Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Alternative model of space-charge-limited thermionic current flow through a plasma

M. D. Campanell*

  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA

  • *michaelcampanell@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 97, 043207 – Published 19 April, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.043207

Abstract

It is widely assumed that thermionic current flow through a plasma is limited by a “space-charge-limited” (SCL) cathode sheath that consumes the hot cathode's negative bias and accelerates upstream ions into the cathode. Here, we formulate a fundamentally different current-limited mode. In the “inverse” mode, the potentials of both electrodes are above the plasma potential, so that the plasma ions are confined. The bias is consumed by the anode sheath. There is no potential gradient in the neutral plasma region from resistivity or presheath. The inverse cathode sheath pulls some thermoelectrons back to the cathode, thereby limiting the circuit current. Thermoelectrons entering the zero-field plasma region that undergo collisions may also be sent back to the cathode, further attenuating the circuit current. In planar geometry, the plasma density is shown to vary linearly across the electrode gap. A continuum kinetic planar plasma diode simulation model is set up to compare the properties of current modes with classical, conventional SCL, and inverse cathode sheaths. SCL modes can exist only if charge-exchange collisions are turned off in the potential well of the virtual cathode to prevent ion trapping. With the collisions, the current-limited equilibrium must be inverse. Inverse operating modes should therefore be present or possible in many plasma devices that rely on hot cathodes. Evidence from past experiments is discussed. The inverse mode may offer opportunities to minimize sputtering and power consumption that were not previously explored due to the common assumption of SCL sheaths.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. P. Zhang, Á. Valfells, L. K. Ang, J. W. Luginsland, and Y. Y. Lau, Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 011304 (2017).
  2. M. E. Griswold and N. J. Fisch, Phys. Plasmas 23, 014502 (2016).
  3. E. Neira and F. Vega, Phys. Plasmas 24, 052117 (2017).
  4. C. D. Child, Phys. Rev. (Series I) 32, 492 (1911); I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 2, 450 (1913).
  5. I. V. Lopatin, Y. H. Akhmadeev, and N. N. Koval, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 103301 (2015).
  6. S. K. Al-Hakary, L. Dosky, and S. K. Talal, Appl. Phys. Res. 6, 45 (2014).
  7. K. A. A. Khalid, T. J. Leong, and K. Mohamed, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63, 2231 (2016).
  8. J. R. Sanmartín, X. Chen, and G. Sánchez-Arriaga, Phys. Plasmas 24, 013515 (2017).
  9. J. Cavalier, N. Lemoine, G. Bousselin, N. Plihon, and J. Ledig, Phys. Plasmas 24, 013506 (2017).
  10. V. A. Nemchinsky and W. S. Severance, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, R423 (2006).
  11. P. Liang and R. Groll, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46, 363 (2018).
  12. K. M. Hanquist, K. Hara, and I. D. Boyd, J. Appl. Phys. 121, 053302 (2017).
  13. I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 33, 954 (1929).
  14. P. D. Prewett and J. E. Allen, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 348, 435 (1976).
  15. S. Takamura, N. Ohno, M. Y. Ye, and T. Kuwabara, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 44, 126 (2004).
  16. T. Gyergyek and M. Čerček, Eur. Phys. J. D 42, 441 (2007).
  17. A. Din, Phys. Plasmas 20, 093505 (2013).
  18. L. Pekker and N. Hussary, Phys. Plasmas 22, 083510 (2015).
  19. G. D. Hobbs and J. A. Wesson, Plasma Phys. 9, 85 (1967).
  20. L. A. Schwager, Phys. Fluids B 5, 631 (1993).
  21. E. Ahedo, Phys. Plasmas 9, 4340 (2002).
  22. J. P. Sheehan, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2012.
  23. J. Ou and X. Zhao, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 57, 50 (2017).
  24. S. Qing and Z. Hu, AIP Adv. 7, 085220 (2017).
  25. M. D. Campanell and M. V. Umansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 085003 (2016).
  26. M. D. Campanell and M. V. Umansky, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26, 124002 (2017).
  27. L. Malter, E. O. Johnson, and W. M. Webster, RCA Rev. 12, 415 (1951); W. M. Webster, E. O. Johnson, and L. Malter, ibid. 13, 163 (1952).
  28. T. Klinger, F. Greiner, A. Rohde, and A. Piel, Phys. Plasmas 2, 1822 (1995).
  29. J. P. Sheehan, N. Hershkowitz, I. D. Kaganovich, H. Wang, Y. Raitses, E. V. Barnat, B. R. Weatherford, and D. Sydorenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 075002 (2013).
  30. N. Hershkowitz, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 22, 11 (1994).
  31. K. U. Riemann, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24, 493 (1991).
  32. J. Loizu, J. Dominski, P. Ricci, and C. Theiler, Phys. Plasmas 19, 083507 (2012).
  33. V. A. Lisovskiy, K. P. Artushenko, and V. D. Yegorenkov, Phys. Plasmas 24, 053501 (2017).
  34. F. Greiner, T. Klinger, and A. Piel, Phys. Plasmas 2, 1810 (1995).
  35. J. H. Palacio Mizrahi and Ya. E. Krasik, Phys. Plasmas 20, 083510 (2013).
  36. E. V. Barnat, G. R. Laity, and S. D. Baalrud, Phys. Plasmas 21, 103512 (2014).
  37. J. Heberlein, J. Mentel, and E. Pfender, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 023001 (2010).
  38. M. Baeva, Plasma Chem. Plasma Proc. 37, 341 (2017).
  39. D. Levko, Phys. Plasmas 22, 073501 (2015).
  40. A. Khrabry, I. D. Kaganovich, V. Nemchinsky, and A. Khodak, Phys. Plasmas 25, 013521 (2018).
  41. P. C. Stangeby, The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices, Plasma Physics Series (IOP, Bristol, 2000).
  42. Y. P. Raizer, Gas-Discharge Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001).
  43. D. Trunec, P. Zikán, J. Wagner, and Z. Bonaventura, Phys. Plasmas 24, 063508 (2017).
  44. A. Tejero-del-Caz, I. Fernández Palop, J. M. Díaz-Cabrera, G. F. Regodón, R. Carmona-Cabezas, and J. Ballesteros, J. Comput. Phys. 350, 747 (2017).
  45. H. J. Lee and J. K. Lee, Phys. Plasmas 5, 2878 (1998).
  46. P. Cagas, A. Hakim, J. Juno, and B. Srinivasan, Phys. Plasmas 24, 022118 (2017).
  47. G. Sánchez-Arriaga, Phys. Plasmas 20, 013504 (2013).
  48. D. Coulette and G. Manfredi, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 025008 (2016).
  49. P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, Phys. Rev. 94, 511 (1954).
  50. D. Levko and Ya. E. Krasik, Phys. Plasmas 21, 112105 (2014).
  51. D. Sydorenko, I. D. Kaganovich, P. L. G. Ventzek, and L. Chen, Phys. Plasmas 23, 122119 (2016).
  52. A. Ya. Ender and V. I. Kuznetsov, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 510, 012046 (2014).
  53. V. I. Kuznetsov and A. Ya. Ender, Plasma Phys. Rep. 41, 905 (2015).
  54. W. X. Ding, T. Klinger, and A. Piel, Phys. Lett. A 222, 409 (1996).
  55. S. Iizuka, P. Michelsen, J. J. Rasmussen, R. Schrittwieser, R. Hatakeyama, K. Saeki, and N. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 145 (1982).
  56. S. Kuhn, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 34, 495 (1994).
  57. M. Komm, S. Ratynskaia, P. Tolias, J. Cavalier, R. Dejarnac, J. P. Gunn, and A. Podolnik, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59, 094002 (2017).
  58. I. G. Mikellides, D. M. Goebel, B. A. Jorns, J. E. Polk, and P. Guerrero, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43, 173 (2015).
  59. G. Sary, L. Garrigues, and J.-P. Boeuf, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26, 055007 (2017).
  60. A. Kaminska, B. Lopez, B. Izrar, and M. Dudeck, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 17, 035018 (2008).
  61. M. D. Campanell, A. V. Khrabrov, and I. D. Kaganovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 255001 (2012)
  62. T. Ito and M. A. Cappelli, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 213901 (2012).
  63. M. D. Campanell and M. V. Umansky, Phys. Plasmas 24, 057101 (2017).
  64. W. Li, J. X. Ma, J. Li, Y. Zheng, and M. Tan, Phys. Plasmas 19, 030704 (2012).
  65. C.-S. Yip, N. Hershkowitz, G. Severn, and S. D. Baalrud, Phys. Plasmas 23, 050703 (2016).
  66. A. Din, Phys. Plasmas 24, 093509 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation