Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Thermodynamic work capacity of quantum information processing

Himanshu Badhani1,2,*, Dhanuja G.S.1,3, and Siddhartha Das1,2,†

  • *Contact author: himanshubadhani@gmail.com
  • Contact author: das.seed@iiit.ac.in

APS Open Sci. 1, 000092 – Published 12 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xnzv-6975

Abstract

We introduce the resource-theoretic free energy of a quantum channel as the maximal work extractable from the channel as its output equilibrates to a thermal state and its reference system remains locally intact. It is proportional to the relative entropy between the given channel and the absolutely thermal channel. It attains a clear operational meaning as twice the asymptotic rates of athermality distillation and formation under Gibbs-preserving superchannels, which map one absolutely thermal channel to another for a given bath, thereby revealing the asymptotic reversibility of the resource theory of athermality for quantum channels. Consequently, we establish that the optimal extractable work in converting one channel to another through the asymptotic athermality distillation and formation tasks equals the difference in their free energies. We call this optimal work the thermodynamic work capacity of channel conversion. Quantum information processing and computing fundamentally concern the manipulation and transformation of quantum channels, which encompass quantum states, their transformations, and measurements. A quantitative characterization of the optimal thermodynamic work gain or expenditure in quantum information processing constitutes a key step toward formulating thermodynamics of quantum processes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information processing in small systems, Prog. Theor. Phys. 127, 1 (2012).
  2. A. Auffèves, Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initiative, PRX Quantum 3, 020101 (2022).
  3. P. P. Potts, Quantum thermodynamics, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 126 (2026).
  4. H. Badhani and S. Das, Conditional channel entropy sets fundamental limits on thermodynamic quantum information processing, arXiv:2604.01217.
  5. G. Gour, M. P. Müller, V. Narasimhachar, R. W. Spekkens, and N. Yunger Halpern, The resource theory of informational nonequilibrium in thermodynamics, Phys. Rep. 583, 1 (2015).
  6. R. Alicki and M. Horodecki, Information-thermodynamics link revisited, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 204001 (2019).
  7. N. Shiraishi and T. Sagawa, Quantum thermodynamics of correlated-catalytic state conversion at small scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 150502 (2021).
  8. U. Singh, S. Das, and N. J. Cerf, Partial order on passive states and Hoffman Majorization in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033091 (2021).
  9. H. Badhani, D. G. S, and S. Das, Thermodynamics of quantum processes: An operational framework for free energy and reversible athermality, arXiv:2510.12790.
  10. C. H. Bennett, Notes on Landauer's principle, reversible computation, and Maxwell's demon, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B 34, 501 (2003).
  11. G. Gour, Quantum Resource Theories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2025); arXiv:2402.05474.
  12. S. Das and U. Sen, Maximum entropy principle for quantum processes, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 59, 245309 (2026).
  13. K. Horodecki, M. Winczewski, L. Sikorski, P. Mazurek, M. Czechlewski, and R. Yehia, Quantification of the energy consumption of entanglement distribution, arXiv:2507.23108.
  14. G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Theoretical framework for quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022339 (2009).
  15. S. Das, Bipartite quantum interactions: Entangling and information processing abilities, arXiv:1901.05895.
  16. S. Das, S. Bäuml, M. Winczewski, and K. Horodecki, Universal limitations on quantum key distribution over a network, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041016 (2021).
  17. Sohail, V. Pandey, U. Singh, and S. Das, Fundamental limitations on the recoverability of quantum processes, Ann. Henri Poincaré 27, 933 (2026).
  18. S. Das, K. Goswami, and V. Pandey, Conditional entropy and information of quantum processes, arXiv:2410.01740.
  19. M. Navascués and L. P. García-Pintos, Nonthermal quantum channels as a thermodynamical resource, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 010405 (2015).
  20. P. Faist, M. Berta, and F. G. S. L. Brandao, Thermodynamic implementations of quantum processes, Commun. Math. Phys. 384, 1709 (2021).
  21. H. Badhani, D. G S, S. Choudhary, V. Anand, and S. Das, Erasure cost of a quantum process: A thermodynamic meaning of the dynamical min-entropy, Quantum Sci. Technol. 11, 015038 (2026); arXiv:2506.05307.
  22. J. Watrous, Notes on super-operator norms induced by Schatten norms, Quantum Inf. Comput. 5, 58 (2005).
  23. M. Berta, M. Christandl, and R. Renner, The quantum reverse Shannon theorem based on one-shot information theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 579 (2011).
  24. S. Das and M. M. Wilde, Quantum rebound capacity, Phys. Rev. A 100, 030302(R) (2019).
  25. K. Fang, O. Fawzi, R. Renner, and D. Sutter, Chain rule for the quantum relative entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100501 (2020).
  26. A. Lenard, Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 575 (1978).
  27. F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250404 (2013).
  28. S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynamics (Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA, 2019); arXiv:1907.01596.
  29. F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Horodecki, N. H. Y. Ng, J. Oppenheim, and S. Wehner, The second laws of quantum thermodynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3275 (2015).
  30. M. Esposito and C. Van den Broeck, Second law and Landauer principle far from equilibrium, Europhys. Lett. 95, 40004 (2011).
  31. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  32. G. Gour, Role of quantum coherence in thermodynamics, PRX Quantum 3, 040323 (2022).
  33. L. Lami, A solution of the generalized quantum Stein's lemma, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 71, 4454 (2025).
  34. D. E. Bruschi, M. Perarnau-Llobet, N. Friis, K. V. Hovhannisyan, and M. Huber, Thermodynamics of creating correlations: Limitations and optimal protocols, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032118 (2015).
  35. M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and A. Acín, Extractable work from correlations, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041011 (2015).
  36. M. N. Bera, A. Riera, M. Lewenstein, Z. B. Khanian, and A. Winter, Thermodynamics as a consequence of information conservation, Quantum 3, 121 (2019).
  37. I. Devetak, M. Junge, C. King, and M. B. Ruskai, Multiplicativity of completely bounded p-norms implies a new additivity result, Commun. Math. Phys. 266, 37 (2006).
  38. G. Gour and M. M. Wilde, Entropy of a quantum channel, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023096 (2021).
  39. A quantum channel is said to be square if its input and output dimensions are equal.
  40. T. Cooney, M. Mosonyi, and M. M. Wilde, Strong converse exponents for a quantum channel discrimination problem and quantum‐feedback‐assisted communication, Commun. Math. Phys. 344, 797 (2016).
  41. F. Leditzky, E. Kaur, N. Datta, and M. M. Wilde, Approaches for approximate additivity of the Holevo information of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012332 (2018).
  42. O. Fawzi, L. Gao, and M. Rahaman, Asymptotic equipartition theorems in von Neumann algebras, Ann. Henri Poincaré 27, 95 (2026).
  43. X. Wang and M. M. Wilde, Resource theory of asymmetric distinguishability for quantum channels, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033169 (2019).
  44. X. Yuan, P. Zeng, M. Gao, and Q. Zhao, One-shot dynamical resource theory, arXiv:2012.02781.
  45. F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 031001 (2024).
  46. S. Tirone, R. Salvia, S. Chessa, and V. Giovannetti, Quantum work extraction efficiency for noisy quantum batteries: The role of coherence, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012204 (2025).
  47. S. Chakraborty, S. Das, A. Ghorui, S. Hazra, and U. Singh, Sample complexity of black box work extraction, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 045070 (2025).
  48. D. Yang, K. Horodecki, and A. Winter, Distributed private randomness distillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 170501 (2019).
  49. N. Shiraishi and R. Takagi, Recovery of the second law in fully quantum thermodynamics, arXiv:2510.05642.
  50. M. Tomamichel, Quantum information processing with finite resources—Mathematical foundations, in Quantum Information Processing with Finite Resources: Mathematical Foundations, SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics Vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, 2016); arXiv:1504.00233.
  51. M. M. Wilde, A. Winter, and D. Yang, Strong converse for the classical capacity of entanglement-breaking and Hadamard channels via a sandwiched Rényi relative entropy, Commun. Math. Phys. 331, 593 (2014).
  52. N. Datta, Min- and max-relative entropies and a new entanglement monotone, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 2816 (2009).
  53. L. Wang and R. Renner, One-shot classical-quantum capacity and hypothesis testing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200501 (2012).
  54. M. Berta, L. Lami, and M. Tomamichel, Continuity of entropies via integral representations, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 71, 1896 (2025).
  55. K. Audenaert, B. Bergh, N. Datta, M. G. Jabbour, Á. Capel, and P. Gondolf, Continuity bounds for quantum entropies arising from a fundamental entropic inequality, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 71, 7029 (2025).
  56. M. M. Wilde, M. Berta, C. Hirche, and E. Kaur, Amortized channel divergence for asymptotic quantum channel discrimination, Lett. Math. Phys. 110, 2277 (2020).
  57. M. B. Ruskai, Inequalities for quantum entropy: A review with conditions for equality, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4358 (2002).
  58. Y. Luo, S. Milz, and F. C. Binder, Thermodynamic criteria for signaling in quantum channels Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043327 (2025).
  59. B. Schumacher, Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996).
  60. A. Abeyesinghe, I. Devetak, P. Hayden, and A. Winter, The mother of all protocols: Restructuring quantum information's family tree, Proc. R. Soc. A 465, 2537 (2009).
  61. I. Devetak and A. Winter, Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states, Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 207 (2005).
  62. E. Kaur, S. Das, M. M. Wilde, and A. Winter, Extendibility limits the performance of quantum processors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070502 (2019).
  63. S. Das, S. Khatri, G. Siopsis, and M. M. Wilde, Fundamental limits on quantum dynamics based on entropy change, J. Math. Phys. 59, 012205 (2018).
  64. B. Bergh, J. Kochanowski, R. Salzmann, and N. Datta, Infinite dimensional asymmetric quantum channel discrimination, arXiv:2308.12959.
  65. Y. Liu and X. Yuan, Operational resource theory of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012035(R) (2020).
  66. B. Regula and R. Takagi, One-shot manipulation of dynamical quantum resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060402 (2021).
  67. X. Yuan, Hypothesis testing and entropies of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. A 99, 032317 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation