Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Mixed-State Quantum Anomaly and Multipartite Entanglement

Leonardo A. Lessa1,2,*, Meng Cheng3,†, and Chong Wang1,‡

  • *Contact author: llessa@pitp.ca
  • Contact author: m.cheng@yale.edu
  • Contact author: cwang4@pitp.ca

Phys. Rev. X 15, 011069 – Published 24 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.011069

Abstract

Quantum entanglement measures of many-body states have been increasingly useful to characterize phases of matter. Here, we explore a surprising connection between mixed-state entanglement and ’t Hooft anomaly. More specifically, we consider lattice systems in d space dimensions with anomalous symmetry G where the anomaly is characterized by an invariant in the group cohomology Hd+2[G,U(1)]. We show that any mixed state ρ that is strongly symmetric under G, in the sense that Gρρ is necessarily (d+2)-nonseparable, i.e., is not the mixture of tensor products of d+2 states in the Hilbert space. Furthermore, such states cannot be prepared from any (d+2)-separable states using finite-depth local quantum channels, so the nonseparability is long-ranged in nature. We provide proof of these results in d1 and plausibility arguments in d>1. The anomaly-nonseparability connection, thus, allows us to generate simple examples of mixed states with nontrivial long-ranged multipartite entanglement. In particular, in d=1 we find an example of intrinsically mixed quantum phase, in the sense that states in this phase cannot be two-way connected to any pure state through finite-depth local quantum channels. We also analyze a mixed anomaly involving both strong and weak symmetries, including systems constrained by the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis type of anomaly. We find that, while strong-weak mixed anomaly, in general, does not constrain quantum entanglement, it does constrain long-range correlations of mixed states in nontrivial ways. Namely, such states are not symmetrically invertible and not gapped Markovian, generalizing familiar properties of anomalous pure states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Popular Summary

Article Text

References (104)

  1. S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  2. J. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0γγ in the σ-model, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  3. G. Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, in Recent Developments in Gauge Theories, edited by G. Hooft, C. Itzykson, A. Jaffe, H. Lehmann, P. K. Mitter, I. M. Singer, and R. Stora (Springer, Boston, MA, 1980), pp. 135–157.
  4. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155138 (2010).
  5. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological orders in interacting bosonic systems, Science 338, 1604 (2012).
  6. X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013).
  7. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 16, 407 (1961).
  8. M. Oshikawa, Commensurability, excitation gap, and topology in quantum many-particle systems on a periodic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1535 (2000).
  9. M. B. Hastings, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 69, 104431 (2004).
  10. M. Cheng, M. Zaletel, M. Barkeshli, A. Vishwanath, and P. Bonderson, Translational symmetry and microscopic constraints on symmetry-enriched topological phases: A view from the surface, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041068 (2016).
  11. H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, C.-M. Jian, and M. P. Zaletel, Lattice homotopy constraints on phases of quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 127202 (2017).
  12. W. Ye, M. Guo, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, and L. Zou, Topological characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, SciPost Phys. 13, 066 (2022).
  13. M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft—Anomaly matching in lattice systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 051 (2023).
  14. X. Chen, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Two-dimensional symmetry-protected topological orders and their protected gapless edge excitations, Phys. Rev. B 84, 235141 (2011).
  15. M. Levin and Z.-C. Gu, Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 86, 115109 (2012).
  16. B. Yoshida, Topological phases with generalized global symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155131 (2016).
  17. B. Buča and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys. 14, 073007 (2012).
  18. C. de Groot, A. Turzillo, and N. Schuch, Symmetry protected topological order in open quantum systems, Quantum 6, 856 (2022).
  19. R. Ma and C. Wang, Average symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031016 (2023).
  20. J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, Symmetry protected topological phases under decoherence, Quantum 9, 1607 (2025).
  21. J.-H. Zhang, Y. Qi, and Z. Bi, Strange correlation function for average symmetry-protected topological phases, arXiv:2210.17485.
  22. R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Topological phases with average symmetries: The decohered, the disordered, and the intrinsic, arXiv:2305.16399.
  23. P. Horodecki, Ł. Rudnicki, and K. Życzkowski, Multipartite entanglement, arXiv:2409.04566.
  24. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
  25. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052112 (2002).
  26. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  27. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal, Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5385 (1999).
  28. L. Gurvits, Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds’ problem and quantum entanglement, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’03 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2003), pp. 10–19.
  29. L. M. Ioannou, Computational complexity of the quantum separability problem, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 335 (2007).
  30. S. Gharibian, Strong NP-hardness of the quantum separability problem, Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 343 (2010).
  31. G. Gutoski, P. Hayden, K. Milner, and M. M. Wilde, Quantum interactive proofs and the complexity of separability testing, Theory Comput. 11, 59 (2015).
  32. By taking a bipartition A|B with A being one site i and B its complement, then we find |ψ=|ψi|ψ˜B. By repeating the same procedure for all other sites i, we conclude |ψ=i|ψi.

  33. G. Brassard and T. Mor, Multi-particle entanglement via two-particle entanglement, in Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by C. P. Williams (Springer, Berlin, 1999), pp. 1–9.
  34. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
  35. F. G. S. L. Brandão and R. O. Vianna, Separable multipartite mixed states: Operational asymptotically necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 220503 (2004).
  36. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed quantum states: Linear contractions and permutation criteria, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 13, 103 (2006).
  37. M. Huber, F. Mintert, A. Gabriel, and B. C. Hiesmayr, Detection of high-dimensional genuine multipartite entanglement of mixed states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 210501 (2010).
  38. A. Gabriel, B. C. Hiesmayr, and M. Huber, Criterion for k-separability in mixed multipartite systems, Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 829 (2010).
  39. T. Gao and Y. Hong, Separability criteria for several classes of n-partite quantum states, Eur. Phys. J. D 61, 765 (2011).
  40. M. Huber, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and J. I. de Vicente, Entropy vector formalism and the structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042328 (2013).
  41. L. Liu, T. Gao, and F. Yan, Separability criteria via sets of mutually unbiased measurements, Sci. Rep. 5, 13138 (2015).
  42. Y. Hong and S. Luo, Detecting k-nonseparability via local uncertainty relations, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042310 (2016).
  43. G. Sarbicki, G. Scala, and D. Chruściński, Family of multipartite separability criteria based on a correlation tensor, Phys. Rev. A 101, 012341 (2020).
  44. Y. Hong, T. Gao, and F. Yan, Detection of k-partite entanglement and k-nonseparability of multipartite quantum states, Phys. Lett. A 401, 127347 (2021).
  45. H. Li, T. Gao, and F. Yan, Parametrized multipartite entanglement measures, Phys. Rev. A 109, 012213 (2024).
  46. S. Szalay, Multipartite entanglement measures, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042329 (2015).
  47. H. Georgi, Lie Algebras in Particle Physics: From Isospin to Unified Theories (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).
  48. V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014).
  49. V. V. Albert, Lindbladians with multiple steady states: Theory and applications, arXiv:1802.00010.
  50. S. Lieu, R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, R. Lundgren, V. V. Albert, and A. V. Gorshkov, Symmetry breaking and error correction in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240405 (2020).
  51. D. V. Else and C. Nayak, Classifying symmetry-protected topological phases through the anomalous action of the symmetry on the edge, Phys. Rev. B 90, 235137 (2014).
  52. Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological orders for interacting fermions: Fermionic topological nonlinear σ models and a special group supercohomology theory, Phys. Rev. B 90, 115141 (2014).
  53. M. A. Metlitski, A 1d lattice model for the boundary of the quantum spin-Hall insulator, arXiv:1908.08958.
  54. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets, Commun. Math. Phys. 115, 477 (1988).
  55. F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010).
  56. F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Oshikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075125 (2012).
  57. For odd system size L3, we may redefine UCZXiUCZX so it squares to +1. In that case, the results for even N follow accordingly, up to global phases.

  58. H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910 (2001).
  59. T.-C. Lu, L. A. Lessa, I. H. Kim, and T. H. Hsieh, Measurement as a shortcut to long-range entangled quantum matter, PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022).
  60. S. Bravyi, I. Kim, A. Kliesch, and R. Koenig, Adaptive constant-depth circuits for manipulating non-Abelian anyons, arXiv:2205.01933.
  61. M. Foss-Feig, A. Tikku, T.-C. Lu, K. Mayer, M. Iqbal, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, N. Hewitt, C. V. Horst, M. Matheny, T. Mengle, B. Neyenhuis, H. Dreyer, D. Hayes, T. H. Hsieh, and I. H. Kim, Experimental demonstration of the advantage of adaptive quantum circuits, arXiv:2302.03029.
  62. M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Verresen, S. L. Campbell, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, J. Johansen, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, J. M. Pino, A. Ransford, M. Rowe, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, M. Foss-Feig, A. Vishwanath, and H. Dreyer, Non-Abelian topological order and anyons on a trapped-ion processor, Nature (London) 626, 505 (2024).
  63. R. Horodecki and M. Horodecki, Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1838 (1996).
  64. For example, it is easy to check that some tensor products of GHZ-like states in the disconnected configuration of Fig. 4 are symmetric under the CZX symmetry.

  65. We thank Chaoming Jian for pointing out the necessity of having such a proof.

  66. J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2018).
  67. A. Kapustin and N. Sopenko, Anomalous symmetries of quantum spin chains and a generalization of the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem, arXiv:2401.02533.
  68. M. B. Hastings, Topological order at nonzero temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210501 (2011).
  69. A. Coser and D. Pérez-García, Classification of phases for mixed states via fast dissipative evolution, Quantum 3, 174 (2019).
  70. S. Sang, Y. Zou, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed-state quantum phases: Renormalization and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031044 (2024).
  71. We note that Ref. [72] conjectured that states like ρ,+ are long-ranged entangled when the strong symmetry is anomalous.

  72. A. Ruiz-de-Alarcón, J. Garre-Rubio, A. Molnár, and D. Pérez-García, Matrix product operator algebras II: Phases of matter for 1D mixed states, Lett. Math. Phys. 114, 43 (2024).
  73. L. A. Lessa, S. Sang, T.-C. Lu, T. H. Hsieh, and C. Wang, Higher-form anomaly and long-range entanglement of mixed states, arXiv:2503.12792.
  74. We note that Ref. [75] discussed a type of “intrinsic mixed-state quantum topological order (TO).” The authors proved that such states cannot be two-way connected to any fully separable states and argued that because “it is widely believed that nonmodular anyon theories cannot be realized by local gapped Hamiltonians in 2D bosonic system,” then “this implies the lack of a pure-state counterpart of the mixed-state TO; thus it is indeed intrinsically mixed.” However, currently, it is unknown whether such states can be two-way connected to some gapless pure states, especially when the channels are generalized and are able to create or eliminate long-range classical correlations.

  75. Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic mixed-state topological order, PRX Quantum 6, 010314 (2025).
  76. N. Bultinck, UV perspective on mixed anomalies at critical points between bosonic symmetry-protected phases, Phys. Rev. B 100, 165132 (2019).
  77. A more precise statement of the mixed anomaly would come from calculating the 3-cocycle ω from Eq. (36). Apart from permutation of labels, it is easy to check that ω(a,b,c)=exp(iπa1b2c3), for a,b,cZ23. This 3-cocycle is not a coboundary, and it matches with the expected low-energy term in the gauged SPT bulk’s Lagrangian, 12A1A2A3H3[Z23,U(1)] [78]. Importantly, this anomaly is mixed because restricting ω to any Z22(Z2,Z2,0)Z23 subgroup gives the trivial 3-cocycle ω|Z22=1.

  78. N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Building models of topological quantum criticality from pivot Hamiltonians, SciPost Phys. 14, 013 (2023).
  79. S. Sang and T. H. Hsieh, Stability of mixed-state quantum phases via finite Markov length, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 070403 (2025).
  80. We note that after the first version of our manuscript appeared online, several works [81, 82] also independently studied the consequences of mixed strong-weak anomaly. The constraints obtained here are different from and complementary to those in Refs. [81, 82].

  81. Z. Wang and L. Li, Anomaly in open quantum systems and its implications on mixed-state quantum phases, PRX Quantum 6, 010347 (2025).
  82. Y. Xu and C.-M. Jian, Average-exact mixed anomalies and compatible phases, arXiv:2406.07417.
  83. M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115147 (2019).
  84. L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking in mixed quantum states, PRX Quantum 6, 010344 (2025).
  85. P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa, and Y. You, Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155150 (2024).
  86. D. S. Freed, Short-range entanglement and invertible field theories, arXiv:1406.7278.
  87. D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases, Geom. Topol. 25, 1165 (2021).
  88. See, however, Refs. [89, 90] for recent discussions on “anomaly” defined in different ways, which can be nontrivial even for purely weak symmetries.

  89. P.-S. Hsin, Z.-X. Luo, and H.-Y. Sun, Anomalies of average symmetries: Entanglement and open quantum systems, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 134.
  90. Y. Zang, Y. Gu, and S. Jiang, Detecting quantum anomalies in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106503 (2024).
  91. J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement, PRX Quantum 4, 030317 (2023).
  92. M. B. Hastings, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 69, 104431 (2004).
  93. B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims, Lieb-Robinson bounds and the exponential clustering theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 119 (2006).
  94. O. Fawzi and R. Renner, Quantum conditional mutual information and approximate Markov chains, Commun. Math. Phys. 340, 575 (2015).
  95. Recall that the mutual information bounds the distance between a correlated state ρAB and its marginals ρA and ρB, as Iρ(A:B)=S(ρABρAρB)(1/2ln(2))ρABρAρB12, where S(··) is the relative entropy and ·1 the trace norm [66, 96].

  96. F. Hiai, M. Ohya, and M. Tsukada, Sufficiency, KMS condition and relative entropy in von Neumann algebras, Pac. J. Math. 96, 99 (1981).
  97. In Definition 8, we require A to be a disk region, which is not the case for annulus Rw˜ in dimensions d2. However, since it does not wrap around the base manifold nontrivially (as it is the boundary of a disk region R), we find it reasonable to assume exponentially decaying CMI for A=Rw˜ as well. In particular, topologically ordered states do satisfy this extra assumption.

  98. The channel can be constructed as follows. Starting from consider a tripartition A, B, C, we can trace out the boundary regions as in the proof of Theorem 5, which leaves behind a tripartite factorized state ρAρBρC due to the vanishing MI. Because of the vanishing CMI, we can then recover the original ρ using Petz maps at the boundary region—this precisely gives a local channel that prepares ρ from a tripartite factorized state.

  99. X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, and C. Wang, Electric polarization as a nonquantized topological response and boundary Luttinger theorem, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023011 (2021).
  100. D. V. Else, R. Thorngren, and T. Senthil, Non-Fermi liquids as ersatz Fermi liquids: General constraints on compressible metals, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021005 (2021).
  101. I. Kimchi, A. Nahum, and T. Senthil, Valence bonds in random quantum magnets: Theory and application to ybmggao4, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031028 (2018).
  102. Strictly speaking, the proof in Ref. [101] was done in the L limit, assuming a “smooth” thermodynamic limit. However, it is not difficult to modify the proof for finite L. The more precise conclusion is that the weak translation symmetry would be spontaneously broken if both the following conditions are satisfied: (i) for |xy|L, ZxZy decays faster than 1/|xy|2;

    (ii) for |xy|O(L), L2ZxZy0. For example, the state ρPQ=0 with only strong SO(2) symmetry has ZxZy1/L, violating the second condition, therefore is compatible with translation symmetry not being spontaneously broken.

  103. Y.-N. Zhou, X. Li, H. Zhai, C. Li, and Y. Gu, Reviving the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem in open quantum systems, Natl. Sci. Rev. 12, nwae287 (2025).
  104. Y.-H. Chen and T. Grover, Symmetry-enforced many-body separability transitions, PRX Quantum 5, 030310 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation