Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Jamming and condensation in one-dimensional driven flow

Hyungjoon Soh1,*, Meesoon Ha2,†, and Hawoong Jeong1,3,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Physics Education, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea
  • 3Institute for the BioCentury, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea

  • *Present address: Kakao, Pangyoyeok-ro 235, Seongnam, 13494, Republic of Korea; jay.mini@kakaobrain.com
  • Corresponding author: msha@chosun.ac.kr
  • hjeong@kaist.edu

Phys. Rev. E 97, 032120 – Published 16 March, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.032120

Abstract

We revisit the slow-bond (SB) problem of the one-dimensional (1D) totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) with modified hopping rates. In the original SB problem, it turns out that a local defect is always relevant to the system as jamming, so that phase separation occurs in the 1D TASEP. However, crossover scaling behaviors are also observed as finite-size effects. In order to check if the SB can be irrelevant to the system with particle interaction, we employ the condensation concept in the zero-range process. The hopping rate in the modified TASEP depends on the interaction parameter and the distance up to the nearest particle in the moving direction, besides the SB factor. In particular, we focus on the interplay of jamming and condensation in the current-density relation of 1D driven flow. Based on mean-field calculations, we present the fundamental diagram and the phase diagram of the modified SB problem, which are numerically checked. Finally, we discuss how the condensation of holes suppresses the jamming of particles and vice versa, where the partially condensed phase is the most interesting, compared to that in the original SB problem.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. D. Chowdhury, A. Schadschneider, and K. Nishinari, Phys. Life Rev. 2, 318 (2005).
  2. P. C. Bressloff and J. M. Newby, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 135 (2013).
  3. I. Neri, N. Kern, and A. Parmeggiani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 098102 (2013).
  4. D. Helbing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067 (2001).
  5. D. Chowdhury, L. Santen, and A. Schadschneider, Phys. Rep. 329, 199 (2000).
  6. B. Embley, A. Parmeggiani, and N. Kern, Phys. Rev. E 80, 041128 (2009).
  7. A. Schadschneider, Physica A 285, 101 (2000).
  8. D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 867 (1976).
  9. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
  10. I. Corwin, Rand. Mat. 01, 1130001 (2012).
  11. J. Quastel, Curr. Dev. Math. 2011, 125 (2011).
  12. B. Derrida, E. Domany, and D. Mukamel, J. Stat. Phys. 69, 667 (1992).
  13. R. A. Blythe and M. R. Evans, J. Phys. A 40, R333 (2007).
  14. M. Ha, J. Timonen, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. E 68, 056122 (2003).
  15. O. Costin, J. L. Lebowitz, E. R. Speer, and A. Troiani, Bull. Inst. Math., Acad. Sin. (New Series) 8, 49 (2013).
  16. J. Schmidt, V. Popkov, and A. Schadschneider, Europhys. Lett. 110, 20008 (2015).
  17. H. Soh, Y. Baek, M. Ha, and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. E 95, 042123 (2017).
  18. M. Myllys, J. Maunuksela, J. Merikoski, J. Timonen, V. K. Horváth, M. Ha, and M. den Nijs, Phys. Rev. E 68, 051103 (2003).
  19. D. Kandel and D. Mukamel, Europhys. Lett. 20, 325 (1992).
  20. H. S. Song and J. M. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 48, 245 (2006).
  21. J. H. Lee and J. M. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 79, 051127 (2009).
  22. R. Basu, V. Sidoravicius, and A. Sly, arXiv:1408.3464 [math.PR] (2014).
  23. I. Neri, N. Kern, and A. Parmeggiani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 068702 (2011).
  24. Y. Baek, M. Ha, and H. Jeong, Phys. Rev. E 90, 062111 (2014).
  25. F. Spitzer, Adv. Math. 5, 246 (1970).
  26. C. Godreche, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 6313 (2003).
  27. M. R. Evans and T. Hanney, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, L441 (2003).
  28. The ZRP is an exact mapping of the periodic TASEP without the slow bond.
  29. S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. A 45, 618 (1992).
  30. S. Großkinsky, G. M. Schütz, and H. Spohn, J. Stat. Phys. 113, 389 (2003).
  31. Previous studies [14, 17] used the average particle occupation at x=L/4 as a good proxy of the bulk density, since the particle-hole symmetry in the original TASEP manifests the boundary of HD/LD locates at x=L/2. With the broken symmetry (b0), the boundary does not locate at x=L/4.
  32. M. R. Evans, Braz. J. Phys. 30, 42 (2000).
  33. M. Abramowitz, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1972).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation