Eric Brewe
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010001 (2025) - Published 10 February, 2025
Eric Brewe, the new Chief Editor for Physical Review Physics Education Research, outlines his vision for a growing journal with an increasingly international reach.
W. Brian Lane, Marisa Michelini, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010002 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025
Zhongzhou Chen and Tong Wan
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010126 (2025) - Published 27 March, 2025
ChatGPT can approach human-level accuracy in grading physics problems, and can be enhanced with multiple trials and explaining the rubric.
Melissa Dancy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010142 (2025) - Published 25 April, 2025
Research explores majority group physics instructors’ awareness of Black women’s alienation, its causes, and their approach to addressing bias.
Vy Le, Jayson M. Nissen, Xiuxiu Tang, Yuxiao Zhang, Amirreza Mehrabi, Jason W. Morphew, Hua Hua Chang, and Ben Van Dusen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010103 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025
Cognitive diagnostic models had high accuracies for classifying students skill levels in four skills: applying vectors, conceptual relationships, algebra, and visualizations.
Cassandra A. Paul and David J. Webb
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010107 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025
In an implementation of the Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-Making in Physics (CLASP) course at a different institution preserved prior findings and the results are interpreted through an equity lens.
Yajun Wei, Yi Zhong, and Feipeng Pi
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010117 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025
While there is no difference for easy problem-solving tasks, for more difficult problem-solving tasks, pre-recorded video instruction is significantly less effective than live instruction.
Kristin Kellar and Paula Heron
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010141 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025
This study builds on previous research to distinguish between students’ errors caused by conceptual misunderstandings and those driven by intuitive reasoning, using Frederick’s Cognitive Reflection Test to support dual-process theories of student reasoning.
Panagiota Chatzidaki, Urban Eriksson, Sarah Zoechling, Sascha Schmeling, and Tobias Fredlund
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010143 (2025) - Published 28 April, 2025
The article provides evidence-based recommendations in the form of a set of effective design principles that can be used as tools for evaluating and designing digital learning modules.
Harish Moni Prakash and Andrew F. Heckler
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010144 (2025) - Published 30 April, 2025
Students with lower response times on physics adjacent math skills items are likely to get better grades when controlling for accuracy on pre or posttest math skills.
Alexandr Nikitin, Petr Kácovský, Marie Snětinová, Martin Chvál, Jitka Houfková, and Zdeňka Koupilová
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010146 (2025) - Published 6 May, 2025
A study of three educational activities showed that students saw science shows generated the most interest, but was seen as the least valuable.
Michal Sigron, Dorothy Langley, Stanisław Dylak, and Edit Yerushalmi
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010101 (2025) - Published 7 January, 2025
A three-year study of perceived engagement with high school students show improved levels of understanding as they are set in more realistic, research-like, conditions.
Alexis Buzzell, Timothy J. Atherton, and Ramón Barthelemy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010102 (2025) - Published 16 January, 2025
This article reviews the landscape of quantum mechanics education in US research-intensive institutions.
Vy Le, Jayson M. Nissen, Xiuxiu Tang, Yuxiao Zhang, Amirreza Mehrabi, Jason W. Morphew, Hua Hua Chang, and Ben Van Dusen
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010103 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025
Cognitive diagnostic models had high accuracies for classifying students skill levels in four skills: applying vectors, conceptual relationships, algebra, and visualizations.
Yangqiuting Li and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010104 (2025) - Published 21 January, 2025
Development and testing of a multiple-choice question sequence designed to enhance students’ understanding of quantum measurements for quantum systems in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space.
William D. Riihiluoma, Zeynep Topdemir, and John R. Thompson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010105 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025
Students in a spins-first quantum mechanics course are more comfortable with Dirac notation than with wave function notation.
Cassandra A. Paul and David J. Webb
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010107 (2025) - Published 23 January, 2025
In an implementation of the Collaborative Learning through Active Sense-Making in Physics (CLASP) course at a different institution preserved prior findings and the results are interpreted through an equity lens.
Luiza Vilarta Rodriguez, Jan T. van der Veen, and Ton de Jong
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010108 (2025) - Published 27 January, 2025
Analogies with classical physics can negatively impact student understanding of introductory quantum physics by increasing their cognitive processing, and by requiring students to understand the limitations of the classical analogy for the quantum scenario, so as to not take the analogies literally.
Skylar Grayson, Molly N. Simon, Sanlyn Buxner, Matthew Wenger, and Chris Impey
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010109 (2025) - Published 28 January, 2025
Students in an astrobiology massive open online course showed increased motivation, and the sources of motivation changed since the pandemic.
Linda Zhang, Madison Swirtz, and Kerstin Nordstrom
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010110 (2025) - Published 30 January, 2025
The perceptions of Asian Americans as overrepresented in physics may hide the less privileged identities that some students hold, and the challenges that come with those less visible identities.
Paul Tschisgale, Marcus Kubsch, Peter Wulff, Stefan Petersen, and Knut Neumann
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010111 (2025) - Published 31 January, 2025
Expert problem solving is well captured by prescriptive problem-solving process models, and these models can be used to systematically teach problem solving.
S. Satanassi and O. Levrini
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010112 (2025) - Published 31 January, 2025
The design of a teaching module for secondary school students that emphasizes the cultural scope of the Second Quantum Revolution.
William D. Riihiluoma, Zeynep Topdemir, and John R. Thompson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010113 (2025) - Published 4 February, 2025
Spins-first upper-division quantum mechanics courses result in students interpreting Dirac bras and kets as vectors and quantum states more than wave functions-first courses do
Laura Stiles-Clarke and Katarin MacLeod
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010114 (2025) - Published 26 February, 2025
It is possible for members of a physics department to increase student recruitment and retention by engaging in incremental shifts of their departmental culture towards diversity and inclusion.
Maxwell Franklin and Eric Brewe
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010115 (2025) - Published 3 March, 2025
This study investigates which affective factors and specific survey responses predict long-term retention of women in physics.
Zac Patterson and Lin Ding
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010116 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025
After prolonged exposure to classical physics, secondary students often develop rigid, realist framings that are difficult to abandon when attempting to learn quantum physics.
Yajun Wei, Yi Zhong, and Feipeng Pi
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010117 (2025) - Published 7 March, 2025
While there is no difference for easy problem-solving tasks, for more difficult problem-solving tasks, pre-recorded video instruction is significantly less effective than live instruction.
Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Nikhil Borse, Amir Bralin, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010118 (2025) - Published 10 March, 2025
Students use both design thinking and science thinking is solving physics problems in labs.
Vegard Gjerde, Martino Marisaldi, Kjellmar Oksavik, Kjartan Olafsson, Harald Spångberg, and Bodil Holst
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010119 (2025) - Published 11 March, 2025
A mandatory retrieval test is an effective, low-effort instructional intervention that promotes greater student adoption of retrieval practice and yields enhanced learning and performance.
Eder Hernandez, Esmeralda Campos, Pablo Barniol, and Genaro Zavala
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010120 (2025) - Published 17 March, 2025
Introductory physics students have similar difficulties applying the superposition principle in both electricity and magnetism contexts.
Qiaoyi Liu, Harish Moni Prakash, and Andrew F. Heckler
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010121 (2025) - Published 17 March, 2025
Two quasi-experimental studies indicate that spaced mastery practice on skills relevant to introductory physics improved exam performance.
Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam, Jason W. Morphew, Carina M. Rebello, and N. Sanjay Rebello
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010122 (2025) - Published 19 March, 2025
Introducing a novel framework, Ways of Thinking in Engineering Design-based Physics, and then applying it in an undergraduate introductory physics laboratory.
Christof Keebaugh, Emily Marshman, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010123 (2025) - Published 20 March, 2025
The development and assessment of an interactive learning tutorial to enhance students’ understanding of concepts related to many particle wavefunctions for a system of two or three bosons and fermions.
Briley L. Lewis, Abygail R. Waggoner, Emma Clarke, Alison L. Crisp, Mark Dodici, Graham M. Doskoch, Michael M. Foley, Ryan Golant, Skylar Grayson, Sahil Hegde, Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas, Charles J. Law, R. R. Lefever, Ishan Mishra, Mark Popinchalk, Sabina Sagynbayeva, Samantha L. Wong, Wei Yan, Kaitlyn L. Ingraham Dixie, and K. Supriya (Astrobites Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010124 (2025) - Published 25 March, 2025
Accessible literature summaries show promise for bridging the gap between undergraduate students’ current abilities and the difficult task of reading scientific literature.
Michael E. Robbins, Gabriel J. DiQuattro, and Eric W. Burkholder
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010125 (2025) - Published 26 March, 2025
It is possible to develop an instrument to measuring expert decision-making in graduate quantum mechanics, which will be valuable for assessing and improving graduate instruction.
Zhongzhou Chen and Tong Wan
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010126 (2025) - Published 27 March, 2025
ChatGPT can approach human-level accuracy in grading physics problems, and can be enhanced with multiple trials and explaining the rubric.
Mary Jane Brundage, David E. Meltzer, and Chandralekha Singh
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010127 (2025) - Published 28 March, 2025
Upper-level students performed no better than introductory students on cyclic-process thermodynamics problems asking whether system entropy increases, decreases, or remains constant.
Rebeckah K. Fussell, Megan Flynn, Anil Damle, Michael F. J. Fox, and N. G. Holmes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010128 (2025) - Published 31 March, 2025
A comparison of different LLMs in coding lab notebooks for the identification of presence of skills.
Kristin A. Oliver, Victoria Borish, Bethany R. Wilcox, and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010129 (2025) - Published 31 March, 2025
Upper-level physics courses focused on the quantum industry need to provide students with an introduction to the industry rather than assuming that they have gathered this information elsewhere.
Christopher J. Fischer, Jennifer A. Delgado, Sarah E. LeGresley, and Jessy R. Changstrom
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010130 (2025) - Published 1 April, 2025
Student identity in introductory calculus-based physics modulates the correlation between their actual calculus abilities and self-evaluation of those abilities.
Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010131 (2025) - Published 2 April, 2025
Physics students relied more heavily on linguistic representations in reasoning on partial and directional derivatives, but students who used algebraic-symbolic representations performed better.
Maria Al Dehaybes, Johan Deprez, Paul van Kampen, and Mieke De Cock
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010132 (2025) - Published 2 April, 2025
In the second of a pair of studies on reasoning about the gradient and the Laplacian, students used graphical, algebraic-symbolic, or linguistic descriptions in different contexts.
Victoria Borish and H. J. Lewandowski
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010133 (2025) - Published 3 April, 2025
Cloud-accessible complex quantum experiments extend the opportunity to work with quantum experiments to undergraduate students at less-resourced institutions.
Wei-Zhao Shi, Chunying Zuo, and Jingying Wang
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010134 (2025) - Published 3 April, 2025
In a study with random teaching assignment and group structure, students understanding of Nature of Science was influenced by the teaching mode, but less so by group structure.
Alistair McInerny, Andrew Boudreaux, and Mila Kryjevskaia
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010135 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025
Study shows strong link between cognitive reflection test scores and conceptual reasoning scores, but no influence from discussions of automatic vs. deliberate reasoning.
Gerd Kortemeyer and Julian Nöhl
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010136 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025
AI can reduce the grading burden for instructors by accurately handling routine tasks, but human oversight remains essential.
John B. Buncher, Jayson M. Nissen, Ben Van Dusen, and Robert M. Talbot
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010137 (2025) - Published 7 April, 2025
Performance differences across gender and race on many FCI items does not result from biased items, but instead from real differences in physics knowledge among these groups.
Ashley B. Heim, Georgia Lawrence, Riya Agarwal, Michelle K. Smith, and N. G. Holmes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010138 (2025) - Published 9 April, 2025
Physics and Biology students described different approaches to evaluating biology and physics experiments regardless of major and the role of critical thinking in each discipline.
Alexis Buzzell, Timothy J. Atherton, and Ramón Barthelemy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010139 (2025) - Published 17 April, 2025
Analysis of 167 modern physics course syllabi reveal three topics consistently taught (quantum, atomic physics, and relativity) across courses with substantial variability beyond these topics.
Hamideh Talafian, Morten Lundsgaard, Maggie S. Mahmood, Eric Kuo, and Timothy J. Stelzer
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010140 (2025) - Published 18 April, 2025
Even with robust professional development, high school physics teachers face significant barriers when trying to shift from structured lab format to a more open-ended approach.
Kristin Kellar and Paula Heron
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010141 (2025) - Published 21 April, 2025
This study builds on previous research to distinguish between students’ errors caused by conceptual misunderstandings and those driven by intuitive reasoning, using Frederick’s Cognitive Reflection Test to support dual-process theories of student reasoning.
Melissa Dancy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010142 (2025) - Published 25 April, 2025
Research explores majority group physics instructors’ awareness of Black women’s alienation, its causes, and their approach to addressing bias.
Panagiota Chatzidaki, Urban Eriksson, Sarah Zoechling, Sascha Schmeling, and Tobias Fredlund
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010143 (2025) - Published 28 April, 2025
The article provides evidence-based recommendations in the form of a set of effective design principles that can be used as tools for evaluating and designing digital learning modules.
Harish Moni Prakash and Andrew F. Heckler
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010144 (2025) - Published 30 April, 2025
Students with lower response times on physics adjacent math skills items are likely to get better grades when controlling for accuracy on pre or posttest math skills.
Smadar Levy, Adi Noga, and Edit Yerushalmi
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010145 (2025) - Published 5 May, 2025
Two case studies explore the orientations of high school teachers which interfered with the implementation of lab activities designed to promote deliberation and student agency.
Alexandr Nikitin, Petr Kácovský, Marie Snětinová, Martin Chvál, Jitka Houfková, and Zdeňka Koupilová
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010146 (2025) - Published 6 May, 2025
A study of three educational activities showed that students saw science shows generated the most interest, but was seen as the least valuable.
Julia Lademann, Jannik Henze, and Sebastian Becker-Genschow
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010147 (2025) - Published 7 May, 2025
Sixth grade students in a randomized controlled study showed some affective benefits when learning with supplementary material generated by AI chatbots but limited learning performance.
Michael E. Robbins, Nathan D. Davis, and Eric W. Burkholder
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010148 (2025) - Published 7 May, 2025
Problems from graduate homework assignments tend not to encourage students to make decisions and thus may not be encouraging the development of problem-solving skill.
Dazhen Tong, Bangjian Jin, Yang Tao, Hongmei Ren, A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010149 (2025) - Published 8 May, 2025
Both human-human and human-AI collaboration significantly improved problem solving, but human-human collaboration showed a larger effect.
MacKenzie Lenz, Jessica Payton, and Ramón Barthelemy
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010150 (2025) - Published 12 May, 2025
A study of the impact of a series of reforms intended to improve graduate students’ experiences suggest they appear to work well for most students but that significant issues remain.
Sadra Jafari Ghalehkohneh, Jared Arnell, Kaden Hart, Hillary Swanson, Boyd Edwards, and John Edwards
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010151 (2025) - Published 20 May, 2025
Simulations with interactive equations can help students make meaningful connections between mathematical and conceptual ideas in upper-division classical mechanics.
Tobias Wyrwich, Marcus Kubsch, Hendrik Drachsler, and Knut Neumann
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010152 (2025) - Published 23 May, 2025
AI tools can be used to identify and distinguish student trajectories as they learn about energy.
Justin C. Dunlap, Ryan Sissons, and Ralf Widenhorn
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010153 (2025) - Published 23 May, 2025
Even when providing correct solutions to an introductory-level energy problem, LLMs fail can fail to generate the assumptions necessary for the solution.
Giulia Polverini, Jakob Melin, Elias Önerud, and Bor Gregorcic
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010154 (2025) - Published 27 May, 2025
Qualitative analysis shows that ChatGPT-4o struggled on items where representational or visual interpretation is important to generating correct answers.
Pornrat Wattanakasiwich, Kreetha Kaewkhong, and Duanghathai Katwibun
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010155 (2025) - Published 2 June, 2025
Physics instructors’ adoption of generative AI is influenced by their level of access and motivation.
Eder Hernandez, Esmeralda Campos, Pablo Barniol, and Genaro Zavala
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010156 (2025) - Published 3 June, 2025
A new instrument, the Test of Understanding of Electric Field, Force, and Flux, helps to identify concepts students struggle to understand such as superposition principle, Gauss’s Law, and electric force interactions.
Diego Ramírez, Eugenio J. Guzmán-Lavín, Javier Pulgar, and Cristian Candia
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010157 (2025) - Published 9 June, 2025
Student group configuration in secondary physics classes shape social development as well as outcomes.
Diana Sachmpazidi, Ben Van Dusen, and Charles Henderson
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010158 (2025) - Published 9 June, 2025
Interviews with graduate students emphasize the importance for changes in graduate programs towards supporting student learning and growth, improving work-life balance, and developing and maintaining healthier student-faculty relationships.
Willem Keppens, Mieke De Cock, Hans Van Winckel, Wim Van Dooren, and Jan Sermeus
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010159 (2025) - Published 11 June, 2025
Students drastically underestimate astronomical distance ratios, and different question formulations give different results.
Yifan Lu, K. Supriya, Shanna Shaked, Elizabeth H. Simmons, and Alexander Kusenko
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010160 (2025) - Published 12 June, 2025
Students who completed supplemental math assignments and physics assignments with AI generated hints improved physics exam scores.
Paula Tuzón, Antoni Salvà Salvà, and Juan Fernández-Gracia
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010161 (2025) - Published 23 June, 2025
Analysis of a complex curriculum network identifies a number of interdisciplinary connections as well as potential alternate organizations of curricula.
Matthew Dew, Emily M. Stump, and N. G. Holmes
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010162 (2025) - Published 27 June, 2025
Instructor-assigned, fixed lab groups reduce gender inequities in equipment usage, suggesting a potential approach to foster more equitable lab environments.
Dazhen Tong, Huihui Wu, Hongmei Ren, Zhirong Wang, Sudong Pan, and Lei Bao
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010163 (2025) - Published 27 June, 2025
Incorporating a cooperative learning method contributed to more substantial improvements in students’ knowledge integration.
Paul Tschisgale, Peter Wulff, and Marcus Kubsch
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 019901 (2025) - Published 4 March, 2025