James K. Hirons, Jonathan D. Perry, Kaylyn Sitka, Dawson T. Nodurft, Scott Crawford, William Bassichis, and Tatiana L. Erukhimova
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020103 (2026) - Published 13 July, 2026
An analysis of Texas A&M’s open-access physics resources found that using supplemental past exams significantly improves student course performance and effectively closes the achievement gap for first-generation students.
Emadelden Fouad and Ian Bentley
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020114 (2026) - Published 6 August, 2026
Physics students express a strong preference for optional rather than mandatory AI integration, largely because they acutely recognize the technology’s tendency to fail at visual-spatial reasoning and circuit analysis.
Shams El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, Benjamin M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020117 (2026) - Published 12 August, 2026
Based on interviews with quantum industry professionals, this study identifies four key categories of experimental skills needed for bachelor’s-level roles in the Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) workforce.
Elien Sijmkens, Tinne De Laet, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020101 (2026) - Published 9 July, 2026
In think aloud protocols engineering students were found to use evaluation strategies infrequently despite using an online reflection tools.
Laura M. Akesson, Jessica L. Rosenberg, Nancy Holincheck, and Benjamin W. Dreyfus
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020102 (2026) - Published 9 July, 2026
People who attended Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics defined what it means to be a physics person either as someone who is good at physics or as someone with an interest in physics.
James K. Hirons, Jonathan D. Perry, Kaylyn Sitka, Dawson T. Nodurft, Scott Crawford, William Bassichis, and Tatiana L. Erukhimova
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020103 (2026) - Published 13 July, 2026
An analysis of Texas A&M’s open-access physics resources found that using supplemental past exams significantly improves student course performance and effectively closes the achievement gap for first-generation students.
Takashi Umeda and Shuji Munejiri
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020104 (2026) - Published 14 July, 2026
This study compares Peer Discussion and Instructor Explanation during problem-solving sessions in calculus-based mechanics and found no statistically significant evidence that either method outperformed the other on post-tests or the final exam.
Jinmei Liu, Xuejuan Zhong, Gang Chen, and Liqing Chen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020105 (2026) - Published 22 July, 2026
A two-dimensional Eye-Tracking–Test model that combines objective gaze data with test responses more accurately diagnoses student misconceptions in Newtonian mechanics.
Willem Keppens, Mieke De Cock, Hans Van Winckel, Wim Van Dooren, and Jan Sermeus
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020106 (2026) - Published 5 August, 2026
This study explores students’ reasoning about the apparent sizes of Moon and Sun and Solar Eclipses and reports new explanations linked to spatial scales.
Willem Keppens, Mieke De Cock, Hans Van Winckel, Wim Van Dooren, and Jan Sermeus
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020107 (2026) - Published 5 August, 2026
This study explores students’ reasoning about the Moon phases and reports new explanations linked to spatial scales.
Ellen Karoline Henriksen, Maria Vetleseter Bøe, Øystein Sørborg, and Ann-Cecilie Larsen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020108 (2026) - Published 12 August, 2026
Students in Stars and Elements, a web-based physics resource, developed understanding of heavy element production, but more explicit focus on nature of science would enhance the resource.
Nicholas T. Young, Rebecca L. Matz, Eric F. Bell, and Caitlin Hayward
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020110 (2026) - Published 4 August, 2026
An analysis of approximately 6,000 introductory physics students demonstrates that while alternative midterm aggregation methods - such as dropping the lowest score - successfully increase average grades, they fail to reduce existing gender or racial equity gaps.
Alexander Volfson, Orly Lankry, and Yuval Ben Abu
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020111 (2026) - Published 5 August, 2026
A new instrument on the nature of heat indicates that students frequently hold a view of heat as a material.
Eleonore Becker, Antonia Bauer, Johanna Schrader, Philipp Bitzenbauer, and Joaquin Veith
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020112 (2026) - Published 6 August, 2026
A large-scale qualitative analysis of student engagement with ChatGPT indicates that a majority employ it strategically to enhance understanding, despite being aware of its inaccuracies, while a minority refrains from using ChatGPT, mostly due to concerns about the erosion of independent thinking and over-reliance on this technology in general.
Muhammad Aswin Rangkuti, Wawan Bunawan, Hendra Y. Agustian, Tuti Hardianti, Dewi Wulandari, and Nazwa Hudaiby
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020113 (2026) - Published 6 August, 2026
Earlier versions of ChatGPT often struggled to align their correct reasoning with accurate final answers on graph-based physics questions. However, version 5.2 demonstrates a substantial leap in conceptual alignment and visual data interpretation.
Emadelden Fouad and Ian Bentley
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020114 (2026) - Published 6 August, 2026
Physics students express a strong preference for optional rather than mandatory AI integration, largely because they acutely recognize the technology’s tendency to fail at visual-spatial reasoning and circuit analysis.
Yi Ding and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020115 (2026) - Published 6 August, 2026
This study challenges strictly linear learning progression models by demonstrating that students’ cognitive development in force and motion is characterized by dynamic, context-dependent mixtures of ideas rather than discrete, stable steps.
F. Escalante, F. Vera, and R. Rivera
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020116 (2026) - Published 12 August, 2026
This study bridges cognitive theory and NLP to systematically analyze students’ intuitive ideas, offering new insight into the cognitive structure of p-prims.
Shams El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, Benjamin M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020117 (2026) - Published 12 August, 2026
Based on interviews with quantum industry professionals, this study identifies four key categories of experimental skills needed for bachelor’s-level roles in the Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) workforce.
Özlem Ery𝚤lmaz Muştu and Hülya Ertaş K𝚤l𝚤ç
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020118 (2026) - Published 12 August, 2026
Half of the students studied struggled to apply special relativity to physical paradoxes because they remained confined to a single, absolute reference frame instead of coordinating multiple perspectives.
Zihao Yang and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020119 (2026) - Published 24 August, 2026
Reorganizing ninth-grade physics instruction around the work-energy relation significantly improves students’ integrated understanding of energy concepts. This approach helps learners effectively bridge the gap between abstract conservation principles and contextualized problem-solving.
Yossi Ben-Zion, Omer Michaeli, and Noah D. Finkelstein
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020120 (2026) - Published 17 August, 2026
As GenAI rises, this study reveals a shift away from traditional online searches toward new patterns of academic information-seeking that vary across topics and geographical regions.
Kelly Miller, Olivia Miller, and Georgia Lawrence
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020121 (2026) - Published 27 August, 2026
Discover how combining explicit problem-solving frameworks with deliberate practice can help undergraduate physics students develop expert-like thinking skills far more effectively than traditional rote repetition.
Moritz Förster, Carsten Albert, and Gesche Pospiech
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020122 (2026) - Published 28 August, 2026
This study reveals how pre-service and in-service teachers make sense of quantum physics’ mathematical language, highlighting both the clarity and the limits of the reduced Dirac formalism.
Diana Sachmpazidi, Chandra Turpen, Jayna Petrella, and Robert P. Dalka
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020123 (2026) - Published 27 August, 2026
The Departmental Action Leadership Institute helps physics departments replace traditional, ad hoc change efforts with collaborative, evidence-based cultures that prioritize student voices.
Chunying Zuo, Qinxuan Zhou, Wei-Zhao Shi, and Jingying Wang
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020124 (2026) - Published 28 August, 2026
Enrolling in a history of physics course significantly improves students’ understanding of the nature of science, with an explicit instruction and group reflection approach proving most effective.
Yajun Wei, Haitao Feng, Chunhong Gao, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020125 (2026) - Published 31 August, 2026
A switch from lab equipment to a household object made a resonance demo more engaging, more relevant, and just as clear for students.
Osman Aksit and Ulku Seher Budak
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020126 (2026) - Published 31 August, 2026
A systematic analysis of high school physics textbooks reveals that while analogies effectively bridge concrete and abstract concepts in topics like electricity, they frequently omit critical limitations, increasing the risk of student misconceptions.
Chase Hatcher, Adrienne Traxler, Lily Donis, Madison Swirtz, Camila Amaral, Justin Gutzwa, Charles Henderson, and Ramón Barthelemy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020127 (2026) - Published 31 August, 2026
A social network analysis of LGBTQ+ and/or women PhD physicists reveals the role of affinity groups in identity-based support, more personal friends in industry, and lower support in government and academia.
Danielle Maldonado and John Stewart
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020128 (2026) - Published 31 August, 2026
Path models for Self Efficacy and Sense of Belonging reveal complex relations amongst diverse variables.
Marc L. Whiting, Lauren Barth-Cohen, Adrian L. Adams, Jordan Gerton, and David Stroupe
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020129 (2026) - Published 9 September, 2026
Students grappling with the enigma of quantum mechanics actively employ three distinct epistemological frames: reasoning about scale, reasoning about connections to math, and reasoning about connections to classical mechanics.
Paul de Haas, Hanna Stammes, Henk W. de Regt, and Erik Barendsen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020130 (2026) - Published 9 September, 2026
By analyzing the dialogues of preservice physics teachers, the researchers identified the use of one classical ontology and four distinct quantum ontologies.
Yimin Wang, Xiaotong Chen, Yushan Xiong, Shaorui Xu, Qiuye Li, and Shaona Zhou
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020131 (2026) - Published 9 September, 2026
This study demonstrates that physics students interacting with a prompt-engineered, student-centered AI agent achieve higher learning performance, experience greater flow, and report lower extraneous cognitive load compared to those using a traditional teacher-centered agent.
Rebeckah K. Fussell, Jillian S. Epstein, Gina Passante, and N. G. Holmes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020132 (2026) - Published 15 September, 2026
A case study using the Physics Measurement Questionnaire reveals that while preceding a closed-response question with an open-response prompt does not alter students’ final selections, the two formats measure fundamentally different aspects of student reasoning.
Mutmainna, Edi Istiyono, Haryanto, and Beta Wulan Febriana
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 020133 (2026) - Published 16 September, 2026
An in-depth phenomenological analysis of an online project-based physics course reveals how preservice teachers’ individual character traits deeply shape their self-efficacy and professional growth.