Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Finite-size scaling in quasi-three-dimensional stick percolation

Ryan K. Daniels*

  • *Contact author: rkd43@cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. E 114, 014102 – Published 1 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nr7x-t2kn

Abstract

This work extends the universal finite-size scaling framework for continuum percolation from two-dimensional (2D) to quasi-three-dimensional (Q3D) stick systems, in which sequentially deposited wires of finite diameter stack vertically on a flat substrate. Using Monte Carlo simulation, the percolation threshold is determined for isotropic Q3D stick systems as Ncl2=6.850923±0.000014, approximately 21.5% above the established 2D value of 5.6373. The threshold is shown to be independent of the wire diameter-to-length ratio d/l, reflecting the scale invariance of the contact topology under sequential deposition. Simulation results indicate that, as for 2D networks, the spanning probability of Q3D stick percolation on square systems with free boundary conditions collapses onto a single universal scaling function once a nonuniversal metric factor is introduced. This collapse is consistent with the universal scaling function established for 2D continuum and lattice percolation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. S. Ye, A. R. Rathmell, Z. Chen, I. E. Stewart, and B. J. Wiley, Metal nanowire networks: The next generation of transparent conductors, Adv. Mater. 26, 6670 (2014).
  2. T. Sannicolo, M. Lagrange, A. Cabos, C. Celle, J.-P. Simonato, and D. Bellet, Metallic nanowire-based transparent electrodes for next generation flexible devices: A review, Small 12, 6052 (2016).
  3. W. Li, H. Zhang, S. Shi, J. Xu, X. Qin, Q. He, K. Yang, W. Dai, G. Liu, Q. Zhou, H. Yu, S. R. P. Silva, and M. Fahlman, Recent progress in silver nanowire networks for flexible organic electronics, J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 4636 (2020).
  4. A. V. Avizienis, H. O. Sillin, C. Martin-Olmos, H. H. Shieh, M. Aono, A. Z. Stieg, and J. K. Gimzewski, Neuromorphic atomic switch networks, PLoS ONE 7, e42772 (2012).
  5. A. Diaz-Alvarez, R. Higuchi, P. Sanz-Leon, I. Marcus, Y. Shingaya, A. Z. Stieg, J. K. Gimzewski, Z. Kuncic, and T. Nakayama, Emergent dynamics of neuromorphic nanowire networks, Sci. Rep. 9, 14920 (2019).
  6. G. Milano, G. Pedretti, M. Fretto, L. Boarino, F. Benfenati, D. Ielmini, I. Valov, and C. Ricciardi, Brain-inspired structural plasticity through reweighting and rewiring in multi-terminal self-organizing memristive nanowire networks, Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 2000096 (2020).
  7. H. G. Manning, F. Niosi, C. G. da Rocha, A. T. Bellew, C. O'Callaghan, S. Biswas, P. F. Flowers, B. J. Wiley, J. D. Holmes, M. S. Ferreira, and J. J. Boland, Emergence of winner-takes-all connectivity paths in random nanowire networks, Nat. Commun. 9, 3219 (2018).
  8. A. Z. Stieg, A. V. Avizienis, H. O. Sillin, C. Martin-Olmos, M. Aono, and J. K. Gimzewski, Emergent criticality in complex Turing B-type atomic switch networks, Adv. Mater. 24, 286 (2012).
  9. J. B. Mallinson, S. Shirai, S. K. Acharya, S. K. Bose, E. Galli, and S. A. Brown, Avalanches and criticality in self-organized nanoscale networks, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw8438 (2019).
  10. J. Li and S.-L. Zhang, Finite-size scaling in stick percolation, Phys. Rev. E 80, 040104(R) (2009).
  11. R. K. Daniels and S. A. Brown, Nanowire networks: How does small-world character evolve with dimensionality? Nanoscale Horiz. 6, 482 (2021).
  12. Y. Y. Tarasevich and A. V. Eserkepov, Electrical conductivity of a random nanowire network: Comparison of two-dimensional and quasi-three-dimensional models, Europhys. Lett. 153, 51001 (2026).
  13. R. Daniels, J. Mallinson, Z. Heywood, P. Bones, M. Arnold, and S. Brown, Reservoir computing with 3d nanowire networks, Neural Networks 154, 122 (2022).
  14. A. Loeffler, R. Zhu, J. Hochstetter, M. Li, K. Fu, A. Diaz-Alvarez, T. Nakayama, J. M. Shine, and Z. Kuncic, Topological properties of neuromorphic nanowire networks, Front. Neurosci. 14, 184 (2020).
  15. Z. Deng and Y. Zhang, Collective behavior of a small-world recurrent neural system with scale-free distribution, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 18, 1364 (2007).
  16. R. K. Daniels, Three dimensional nanowire networks for reservoir computing, MSc thesis, University of Canterbury, 2022.
  17. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 2018).
  18. V. Privman and M. E. Fisher, Universal critical amplitudes in finite-size scaling, Phys. Rev. B 30, 322 (1984).
  19. J.-P. Hovi and A. Aharony, Scaling and universality in the spanning probability for percolation, Phys. Rev. E 53, 235 (1996).
  20. R. M. Ziff and M. E. J. Newman, Convergence of threshold estimates for two-dimensional percolation, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016129 (2002).
  21. R. M. Ziff, Spanning probability in 2d percolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2670 (1992).
  22. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Efficient Monte Carlo algorithm and high-precision results for percolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4104 (2000).
  23. C.-K. Hu, C.-Y. Lin, and J.-A. Chen, Universal scaling functions in critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 193 (1995).
  24. R. E. Tarjan, Efficiency of a good but not linear set union algorithm, J. ACM 22, 215 (1975).
  25. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, Fast Monte Carlo algorithm for site or bond percolation, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016706 (2001).
  26. G. E. Pike and C. H. Seager, Percolation and conductivity: A computer study. I, Phys. Rev. B 10, 1421 (1974).
  27. I. Balberg, N. Binenbaum, and C. H. Anderson, Critical behavior of the two-dimensional sticks system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1605 (1983).
  28. Z. Néda, R. Florian, and Y. Brechet, Reconsideration of continuum percolation of isotropically oriented sticks in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3717 (1999).
  29. T. Vicsek and J. Kertész, Monte Carlo renormalisation-group approach to percolation on a continuum: Test of universality, J. Phys. A 14, L31 (1981).
  30. N. Wagner, I. Balberg, and D. Klein, Monte Carlo results for continuum percolation in low and high dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 74, 011127 (2006).
  31. Y. Y. Tarasevich and A. V. Eserkepov, Percolation of sticks: Effect of stick alignment and length dispersity, Phys. Rev. E 98, 062142 (2018).
  32. A. P. Chatterjee, Percolation in polydisperse systems of aligned rods: A lattice-based analysis, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 204911 (2014).
  33. S. P. Finner, M. I. Kotsev, M. A. Miller, and P. van der Schoot, Continuum percolation of polydisperse rods in quadrupole fields: Theory and simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 034903 (2018).
  34. www.csd3.cam.ac.uk.
  35. www.dirac.ac.uk.
  36. https://github.com/rkdan/stick-percolation.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation