- Open Access
Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 020106 – Published 19 October, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020106
Abstract
National studies of science education have unanimously concluded that preparing our students for the demands of the 21st century workplace is one of the major goals. This paper describes a study of student activities in introductory college physics labs, which were designed to help students acquire abilities that are valuable in the workplace. In these labs [called Investigative Science Learning Environment (ISLE) labs], students design their own experiments. Our previous studies have shown that students in these labs acquire scientific abilities such as the ability to design an experiment to solve a problem, the ability to collect and analyze data, the ability to evaluate assumptions and uncertainties, and the ability to communicate. These studies mostly concentrated on analyzing students’ writing, evaluated by specially designed scientific ability rubrics. Recently, we started to study whether the ISLE labs make students not only write like scientists but also engage in discussions and act like scientists while doing the labs. For example, do students plan an experiment, validate assumptions, evaluate results, and revise the experiment if necessary? A brief report of some of our findings that came from monitoring students’ activity during ISLE and nondesign labs was presented in the Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. We found differences in student behavior and discussions that indicated that ISLE labs do in fact encourage a scientistlike approach to experimental design and promote high-quality discussions. This paper presents a full description of the study.
Article Text
References (27)
- R. W. Bybee and B. Fuchs, “Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education,” J. Res. Sci. Teach. 43, 349 (2006).
- P. Chin, H. Munby, N. L. Hutchinson, J. Taylor, and F. Clark, in Reconsidering Science Learning, edited by E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, A. Whitelegg, and E. Whitelegg (Routledge Falmer, London, 2004), p. 118.
- M. Coles, in Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium of IOSTE, edited by K. Colhoun, R. Panwar, and S. Shrum (University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, 1997), Vol. 1, p. 292.
- R. Gott, S. Duggan, and P. Johnson, “What do practicing applied scientists do and what are the implications for science education?,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 17, 97 (1999).
- E. Lottero-Perdue and N. W. Brickhouse, “Learning on the job: The acquisition of scientific competence,” Sci. Educ. 86, 756 (2002).
- S. Duggan and R. Gott, “What sort of science education do we really need?,” Int. J. Sci. Educ. 24, 661 (2002).
- Improving Undergraduate Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Report of a Workshop, edited by R. A. McCray, R. L. DeHaan, and J. A. Schuck (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003), http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309089298/html
- Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Phase II, Committee on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2005), http://nap.edu/catolog/11338.html
- National Research Council,National Science Education Standards (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).
- Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K–8, edited by R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, and A. W. Shouse (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2007).
- R. Czujko, in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities, edited by E. F. Redish and J. S. Rigden, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 399 (AIP, Woodbury, NY, 1997), p. 213.
- J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999).
- E. Etkina and A. Van Heuvelen, Investigative Science Learning Environment: Using the processes of science and cognitive strategies to learn physics, in Proceedings of the 2001 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by S. Franklin, J. Marx, and K. Cummings, (Rochester, NY, 2001), p. 17.
- E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, S. White-Brahmia, D. Brookes, M. Gentile, S. Murthy, D. Rosengrant, and A. Warren, “Scientific abilities and their assessment,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 020103 (2006).
- A. Lawson, “What Does Galileo’s Discovery of Jupiter’s Moons Tell Us About the Process of Scientific Discovery?,” Sci. Educ. 11, 1 (2002).
- E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997).
- P. Heller and M. Hollabaugh, “Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 637 (1992).
- E. Etkina, S. Murthy, and X. Zou, “Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design,” Am. J. Phys. 74, 979 (2006).
- S. Murthy and E. Etkina, in Physics Education Research Conference, edited by J. Marx and S. Franklin, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 790 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2004), p. 133.
- A complete set of rubrics is available at http://paer.rutgers.edu/scientificabilities
- E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, D. Brookes, S. Murthy, A. Karelina, and M. Villasenor, in Proceedings of a National STEM Assessment Conference, Washington, DC, October 19–21, 2006, edited by Donald G. Deeds and Bruce W. Callen, National Science Foundation and Drury University, 2008.
- V. Otero, The process of learning about static electricity and the role of the computer simulator, Ph.D. Thesis (San Diego University, 2001), http://education.colorado.edu/faculty/oterov/Otero_Dissertation.htm
- P. Adey and M. Shayer, An Exploration of Long-Term Far-Transfer Effects Following an Extended Intervention Program in the High School Science Curriculum, Cognition and instruction 11, 1 (1993).
- A. F. Artzt and E. Armour-Thomas, Development of a Cognitive-Metacognitive Framework for Protocol Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving in Small Groups, Cognition and instruction 9, 137 (1992).
- R. Lippmann and the Physics Education Research Group, Analyzing students’ use of metacognition during laboratory activities, in AREA Meeting (New Orleans, 2002), available at http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/papers/lippmann/meta_lab.pdf
- R. Lippman Kung, A. Danielson, and C. Linder, Metacognition in the students laboratory: Is increased metacognition necessarily better, in EARLI symposium (2005), available at http://www.anst.uu.se/rekun676/meta.pdf
- A. Karelina and E. Etkina, in Physics Education Research Conference, edited by Laura McCullough, Leon Hsu and Paula Heron. AIP Conf. Proc. No. 883 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2007), p. 93.
