Spin squeezing from bilinear spin-spin interactions: Two simple theorems
Tommaso Roscilde, Fabio Mezzacapo, and Tommaso Comparin
Phys. Rev. A 104, L040601 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
M. Génévriez, D. Wehrli, T. Berglitsch, and F. Merkt
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042811 (2021) - Published 18 October, 2021
The authors developed a highly sensitive method based on a quantum-control double-resonance-spectroscopy scheme to study electronically excited states of molecular ions that do not dissociate. The method is used to study the Rydberg state of MgAr, and the results contribute to the first extensive characterization of the Rydberg states of a molecular cation.
Masoud Gharahi and Stefano Mancini
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042402 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
On the basis of an algebraic-geometric approach, the authors provide a rigorous characterization of pure states of three-qudit systems in terms of a finite number of families and subfamilies. The characterization has operational relevance for quantifying entanglement as a resource.
Theerapat Tansuwannont and Debbie Leung
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042410 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Current fault-tolerant quantum computation protocols require the preparation of a large number of auxiliary qubits. In contrast, the “weight parity error correction” introduced here is a remarkably qubit-efficient technique for correcting even high-weight errors in some stabilizer codes, provided that the weight parity is known.
Andrew E. Sifain, Francesca Fassioli, and Gregory D. Scholes
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042416 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Entanglement is both fragile and challenging to quantify experimentally, since the state density matrix is not readily available. Here, the authors propose an experimental measure of multipartite entanglement of excitons in some chemical systems using nonlinear optical spectroscopy.
Paul Kairys and Travis S. Humble
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042602 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Building on known quantum control methods, the authors propose a technique to scalably use optimal control to simulate quantum dynamics. They validate this approach with numerical simulation of a system of superconducting transmons.
Xianwu Jiang, Josh Forer, Chi Hong Yuen, Mehdi Ayouz, and Viatcheslav Kokoouline
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042801 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
The authors present a computational analysis of dissociative recombination of CH, in which both direct and indirect mechanisms are included. Good agreement with experiments is found in a wide regime while an explanation for disagreement was provided at lower energies. The theoretical method used in this study could be applicable in a wide range of diatomic cations.
A. J. Rasmusson, Marissa D'Onofrio, Yuanheng Xie, Jiafeng Cui, and Philip Richerme
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043108 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Resolved-sideband cooling is a workhorse technique for a wide range of experiments with trapped ions, atoms, or micromechanical oscillators in the quantum regime. In this work, the authors provide both a novel approach to effectively optimize the cooling sequences using graph theory, as well as a technique to measure the ion temperature more accurately. The procedure should be applicable to any trapped-ion experiment.
S. Iida, S. Kuma, M. Kuriyama, T. Furukawa, M. Kusunoki, H. Tanuma, K. Hansen, H. Shiromaru, and T. Azuma
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043114 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
The authors report a detailed study of the spontaneous decay and the laser-induced delayed detachment associated with radiative cooling processes of hot anions of pentacene, a prototypical member of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) family of molecules. As an important constituent of interstellar clouds, this molecule is of particular interest to the fields of astrophysics and astrochemistry.
Eduardo Ibarra-García-Padilla, Sohail Dasgupta, Hao-Tian Wei, Shintaro Taie, Yoshiro Takahashi, Richard T. Scalettar, and Kaden R. A. Hazzard
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043316 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
The authors study thermodynamic properties of the SU() Fermi-Hubbard model in 2D square lattices and discover simple scaling laws of the energy, the number of on-site pairs, and the kinetic energy with respect to when the temperature is above the superexchange energy. The results establish a limit to the cooling for SU() fermions in 2D, in contrast to the arbitrarily low temperatures that could potentially be achieved in 1D.
Saumya Biswas and S. J. van Enk
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043703 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Taking inspiration from the human eye, the authors propose using a five-level molecule to detect up to two photons of different frequency that arrive sequentially. They use two formalisms to develop this model: a density-matrix method to achieve analytical results and characterize the proposed detector, and a Hamiltonian method that they show is well suited for numerical calculations.
Tommaso Roscilde, Fabio Mezzacapo, and Tommaso Comparin
Phys. Rev. A 104, L040601 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
Liam H. Scarlett, Una S. Rehill, Mark C. Zammit, Klaus Bartschat, Igor Bray, and Dmitry V. Fursa
Phys. Rev. A 104, L040801 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Axel U. J. Lode, Rui Lin, Miriam Büttner, Luca Papariello, Camille Lévêque, R. Chitra, Marios C. Tsatsos, Dieter Jaksch, and Paolo Molignini
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041301 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Sora Akagami, Hiroyuki Tajima, and Kei Iida
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041302 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
C. L. Baldwin, P. Bienias, A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gullans, and M. Maghrebi
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041303 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
J. O. Austin, Z. N. Shaw, Z. Chen, K. W. Mahmud, and Y. Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041304 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
Rodney E. S. Polkinghorne, Andrew J. Groszek, and Tapio P. Simula
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041305 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
Naota Sekiguchi, Kosuke Shibata, Aki Torii, Hiroyuki Toda, Ryohei Kuramoto, Daiki Fukuda, and Takuya Hirano
Phys. Rev. A 104, L041306 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Olli Siltanen, Tom Kuusela, and Jyrki Piilo
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042201 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Arpan Das, Anindita Bera, Sagnik Chakraborty, and Dariusz Chruściński
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042202 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Pablo Bayona-Pena and Kazutaka Takahashi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042203 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
J. Villavicencio, E. Cota, F. Rojas, Jesús A. Maytorena, and D. Morachis Galindo
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042204 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Ali Raza Mirza, Muhammad Zia, and Adam Zaman Chaudhry
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042205 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Michał Dobrski, Maciej Przanowski, Jaromir Tosiek, and Francisco J. Turrubiates
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042206 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Yusef Maleki, Jiru Liu, and M. Suhail Zubairy
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042207 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Ahana Ghoshal, Sreetama Das, Amit Kumar Pal, Aditi Sen(De), and Ujjwal Sen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042208 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Brij Mohan and Arun K. Pati
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042209 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Łukasz Rudnicki and Stephen P. Walborn
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042210 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Zacharie Van Herstraeten and Nicolas J. Cerf
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042211 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Saleh Rahimi-Keshari, Mohammad Mehboudi, Dario De Santis, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Antonio Acín
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042212 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Siddhant Das and Ward Struyve
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042214 (2021) - Published 18 October, 2021
T. A. B. Pinto Silva and R. M. Angelo
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042215 (2021) - Published 18 October, 2021
M. Kiciński and J. K. Korbicz
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042216 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Sneha Munshi, Rahul Kumar, and A. K. Pan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042217 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Carlos Pineda, David Davalos, Carlos Viviescas, and Antonio Rosado
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042218 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Ajith Ramachandran, Michael Genkin, Auditya Sharma, Alexander Eisfeld, Sebastian Wüster, and Jan-Michael Rost
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042219 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Thomas Cope
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042220 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Thomas G. Wong and Joshua Lockhart
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042221 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
M. V. Scherer and A. D. Ribeiro
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042222 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Xiang Zhan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042223 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
Ayaka Usui, Wolfgang Niedenzu, and Marcus Huber
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042224 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Aleksi Bossart and Romain Fleury
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042225 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
L. Van Damme, D. Sugny, and S. J. Glaser
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042226 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Oscar Cordero, Arturo Villegas, Juan-Rafael Alvarez, Roberto de J. León-Montiel, M. H. M. Passos, and Juan P. Torres
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042401 (2021) - Published 1 October, 2021
Masoud Gharahi and Stefano Mancini
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042402 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
On the basis of an algebraic-geometric approach, the authors provide a rigorous characterization of pure states of three-qudit systems in terms of a finite number of families and subfamilies. The characterization has operational relevance for quantifying entanglement as a resource.
Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, and Xiaoqi Zhou
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042403 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Kun Zhang and Jin Wang
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042404 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Lihua Yang, Xiaofei Qi, and Jinchuan Hou
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042405 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Sarah Hagen and Mark Byrd
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042406 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Debasis Mondal, Jaskaran Singh, and Dagomir Kaszlikowski
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042407 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Michael L. Wall and Giuseppe D'Aguanno
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042408 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Darvin Wanisch and Stephan Fritzsche
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042409 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Theerapat Tansuwannont and Debbie Leung
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042410 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Current fault-tolerant quantum computation protocols require the preparation of a large number of auxiliary qubits. In contrast, the “weight parity error correction” introduced here is a remarkably qubit-efficient technique for correcting even high-weight errors in some stabilizer codes, provided that the weight parity is known.
Małgorzata Strzałka and Katarzyna Roszak
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042411 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Qingshan Xu, Xiaoqing Tan, Rui Huang, and Meiqi Li
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042412 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Eyuri Wakakuwa
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042413 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Natália S. Móller, Bruna Sahdo, and Nelson Yokomizo
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042414 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
Q. Guan, G. W. Biedermann, A. Schwettmann, and R. J. Lewis-Swan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042415 (2021) - Published 18 October, 2021
Andrew E. Sifain, Francesca Fassioli, and Gregory D. Scholes
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042416 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Entanglement is both fragile and challenging to quantify experimentally, since the state density matrix is not readily available. Here, the authors propose an experimental measure of multipartite entanglement of excitons in some chemical systems using nonlinear optical spectroscopy.
Abdul Basit, Hamad Ali, Fazal Badshah, Xiao-Fei Yang, and Guoqin Ge
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042417 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Kishor Bharti and Tobias Haug
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042418 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Soumyakanti Bose
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042419 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Timo Simnacher, Jakub Czartowski, Konrad Szymański, and Karol Życzkowski
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042420 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Song Lin, Xin Zhang, Gong-De Guo, Li-Li Wang, and Xiao-Fen Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042421 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Xiao-Feng Shi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042422 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Jerzy Paczos, Marcin Wierzbiński, Grzegorz Rajchel-Mieldzioć, Adam Burchardt, and Karol Życzkowski
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042423 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
Shu Kanno, Suguru Endo, Yasunari Suzuki, and Yuuki Tokunaga
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042424 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Peng-Fei Zhou, Rui Hong, and Shi-Ju Ran
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042601 (2021) - Published 1 October, 2021
Paul Kairys and Travis S. Humble
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042602 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Building on known quantum control methods, the authors propose a technique to scalably use optimal control to simulate quantum dynamics. They validate this approach with numerical simulation of a system of superconducting transmons.
Samuele Ferracin, Seth T. Merkel, David McKay, and Animesh Datta
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042603 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Ibukunoluwa A. Adisa and Thomas G. Wong
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042604 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Eric R. Hudson and Wesley C. Campbell
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042605 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Fabio Zoratti, Nicola Dalla Pozza, Marco Fanizza, and Vittorio Giovannetti
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042606 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
William M. Kirby, Sultana Hadi, Michael Kreshchuk, and Peter J. Love
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042607 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Javid Naikoo, Subhashish Banerjee, A. K. Pan, and Sibasish Ghosh
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042608 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Wei Wu and Jun-Hong An
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042609 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Pravin Kumar Dahal and Daniel R. Terno
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042610 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Xianwu Jiang, Josh Forer, Chi Hong Yuen, Mehdi Ayouz, and Viatcheslav Kokoouline
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042801 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
The authors present a computational analysis of dissociative recombination of CH, in which both direct and indirect mechanisms are included. Good agreement with experiments is found in a wide regime while an explanation for disagreement was provided at lower energies. The theoretical method used in this study could be applicable in a wide range of diatomic cations.
C. Küstner-Wetekam, X. Q. Hu, L. Marder, Ph. Schmidt, C. Ozga, Ch. Zindel, H. Otto, Y. G. Peng, J. G. Wang, C. Richter, N. Sisourat, U. Hergenhahn, A. Knie, A. Ehresmann, Y. Wu, and A. Hans
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042802 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Neetik Mukherjee and Amlan K. Roy
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042803 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Jurgita Koncevičiūtė and Valdas Jonauskas
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042804 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Konstantin V. Kazakov and Andrey A. Vigasin
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042805 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
S. Creutzburg, A. Niggas, D. Weichselbaum, P. L. Grande, F. Aumayr, and R. A. Wilhelm
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042806 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
D. Edwards, D. Stevens, Z. Cheong, V. Graves, J. D. Gorfinkiel, F. Blanco, G. Garcia, M. J. Brunger, R. D. White, and J. P. Sullivan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042807 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Paulo H. R. Amaral and José R. Mohallem
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042808 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Philip Jacobson, Andrija Rasovic, Arthur Campello, Chase Goddard, Matthew Dykes, Yuchao Chen, J. Y. Peter Ko, Stanislav Stoupin, Gwen Gardner, Justin Oh, and Carl Franck
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042809 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
D. Runco and P. Riccardi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042810 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
M. Génévriez, D. Wehrli, T. Berglitsch, and F. Merkt
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042811 (2021) - Published 18 October, 2021
The authors developed a highly sensitive method based on a quantum-control double-resonance-spectroscopy scheme to study electronically excited states of molecular ions that do not dissociate. The method is used to study the Rydberg state of MgAr, and the results contribute to the first extensive characterization of the Rydberg states of a molecular cation.
M. T. Herd, E. C. Cook, and W. D. Williams
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042812 (2021) - Published 19 October, 2021
A. Méry, X. Fléchard, S. Guillous, V. Kumar, M. Lalande, J. Rangama, W. Wolff, and A. Cassimi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042813 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Alexander Makhlin, Panagiotis Papoulias, and Eugene Surdutovich
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042814 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Guangyi Wang, Hu Zhou, Zewen Zong, and Ximeng Chen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042815 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Klaudia Zaremba-Kopczyk and Michał Tomza
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042816 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Yong-Hui Zhang, Li-Yan Tang, and Ting-Yun Shi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042817 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
M. Belabbas, M. K. Inal, and M. Benmouna
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042818 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Deok-Young Lee, Sangkyung Lee, M. M. Kim, and Sin Hyuk Yim
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042819 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
I. B. Abdurakhmanov, C. T. Plowman, K. H. Spicer, I. Bray, and A. S. Kadyrov
Phys. Rev. A 104, 042820 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
Jun-Ping Wang and Feng He
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043101 (2021) - Published 1 October, 2021
Tor Kjellsson Lindblom and Sølve Selstø
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043102 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
David H. Meyer, Christopher O'Brien, Donald P. Fahey, Kevin C. Cox, and Paul D. Kunz
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043103 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Yang Li, Takeshi Sato, and Kenichi L. Ishikawa
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043104 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
XuanYang Lai, SongPo Xu, ShaoGang Yu, MengWen Shi, Wei Quan, and XiaoJun Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043105 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Xie-Qian Li, Shuo Zhang, Jie Zhang, Wei Wu, Chu Guo, and Ping-Xing Chen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043106 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Yongkun Chen, Yueming Zhou, Jia Tan, Min Li, Wei Cao, and Peixiang Lu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043107 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
A. J. Rasmusson, Marissa D'Onofrio, Yuanheng Xie, Jiafeng Cui, and Philip Richerme
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043108 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Resolved-sideband cooling is a workhorse technique for a wide range of experiments with trapped ions, atoms, or micromechanical oscillators in the quantum regime. In this work, the authors provide both a novel approach to effectively optimize the cooling sequences using graph theory, as well as a technique to measure the ion temperature more accurately. The procedure should be applicable to any trapped-ion experiment.
Chenhang Huang, Daniel Pitagora, Timothy Zaklama, and Kálmán Varga
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043109 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Shilin Hu, Zheng Shu, Li Guo, and Jing Chen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043110 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
MuFeng Zhu, Jin Zhang, LinQiang Hua, ZhengRong Xiao, SongPo Xu, XuanYang Lai, and XiaoJun Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043111 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Tomthin Nganba Wangjam, Huynh Van Sa Lam, and Vinod Kumarappan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043112 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
S. D. López, S. Donsa, S. Nagele, D. G. Arbó, and J. Burgdörfer
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043113 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
S. Iida, S. Kuma, M. Kuriyama, T. Furukawa, M. Kusunoki, H. Tanuma, K. Hansen, H. Shiromaru, and T. Azuma
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043114 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
The authors report a detailed study of the spontaneous decay and the laser-induced delayed detachment associated with radiative cooling processes of hot anions of pentacene, a prototypical member of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) family of molecules. As an important constituent of interstellar clouds, this molecule is of particular interest to the fields of astrophysics and astrochemistry.
Meng Zhao, YanLan Wang, Wei Quan, XuanYang Lai, HongPing Liu, JianDuo Lu, and XiaoJun Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043115 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
F. Cajiao Vélez
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043116 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
Hui Hu, Zeng-Qiang Yu, Jia Wang, and Xia-Ji Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043301 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Vincent Vuatelet and Adam Rançon
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043302 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Mingyuan He and Qi Zhou
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043303 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Alexander Yu. Cherny
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043304 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Frederik Møller, Thomas Schweigler, Mohammadamin Tajik, João Sabino, Federica Cataldini, Si-Cong Ji, and Jörg Schmiedmayer
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043305 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Chuanzhou Zhu, Mark E. Siemens, and Mark T. Lusk
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043306 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Xunda Jiang, Bo Lu, Chengyin Han, Ruihuan Fang, Minhua Zhao, Zhu Ma, Tian Guo, and Chaohong Lee
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043307 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
W. Kirkby, D. H. J. O'Dell, and J. Mumford
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043308 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Haydn S. Adlong, Weizhe Edward Liu, Lincoln D. Turner, Meera M. Parish, and Jesper Levinsen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043309 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Matthew Edmonds
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043310 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Furkan Çağrı Top, Yair Margalit, and Wolfgang Ketterle
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043311 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
Maria Arazo, Montserrat Guilleumas, Ricardo Mayol, and Michele Modugno
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043312 (2021) - Published 19 October, 2021
Renato Pessoa, S. A. Vitiello, and L. A. Peña Ardila
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043313 (2021) - Published 19 October, 2021
Yuma Watanabe, Shohei Watabe, and Tetsuro Nikuni
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043314 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Jin Su, Hao Lyu, Yuanyuan Chen, and Yongping Zhang
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043315 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Eduardo Ibarra-García-Padilla, Sohail Dasgupta, Hao-Tian Wei, Shintaro Taie, Yoshiro Takahashi, Richard T. Scalettar, and Kaden R. A. Hazzard
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043316 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
The authors study thermodynamic properties of the SU() Fermi-Hubbard model in 2D square lattices and discover simple scaling laws of the energy, the number of on-site pairs, and the kinetic energy with respect to when the temperature is above the superexchange energy. The results establish a limit to the cooling for SU() fermions in 2D, in contrast to the arbitrarily low temperatures that could potentially be achieved in 1D.
Timo Eichmann and James R. Anglin
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043317 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Pedro Pessoa
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043318 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Zipeng Wang and Shina Tan
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043319 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Kuldeep Suthar, Pardeep Kaur, Sandeep Gautam, and Dilip Angom
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043320 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Roman Bause, Akira Kamijo, Xing-Yan Chen, Marcel Duda, Andreas Schindewolf, Immanuel Bloch, and Xin-Yu Luo
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043321 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Masaya Kunimi and Ippei Danshita
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043322 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Jonas Kitzinger, Xin Meng, Matteo Fadel, Valentin Ivannikov, Kae Nemoto, William J. Munro, and Tim Byrnes
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043323 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
J. N. Stehouwer, H. T. C. Stoof, J. Smits, and P. van der Straten
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043324 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Manuele Tettamanti and Alberto Parola
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043325 (2021) - Published 27 October, 2021
Chengdong Mi, Khan Sadiq Nawaz, Liangchao Chen, Pengjun Wang, Han Cai, Da-Wei Wang, Shi-Yao Zhu, and Jing Zhang
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043326 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Arthur Christianen, Gerrit C. Groenenboom, and Tijs Karman
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043327 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
Junsen Wang, Youjin Deng, and Wei Zheng
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043328 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
A. Muñoz de las Heras and I. Carusotto
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043501 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Verónica P. Simonsen, Dick Bedeaux, and Ingve Simonsen
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043502 (2021) - Published 4 October, 2021
Aleksi Leinonen, Kimmo Saastamoinen, Henri Pesonen, Gaofeng Wu, Taco D. Visser, Jari Turunen, and Ari T. Friberg
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043503 (2021) - Published 6 October, 2021
Davide D’Ambrosio, Xavier Zambrana-Puyalto, Marialuisa Capezzuto, Antonio Giorgini, Pietro Malara, Saverio Avino, and Gianluca Gagliardi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043504 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
N. Yu. Kuznetsov, K. S. Grigoriev, and V. A. Makarov
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043505 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Ya Tian, Cheng Gong, Xiangming Hu, and XiaoJun Liu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043506 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Jianxing Pan, Tianye Huang, Yutian Wang, Zhichao Wu, Jing Zhang, and Luming Zhao
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043507 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Yueqing Du, Qun Gao, Zhiwen He, Jingyi Li, Chao Zeng, Dong Mao, and Jianlin Zhao
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043508 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
A. M. Zheltikov
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043509 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Junpeng Hou, Zhitong Li, Qing Gu, and Chuanwei Zhang
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043510 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Jonathan M. Silver, Kenneth T. V. Grattan, and Pascal Del'Haye
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043511 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Xu Zheng and Baowen Li
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043512 (2021) - Published 12 October, 2021
Piyali Biswas, Suman Dey, and Somnath Ghosh
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043513 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Filippus S. Roux
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043514 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Alfredo Rates, Ad Lagendijk, Ozan Akdemir, Allard P. Mosk, and Willem L. Vos
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043515 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Vladimir N. Gladilin and Michiel Wouters
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043516 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
B. Olmos, C. Liedl, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Schneeweiss
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043517 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Stephen H. Simpson, Yoshihiko Arita, Kishan Dholakia, and Pavel Zemánek
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043518 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
J. J. Pigeon, D. Tovey, S. Ya. Tochitsky, G. J. Louwrens, I. Ben-Zvi, D. Martyshkin, V. Fedorov, K. Karki, S. Mirov, and C. Joshi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043519 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
P. Franke, D. Ramsey, T. T. Simpson, D. Turnbull, D. H. Froula, and J. P. Palastro
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043520 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Deng-Gao Lai, Wei Qin, Bang-Pin Hou, Adam Miranowicz, and Franco Nori
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043521 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
A. V. Mitrofanov, A. A. Voronin, M. M. Nazarov, M. V. Rozhko, P. A. Shcheglov, M. V. Chashchin, P. B. Glek, A. B. Fedotov, D. A. Sidorov-Biryukov, V. Ya. Panchenko, and A. M. Zheltikov
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043522 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Eduardo Bittencourt, Renato Klippert, Diego Renan da Silva, and Érico Goulart
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043523 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Fuxi Lu, Hao Wu, Yi Liang, Liu Tan, Zhifu Tan, Xu Feng, Yi Hu, Yinxiao Xiang, Xubo Hu, Zhigang Chen, and Jingjun Xu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043524 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
Yongkang Feng, Shaoxi Shi, Jinbin Li, Yajuan Ren, Xiao Zhang, Jianhong Chen, and Hongchuan Du
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043525 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Justin Widjaja, Erekle Kobakhidze, Tiernan R. Cartwright, Joshua P. Lourdesamy, Antoine F. J. Runge, Tristram J. Alexander, and C. Martijn de Sterke
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043526 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
J. Chathanathil, G. Liu, and S. A. Malinovskaya
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043701 (2021) - Published 5 October, 2021
Rui Asaoka, Yuuki Tokunaga, Rina Kanamoto, Hayato Goto, and Takao Aoki
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043702 (2021) - Published 7 October, 2021
Saumya Biswas and S. J. van Enk
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043703 (2021) - Published 11 October, 2021
Taking inspiration from the human eye, the authors propose using a five-level molecule to detect up to two photons of different frequency that arrive sequentially. They use two formalisms to develop this model: a density-matrix method to achieve analytical results and characterize the proposed detector, and a Hamiltonian method that they show is well suited for numerical calculations.
M. Donaire
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043704 (2021) - Published 15 October, 2021
Alan Kahan, Leonardo Ermann, and Cecilia Cormick
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043705 (2021) - Published 19 October, 2021
Wangjun Lu, Jie Chen, Le-Man Kuang, and Xiaoguang Wang
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043706 (2021) - Published 20 October, 2021
Kai-Hong Luo, Matteo Santandrea, Michael Stefszky, Jan Sperling, Marcello Massaro, Alessandro Ferreri, Polina R. Sharapova, Harald Herrmann, and Christine Silberhorn
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043707 (2021) - Published 21 October, 2021
Youjiang Xu, Diego Fallas Padilla, and Han Pu
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043708 (2021) - Published 22 October, 2021
Sheng-Wen Li (李圣文) and Li-Ping Yang (杨立平)
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043709 (2021) - Published 26 October, 2021
Ying Yang, Zhengwei Zuo, and Dawei Cao
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043710 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
Wenlei Zhang, Ravi K. Saripalli, Jacob M. Leamer, Ryan T. Glasser, and Denys I. Bondar
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043711 (2021) - Published 28 October, 2021
J. M. Betancourt, F. J. Rodríguez, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043712 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
Chanchal, G. P. Teja, Christoph Simon, and Sandeep K. Goyal
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043713 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
P. R. Berman and A. Kuzmich
Phys. Rev. A 104, 043714 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021
Sijia Gao, Fiona C. Speirits, Francesco Castellucci, Sonja Franke-Arnold, Stephen M. Barnett, and Jörg B. Götte
Phys. Rev. A 104, 049901 (2021) - Published 8 October, 2021
Ippei Danshita, Daisuke Yamamoto, and Yasuyuki Kato
Phys. Rev. A 104, 049902 (2021) - Published 13 October, 2021
Samuel J. Garratt, Christoph Eigen, Jinyi Zhang, Patrik Turzák, Raphael Lopes, Robert P. Smith, Zoran Hadzibabic, and Nir Navon
Phys. Rev. A 104, 049903 (2021) - Published 14 October, 2021
Eric A. Carlen, Markus Holzmann, Ian Jauslin, and Elliott H. Lieb
Phys. Rev. A 104, 049904 (2021) - Published 25 October, 2021
M. Mohebbi
Phys. Rev. A 104, 049905 (2021) - Published 29 October, 2021