Browse Issues:

EDITORIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

Editorial: Goals from the Incoming Chief Editor

Eric Brewe

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010001 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025

Eric Brewe, the new Chief Editor for Physical Review Physics Education Research, outlines his vision for a growing journal with an increasingly international reach.

Editorial: Focused Collection: Investigating and Improving Quantum Education through Research

W. Brian Lane, Marisa Michelini, and Chandralekha Singh

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010002 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025

HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLES

Grading explanations of problem-solving process and generating feedback using large language models at human-level accuracy

Zhongzhou Chen and Tong Wan

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010126 (2025) - Published 27 March, 2025

ChatGPT can approach human-level accuracy in grading physics problems, and can be enhanced with multiple trials and explaining the rubric.

Majority group physics instructors struggle to notice, name, and disrupt racist and sexist student interactions

Melissa Dancy

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010142 (2025) - Published 25 April, 2025

Research explores majority group physics instructors’ awareness of Black women’s alienation, its causes, and their approach to addressing bias.

Applying cognitive diagnostic models to mechanics concept inventories

Vy Le, Jayson M. Nissen, Xiuxiu Tang, Yuxiao Zhang, Amirreza Mehrabi, Jason W. Morphew, Hua Hua Chang, and Ben Van Dusen

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010103 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025

Cognitive diagnostic models had high accuracies for classifying students skill levels in four skills: applying vectors, conceptual relationships, algebra, and visualizations.

Examining equity and graduation rates at two institutions using a course deficit model and the collaborative learning through active sense-making in physics curriculum

Cassandra A. Paul and David J. Webb

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010107 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025

In an implementation of the Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-Making in Physics (CLASP) course at a different institution preserved prior findings and the results are interpreted through an equity lens.

Ineffectiveness of recorded video instruction for teaching complex content in secondary school physics classrooms

Yajun Wei, Yi Zhong, and Feipeng Pi

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010117 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025

While there is no difference for easy problem-solving tasks, for more difficult problem-solving tasks, pre-recorded video instruction is significantly less effective than live instruction.

Distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning approaches: An application of dual-process theories

Kristin Kellar and Paula Heron

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010141 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025

This study builds on previous research to distinguish between students’ errors caused by conceptual misunderstandings and those driven by intuitive reasoning, using Frederick’s Cognitive Reflection Test to support dual-process theories of student reasoning.

What makes digital learning effective? Evaluation of a digital learning module about positron emission tomography

Panagiota Chatzidaki, Urban Eriksson, Sarah Zoechling, Sascha Schmeling, and Tobias Fredlund

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010143 (2025) - Published 28 April, 2025

The article provides evidence-based recommendations in the form of a set of effective design principles that can be used as tools for evaluating and designing digital learning modules.

Response time on math skills and its association with math skills accuracy and physics course grades

Harish Moni Prakash and Andrew F. Heckler

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010144 (2025) - Published 30 April, 2025

Students with lower response times on physics adjacent math skills items are likely to get better grades when controlling for accuracy on pre or posttest math skills.

Physics demonstrations, science show, or hands-on practical work? Exploring students’ intrinsic motivation

Alexandr Nikitin, Petr Kácovský, Marie Snětinová, Martin Chvál, Jitka Houfková, and Zdeňka Koupilová

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010146 (2025) - Published 6 May, 2025

A study of three educational activities showed that students saw science shows generated the most interest, but was seen as the least valuable.

ARTICLES

Longitudinal trends of high school physics students’ perceptions of experience, difficulty, and development in a long-term inquiry framework

Michal Sigron, Dorothy Langley, Stanisław Dylak, and Edit Yerushalmi

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010101 (2025) - Published 7 January, 2025

A three-year study of perceived engagement with high school students show improved levels of understanding as they are set in more realistic, research-like, conditions.

Quantum mechanics curriculum in the U.S.: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used

Alexis Buzzell, Timothy J. Atherton, and Ramón Barthelemy

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010102 (2025) - Published 16 January, 2025

This article reviews the landscape of quantum mechanics education in US research-intensive institutions.

Applying cognitive diagnostic models to mechanics concept inventories

Vy Le, Jayson M. Nissen, Xiuxiu Tang, Yuxiao Zhang, Amirreza Mehrabi, Jason W. Morphew, Hua Hua Chang, and Ben Van Dusen

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010103 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025

Cognitive diagnostic models had high accuracies for classifying students skill levels in four skills: applying vectors, conceptual relationships, algebra, and visualizations.

Improving student understanding of quantum measurement in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space using a research-based multiple-choice question sequence

Yangqiuting Li and Chandralekha Singh

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010104 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025

Development and testing of a multiple-choice question sequence designed to enhance students’ understanding of quantum measurements for quantum systems in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.

Symbolic forms analysis of expressions for probability in Dirac and wave function notations for spins-first students

William D. Riihiluoma, Zeynep Topdemir, and John R. Thompson

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010105 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025

Students in a spins-first quantum mechanics course are more comfortable with Dirac notation than with wave function notation.

Examining equity and graduation rates at two institutions using a course deficit model and the collaborative learning through active sense-making in physics curriculum

Cassandra A. Paul and David J. Webb

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010107 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025

In an implementation of the Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-Making in Physics (CLASP) course at a different institution preserved prior findings and the results are interpreted through an equity lens.

Role of analogies with classical physics in introductory quantum physics teaching

Luiza Vilarta Rodriguez, Jan T. van der Veen, and Ton de Jong

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010108 (2025) - Published 27 January, 2025

Analogies with classical physics can negatively impact student understanding of introductory quantum physics by increasing their cognitive processing, and by requiring students to understand the limitations of the classical analogy for the quantum scenario, so as to not take the analogies literally.

Motivation, demographics, and engagement during COVID-19 in an astrobiology massive open online course

Skylar Grayson, Molly N. Simon, Sanlyn Buxner, Matthew Wenger, and Chris Impey

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010109 (2025) - Published 28 January, 2025

Students in an astrobiology massive open online course showed increased motivation, and the sources of motivation changed since the pandemic.

Physics identity of Asian identified US college students

Linda Zhang, Madison Swirtz, and Kerstin Nordstrom

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010110 (2025) - Published 30 January, 2025

The perceptions of Asian Americans as overrepresented in physics may hide the less privileged identities that some students hold, and the challenges that come with those less visible identities.

Exploring the sequential structure of students’ physics problem-solving approaches using process mining and sequence analysis

Paul Tschisgale, Marcus Kubsch, Peter Wulff, Stefan Petersen, and Knut Neumann

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010111 (2025) - Published 31 January, 2025

Expert problem solving is well captured by prescriptive problem-solving process models, and these models can be used to systematically teach problem solving.

Second quantum revolution: The progressive design of an approach to value its cultural and conceptual scope

S. Satanassi and O. Levrini

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010112 (2025) - Published 31 January, 2025

The design of a teaching module for secondary school students that emphasizes the cultural scope of the Second Quantum Revolution.

Comparative analysis of spins-first and wave functions-first students’ understanding of expressions in quantum mechanics

William D. Riihiluoma, Zeynep Topdemir, and John R. Thompson

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010113 (2025) - Published 4 February, 2025

Spins-first upper-division quantum mechanics courses result in students interpreting Dirac bras and kets as vectors and quantum states more than wave functions-first courses do

Moving toward belonging in a physics department: What changes are possible with and without a paradigm shift?

Laura Stiles-Clarke and Katarin MacLeod

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010114 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025

It is possible for members of a physics department to increase student recruitment and retention by engaging in incremental shifts of their departmental culture towards diversity and inclusion.

What correlates with persistence of women in physics?

Maxwell Franklin and Eric Brewe

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010115 (2025) - Published 3 March, 2025

This study investigates which affective factors and specific survey responses predict long-term retention of women in physics.

Epistemic framing analysis of secondary students during instruction on quantum physics

Zac Patterson and Lin Ding

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010116 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025

After prolonged exposure to classical physics, secondary students often develop rigid, realist framings that are difficult to abandon when attempting to learn quantum physics.

Ineffectiveness of recorded video instruction for teaching complex content in secondary school physics classrooms

Yajun Wei, Yi Zhong, and Feipeng Pi

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010117 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025

While there is no difference for easy problem-solving tasks, for more difficult problem-solving tasks, pre-recorded video instruction is significantly less effective than live instruction.

Investigating the design-science connection in a multiweek engineering design-based introductory physics laboratory task

Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Nikhil Borse, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010118 (2025) - Published 10 March, 2025

Students use both design thinking and science thinking is solving physics problems in labs.

Mandatory retrieval test to incentivize retrieval practice of physics principles

Vegard Gjerde, Martino Marisaldi, Kjellmar Oksavik, Kjartan Olafsson, Harald Spångberg, and Bodil Holst

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010119 (2025) - Published 11 March, 2025

A mandatory retrieval test is an effective, low-effort instructional intervention that promotes greater student adoption of retrieval practice and yields enhanced learning and performance.

Students’ understanding of electric flux and magnetic circulation and the role of the superposition principle in Gauss’s and Ampere’s laws

Eder Hernandez, Esmeralda Campos, Pablo Barniol, and Genaro Zavala

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010120 (2025) - Published 17 March, 2025

Introductory physics students have similar difficulties applying the superposition principle in both electricity and magnetism contexts.

Algebra and other relevant physics skills: The effectiveness of mastery practice on skills accuracy and exam grade in introductory physics

Qiaoyi Liu, Harish Moni Prakash, and Andrew F. Heckler

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010121 (2025) - Published 17 March, 2025

Two quasi-experimental studies indicate that spaced mastery practice on skills relevant to introductory physics improved exam performance.

Presenting a STEM Ways of Thinking framework for engineering design-based physics problems

Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010122 (2025) - Published 19 March, 2025

Introducing a novel framework, Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design-based Physics, and then applying it in an undergraduate introductory physics laboratory.

Improving student understanding of fermionic and bosonic wave function

Christof Keebaugh, Emily Marshman, and Chandralekha Singh

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010123 (2025) - Published 20 March, 2025

The development and assessment of an interactive learning tutorial to enhance students’ understanding of concepts related to many particle wavefunctions for a system of two or three bosons and fermions.

Improving undergraduate astronomy students’ skills with research literature via accessible summaries: An exploratory case study with Astrobites-based reading assignments

Briley L. Lewis, Abygail R. Waggoner, Emma Clarke, Alison L. Crisp, Mark Dodici, Graham M. Doskoch, Michael M. Foley, Ryan Golant, Skylar Grayson, Sahil Hegde, Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas, Charles J. Law, R. R. Lefever, Ishan Mishra, Mark Popinchalk, Sabina Sagynbayeva, Samantha L. Wong, Wei Yan, Kaitlyn L. Ingraham Dixie, and K. Supriya (Astrobites Collaboration)

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010124 (2025) - Published 25 March, 2025

Accessible literature summaries show promise for bridging the gap between undergraduate students’ current abilities and the difficult task of reading scientific literature.

Assessment of expert decisions in graduate quantum mechanics

Michael E. Robbins, Gabriel J. DiQuattro, and Eric W. Burkholder

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010125 (2025) - Published 26 March, 2025

It is possible to develop an instrument to measuring expert decision-making in graduate quantum mechanics, which will be valuable for assessing and improving graduate instruction.

Grading explanations of problem-solving process and generating feedback using large language models at human-level accuracy

Zhongzhou Chen and Tong Wan

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010126 (2025) - Published 27 March, 2025

ChatGPT can approach human-level accuracy in grading physics problems, and can be enhanced with multiple trials and explaining the rubric.

Investigating the impact of problem properties on introductory and advanced student responses to introductory thermodynamics conceptual problems

Mary Jane Brundage, David E. Meltzer, and Chandralekha Singh

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010127 (2025) - Published 28 March, 2025

Upper-level students performed no better than introductory students on cyclic-process thermodynamics problems asking whether system entropy increases, decreases, or remains constant.

Comparing large language models for supervised analysis of students’ lab notes

Rebeckah K. Fussell, Megan Flynn, Anil Damle, Michael F. J. Fox, and N. G. Holmes

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010128 (2025) - Published 31 March, 2025

A comparison of different LLMs in coding lab notebooks for the identification of presence of skills.

Education for expanding the quantum workforce: Students’ perceptions of the quantum industry in an upper-division physics capstone course

Kristin A. Oliver, Victoria Borish, Bethany R. Wilcox, and H. J. Lewandowski

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010129 (2025) - Published 31 March, 2025

Upper-level physics courses focused on the quantum industry need to provide students with an introduction to the industry rather than assuming that they have gathered this information elsewhere.

Student gender modulates the intersection of calculus proficiency and calculus self-efficacy in an introductory electricity and magnetism course

Christopher J. Fischer, Jennifer A. Delgado, Sarah E. LeGresley, and Jessy R. Changstrom

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010130 (2025) - Published 1 April, 2025

Student identity in introductory calculus-based physics modulates the correlation between their actual calculus abilities and self-evaluation of those abilities.

Students’ understanding of two-variable calculus concepts in mathematics and physics contexts. I. The partial derivative and the directional derivative

Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010131 (2025) - Published 2 April, 2025

Physics students relied more heavily on linguistic representations in reasoning on partial and directional derivatives, but students who used algebraic-symbolic representations performed better.

Students’ understanding of two-variable calculus concepts in mathematics and physics contexts. II. The gradient and the Laplacian

Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010132 (2025) - Published 2 April, 2025

In the second of a pair of studies on reasoning about the gradient and the Laplacian, students used graphical, algebraic-symbolic, or linguistic descriptions in different contexts.

Affordances and challenges of incorporating a remote, cloud-accessible quantum experiment into undergraduate courses

Victoria Borish and H. J. Lewandowski

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010133 (2025) - Published 3 April, 2025

Cloud-accessible complex quantum experiments extend the opportunity to work with quantum experiments to undergraduate students at less-resourced institutions.

Impact of inquiry-based teaching and group composition on students’ understanding of the nature of science in college physics laboratory

Wei-Zhao Shi, Chunying Zuo, and Jingying Wang

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010134 (2025) - Published 3 April, 2025

In a study with random teaching assignment and group structure, students understanding of Nature of Science was influenced by the teaching mode, but less so by group structure.

Incorporating explicit discussions on the duality of reasoning into physics instruction

Alistair McInerny, Andrew Boudreaux, and Mila Kryjevskaia

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010135 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025

Study shows strong link between cognitive reflection test scores and conceptual reasoning scores, but no influence from discussions of automatic vs. deliberate reasoning.

Assessing confidence in AI-assisted grading of physics exams through psychometrics: An exploratory study

Gerd Kortemeyer and Julian Nöhl

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010136 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025

AI can reduce the grading burden for instructors by accurately handling routine tasks, but human oversight remains essential.

Is the Force Concept Inventory biased across the intersections of gender and race?

John B. Buncher, Jayson M. Nissen, Ben Van Dusen, and Robert M. Talbot

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010137 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025

Performance differences across gender and race on many FCI items does not result from biased items, but instead from real differences in physics knowledge among these groups.

Perceptions of interdisciplinary critical thinking among biology and physics undergraduates

Ashley B. Heim, Georgia Lawrence, Riya Agarwal, Michelle K. Smith, and N. G. Holmes

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010138 (2025) - Published 9 April, 2025

Physics and Biology students described different approaches to evaluating biology and physics experiments regardless of major and the role of critical thinking in each discipline.

Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S.

Alexis Buzzell, Timothy J. Atherton, and Ramón Barthelemy

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010139 (2025) - Published 17 April, 2025

Analysis of 167 modern physics course syllabi reveal three topics consistently taught (quantum, atomic physics, and relativity) across courses with substantial variability beyond these topics.

Teachers’ experiences with taking an open-ended approach in teaching labs in high school physics classes

Hamideh Talafian, Morten Lundsgaard, Maggie S. Mahmood, Eric Kuo, and Timothy J. Stelzer

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010140 (2025) - Published 18 April, 2025

Even with robust professional development, high school physics teachers face significant barriers when trying to shift from structured lab format to a more open-ended approach.

Distinguishing between students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning approaches: An application of dual-process theories

Kristin Kellar and Paula Heron

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010141 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025

This study builds on previous research to distinguish between students’ errors caused by conceptual misunderstandings and those driven by intuitive reasoning, using Frederick’s Cognitive Reflection Test to support dual-process theories of student reasoning.

Majority group physics instructors struggle to notice, name, and disrupt racist and sexist student interactions

Melissa Dancy

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010142 (2025) - Published 25 April, 2025

Research explores majority group physics instructors’ awareness of Black women’s alienation, its causes, and their approach to addressing bias.

What makes digital learning effective? Evaluation of a digital learning module about positron emission tomography

Panagiota Chatzidaki, Urban Eriksson, Sarah Zoechling, Sascha Schmeling, and Tobias Fredlund

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010143 (2025) - Published 28 April, 2025

The article provides evidence-based recommendations in the form of a set of effective design principles that can be used as tools for evaluating and designing digital learning modules.

Response time on math skills and its association with math skills accuracy and physics course grades

Harish Moni Prakash and Andrew F. Heckler

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010144 (2025) - Published 30 April, 2025

Students with lower response times on physics adjacent math skills items are likely to get better grades when controlling for accuracy on pre or posttest math skills.

Long and winding road toward change in teachers’ goals and orientations in the instructional lab

Smadar Levy, Adi Noga, and Edit Yerushalmi

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010145 (2025) - Published 5 May, 2025

Two case studies explore the orientations of high school teachers which interfered with the implementation of lab activities designed to promote deliberation and student agency.

Physics demonstrations, science show, or hands-on practical work? Exploring students’ intrinsic motivation

Alexandr Nikitin, Petr Kácovský, Marie Snětinová, Martin Chvál, Jitka Houfková, and Zdeňka Koupilová

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010146 (2025) - Published 6 May, 2025

A study of three educational activities showed that students saw science shows generated the most interest, but was seen as the least valuable.

Augmenting learning environments using AI custom chatbots: Effects on learning performance, cognitive load, and affective variables

Julia Lademann, Jannik Henze, and Sebastian Becker-Genschow

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010147 (2025) - Published 7 May, 2025

Sixth grade students in a randomized controlled study showed some affective benefits when learning with supplementary material generated by AI chatbots but limited learning performance.

Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected

Michael E. Robbins, Nathan D. Davis, and Eric W. Burkholder

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010148 (2025) - Published 7 May, 2025

Problems from graduate homework assignments tend not to encourage students to make decisions and thus may not be encouraging the development of problem-solving skill.

Exploring the role of human-AI collaboration in solving scientific problems

Dazhen Tong, Bangjian Jin, Yang Tao, Hongmei Ren, A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, and Lei Bao

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010149 (2025) - Published 8 May, 2025

Both human-human and human-AI collaboration significantly improved problem solving, but human-human collaboration showed a larger effect.

Graduate program reform in one department of physics and astronomy: A case study of students’ experiences with early new policy

MacKenzie Lenz, Jessica Payton, and Ramón Barthelemy

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010150 (2025) - Published 12 May, 2025

A study of the impact of a series of reforms intended to improve graduate students’ experiences suggest they appear to work well for most students but that significant issues remain.

Upper-division physics simulations with equation manipulation

Sadra Jafari Ghalehkohneh, Jared Arnell, Kaden Hart, Hillary Swanson, Boyd Edwards, and John Edwards

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010151 (2025) - Published 20 May, 2025

Simulations with interactive equations can help students make meaningful connections between mathematical and conceptual ideas in upper-division classical mechanics.

Tracking students’ progression in developing understanding of energy using AI technologies

Tobias Wyrwich, Marcus Kubsch, Hendrik Drachsler, and Knut Neumann

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010152 (2025) - Published 23 May, 2025

AI tools can be used to identify and distinguish student trajectories as they learn about energy.

Descending an inclined plane with a large language model

Justin C. Dunlap, Ryan Sissons, and Ralf Widenhorn

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010153 (2025) - Published 23 May, 2025

Even when providing correct solutions to an introductory-level energy problem, LLMs fail can fail to generate the assumptions necessary for the solution.

Performance of ChatGPT on tasks involving physics visual representations: The case of the brief electricity and magnetism assessment

Giulia Polverini, Jakob Melin, Elias Önerud, and Bor Gregorcic

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010154 (2025) - Published 27 May, 2025

Qualitative analysis shows that ChatGPT-4o struggled on items where representational or visual interpretation is important to generating correct answers.

Physics instructors’ acceptance and implementation of generative AI

Pornrat Wattanakasiwich, Kreetha Kaewkhong, and Duanghathai Katwibun

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010155 (2025) - Published 2 June, 2025

Physics instructors’ adoption of generative AI is influenced by their level of access and motivation.

Test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux: A reliable multiple-choice assessment tool

Eder Hernandez, Esmeralda Campos, Pablo Barniol, and Genaro Zavala

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010156 (2025) - Published 3 June, 2025

A new instrument, the Test of Understanding of Electric Field, Force, and Flux, helps to identify concepts students struggle to understand such as superposition principle, Gauss’s Law, and electric force interactions.

Self-select groups increase stability but reduce collaboration in high school physics

Diego Ramírez, Eugenio J. Guzmán-Lavín, Javier Pulgar, and Cristian Candia

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010157 (2025) - Published 9 June, 2025

Student group configuration in secondary physics classes shape social development as well as outcomes.

Role of departmental support structures and self-efficacy on physics student persistence: An examination of students’ experience from 19 physics graduate programs

Diana Sachmpazidi, Ben Van Dusen, and Charles Henderson

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010158 (2025) - Published 9 June, 2025

Interviews with graduate students emphasize the importance for changes in graduate programs towards supporting student learning and growth, improving work-life balance, and developing and maintaining healthier student-faculty relationships.

Exploring student estimates of astronomical scales: Impact of question formulation and visualization

Willem Keppens, Mieke De Cock, Hans Van Winckel, Wim Van Dooren, and Jan Sermeus

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010159 (2025) - Published 11 June, 2025

Students drastically underestimate astronomical distance ratios, and different question formulations give different results.

Incentivizing supplemental math assignments and using AI-generated hints is associated with improved exam performance

Yifan Lu, K. Supriya, Shanna Shaked, Elizabeth H. Simmons, and Alexander Kusenko

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010160 (2025) - Published 12 June, 2025

Students who completed supplemental math assignments and physics assignments with AI generated hints improved physics exam scores.

Complex networks approach to curriculum analysis and subject integration: A case study on physics and mathematics

Paula Tuzón, Antoni Salvà Salvà, and Juan Fernández-Gracia

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010161 (2025) - Published 23 June, 2025

Analysis of a complex curriculum network identifies a number of interdisciplinary connections as well as potential alternate organizations of curricula.

Structuring groups for gender equitable equipment usage in labs

Matthew Dew, Emily M. Stump, and N. G. Holmes

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010162 (2025) - Published 27 June, 2025

Instructor-assigned, fixed lab groups reduce gender inequities in equipment usage, suggesting a potential approach to foster more equitable lab environments.

Promoting knowledge integration in work and mechanical energy through conceptual framework and cooperative learning instruction

Dazhen Tong, Huihui Wu, Hongmei Ren, Zhirong Wang, Sudong Pan, and Lei Bao

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010163 (2025) - Published 27 June, 2025

Incorporating a cooperative learning method contributed to more substantial improvements in students’ knowledge integration.

ERRATA

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation