- Open Access
Attitudinal gains across multiple universities using the Physics and Everyday Thinking curriculum
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 020104 – Published 16 October, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020104
Abstract
Instructional techniques based on research in cognitive science and physics education have been used in physics courses to enhance student learning. While dramatic increases in conceptual understanding have been observed, students enrolled in these courses tend to move away from scientistlike views of the discipline and toward novicelike views, as measured by various assessment instruments. It has been proposed that course materials and instruction that explicitly address epistemology, the nature of science, and the nature of learning science will help students develop views more closely aligned with the views of scientists. The Physics and Everyday Thinking (PET) curriculum has specific goals for helping nonscience majors explicitly reflect on the nature of science and the nature of learning science. We show that in PET courses with small and large enrollments, shifts toward expert responses ranged from to on the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. These results are compared to results from other studies using a variety of similar assessment instruments.
Article Text
References (22)
- NRC, National Science Education Standards (National Academy, Washington, DC, 1996).
- AAAS, Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).
- L. C. McDermott, Physics by Inquiry (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vols. I and III.
- American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), Powerful Ideas in Physical Science (AAPT, College Park, MD, 1995).
- D. P. Jackson and P. W. Laws, Workshop Physical Science: Project-based science education for future teachers, parents, and citizens, in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities, Proceedings of the ICUPE, edited by E. F. Redish and J. S. Rigden (AIP, College Park, MD, 1997), pp. 623–630.
- Z. Hrepic, P. Adams, J. Zeller, N. Talbott, G. Taggart, and L. Young, in Physics Education Research-2005, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 818, edited by P. Heron, L. McCollough, and J. Marx (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 2006), pp. 121–124.
- F. Goldberg, S. Robinson, and V. Otero, Physics for Elementary Teachers (It’s About Time, Armonk, NY, 2006).
- F. Goldberg, S. Robinson, R. Kruse, N. Thompson, and V. Otero, Physical Science and Everyday Thinking (It’s About Time, Armonk, NY, in press).
- L. C. McDermott, Milliken Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap, Am. J. Phys. 59, 301 (1991).
- M. Jenness and P. Miller, PET External Evaluation: An Analysis of Pre/Post Content Test Scores (Mallinson Institute for Science Education, Western Michigan, 2005).
- F. Abd-El-Khalick, Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but…, J. Sci. Teach. Educ. 12, 215 (2001).
- V. Ackerson, F. Abd-El-Khalick, and N. Lederman, Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 37, 295 (2000).
- A. Elby, Helping physics students learn how to learn, Am. J. Phys. 69, S54 (2001).
- A. Elby, J. Fredriksen, C. Schwarz, and B. White, Epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science, http://www2.physics.umd.edu/~elby/EBAPS/EBAPS_items.htm
- E. Redish, J. Saul, and R. Steinberg, Student expectations in introductory physics, Am. J. Phys. 66, 212 (1998).
- W. Adams, K. Perkins, N. Podolefsky, M. Dubson, N. Finkelstein, and C. Wieman, New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010101 (2006).
- R. Thornton and D. Sokoloff, Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motional Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula, Am. J. Phys. 66, 338 (1998).
- S. Pollock, Transferring transformations: Learning gains, student attitudes, and the impacts of multiple instructors in large lecture classes, in Physics Education Research-2005, edited by P. Heron, L. McCollough, and J. Marx, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 818 (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 2006), pp. 141–144. New data up to 2007 have been included obtained through personal communication.
- N. Sanjay Rebello and Charles B. Mamolo, presented at the American Association of Physics Teachers, Greensboro, NC, 2007 (unpublished).
- R. Allain and R. Kruse (unpublished).
- K. Perkins, W. Adams, S. Pollock, N. Finkelstein, and C. Wieman, Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey, in Physics Education Research-2004, edited by J. Marx, P. Heron, and S. Franklin, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 790 (American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, 2005), pp. 61–64.
- L. Hsu, K. Cummings, and J. Taylor, Assessing adaptations of Physics by Inquiry: Students' attitudes, presented at the Bi-Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers, Greensboro, NC, 2007 (unpublished).
