Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nontrivial spontaneous synchronization

R. Sumi1,2, Z. Néda1, A. Tunyagi1, Sz. Boda1, and Cs. Szász3

  • 1Faculty of Physics, Babeş-Bolyai University, RO-400084 Cluj, Romania
  • 2E-Austria Research Institute, RO-300223 Timisoara, Romania
  • 3Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, RO-400020 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Phys. Rev. E 79, 056205 – Published 6 May, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.056205

Abstract

The collective behavior of an ensemble of multimode stochastic oscillators is investigated. The oscillators are pulse coupled; they are able to emit pulses and to detect the pulses emitted by the others. As a function of the output intensity in the system they can operate in different modes having different pulsing periods. The system is designed to optimize the output intensity around a fixed f output threshold. In order to do so a simple dynamics is considered. Whenever the total output intensity in the system is lower than f, a mode with a higher interpulse period is chosen. If the light intensity in the system is higher than f, a mode with a lower interpulse period is selected. As a side effect of this simple optimization rule, for a given f interval a nontrivial synchronization of the oscillators is observed. The synchronization level is studied by computer simulations, investigating the influence of model parameters (number of modes, stochasticity of the oscillators, the f threshold value, and interaction topology). An experimental realization of this system is also considered; an ensemble of electronic oscillators communicating with light pulses was constructed and studied. The experimental system behaves in many ways similar to the theoretically considered multimode stochastic oscillator ensemble.

Article Text

References (17)

  1. S. Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order (Hyperion, New York, 2003).
  2. S. Strogatz, Physica D 143, 1 (2000).
  3. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002).
  4. Y. Kuramoto and I. Nishikava, J. Stat. Phys. 49, 569 (1987).
  5. R. Mirollo and S. Strogatz, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50, 1645 (1990).
  6. S. Bottani, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2334 (1996).
  7. A. S. Pikovsky and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 775 (1997).
  8. R. FitzHugh, Bull. Math. Biophys. 17, 257 (1955).
  9. J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962).
  10. A. Nikitin, Z. Néda, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 024101 (2001).
  11. Z. Néda, A. Nikitin, and T. Vicsek, Physica A 321, 238 (2003).
  12. Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, T. Vicsek, Y. Brechet, and A. L. Barabási, Phys. Rev. E 61, 6987 (2000).
  13. Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, Y. Brechet, T. Vicsek, and A.-L. Barabási, Nature (London) 403, 849 (2000).
  14. S. H. Strogatz and I. Stewart, Sci. Am. 269, 102 (1993).
  15. C. S. Peskin, Mathematical Aspects of Heart Physiology (Courant Institute of Mathematics, New York, 1975), pp. 250–278.
  16. M. McClintock, Nature (London) 229, 244 (1971).
  17. Collective dynamics of electronic fireflies movies http://www.phys.ubbcluj.ro/~zneda/sync

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation