Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonrelativistic hybrid geometries with gravitational gauge-fixing terms

Sinya Aoki1, Janos Balog2, Shuichi Yokoyama1, and Kentaroh Yoshida3

  • 1Center for Gravitational Physics, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
  • 2Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, MTA Lendület Holographic QFT Group, 1525 Budapest 114, P.O. Box 49, Hungary
  • 3Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013169 – Published 19 February, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013169

Abstract

We search a gravitational system that allows a nonrelativistic hybrid geometry interpolating the Schrödinger and Lifshitz spacetimes as a solution. As such a candidate an Einstein-Maxwell-Higgs system naturally arises and we verify that this system indeed supports the hybrid geometry with the help of a gauge-fixing term for diffeomorphism. As a result, this gravitational system may be interpreted as a holographic dual of a general nonrelativistic system at the boundary.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. G. 't Hooft, Conf. Proc. C930308, 284 (1993).
  2. L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995).
  3. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  4. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  5. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  6. D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. D 78, 046003 (2008).
  7. K. Balasubramanian and J. McGreevy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 061601 (2008).
  8. C. Duval, M. Hassaine, and P. A. Horvathy, Ann. Phys. 324, 1158 (2009).
  9. S. Kachru, X. Liu, and M. Mulligan, Phys. Rev. D 78, 106005 (2008).
  10. M. Taylor, arXiv:0812.0530.
  11. T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz, and E. J. Martinec, arXiv:hep-th/9808016.
  12. S. Aoki, K. Kikuchi, and T. Onogi, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 101B01 (2015).
  13. S. Aoki, J. Balog, T. Onogi, and P. Weisz, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 083B04 (2016).
  14. S. Aoki, J. Balog, T. Onogi, and P. Weisz, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 043B01 (2017).
  15. S. Aoki and S. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2018, 031B01 (2018).
  16. M. Albanese et al. (APE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 192, 163 (1987).
  17. R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2006) 064.
  18. S. Aoki and S. Yokoyama, Nucl. Phys. B 933, 262 (2018).
  19. S. Aoki, J. Balog, and S. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 043 (2019).
  20. S. Aoki, S. Yokoyama, and K. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 99, 126002 (2019).
  21. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011).
  22. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, arXiv:1810.05338.
  23. K. Balasubramanian and J. McGreevy, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2011) 137.
  24. J. McGreevy, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2010, 723105 (2010).
  25. G. T. Horowitz, Lect. Notes Phys. 828, 313 (2011).
  26. N. Iqbal, H. Liu, and M. Mezei, in Proceedings of the TASI 2010, String Theory and Its Applications (World Scientific, Singapore, 2011), pp. 707–815.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation