- Access by Xinjiang University
Size Effects in Carbon Nanotubes
Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1869 – Published 31 August, 1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1869
Abstract
The intershell spacing of multi-walled carbon nanotubes was determined by analyzing the high resolution transmission electron microscopy images of these nanotubes. For the nanotubes that were studied, the intershell spacing is found to range from 0.34 to 0.39 nm, increasing with decreasing tube diameter. A model based on the results from real space image analysis is used to explain the variation in intershell spacings obtained from reciprocal space periodicity analysis. The increase in intershell spacing with decreased nanotube diameter is attributed to the high curvature, resulting in an increased repulsive force, associated with the decreased diameter of the nanotube shells.
References (35)
- S. Iijima, Nature (London) 354, 56 (1991).
- S. Iijima and T. Ichihashi, Nature (London) 363, 603 (1993).
- D. S. Bethune et al., Nature (London) 363, 605 (1993).
- M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and R. Saito, Carbon 33, 883 (1995).
- J. W. Mintmire and C. White, Carbon 33, 893 (1995).
- T. W. Ebbesen and P. M. Ajayan, Nature (London) 358, 220 (1992).
- M. Endo and H. W. Kroto, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6941 (1992).
- N. G. Chopra et al., Nature (London) 377, 135 (1995).
- P. M. Ajayan and S. Iijima, Nature (London) 361, 333 (1993).
- A. G. Rinzler et al., Science 269, 1550 (1995).
- R. S. Ruoff and D. C. Lorents, Carbon 33, 925 (1995).
- M. W. Maddox and K. E. Gubbins, Langmuir 11, 3988 (1995).
- A. C. Dillon et al., Nature (London) 386, 377 (1997).
- W. A. de Heer, A. Châtelain, and D. Ugarte, Science 270, 1179 (1995).
- L. Chico et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 971 (1996).
- M. Menon and D. Srivastava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4453 (1997).
- T. W. Odom, J.-L. Huang, P. Kim, and C. M. Lieber, Nature (London) 391, 62 (1998).
- J. W. G. Wildoer et al., Nature (London) 391, 59 (1998).
- N. Hamada, S. Sawada, and A. Oshiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1579 (1992).
- M. R. Pederson and J. Q. Broughton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2689 (1992).
- K. Akagi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2307 (1995).
- Y. Saito et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 1907 (1993).
- M. Ge and K. Sattler, Science 260, 515 (1993).
- X. F. Zhang et al., J. Cryst. Growth 130, 368 (1993).
- High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy and Associated Techniques, P. R. Buseck, J. M. Cowley, and L. Eyring (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).
- C.-H. Kiang et al., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 6612 (1994).
- M. Bretz, B. G. Demczyk, and L. Zhang, J. Cryst. Growth 141, 304 (1994).
- X. Sun et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, R12 629 (1996).
- J. M. Cowley and S. D. Packard, Ultramicroscopy 63, 39 (1996).
- C.-H. Kiang and W. A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2515 (1996).
- M. Liu and J. M. Cowley, Carbon 32, 393 (1994).
- M. Liu and J. M. Cowley, Ultramicroscopy 53, 333 (1994).
- T. W. Ebbesen, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 24, 235 (1994).
- J. S. Speck, M. Endo, and M. S. Dresselhaus, J. Cryst. Growth 94, 834 (1989).
- S. Iijima, P. M. Ajayan, and T. Ichihashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3100 (1992).