 (2026) - Published 8 January, 2026
This study reveals that student reasoning about half-life is context-sensitive and nonrobust, aligning with a knowledge-in-pieces model.
Karl Henrik Fredly, Tor Ole B. Odden, and Benjamin M. Zwickl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010103 (2026) - Published 20 January, 2026
As students move from novice to expert in computation they experience two transitions in expertise.
Yajun Wei, Xiuli Wei, and Ziqiang Chen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010104 (2026) - Published 21 January, 2026
A bibliometric analysis of publications in PRPER in its first 20 years reveal growth and enduring contributions of foundational articles.
Benjamin Groß, Lana Ivanjek, Salome Flegr, Judith Glaesser, Augustin Kelava, and Jan-Philipp Burde
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010105 (2026) - Published 21 January, 2026
A new concept inventory assesses student understanding of electric circuits.
Li Tang, Yue Xiao, Yaxin Gao, You Yu, Mingjie Wan, Qilong Cao, and Wei Fang
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010106 (2026) - Published 21 January, 2026
Learning environments that are perceived as positive diminish the effect of burnout on motivation among Chinese university students.
Diana Sachmpazidi, Mike Verostek, Chandra Turpen, and Jayna Petrella
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010107 (2026) - Published 23 January, 2026
A survey assesses departmental culture around changing programs to improve student experience or outcomes.
Yossi Ben-Zion, Turhan K. Carroll, Colin G. West, Jesse Wong, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010109 (2026) - Published 26 January, 2026
Students in E&M who generated simulations with AI had larger learning gains than those working with physical equipment.
Dennys Gahrmann, Irene Neumann, and Andreas Borowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010110 (2026) - Published 28 January, 2026
A large-scale study reveals no significant changes in scores on a diagnostic test of preparation for university physics over a ten-year period.
André Meyer, Stanley Fischer, and Gunnar Friege
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010111 (2026) - Published 28 January, 2026
Using a problem-solving rubric along with a conceptual test diagnoses learning needs among secondary physics students.
Andrew Boudreaux, Emily Borda, Brittany Mureno, Eric McKenzie, Alessandra Hughes, Autumn Welker, Lauren Stredicke, and Todd Haskell
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010112 (2026) - Published 28 January, 2026
Think aloud interviews with K-8 preservice teachers indicate that they use energy concepts productively across scientific disciplines.
Hadas Levi, Yaron Lehavi, and Avraham Merzel
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010113 (2026) - Published 3 February, 2026
Analysis of classroom video reveals a systematic association between the modeling skills teachers aimed to develop (i.e., Mathematization, Manipulation, Interpretation, Validation) and corresponding student difficulties in coordinating mathematical reasoning and physical sense-making.
Louis Leblond, Ying Wang, Jennelle L. Malcos, and Rayne A. Sperling
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010114 (2026) - Published 4 February, 2026
Students sent prompts aligned with a self-regulated learning framework performed better on measures of content proficiency but not measures of metacognitive awareness or self-efficacy.
J. Caleb Speirs, W. Brian Lane, and Naomi Laird
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010115 (2026) - Published 5 February, 2026
A mixed method study of student perceptions of grades attends to the meaning of grades as well as how grades effect students.
Yuchen Jiang, Xiu-Mei Feng, Yuting Liu, Yiting Wang, Li Xie, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010116 (2026) - Published 6 February, 2026
Generative AI models can be used to provide feedback on instructional designs and the feedback is comparable to human generated feedback.
Jaya Shivangani Kashyap and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010117 (2026) - Published 10 February, 2026
Case study of an upper division student solving problems reveals that the student did not have global coherence in approach, but sought local coherence.
Judith M. Schmid, Joaquin Veith, and Philipp Bitzenbauer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010118 (2026) - Published 13 February, 2026
New instrument identifies state and development of mental models around light polarization.
Alican Kaya and Sema Ç𝚤ld𝚤r
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010119 (2026) - Published 17 February, 2026
Preservice physics teachers employ a variety of metacognitive strategies when posing problems.
Sarah B. Wise, Courtney Ngai, and Joel C. Corbo
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010120 (2026) - Published 19 February, 2026
Departmental Action Teams were capable of supporting organizational learning and sustained departmental change.
M. Klassen and G. Friege
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010121 (2026) - Published 23 February, 2026
In an eye-tracking study focused on graphical representations, novices exhibited signs consistent with increased cognitive load (longer overall processing times, more scattered scan paths, and frequent signs of disorientation) relative to experts; AI models demonstrated limited abilities.
Yu Bai, Guian Li, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010122 (2026) - Published 24 February, 2026
Conceptual frameworks, like the one developed for the Ideal Gas Law, can provide valuable insights for developing educational interventions and deepen understanding.
Avital Pelakh, Melanie L. Good, Eric Kuo, Michael Tumminia, Nabila Jamal-Orozco, Amy Adelman, Jordann Antoan, Brian Galla, and Timothy J. Nokes-Malach
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010123 (2026) - Published 25 February, 2026
Interviews with students who report negative experiences with physics classes show that they appreciated peer interactions and class activities, but negative experiences with classes, course structure, and instructors.
Eva Rexigel, Linda Qerimi, Jonas Bley, Sarah Malone, Stefan Küchemann, and Jochen Kuhn
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010124 (2026) - Published 25 February, 2026
The inclusion of a graphical-geometric representations in the teaching of the Mach-Zender interferometer, such as the Bloch sphere, appears to encourage learners to integrate other, redundant external representations.
Katherine Gifford, Gabriel S. Ehrlich, Engin Bumbacher, and Eric Kuo
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010125 (2026) - Published 26 February, 2026
Interview participants use coherence between mathematical and qualitative sensemaking to reconstruct equations when they have been forgotten.
Jonas Bley, Eva Rexigel, Alda Arias, Lars Krupp, Nikolas Longen, Paul Lukowicz, Stefan Küchemann, Jochen Kuhn, Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, and Artur Widera
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010126 (2026) - Published 2 March, 2026
Students with little experience in quantum physics showed improved performance and reduced cognitive load when using Dimensional Circle Notation for multi-qubit systems.
Eder Hernandez, Esmeralda Campos, Pablo Barniol, and Genaro Zavala
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010127 (2026) - Published 5 March, 2026
On a test with parallel questions about electric and magnetic fields, students struggled with superposition, field representations, and conflated idea from electric to magnetic fields.
Jeffrey M. Rabin, Andrew Meyertholen, and Brian Shotwell
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010128 (2026) - Published 6 March, 2026
Students in math and physics courses, recognize and navigate cultural differences between the two disciplines.
Alice Gasparini, F. Stern, M. Delaval, and A. Müller
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010129 (2026) - Published 11 March, 2026
A quasiexperimental study found no differences in student understanding in classes that used smartphones and tablets as experimental tools.
Idris Malik and Warren Christensen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010130 (2026) - Published 12 March, 2026
Students in a Quantum Mechanics course demonstrated a variety of metarepresentational competences in change of basis problem interviews.
Marianne Korner and Christos N. Likos
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010131 (2026) - Published 26 March, 2026
Action research project showed that careful course material selection and appropriate mathematical tools helped to overcome students negative attitudes toward theoretical physics.
Jacob Feinleib, Matthew Dew, and N. G. Holmes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010132 (2026) - Published 26 March, 2026
When lab students shared roles attitudinal variables improved, and when they split roles the attitudinal variables were worse.
Kuerbanjiang Jielili, Ziqi Yao, Shuhe Zhang, Mingpu Lan, and Jianxin Yao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010133 (2026) - Published 9 April, 2026
Based on a two-stage cognitive diagnostic model, an assessment tool was developed showing that students with identical physics scores can have clearly different patterns of concept mastery and misconceptions.
Tobias Geisler and Gerd Kortemeyer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010134 (2026) - Published 9 April, 2026
Generative AI, ChatGPT 5.4 specifically, can be used to develop bots that produce practice problems and then with a reasonable amount of training, provide useful formative feedback.
Emilie Gertz, Lene Møller Madsen, and Henriette Tolstrup Holmegaard
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010135 (2026) - Published 15 April, 2026
Gendered identities and power dynamics discourage young women from negotiating and sustaining positive choices in physics and math.
Florian Budimaier, Matthias Fasching, Anna Reumann, and Esmeralda Campos
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010136 (2026) - Published 24 April, 2026
Teachers use AI differently in lesson planning according to their needs and experience teaching physics.
Ian Descamps, Roger Tobin, Paul Wagoner, David Hammer, N. G. Holmes, and Rachel E. Scherr
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010137 (2026) - Published 27 April, 2026
Differing perspectives on expectations, motivations, goals, and theoretical commitments yield differently designed lab activities.
Greg Gallagher, Gautam Vemuri, Danka Maric, and Andrew Gavrin
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010138 (2026) - Published 28 April, 2026
Students in a physics program with a computational emphasis show increased computational skill, but the development of these skills is not a steady progression and instead influenced by specific experiences.
Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010139 (2026) - Published 1 May, 2026
Interviews with students reveals students engage in coordination and encapsulation when reasoning about the 2-d heat equation.
Tilmann Steinmetz, Thomas Wilhelm, Lana Ivanjek, Thomas Schubatzky, Claudia Haagen-Schützenhöfer, Liza Dopatka, Verena Spatz, Martin Hopf, and Jan-Philipp Burde
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010140 (2026) - Published 6 May, 2026
While undergraduates before instruction have greater conceptual understanding of DC circuits than high school students, the common misunderstandings are present in relatively similar frequencies.
Tom Reshef-Israeli and Shulamit Kapon
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010141 (2026) - Published 13 May, 2026
A novel methodology provides a time-resolved account of collaborative modeling by small groups and offers insights for supporting modeling-rich physics learning.
Fargol Seifollahi, David E. Meltzer, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010142 (2026) - Published 15 May, 2026
This study shows that prior preparation strongly predicts success in upper-level E&M, with strong links between conceptual understanding and quantitative performance.
Meagan Sundstrom, Justin Gambrell, Colin Green, Adrienne L. Traxler, and Eric Brewe
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010143 (2026) - Published 21 May, 2026
Classroom implementations of active learning fall into five distinct styles that do not correspond to named methods, yet all achieve comparable student learning outcomes.
Julia Hofmann, Pascal Klein, Andreas Müller, and Josefine Neuhaus
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010144 (2026) - Published 22 May, 2026
An intervention aimed at improving understanding of equations reveals performance improvements using two strategies, dimensional analysis and special case analysis.
Alia Hamdan, Ash Bista, Dina L. Newman, and Scott Franklin
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010145 (2026) - Published 26 May, 2026
Interview study identifies four distinct reasons faculty choose to share or not share elements of their identities.
Amogh Sirnoorkar and N. Sanjay Rebello
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010146 (2026) - Published 16 June, 2026
Students value AI feedback more when prompts are systematically structured.
Sara Satanassi and Sibel Erduran
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010147 (2026) - Published 16 June, 2026
Core epistemic aims and values of quantum computation include objectivity, simplicity, accuracy, and novelty.
Shaorui Xu, Qiuye Li, Yilin Chen, Yang Xiao, and Shaona Zhou
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010148 (2026) - Published 24 June, 2026
In an eye-tracking study, students spent more time on information redundant problems although there were no differences in performance.
Oriel Marshall, Jesper Bruun, Katrien Kolenberg, Anja C. Andersen, and Peter Van Petegem
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010149 (2026) - Published 25 June, 2026
Students use classroom experiments as analogies to build conceptual models of atmospheric processes on Earth and exoplanets.
Jonathan D. Perry, Carlee Garrett, Isabella Oaks, James Hirons, Toni Sauncy, Jonan P. Donaldson, Susan White, Rachel L Ivie, and Tatiana Erukhimova
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010150 (2026) - Published 26 June, 2026
Informal physics outreach programs strengthen students’ resilience, sense of belonging, physics identity, and career skills across diverse institutional contexts.
Dazhen Tong, Huihui Wu, A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, Junci Liu, Lei Jiang, and Hongmei Ren
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010151 (2026) - Published 30 June, 2026
DeepSeek improves instructional design quality for pre-service teachers, though its success depends on proactive interaction rather than passive use.
Angela Johnson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010601 (2026) - Published 15 June, 2026
A research-based guide for physics educators to design, implement, and evaluate DEI interventions that create positive learning experiences for all students.