- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Surface viscosity in nematic liquid crystals

G. Barbero1 and L. Pandolfi2

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica and CNISM, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
  • 2Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

PDF

Phys. Rev. E 79, 051701 – Published 8 May, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051701

Abstract

We consider the effect of a localized surface viscosity on the relaxation of an imposed deformation in nematic liquid crystal cells. The simple case in which the samples are in the shape of a slab and the differential equations can be linearized is considered. The apparent inconsistence between the initial values of the time derivatives at the border evaluated by means of the bulk equation and of the boundary condition is related to the assumption that the distorting field is removed in a discontinuous manner. In this framework we shall see that the dynamical problem relevant to the relaxation of the deformation is a well posed problem. In particular, the time derivatives of the nematic director evaluated on the surface by means of the bulk differential equation and by means of the dynamical boundary condition are identical for times larger than the switching time of the deforming field. The analysis of the relaxation of the imposed deformation based on the diffusion equation, with the boundary condition containing the surface viscosity, is then valid only for times larger than the switching time of the deforming field. From this observation we conclude that the concept of localized surface viscosity is useful in the description of slow dynamics of nematic liquid crystals.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (20)

  1. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994).
  2. A. Rapini and M. Papoular, J. Phys. (Paris), Colloq. 30, C4-54 (1969).
  3. A. I. Derzhanskii and A. G. Petrov, Acta Phys. Pol. A 55, 747 (1979).
  4. S. Faetti, M. Nobili, and I. Raggi, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 445 (1999).
  5. A. Mertelj and M. Copic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5844 (1998).
  6. A. Mertelj and M. Copic, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1622 (2000).
  7. M. Vilfan, I. D. Olenik, A. Mertelj, and M. Copic, Phys. Rev. E 63, 061709 (2001).
  8. A. G. Petrov, A. Th. Ionescu, C. Versace, and N. Scaramuzza, Liq. Cryst. 19, 169 (1995).
  9. Y. Marinov, N. Shonova, C. Versace, and A. G. Petrov, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. (Phila. Pa.) 329, 533 (1999).
  10. Y. Marinov, N. Shonova, S. Naydenova, and A. G. Petrov, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. (Phila. Pa.) 351, 411 (2000).
  11. A. M. Sonnet, E. G. Virga, and G. E. Durand, Phys. Rev. E 62, 3694 (2000).
  12. I. C. Gohberg and M. G. Krejn, Opèrateurs Linèairs Non Auto-adjoints Dans un Espace Hilbertien (Dunod, Paris, 1971).
  13. E. G. Virga, Variational Theories for Liquid Crystals (Chapman and Hall, London, 1994).
  14. F. M. Leslie, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 28, 265 (1968).
  15. F. M. Leslie, Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 4, 167 (1992).
  16. G. E. Durand and E. G. Virga, Phys. Rev. E 59, 4137 (1999).
  17. G. Barbero and L. R. Evangelista, Phys. Rev. E 70, 031605 (2004).
  18. A. Favini, G. R. Goldstein, J. A. Goldstein, and S. Romanelli, J. Evol. Equ. 2, 1 (2002).
  19. G. R. Goldstein, Adv. Differ. Equ. 11, 457 (2006).
  20. S. Gatti and A. Miranville, Asymptotic Behavior of a Phase-Field System with Dynamic Boundary Conditions. Differential Equations: Inverse and Direct Problems, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics Vol. 251 (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2006), pp. 149–170.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 79, 051701– Published 8 May, 2009
  • Received 9 February 2009

© 2009 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation