- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Landscape of quantum information science and engineering education: From physics foundations to interdisciplinary frontiers

A. R. Piña1,*, Shams El-Adawy2,3, Mike Verostek1, Brett T. Boyle1, Mateo Cacheiro1, Matt Lawler1, Namitha Pradeep1, Ella Watts1, Colin G. West3 et al.

H. J. Lewandowski2,3 and Benjamin M. Zwickl1

  • *Contact author: andi.pina@rit.edu, they/them/theirs
PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020131 – Published 16 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pstt-46b9

Abstract

Quantum information science and engineering (QISE) is rapidly gaining interest from those within many disciplines, and higher education needs to adapt to the changing landscape. Although QISE education still has a strong presence and roots in physics, the field is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary. There is a need to understand the presence of QISE instruction and quantum-related instruction across all disciplines in order to figure out where QISE education is already happening and where it could be expanded. Although there is recent work that characterizes introductory QISE courses, there is no holistic picture of the landscape of QISE and quantum-related education in the United States. To understand how QISE education is evolving, we analyzed course catalogs from 1456 U.S. institutions. We found 61 institutions offering QISE degree programs, mostly at Ph.D.-granting schools, with interdisciplinary programs being the most common. Physics, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science are the primary contributors to these programs. Across all institutions, we identified over 8000 courses mentioning “quantum,” mainly in physics and chemistry departments, but about one-third of institutions in our study had none. We also found over 500 dedicated QISE courses, concentrated in Ph.D.-granting institutions, primarily in physics, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science. Physics leads in offering both general quantum-related courses (∼4700) and QISE-specific courses (∼200). While quantum knowledge is often a prerequisite for QISE, there are efforts to make QISE education more accessible to students with less background in quantum mechanics. Across multiple disciplines, we also see that QISE topics are being introduced in courses not fully dedicated to QISE, which may be a productive strategy for increasing students’ access to QISE education. Our dataset and analysis provide the most comprehensive overview to date of quantum education across U.S. higher education. Additionally, this work is the first to address, in detail, the landscape of quantum content in two-year and community colleges and examines the largest set of MSIs in this context. We hope these findings will support and guide future efforts in curriculum design, workforce development, and education policy across the quantum ecosystem.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. L. Smith, H.R.6227—115th congress (2017–2018): National quantum initiative act (2018), https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227.
  2. National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science, Quantum information science and technology workforce development national strategic plan (2022), https://www.quantum.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/QIST-Natl-Workforce-Plan.pdf.
  3. T. Ryan, H.R.4346—117th congress (2021–2022): Chips and science act (2022), https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346.
  4. C. Singh, Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instruction, Am. J. Phys. 76, 277 (2008).
  5. C. Singh and E. Marshman, Analogous patterns of student reasoning difficulties in introductory physics and upper-level quantum mechanics, presented at PER Conf. 2013, Portland, OR, 10.1119/perc.2013.inv.010.
  6. C. Singh and E. Marshman, Investigating student difficulties with Dirac notation, presented at PER Conf. 2014, Portland, OR, 10.1119/perc.2013.pr.074.
  7. E. Marshman and C. Singh, Student difficulties with quantum states while translating state vectors in Dirac notation to wave functions in position and momentum representations, presented at PER Conf. 2015, College Park, MD, 10.1119/perc.2015.pr.048.
  8. E. Marshman and C. Singh, Framework for understanding the patterns of student difficulties in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020119 (2015).
  9. C. Singh and E. Marshman, Review of student difficulties in upper-level quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020117 (2015).
  10. E. Gire and C. Manogue, Resources students use to understand quantum mechanical operators, AIP Conf. Proc. 1064, 115 (2008).
  11. E. Gire and C. Manogue, Making sense of quantum operators, eigenstates and quantum measurements, AIP Conf. Proc. 1413, 195 (2012).
  12. G. Passante, P. J. Emigh, and P. S. Shaffer, Student ability to distinguish between superposition states and mixed states in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020135 (2015).
  13. G. Passante, P. J. Emigh, and P. S. Shaffer, Examining student ideas about energy measurements on quantum states across undergraduate and graduate levels, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020111 (2015).
  14. P. J. Emigh, G. Passante, and P. S. Shaffer, Student understanding of time dependence in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020112 (2015).
  15. P. J. Emigh, G. Passante, and P. S. Shaffer, Student understanding of superposition: Vectors and wave functions, presented at PER Conf. 2016, Sacramento, CA, 10.1119/perc.2016.pr.023.
  16. J. R. Hoehn and N. D. Finkelstein, Students’ flexible use of ontologies and the value of tentative reasoning: Examples of conceptual understanding in three canonical topics of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010122 (2018).
  17. G. Passante, B. P. Schermerhorn, S. J. Pollock, and H. R. Sadaghiani, Time evolution in quantum systems: A closer look at student understanding, Eur. J. Phys. 41, 015705 (2019).
  18. G. Corsiglia, S. Pollock, and G. Passante, Intuition in quantum mechanics: Student perspectives and expectations, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010109 (2023).
  19. W. D. Riihiluoma, Z. Topdemir, and J. R. Thompson, Network analysis of students’ conceptual understanding of mathematical expressions for probability in upper-division quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 020102 (2024).
  20. E. Gire and E. Price, Structural features of algebraic quantum notations, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11, 020109 (2015).
  21. B. P. Schermerhorn, G. Passante, H. Sadaghiani, and S. J. Pollock, Exploring student preferences when calculating expectation values using a computational features framework, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020144 (2019).
  22. M. Wawro, K. Watson, and W. Christensen, Students’ metarepresentational competence with matrix notation and Dirac notation in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020112 (2020).
  23. B. W. Dreyfus, A. Elby, A. Gupta, and E. R. Sohr, Mathematical sense-making in quantum mechanics: An initial peek, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020141 (2017).
  24. A. Pina, Z. Topdemir, and J. R. Thompson, Student understanding of eigenvalue equations in quantum mechanics: Symbolic forms analysis, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Omaha Nebraska, 2023), pp. 90–98.
  25. A. R. Piña, Z. Topdemir, and J. R. Thompson, Student understanding of eigenvalue equations in quantum mechanics: symbolic blending and sensemaking analysis, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010153 (2024).
  26. A. Kohnle and G. Passante, Characterizing representational learning: A combined simulation and tutorial on perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020131 (2017).
  27. G. Passante and A. Kohnle, Enhancing student visual understanding of the time evolution of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010110 (2019).
  28. S. Zaman Ahmed, C. A. Weidner, J. H. M. Jensen, J. F. Sherson, and H. J. Lewandowski, Student use of a quantum simulation and visualization tool, Eur. J. Phys. 43, 065703 (2022).
  29. C. Singh, Quantum interactive learning tutorials, Am. J. Phys. 76, 400 (2016).
  30. P. J. Emigh, G. Passante, and P. S. Shaffer, Developing and assessing tutorials for quantum mechanics: Time dependence and measurements, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020128 (2018).
  31. B. P. Schermerhorn, G. Corsiglia, H. Sadaghiani, G. Passante, and S. Pollock, From Cartesian coordinates to Hilbert space: Supporting student understanding of basis in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010145 (2022).
  32. V. Borish and H. J. Lewandowski, Seeing quantum effects in experiments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020144 (2023).
  33. V. Borish and H. J. Lewandowski, Student reasoning about quantum mechanics while working with physical experiments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 020135 (2024).
  34. K. A. Oliver, V. Borish, B. R. Wilcox, and H. J. Lewandowski, Education for expanding the quantum workforce: Students’ perceptions of the quantum industry in an upper-division physics capstone course, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010129 (2025).
  35. S. DeVore and C. Singh, Development of an interactive tutorial on quantum key distribution, presented at PER Conf. 2015, Minneapolis, MN, 10.1119/perc.2014.pr.011.
  36. M. F. J. Fox, B. M. Zwickl, and H. J. Lewandowski, Preparing for the quantum revolution: What is the role of higher education?, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020131 (2020).
  37. C. Hughes, D. Finke, D.-A. German, C. Merzbacher, P. M. Vora, and H. J. Lewandowski, Assessing the needs of the quantum industry, IEEE Trans. Educ. 65, 592 (2022).
  38. M. Hasanovic, C. A. Panayiotou, D. M. Silberman, P. Stimers, and C. I. Merzbacher, Quantum technician skills and competencies for the emerging quantum 2.0 industry, Opt. Eng. (N.Y.) 61, 081803 (2022).
  39. B. Cervantes, G. Passante, B. Wilcox, and S. Pollock, An overview of quantum information science courses at U.S. institutions, presented at PER Conf. 2021, Virtual Conference, 10.1119/perc.2021.pr.Cervantes.
  40. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, and B. Wilcox, Disparities in access to U.S. quantum information education, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 010131 (2024).
  41. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, S. J. Pollock, and B. R. Wilcox, Introductory quantum information science coursework at U.S. institutions: Content coverage, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 11, 16 (2024).
  42. F. Greinert, R. Müller, P. Bitzenbauer, M. S. Ubben, and K.-A. Weber, Future quantum workforce: competences, requirements, and forecasts, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010137 (2023).
  43. F. Greinert, M. S. Ubben, I. N. Dogan, D. Hilfert-Rüppell, and R. Müller, Advancing quantum technology workforce: industry insights into qualification and training needs, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 11, 82 (2024).
  44. S. Goorney, B. Muñoz, and J. Sherson, Quantum technology master’s: A shortcut to the quantum industry?, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 12, 2 (2025).
  45. A. Buzzell, R. Barthelemy, and T. Atherton, Modern physics courses: Understanding the content taught in the U.S., Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010139 (2025).
  46. A. Buzzell, T. J. Atherton, and R. Barthelemy, Quantum mechanics curriculum in the U.S.: Quantifying the instructional time, content taught, and paradigms used, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 010102 (2025).
  47. M. H. Nguyen, J. J. Ramirez, and S. Laderman, What counts as a minority-serving institution? Toward the utilization of a standardized and uniform definition and typology, Educ. Res. 52, 174 (2023).
  48. National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (2022), https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data.
  49. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (2024), Accredited Programs, https://amspub.abet.org/aps/name-search?searchType=institution.
  50. Minority University Research and Education Project (MUREP, NASA List of Minority Serving Institutions (2023), https://msiexchange.nasa.gov/pdf/2023-2024%20MSI%20List.pdf.
  51. P. Tschisgale, P. Wulff, and M. Kubsch, Integrating artificial intelligence-based methods into qualitative research in physics education research: A case for computational grounded theory, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020123 (2023).
  52. M. Caramaschi and T. O. B. Odden, Uncovering shifts in the history of physics education: A systematic, NLP-based, thematic analysis of articles from the physics teacher and physics education journals (1966–2019), arXiv:2504.02703.
  53. United States quantum education landscape—dataset and visualizations, 2024, https://quantumlandscape.streamlit.app/.
  54. S. E. Economou and E. Barnes, Hello quantum world! A rigorous but accessible first-year university course in quantum information science, arXiv:2210.02868.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 21, 020131– Published 16 October, 2025
  • Received 22 April 2025
  • Accepted 19 September 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation