- Open Access
Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010108 – Published 1 May, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108
Abstract
Conventional physics laboratory courses generally include an emphasis on increasing students’ ability to carry out data analysis according to scientific practice, in particular, those aspects that relate to measurement uncertainty. This study evaluates the efficacy of the conventional approach by analyzing the understanding of measurement of freshmen following the physics major sequence, i.e., top achievers, with regard to data collection, data processing, and data comparison, through pre- and postinstruction tests by using an established instrument. The findings show that the laboratory course improved the performance of the majority of students insofar as the more mechanical aspects of data collection and data processing were concerned. However, only about 20% of the cohort of physics majors exhibited a deeper understanding of measurement uncertainty required for data comparison.
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (31)
- F. Tyler, A Laboratory Manual of Physics, 6th ed. (Arnold, London, 1988).
- J. R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, 2nd ed. (University Science Books, New York, 1997).
- M.-G. Séré, R. Journeaux, and C. Larcher, Learning the statistical analysis of measurement error, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 15, 427 (1993).
- J. Garatt, A. Horn, and J. Tomlinson, Misconceptions about error, Chemistry Education Research and Practice 4, 54 (2000).
- R. Lippmann, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2003.
- D. Deardorff, Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, 2001.
- D. Abbott, Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, 2003.
- D. Evangelinos, E. Psillos, and O. Valassiades, in Teaching and Learning in the Science Laboratory, edited by D. Psillos and H. Niederrer (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 179–190.
- American Association of Physics Teachers, Goals of the introductory physics laboratory, Am. J. Phys. 66, 483 (1998).
- Particularly in surveys of scientific literacy through the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) as in OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills (OECD, Paris, 2003).
- M. Lemke and P. Gonzales, U.S. Student and Adult Performance on International Assessments of Educational Achievement: Findings from The Condition of Education 2006 (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2006).
- J. Osborne, S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, and R. Duschl, What ‘ideas-about-evidence’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 692 (2003).
- S. Allie, A. Buffler, L. Kaunda, B. Campbell, and F. Lubben, First-year physics students’ perceptions of the quality of experimental measurements, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 20, 447 (1998).
- A. Buffler, S. Allie, F. Lubben, and B. Campbell, The development of first year physics students’ ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23, 1137 (2001).
- F. Lubben, A. Buffler, S. Allie, and B. Campbell, Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entrant university freshmen, Sci. Educ. 85, 311 (2001).
- S. Allie and A. Buffler, A course in tools and procedures for Physics I, Am. J. Phys. 66, 613 (1998).
- As replicated in E. Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003).
- H. Motulsky, Intuitive Biostatistics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
- F. Marton and R. Säljö, On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process, Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 46, 4 (1976); On qualitative differences in learning: 2. Outcome as a function of learners’ conception of task, 46, 115 (1976).
- R. E. Scherr, Modeling student thinking: An example from special relativity, Am. J. Phys. 75, 272 (2007).
- R. L. Kung, Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course, Am. J. Phys. 73, 771 (2005).
- E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, D. T. Brookes, and D. Mills, Role of experiments in physics instruction—a process approach, Phys. Teach. 40, 351 (2002).
- E. Etkina, S. Murthy, and X. Zou, Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design, Am. J. Phys. 74, 979 (2006).
- B. Ibrahim, M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town, 2006.
- M.-G. Séré, F. Fernandez-Gonzalez, J. Gallegos, F. Gonzales-Garcia, E. De Manuel, J. Perales, and J. Leach, Images of science linked to labwork: A survey of secondary school and university students, Res. Sci. Educ. 31, 499 (2001).
- S. Allie, A. Buffler, B. Campbell, F. Lubben, D. Evangelinos, D. Psillos, and O. Valassiades, Teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory, Phys. Teach. 41, 394 (2003).
- International Organization for Standardization, International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM) (ISO, Geneva, 1996).
- International Organization for Standardization, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) (ISO, Geneva, 1995).
- L. Kirkup, A guide to GUM, Eur. J. Phys. 23, 483 (2002).
- A. Buffler, S. Allie, and F. Lubben, Teaching Measurement and Uncertainty the GUM Way, Phys. Teach. (to be published).
- S. Pillay, A. Buffler, F. Lubben, and S. Allie, Effectiveness of a GUM-Compliant Course for Teaching Measurement in the Introductory Physics Laboratory, Eur J. Phys. (to be published).
