- Access by Xinjiang University
Large small-scale kinematic dynamo in protoneutron stars
Phys. Rev. E 114, 015221 – Published 28 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qxm8-gl1p
Abstract
Magnetars are young, isolated neutron stars that possess an exceptionally strong magnetic field, with surface dipolar strengths on the order of . One of the plausible scenarios for generating such a strong field is an exponential amplification by a turbulent convective dynamo during the protoneutron star phase. However, the short expected duration of the convection () imposes a stringent constraint on the dynamo growth rate. We perform an extensive set of 82 three-dimensional convective dynamo simulations in the anelastic approximation and investigate the kinematic phase to quantify the dynamo growth rate . We find that increases with both the magnetic Prandtl number and the Rayleigh number , with the most unstable mode becoming highly nonaxisymmetric and multipolar. We further observe a gradual transition from large-scale to small-scale dynamo as the magnetic Reynolds number increases, resulting in a magnetic field that is predominantly concentrated at small scales. The trend remains unchanged when the outer magnetic boundary condition is varied. Since resolving the increasingly small scales becomes numerically impractical, we employ the theoretical small-scale Kazantsev dynamo model to explore the large regime characteristic of protoneutron stars. The model qualitatively captures the growth rate behavior observed in simulations and, upon extrapolation to the large limit, indicates that is only weakly dependent on the resistivity in a PNS. Under conditions relevant to the PNS, this model predicts a magnetic energy growth rate of the order of .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (76)
- M. Ugliano, H.-T. Janka, A. Marek, and A. Arcones, Progenitor-explosion connection and remnant birth masses for neutrino-driven supernovae of iron-core progenitors, Astrophys. J. 757, 69 (2012).
- B. Müller, A. Heger, and J. Powell, Minimum neutron star mass in neutrino-driven supernova explosions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 071403 (2025).
- C. Maraston, M. Limongi, J. Neumann, L. Roberti, A. Chieffi, D. Thomas, and J. Lian, Stellar population modelling of neutron stars and black holes: Spatially resolved graveyards in MaNGA/SDSS-IV galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 540, 2359 (2025).
- R. I. Epstein, Lepton-driven convection in supernovae, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 188, 305 (1979).
- W. Keil, H.-T. Janka, and E. Müller, Ledoux convection in protoneutron stars—A clue to supernova nucleosynthesis? Astrophys. J. 473, L111 (1996).
- H. Nagakura, A. Burrows, D. Radice, and D. Vartanyan, A systematic study of proto-neutron star convection in three-dimensional core-collapse supernova simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 5764 (2020).
- A. Pascal, Modelling proto-neutron star evolution, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, 2021.
- P. Cerda-Duran and N. Elias-Rosa, Neutron stars formation and core collapse supernovae, in The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–56.
- A. K. Harding, The neutron star zoo, Front. Phys. 8, 679 (2013).
- S. A. Olausen and V. M. Kaspi, The McGill magnetar catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 212, 6 (2014).
- V. M. Kaspi and A. M. Beloborodov, Magnetars, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 261 (2017).
- A. Reisenegger and F. S. Zepeda, Order-of-magnitude physics of neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 52 (2016).
- R. C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Formation of very strongly magnetized neutron stars: Implications for gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J. 392, L9 (1992).
- S. E. Woosley, Bright supernovae from magnetar birth, Astrophys. J. 719, L204 (2010).
- D. Kasen and L. Bildsten, Supernova light curves powered by young magnetars, Astrophys. J. 717, 245 (2010).
- B. D. Metzger, D. Giannios, T. A. Thompson, N. Bucciantini, and E. Quataert, The protomagnetar model for gamma-ray bursts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 2031 (2011).
- C. Kouveliotou, Magnetars, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5351 (1999).
- P. Beniamini, K. Hotokezaka, A. Van Der Horst, and C. Kouveliotou, Formation rates and evolution histories of magnetars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 1426 (2019).
- F. R. Schneider, S. T. Ohlmann, P. Podsiadlowski, F. K. Röpke, S. A. Balbus, R. Pakmor, and V. Springel, Stellar mergers as the origin of magnetic massive stars, Nature (London) 574, 211 (2019).
- L. Ferrario and D. Wickramasinghe, Modelling of isolated radio pulsars and magnetars on the fossil field hypothesis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 367, 1323 (2006).
- E. I. Makarenko, A. P. Igoshev, and A. Kholtygin, Testing the fossil field hypothesis: Could strongly magnetized OB stars produce all known magnetars? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 5813 (2021).
- H. C. Spruit, Origin of neutron star magnetic fields, AIP Conf. Proc. 983, 391 (2008).
- C. Dehman and J. A. Pons, Magnetar field dynamics shaped by chiral anomalies and helicity, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033231 (2025).
- C. Thompson and R. C. Duncan, Neutron star dynamos and the origins of pulsar magnetism, Astrophys. J. 408, 194 (1993).
- R. Raynaud, J. Guilet, H.-T. Janka, and T. Gastine, Magnetar formation through a convective dynamo in protoneutron stars, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2732 (2020).
- C. J. White, A. Burrows, M. S. Coleman, and D. Vartanyan, On the origin of pulsar and magnetar magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. 926, 111 (2022).
- Y. Masada, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, Convection and dynamo in newly born neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 924, 75 (2022).
- M. Obergaulinger, P. Cerdá-Durán, E. Müller, and M. A. Aloy, Semi-global simulations of the magneto-rotational instability in core collapse supernovae, Astron. Astrophys. 498, 241 (2009).
- P. Mösta, C. D. Ott, D. Radice, L. F. Roberts, E. Schnetter, and R. Haas, A large-scale dynamo and magnetoturbulence in rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae, Nature (London) 528, 376 (2015).
- J. Guilet and E. Müller, Numerical simulations of the magnetorotational instability in protoneutron stars – I. Influence of buoyancy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 2153 (2015).
- A. Reboul-Salze, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and M. Bugli, A global model of the magnetorotational instability in protoneutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 645, A109 (2021).
- P. Barrère, J. Guilet, A. Reboul-Salze, R. Raynaud, and H.-T. Janka, A new scenario for magnetar formation: Tayler-Spruit dynamo in a proto-neutron star spun up by fallback, Astron. Astrophys. 668, A79 (2022).
- P. Barrère, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and A. Reboul-Salze, Numerical simulations of the Tayler–Spruit dynamo in proto-magnetars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, L88 (2023).
- P. Barrère, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and A. Reboul-Salze, Tayler-Spruit dynamo in stably stratified rotating fluids: Application to proto-magnetars, Astron. Astrophys. 695, A183 (2025).
- A. Igoshev, P. Barrère, R. Raynaud, J. Guilet, T. Wood, and R. Hollerbach, A connection between proto-neutron-star Tayler–Spruit dynamos and low-field magnetars, Nat. Astron. 9, 541 (2025).
- J. Guilet, A. Reboul-Salze, R. Raynaud, M. Bugli, and B. Gallet, MRI-driven dynamo at very high magnetic Prandtl numbers, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 4346 (2022).
- L. E. Held and G. Mamatsashvili, MRI turbulence in accretion discs at large magnetic Prandtl numbers, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 2309 (2022).
- S. Lander, Generating neutron-star magnetic fields: Three dynamo phases, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.: Lett. 507, L36 (2021).
- L. F. Roberts, G. Shen, V. Cirigliano, J. A. Pons, S. Reddy, and S. Woosley, Protoneutron star cooling with convection: The effect of the symmetry energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 061103 (2012).
- S. R. Lantz and Y. Fan, Anelastic magnetohydrodynamic equations for modeling solar and stellar convection zones, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 121, 247 (1999).
- L. Hüdepohl, Neutrinos from the formation, cooling, and black hole collapse of neutron stars, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, 2014.
- U. R. Christensen and J. Aubert, Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields, Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97 (2006).
- T. Gastine and J. Wicht, Effects of compressibility on driving zonal flow in gas giants, Icarus 219, 428 (2012).
- N. Schaeffer, Efficient spherical harmonic transforms aimed at pseudospectral numerical simulations, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 751 (2013).
- https://magic-sph.github.io/.
- B. Favier and M. Proctor, Growth rate degeneracies in kinematic dynamos, Phys. Rev. E 88, 031001 (2013).
- K. J. Richardson, R. Hollerbach, and M. R. E. Proctor, From large-scale to small-scale dynamos in a spherical shell, Phys. Fluids 24, 107103 (2012).
- L. F. Richardson, Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 110, 709 (1926).
- A. A. Schekochihin, S. C. Cowley, S. F. Taylor, J. L. Maron, and J. C. McWilliams, Simulations of the small-scale turbulent dynamo, Astrophys. J. 612, 276 (2004).
- G. K. Batchelor, On the spontaneous magnetic field in a conducting liquid in turbulent motion, Proc. R. Soc. London A 201, 405 (1950).
- A. Schekochihin, S. Cowley, J. Maron, and L. Malyshkin, Structure of small-scale magnetic fields in the kinematic dynamo theory, Phys. Rev. E 65, 016305 (2001).
- A. Kazantsev, Enhancement of a magnetic field by a conducting fluid, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 1031 (1968).
- J. Schober, D. Schleicher, C. Federrath, R. Klessen, and R. Banerjee, Magnetic field amplification by small-scale dynamo action: Dependence on turbulence models and Reynolds and Prandtl numbers, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026303 (2012).
- S. Bovino, D. R. Schleicher, and J. Schober, Turbulent magnetic field amplification from the smallest to the largest magnetic Prandtl numbers, New J. Phys. 15, 013055 (2013).
- G. P. Romano and R. A. Antonia, Longitudinal and transverse structure functions in a turbulent round jet: Effect of initial conditions and Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech. 436, 231 (2001).
- E. T. Vishniac and D. Shapovalov, Properties of magnetic helicity flux in turbulent dynamos, Astrophys. J. 780, 144 (2014).
- I. Kolokolov, V. Lebedev, and G. Sizov, Magnetic field correlations in random flow with strong steady shear, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 113, 339 (2011).
- N. K. Singh, I. Rogachevskii, and A. Brandenburg, Enhancement of small-scale turbulent dynamo by large-scale shear, Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L8 (2017).
- J. Mason, L. Malyshkin, S. Boldyrev, and F. Cattaneo, Magnetic dynamo action in random flows with zero and finite correlation times, Astrophys. J. 730, 86 (2011).
- C. Federrath, Magnetic field amplification in turbulent astrophysical plasmas, J. Plasma Phys. 82, 535820601 (2016).
- A. A. Schekochihin and R. M. Kulsrud, Finite-correlation-time effects in the kinematic dynamo problem, Phys. Plasmas 8, 4937 (2001).
- P. Bhat and K. Subramanian, Fluctuation dynamo at finite correlation times and the Kazantsev spectrum, Astrophys. J. 791, L34 (2014).
- R. M. Kulsrud and S. W. Anderson, The spectrum of random magnetic fields in the mean field dynamo theory of the Galactic magnetic field, Astrophys. J. 396, 606 (1992).
- S. Xu and A. Lazarian, Turbulent dynamo in a conducting fluid and a partially ionized gas, Astrophys. J. 833, 215 (2016).
- A. A. Schekochihin, J. L. Maron, S. C. Cowley, and J. C. McWilliams, The small-scale structure of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence with large magnetic Prandtl numbers, Astrophys. J. 576, 806 (2002).
- D. J. Price and S. Rosswog, Producing ultrastrong magnetic fields in neutron star mergers, Science 312, 719 (2006).
- B. Giacomazzo, J. Zrake, P. C. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and R. Perna, Producing magnetar magnetic fields in the merger of binary neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 809, 39 (2015).
- K. Kiuchi, P. Cerdá-Durán, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124034 (2015).
- K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Global simulations of strongly magnetized remnant massive neutron stars formed in binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 97, 124039 (2018).
- J. Aubert, J. Aurnou, and J. Wicht, The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos, Geophys. J. Int. 172, 945 (2008).
- P. Olson and U. R. Christensen, Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 250, 561 (2006).
- T. Gastine, L. Duarte, and J. Wicht, Dipolar versus multipolar dynamos: The influence of the background density stratification, Astron. Astrophys. 546, A19 (2012).
- S. Tobias, The turbulent dynamo, J. Fluid Mech. 912, P1 (2021).
- K. Kiuchi, A. Reboul-Salze, M. Shibata, and Y. Sekiguchi, A large-scale magnetic field produced by a solar-like dynamo in binary neutron star mergers, Nat. Astron. 8, 298 (2024).
- A. Reboul-Salze, J. Guilet, R. Raynaud, and M. Bugli, MRI-driven dynamos in protoneutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 667, A94 (2022).
- A. Reboul-Salze, L. E. Held, and K. Kiuchi, Magnetorotational instability-driven dynamo at high Prandtl numbers, Astron. Astrophys. 701, A198 (2025).