Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Osmotic motion of a semipermeable vesicle

Ehud Yariv

Phys. Rev. Fluids 11, 053603 – Published 7 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vcwd-hnb8

Abstract

When a semipermeable vesicle is exposed to a solute concentration gradient, it experiences a nonuniform osmotic pressure distribution. This distribution, incompatible with static equilibrium, induces inward osmosis on the low-concentration side and outward osmosis on the high-concentration side. The resulting imbalance drives the vesicle to drift down the gradient—a phenomenon known as osmophoresis. While osmophoresis may superficially resemble other phoretic mechanisms (such as diffusiophoresis or thermophoresis) driven by scalar field gradients, it is fundamentally distinct due to its essential dependence on the absolute value of the (strictly non-negative) concentration field itself. In this work, we revisit the osmophoresis problem, identifying the appropriate limiting process that consistently represents an imposed macroscale concentration gradient, and clarifying the distinction between the concentration and pressure fields and their dynamic counterparts. Our scrutiny resolves the longstanding anomaly of significant advective transport at low Péclet numbers, as originally reported by Anderson [Phys. Fluids 26, 2871 (1983)], and yields a closed-form expression for the drift velocity, valid for all Péclet numbers. We demonstrate how previous efforts to go beyond leading-order approximation at small Péclet numbers have led to inconsistent perturbation schemes.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. O. Kedem and A. Katchalsky, Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 27, 229 (1958).
  2. L. G. M. Gordon, Osmophoresis, J. Phys. Chem. 85, 1753 (1981).
  3. C. G. Pope, Investigation of osmophoresis, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 1869 (1982).
  4. J. L. Anderson, Movement of a semipermeable vesicle through an osmotic gradient, Phys. Fluids 26, 2871 (1983).
  5. J. L. Anderson, M. E. Lowell, and D. C. Prieve, Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 1. Non-electrolytes, J. Fluid Mech. 117, 107 (1982).
  6. D. C. Prieve, J. P. Ebel, J. L. Anderson, and M. E. Lowell, Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 2: Electrolytes, J. Fluid Mech. 148, 247 (1984).
  7. J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989).
  8. R. S. Subramanian, Slow migration of a gas bubble in a thermal gradient, AIChE J. 27, 646 (1981).
  9. L. Zhang, R. S. Subramanian, and R. Balasubramaniam, Motion of a drop in a vertical temperature gradient at small Marangoni number—The critical role of inertia, J. Fluid Mech. 448, 197 (2001).
  10. R. Balasubramaniam and R. S. Subramanian, Thermocapillary convection due to a stationary bubble, Phys. Fluids 16, 3131 (2004).
  11. E. Yariv, Comment on “thermocapillary convection due to a stationary bubble” [Phys. Fluids 16, 3131 (2004)], Phys. Fluids 17, 039101 (2005).
  12. For comparison, we note that the diffusiophoretic velocity is of order RT2α/η, where is the thickness of the interaction layer [5]. Taking as 1 nm we find that velocity to be about 1/10 of the above U value.
  13. R. S. Subramanian and R. Balasubramaniam, The Motion of Bubbles and Drops in Reduced Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
  14. With nanometer-size pores, it is not a priori clear whether the expression for the hydraulic coefficient makes sense quantitatively. Nonetheless, there is no question that Lp does depend upon the solvent viscosity.
  15. H. Brenner, The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle—IV. Arbitrary fields of flow, Chem. Eng. Sci. 19, 703 (1964).
  16. J. Happel and H. Brenner, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965).
  17. H. A. Stone and A. D. T. Samuel, Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4102 (1996).
  18. E. Yariv, Thermophoresis due to strong temperature gradients, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 69, 453 (2008).
  19. H. J. Keh and F. R. Yang, Boundary effects on osmophoresis: Motion of a vesicle normal to a plane wall, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 609 (1993).
  20. H. J. Keh and F. R. Yang, Boundary effects on osmophoresis: Motion of a vesicle in an arbitrary direction with respect to a plane wall, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 3555 (1993).
  21. H. J. Keh and Y. S. Hsu, Osmophoresis of a spherical vesicle in a circular cylindrical pore, AIChE J. 51, 2628 (2005).
  22. Y. S. Hsu and H. J. Keh, Boundary effects on osmophoresis: Motion of a spherical vesicle perpendicular to two plane walls, Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 434 (2006).
  23. E. Yariv, Drift of a semi-permeable vesicle through an osmotic gradient: Anomalous velocity amplification due to a proximate wall, J. Fluid Mech. 1011, A18 (2025).
  24. H. J. Keh and F. R. Yang, Particle interactions in osmophoresis, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18, 593 (1992).
  25. H. J. Keh, K. D. Horng, and J. Kuo, Boundary effects on electrophoresis of colloidal cylinders, J. Fluid Mech. 231, 211 (1991).
  26. H. J. Keh and S. B. Chen, Diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis of colloidal cylinders, Langmuir 9, 1142 (1993).
  27. T. J. Pedley and J. Fischbarg, The development of osmotic flow through an unstirred layer, J. Theor. Biol. 70, 427 (1978).
  28. T. J. Pedley, The interaction between stirring and osmosis. Part 1, J. Fluid Mech. 101, 843 (1980).
  29. T. J. Pedley, The interaction between stirring and osmosis. Part 2, J. Fluid Mech. 107, 281 (1981).
  30. Z. Peng, T. Zhou, and J. F. Brady, Activity-induced propulsion of a vesicle, J. Fluid Mech. 942, A32 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation