Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Emergence of quantum Darwinism and pointer states for noncommuting evolutions

Diana A. Chisholm1,2,*, G. Massimo Palma1, and Luca Innocenti1

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica—Emilio Segrè, Università degli Studi di Palermo, via Archirafi 36, I-90123 Palermo, Italy
  • 2School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4, Ireland

  • *Contact author: diana.chisholm@ucd.ie

APS Open Sci. 1, 000024 – Published 22 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/75jr-ltct

Abstract

Quantum systems achieve objectivity by redundantly encoding information about themselves into the surrounding environment, through a mechanism known as quantum Darwinism. When this happens, observers measure the environment and infer the system to be in one of its pointer states. We study the emergence of objectivity whenever the Hamiltonian of the system and the interaction Hamiltonian between system and environment do not commute, a condition where it becomes difficult to identify pointer states, and the use of methods such as the predictability sieve becomes necessary. We show in an explicit qubit model to what degree the noncommuting evolution allows for the emergence of objective states, and show that a definition of pointer states based on spectrum broadcast structure is more natural in this context, and coincides with the one based on the predictability sieve for commuting evolutions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. H. Ollivier, D. Poulin, and W. H. Zurek, Objective properties from subjective quantum states: Environment as a witness, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 220401 (2004).
  2. W. H. Zurek, Quantum Darwinism, Nat. Phys. 5, 181 (2009).
  3. W. H. Zurek, Quantum theory of the classical: Einselection, envariance, quantum Darwinism and extantons, Entropy 24, 1520 (2022).
  4. R. Horodecki, J. K. Korbicz, and P. Horodecki, Quantum origins of objectivity, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032122 (2015).
  5. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  6. J. K. Korbicz, Roads to objectivity: Quantum Darwinism, Spectrum Broadcast Structures, and Strong quantum Darwinism—A review, Quantum 5, 571 (2021).
  7. T. P. Le and A. Olaya-Castro, Strong quantum Darwinism and strong independence are equivalent to spectrum broadcast structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010403 (2019).
  8. J. Preskill, Quantum Shannon theory, arXiv:1604.07450.
  9. N. Megier, A. Smirne, S. Campbell, and B. Vacchini, Correlations, information backflow, and objectivity in a class of pure dephasing models, Entropy 24, 304 (2022).
  10. N. Mirkin and D. A. Wisniacki, Many-body localization and the emergence of quantum Darwinism, Entropy 23, 1377 (2021).
  11. X.-K. Guo and Z. Huang, On the relation between quantum Darwinism and approximate quantum Markovianity, Phys. Lett. A 491, 129204 (2023).
  12. S. Engineer, T. Rivlin, S. Wollmann, M. Malik, and M. P. Lock, Equilibration of objective observables in a dynamical model of quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A 113, 032205 (2026).
  13. M. A. Ciampini, G. Pinna, P. Mataloni, and M. Paternostro, Experimental signature of quantum Darwinism in photonic cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 98, 020101(R) (2018).
  14. M.-C. Chen, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, D. Wu, X.-L. Wang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Emergence of classical objectivity of quantum Darwinism in a photonic quantum simulator, Sci. Bull. 64, 580 (2019).
  15. T. K. Unden, D. Louzon, M. Zwolak, W. H. Zurek, and F. Jelezko, Revealing the emergence of classicality using nitrogen-vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140402 (2019).
  16. Z. Zhu, K. Salice, A. Touil, Z. Bao, Z. Song, P. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song, Q. Guo, H. Wang, and R. Mondaini, Observation of quantum Darwinism and the origin of classicality with superconducting circuits, Sci. Adv. 11, eadx6857 (2025).
  17. D. A. Chisholm, G. García-Pérez, M. A. C. Rossi, S. Maniscalco, and G. M. Palma, Witnessing objectivity on a quantum computer, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 015022 (2022).
  18. W. H. Zurek, Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse? Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 (1981).
  19. W. H. Zurek, Environment-induced superselection rules, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862 (1982).
  20. J. K. Korbicz, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Objectivity in a noisy photonic environment through quantum state information broadcasting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120402 (2014).
  21. M. Kiciński and J. K. Korbicz, Decoherence and objectivity in higher spin environments, Phys. Rev. A 104, 042216 (2021).
  22. T.-H. Lee and J. K. Korbicz, Encoding position by spins: Objectivity in the boson-spin model, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052204 (2024).
  23. S. Campbell, B. Çakmak, O. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, M. Paternostro, and B. Vacchini, Collisional unfolding of quantum Darwinism, Phys. Rev. A 99, 042103 (2019).
  24. S. Lorenzo, M. Paternostro, and G. M. Palma, Anti-Zeno-based dynamical control of the unfolding of quantum Darwinism, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013164 (2020).
  25. G. García-Pérez, D. A. Chisholm, M. A. C. Rossi, G. M. Palma, and S. Maniscalco, Decoherence without entanglement and quantum Darwinism, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012061(R) (2020).
  26. D. A. Chisholm, G. García-Pérez, M. A. C. Rossi, G. M. Palma, and S. Maniscalco, Stochastic collision model approach to transport phenomena in quantum networks, New J. Phys. 23, 033031 (2021).
  27. A. S. Holevo, Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel, Probl. Peredachi Inf. 9, 3 (1973).
  28. R. Blume-Kohout and W. H. Zurek, Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062310 (2006).
  29. C. J. Riedel, W. H. Zurek, and M. Zwolak, The rise and fall of redundancy in decoherence and quantum Darwinism, New J. Phys. 14, 083010 (2012).
  30. D. A. Chisholm, L. Innocenti, and G. M. Palma, The meaning of redundancy and consensus in quantum objectivity, Quantum 7, 1074 (2023).
  31. D. A. Chisholm, L. Innocenti, and G. M. Palma, Importance of using the averaged mutual information when quantifying quantum objectivity, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012218 (2024).
  32. E. Ryan, E. Carolan, S. Campbell, and M. Paternostro, Commutativity and the emergence of classical objectivity, J. Phys. Commun. 6, 095005 (2022).
  33. P. Duruisseau, A. Touil, and S. Deffner, Pointer states and quantum Darwinism with two-body interactions, Entropy 25, 1573 (2023).
  34. E. Doucet and S. Deffner, Classifying two-body Hamiltonians for quantum Darwinism, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041064 (2024).
  35. C. A. Brasil and L. A. de Castro, Understanding the pointer states, Eur. J. Phys. 36, 065024 (2015).
  36. W. H. Zurek, S. Habib, and J. P. Paz, Coherent states via decoherence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1187 (1993).
  37. F. M. Cucchietti, J. P. Paz, and W. H. Zurek, Decoherence from spin environments, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052113 (2005).
  38. U. Singh, A. Sawicki, and J. K. Korbicz, Pointer states in the Born-Markov approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 030203 (2024).
  39. D. A. R. Dalvit, J. Dziarmaga, and W. H. Zurek, Unconditional pointer states from conditional master equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 373 (2001).
  40. P. Mironowicz, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Non-perfect propagation of information to a noisy environment with self-evolution, Entropy 24, 467 (2022).
  41. D. A. Chisholm, Code for “Emergence of objectivity and pointer states in quantum Darwinism for noncommutative evolution” (v1.0.0), Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20041720.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation