Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Crystal growth and magnetic properties of spin-1/2 distorted triangular lattice antiferromagnet CuLa2Ge2O8

S. Thamban1,2,*, C. Aguilar-Maldonado2, S. Chillal2, R. Feyerherm2, K. Prokeš2, A. J. Studer3, D. Abou-Ras2, K. Karmakar2, A. T. M. N. Islam2 et al.

B. Lake1,2,†

  • *Contact author: sreejith.thamban@helmholtz-berlin.de
  • Contact author: bella.lake@helmholtz-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. Materials 10, 054403 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8zkd-78q3

Abstract

CuLa2Ge2O8 forms a distorted triangular lattice of quantum spin-1/2 Cu2+ ions. A crystal growth method was developed using the traveling-solvent floating zone technique, resulting in the synthesis of a large single crystal (4mm×4mm×10 mm). The crystal was characterized with regard to phase purity and crystallinity using powder x-ray diffraction, energy dispersive x-ray analysis, and Laue diffraction, and found to be of excellent quality. The magnetic properties were characterized using dc-susceptibility, magnetization, and heat capacity measurements, which revealed weak magnetic frustration with long-range magnetic order occurring below TN=1.14(1) K. The magnetic structure determined using neutron powder diffraction is a commensurate, noncollinear antiferromagnetic structure, different from the 120 order of an equilateral triangular antiferromagnet. The ordered moments lie in the bc-plane, with components mb=0.50(3) µB and mc=0.73(5) µB along the b- and c-axes respectively, giving a total ordered moment of Mtotal=0.89(6)µB/Cu2+ at 20 mK.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  2. S. Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nat. Phys. 4, 173 (2008).
  3. M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical frustration in the ferromagnetic pyrochlore Ho2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997).
  4. J. Khatua, M. Gomilšek, J. Orain, A. Strydom, Z. Jagličić, C. Colin, S. Petit, A. Ozarowski, L. Mangin-Thro, K. Sethupathi, et al., Signature of a randomness-driven spin-liquid state in a frustrated magnet, Commun. Phys. 5, 99 (2022).
  5. C. Balz, B. Lake, J. Reuther, H. Luetkens, R. Schönemann, T. Herrmannsdörfer, Y. Singh, A. Nazmul Islam, E. M. Wheeler, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, et al., Physical realization of a quantum spin liquid based on a complex frustration mechanism, Nat. Phys. 12, 942 (2016).
  6. R. Zhong, S. Guo, G. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. J. Cava, Strong quantum fluctuations in a quantum spin liquid candidate with a Co-based triangular lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14505 (2019).
  7. R. Sibille, N. Gauthier, H. Yan, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, B. Winn, U. Filges, G. Balakrishnan, M. Kenzelmann, N. Shannon, and T. Fennell, Experimental signatures of emergent quantum electrodynamics in Pr2Hf2O7, Nat. Phys. 14, 711 (2018).
  8. Y. Shirata, H. Tanaka, A. Matsuo, and K. Kindo, Experimental realization of a spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057205 (2012).
  9. J. A. Paddison, M. Daum, Z. Dun, G. Ehlers, Y. Liu, M. B. Stone, H. Zhou, and M. Mourigal, Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4, Nat. Phys. 13, 117 (2017).
  10. M. Collins and O. Petrenko, Review/synthèse: Triangular antiferromagnets, Can. J. Phys. 75, 605 (1997).
  11. J. S. Gardner, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. E. Greedan, Magnetic pyrochlore oxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010).
  12. I. Syôzi, Statistics of kagomé lattice, Prog. Theor. Phys. 6, 306 (1951).
  13. E. M. Wheeler, R. Coldea, E. Wawrzyńska, T. Sörgel, M. Jansen, M. M. Koza, J. Taylor, P. Adroguer, and N. Shannon, Spin dynamics of the frustrated easy-axis triangular antiferromagnet 2HAgNiO2 explored by inelastic neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104421 (2009).
  14. A. V. Chubukov and T. Jolicoeur, Order-from-disorder phenomena in Heisenberg antiferromagnets on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11137 (1992).
  15. H. Cho, M. Kratochvílová, H. Sim, K.-Y. Choi, C. H. Kim, C. Paulsen, M. Avdeev, D. C. Peets, Y. Jo, S. Lee, Y. Noda, M. J. Lawler, and J.-G. Park, Properties of spin-12 triangular-lattice antiferromagnets CuY2Ge2O8 and CuLa2Ge2O8, Phys. Rev. B 95, 144404 (2017).
  16. R. Triboulet, Crystal growth by traveling heater method, in Handbook of Crystal Growth (Elsevier, North-Holland, 2015), pp. 459–504.
  17. G. Wolff and A. Mlavsky, Crystal Growth, Theory and Techniques Vol. 1, edited by C. H. L. Goodman (Springer, Berlin, 1974).
  18. P. Rudolph, Handbook of Crystal Growth: Bulk Crystal Growth (Elsevier, North-Holland, 2014).
  19. S. Koohpayeh, Single crystal growth by the traveling solvent technique: A review, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 62, 22 (2016).
  20. Z. Qiao, J. Liang, and G. Rao, Beijing Keji Daxue Xuebao, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 13, 154 (1991).
  21. K. Oka and H. Unoki, Phase diagram of the La2O3-CuO system and crystal growth of (LaBa)2CuO4, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26, L1590 (1987).
  22. E. I. Speranskaya, The CuO-GeO2 and Cu2OGeO2 systems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Neorg. Mater. 3 (1967).
  23. I. Bondar, Physicochemical analysis of oxide system exemplified by a new class of compounds – Rare earth germanates, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Neorg. Mater. 15 (1979).
  24. A. J. Studer, M. E. Hagen, and T. J. Noakes, Wombat: The high-intensity powder diffractometer at the OPAL reactor, Physica B 385-386, 1013 (2006).
  25. J. Campá, E. Gutiérrez-Puebla, M. Monge, C. R. Valero, J. Mira, J. Rivas, C. Cascales, and I. Rasines, CuNd2Ge2O8: Crystal growth, crystal structure, and magnetic and spectroscopic properties, J. Solid State Chem. 120, 254 (1995).
  26. H. Cho, M. Kratochvílová, N. Lee, H. Sim, and J.-G. Park, Frustrated antiferromagnetic honeycomb-tunnel-like lattice CuR2Ge2O8 (R = Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu), Phys. Rev. B 96, 224427 (2017).
  27. J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B 192, 55 (1993).
  28. R. Nath, K. M. Ranjith, J. Sichelschmidt, M. Baenitz, Y. Skourski, F. Alet, I. Rousochatzakis, and A. A. Tsirlin, Hindered magnetic order from mixed dimensionalities in CuP2O6, Phys. Rev. B 89, 014407 (2014).
  29. Y. C. Arango, E. Vavilova, M. Abdel-Hafiez, O. Janson, A. A. Tsirlin, H. Rosner, S.-L. Drechsler, M. Weil, G. Nénert, R. Klingeler, O. Volkova, A. Vasiliev, V. Kataev, and B. Büchner, Magnetic properties of the low-dimensional spin-12 magnet αCu2As2O7, Phys. Rev. B 84, 134430 (2011).
  30. S. Guchhait, S. Baby, M. Padmanabhan, A. Medhi, and R. Nath, Quasi-two-dimensional magnetism in spin-12 square lattice compound Cu[C6H2(COO)4][H3N-(CH2)2NH3]3H2O, Europhys. Lett. 133, 57006 (2021).
  31. J. B. Parkinson and D. J. Farnell, An Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010), Vol. 816.
  32. J. C. Bonner and M. E. Fisher, Linear magnetic chains with anisotropic coupling, Phys. Rev. 135, A640 (1964).
  33. S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press (OUP), Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, United Kingdom, 2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation