Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measuring student learning with item response theory

Young-Jin Lee, David J. Palazzo, Rasil Warnakulasooriya, and David E. Pritchard

  • Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 010102 – Published 31 January, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010102

Abstract

We investigate short-term learning from hints and feedback in a Web-based physics tutoring system. Both the skill of students and the difficulty and discrimination of items were determined by applying item response theory (IRT) to the first answers of students who are working on for-credit homework items in an introductory Newtonian physics course. We show that after tutoring a shifted logistic item response function with lower discrimination fits the students’ second responses to an item previously answered incorrectly. Student skill decreased by 1.0 standard deviation when students used no tutoring between their (incorrect) first and second attempts, which we attribute to “item-wrong bias.” On average, using hints or feedback increased students’ skill by 0.8 standard deviation. A skill increase of 1.9 standard deviation was observed when hints were requested after viewing, but prior to attempting to answer, a particular item. The skill changes measured in this way will enable the use of IRT to assess students based on their second attempt in a tutoring environment.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (13)

  1. A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman, Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics, in Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, edited by L. B. Resnick (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990), p. 453.
  2. http://www.masteringphysics.com/ was made by Effective Educational Technologies, a company started by the family of one of the authors (D.E.P.). It has been purchased by Pearson Education.
  3. N. Chudowsky, R. Glaser, and J. W. Pellegrino, Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2001).
  4. F. B. Baker and S.-H. Kim, Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004).
  5. R. K. Hambleton and H. Swaminathan, Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications (Kluwer Nijhoff, Boston, 1985).
  6. F. M. Lord, Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1980).
  7. Computer code BILOG-MG (Version 3.0) (Assessment Systems Corporation; St. Paul, MN, 2003).
  8. S. Kim, F. B. Baker, and M. J. Subkoviak, The 1kn rules in the minimum logit chi-square estimation procedure when small samples are used, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 42, 113 (1989).
  9. We also examined if subtasks were more beneficial than hints, considering the fact that subtasks provide much more specific information than hints, but found no statistical evidence.

  10. This “hints first” route was followed in 11.0% of all cases, and the median, mode, and maximum use of this route by students were 8.6%, 0.01%, and 71%, respectively.

  11. E.-S. Morote and D. E. Pritchard, Technology closes the gap between students' individual skills and background difference, in Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education: International Conference, Atlanta, GA edited by C. Crowford, D. A. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, and R. Weber (AACE, Chesapeake, VA, 2004), p. 826.
  12. R. Warnakulasooriya and D. E. Pritchard, Time to completion reveals problem-solving transfer, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, CA, edited by J. Max, P. Heron, and S. Franklin (AIP, Melville, NY, 2004), p. 205.
  13. R. Warnakulasooriya, D. J. Palazzo, and D. E. Pritchard, Evidence of problem-solving transfer in web-based Socratic tutor, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, edited by P. Heron, L. McCullough, and J. Max (AIP, Melville, NY, 2005), p. 41.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation