Publishing Guidelines
Thank you for your interest in Physical Review Fluids, the Physical Review journal dedicated to publishing innovative research that will significantly advance the fundamental understanding of fluid dynamics.
This page guides you through all the steps in the peer-review process, from submission to publication.
Before you submit, be sure to:
- Understand Physical Review Fluids’s Scope and Editorial Criteria.
- Choose the best Article Type to share your results.
- Select templates for preparing your manuscript (A PDF version of your paper is all that’s needed for it to be sent for peer review.)
- Discover your Publishing Options, including options for publishing Open Access.
- Ensure your submission complies with Physical Review’s Editorial Policies and Practices, including guidelines on Authorship and Ethics and Research Integrity.
- Prepare your Data Availability statement, see Data Availability Policy and Guidelines.
- Include in the paper any disclosure about AI Use, according to the APS Journals policies on Appropriate Use of AI Tools.
To check the status of your paper at any time, visit the APS Manuscript Status page. You will need your manuscript’s 7-digit Accession Code and the last name of one of the first three authors on your paper.
If you need help with any aspect of the publishing process, please including those published in APS Open Science. APS Help.
Prepare Your Manuscript
The guidelines listed here for preparing your paper for submission are similar across all Physical Review journals. For your convenience, these links take you to specific submission guidelines for Physical Review Fluids:
- Article Types and Length Limits
- Writing the Paper
- Physical Review Fluids-Specific Style and Formatting
- Supplemental Material
- Joint Submissions
- Additional Materials
- Data Availability Statements
- Appropriate Use of AI Tools
Article Types and Length Limits
Regular Articles (no length limit)
Regular Articles are research articles that meet Physical Review Fluids’ editorial criteria and scope. Although there is no limit to the length for a Regular Article/Research Article, the appropriate length for a paper depends on the information it contains.
For papers submitted to the Methods: NEAT section, each submission must present a new numerical, experimental, and/or theoretical (NEAT) approach/methodology/method and its validation and either:
(1) underpins a companion paper that has been submitted in parallel to Phys. Rev. Fluids or another Phys. Rev. journal focused on the traditional journal goals of publishing papers contributing novel work in fluid dynamics discovery
OR
(2) introduces a new technique that demonstrates potential for substantial discovery in fluid dynamics, or extends current capabilities to model complex fluid dynamics problems, documents sufficient validation and provides substantiated generalization.
Authors should ensure that either (1) or (2) is addressed explicitly in the manuscript (and also in a cover letter submitted with the manuscript). For (1) the cover letter should refer to the title and/or manuscript code of the companion paper.
Letters (length limit: 4500 words)
Letters are original research articles reporting important results that are accessible in a short format. Importance will be assessed based on current interest and significance of the advance to the field. Authors may follow a Letter with a more complete account as a Regular Article. Letters receive priority handling, so authors should justify the need for publication in this format in their submission letter.
Perspectives (no length limit)
Perspectives are forward-looking articles that address an emerging topic or subfield of interest to the journal. They should help scientists already active in the field to obtain a broader view of the subject, and provide those not yet active in the field with an overview of the state of the art as well as an outlook on avenues for progress. Perspectives are expected to contain a brief review section and a summary of current activity in the field, as well as a substantial part that elaborates on open challenges and future developments. Physical Review Fluids does not consider white papers, opinion pieces, or articles exclusively focused on the review of previous work.
Perspectives are invited by the editors, but interested authors may send one-page proposals and presubmission inquiries to prfluids@aps.org.
Gallery of Fluid Motion (no length limit)
Each year Physical Review Fluids invites the winners of Gallery of Fluid Motion (GFM) Awards to submit a short paper based on their work to the journal. The GFM is not organized or run by Physical Review Fluids, but by a separate committee, and the winners for each year are announced at the Annual Division of Fluid Dynamics meeting. See details about the Gallery of Fluid Motion. The GFM-winning papers submitted to Physical Review Fluids are peer reviewed. The published GFM papers from each annual meeting appear together on the Physical Review Fluids Collection page.
Invited Papers (no length limit)
Each year the editors of Physical Review Fluids invite the authors of selected presentations made at the Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics to submit a paper based on their talk. The selections are made based on the importance and interest of the talk. All submitted papers are peer reviewed. The published papers from each annual meeting appear together on the Physical Review Fluids Collection page.
Comments and Replies (length limit: 3500 words)
Comments critique or correct papers by other authors that were previously published in Physical Review Fluids. Each Comment should contain an abstract and should state clearly the paper to which it refers. See more details about Comments.
Erratum
An Erratum notifies readers about errors or omissions in previously published papers. See more details about Errata in the Policies and Practices.
Visit this Length Guide for information about length limits for all articles published in the Physical Review journals.
Writing the Paper
Audience
Your manuscript should be written for a general readership, so as to make it understandable to a broad spectrum of researchers, and should avoid unfamiliar terminology except when needed to convey a unique or nuanced meaning.
Relevant context
The key results of the paper should be properly contextualized with regard to related literature.
Article Templates
A PDF version of your paper is all that’s needed for it to be sent for peer review. However, submitting properly formatted source files in LaTeX (preferred) or Microsoft Word simplifies peer-review because information from your paper can be more easily extracted. These source files also allow your paper to be rapidly prepared for publication if accepted. Source files will be converted to a PDF on submission.
- See the REVTeX Home Page for template files called apstemplate.tex for APS journals. They are located in the doc/latex/revtex/sample directory. See also REVTeX 4 - Frequently Asked Questions.
- Download this Microsoft Word template for Physical Review.
Templates Available in Overleaf
Authors who use the online LaTeX editor Overleaf can use APS-approved templates for authoring and submitting their manuscripts. Search for “Physical Review” under Templates. When you’re done authoring, click on “Submit to APS” on the top of the page and choose from the options to export your paper.
Style and Formatting
General
Detailed information on style and formatting is available at APS Journals Style Guide. These Style Basics offer essential tips on formatting and styling the following sections of your paper:
- Title
- Affiliations
- Byline footnotes
- Main article text
- Data availability statement
- Acknowledgments
- Author contribution statement
- References and subsidiary remarks
- Appendixes
- Mathematical notation
- Tables and figures
- Supplemental Material
Physical Review Fluids-Specific Style and Formatting
Titles in references
Physical Review Fluids requires titles for all references as an aid to the reviewers and potential readers, and to improve the accuracy of online searches. If an author does not include titles in the reference list, they will be added in the production process.
Language Editing Services
All articles in the Physical Review journals are published in American English. APS has partnered with Editage to offer the following Language Editing Author Services:
- English language editing
- Translation services
- Plain language summaries
Author Names
Authors with Chinese, Japanese, or Korean names may choose to have their names published in their native language alongside the English versions of their names in the author list of their publications. See Information About Author Names for details on how to prepare your manuscript.
Accessibility Requirements
APS complies with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, which make online content accessible to the broadest readership possible. Articles published online should meet the following guidelines:
- Clear and easy-to-read figures in accessible color palettes
- Use of words or symbols (instead of color) to provide meaning
- Descriptive links
Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material is useful information that is not essential to understanding an article’s main results, such as
- Multimedia files
- Parameters used in or produced by calculations
- Details of sample preparation
- Derivations of equations
Refer to the following guidelines when preparing Supplemental Material:
Content
A paper must stand on its own and be understandable and convincing without Supplemental Material. Editors may ask you to incorporate Supplemental Material into a paper as main text or Appendices. Editors may also ask you to convert a Letter into a longer Article to allow for this extra information.
Referencing Supplemental Material
APS stores all Supplemental Material files for a published paper as a single deposit with a dedicated URL. Authors should cite the Supplemental Material in the paper’s reference list and explain its content as follows:
See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for [give brief description of material].
Incorporating references in Supplemental Material
All references cited in the Supplemental Material should be listed in the reference section of the main text.
For editorial policies and more details about preparing and depositing Supplemental Material, see Supplemental Material Instructions.
Joint Submissions
Authors are welcome to submit two or more related or complementary papers to the same journal or to different Physical Review journals. These Joint Submissions enable authors to reach a wider audience and to take advantage of multiple formats across the Physical Review family of journals. For example, you can submit a Letter to Physical Review Letters and a longer Regular Article with more detail to Physical Review Fluids. At Physical Review Fluids, authors can jointly submit a Letter and a Regular Article. In all cases, the longer article should present considerably more (or different) information than contained in the abbreviated publication, and it should lead to a substantially improved understanding of the subject. Some duplication of figures, tables, and text material will often be appropriate, but should be limited and must be properly referenced.
The editors coordinate the handling of Joint Submissions, which usually means that they will be reviewed by one or more of the same referees. (See Editorial Supplemental Material or Joint Submission?) If accepted, publication of the two papers will usually also be coordinated. If only one of the papers is accepted for publication, the editors will advise the authors on how to proceed. Authors may, for example, be offered the opportunity to combine the two manuscripts into a single one, or to transfer the short manuscript to a different Physical Review journal as a separate publication.
To ensure your papers are handled as Joint Submissions, please clearly indicate your intention in the Cover Letter of all the relevant submissions.
Cover Letter
The cover letter is an opportunity to explain why the manuscript is appropriate for the journal. It should include the following:
- Context of the results
- Summary of key findings
- Relevant submission history at Physical Review, including another paper that is part of a joint submission
- Any recommended or excluded referees
Additional Materials
Physical Review Fluids does not require additional materials beyond what is mentioned above.
Data Availability Statements
All published articles must include a Data Availability Statement (DAS) that explains whether and how authors are sharing their data. Authors are asked to enter a complete data availability statement during the submission process, including relevant citations.
See Guidelines for Data Availability Statements in Physical Review.
Appropriate Use of AI Tools
AI tools may be used to assist with aspects of research and manuscript preparation, but AI tools cannot replace authors’ expertise, judgment, or accountability. An AI program cannot be held accountable and cannot be listed as an author. Authors are fully responsible for accuracy and must review and refine all AI-generated content. Moreover, they must disclose in the paper any substantive uses of AI. Prior to submitting a manuscript, authors should review the APS Journals policies on the Appropriate Use of AI Tools, and authors must ensure they comply with the guidelines on use, disclosure, and rights protection.
Peer Review
All APS journals follow the single-anonymized peer review procedures outlined in the Editorial Policies and Practices.
Responding to Referee Reports
These standard tips will help you respond effectively to a referee report.
When resubmitting your paper in response to a positive editorial invitation, check the following to ensure your paper can be quickly prepared for publication if it’s accepted.
- Equations are accurate.
- Author names and bylines, Acknowledgment statements, and Author Contribution statements align with Physical Review Policies and Practices.
- The byline footnote provides the email address of the post-publication contact author (or authors), as follows: *Contact author: author@email.com.
- All authors who want to link their ORCID iDs have provided them. When a new paper is submitted, APS provides authors with a link to verify their iDs and associate them with the paper. If you’ve misplaced this link, you can contact the journal to resend it.
Time Frame for Resubmission
Resubmitting your article as soon as possible ensures the timely sharing of your results. The recommended time frame for submission is three to four weeks, but articles requiring more extensive revisions may take longer.
Resubmit or Transfer Your Paper
The APS portfolio provides many publishing options and welcomes the transfer of a manuscript between journals. If a manuscript is not suitable for publication at a given APS journal, the editors aim to support authors by suggesting another journal or journals, provided a suitable option exists. See the APS Journals policies on Transfers Between Journals to learn how editors determine the recommended transfer journals and what your options are for transfer.
To resubmit or transfer your paper, go to the APS Submission Server.
When resubmitting or transferring your paper, please provide the following:
- The most recent version of your manuscript without mark-ups or highlights
- A point-by-point response to the most recent set of peer review reports, if reports were obtained
- A list of changes you have made since the last submission
- A PDF version of your manuscript that highlights any changes you have made since the last submission
- A revised cover letter: If you are transferring your paper in response to an explicit invitation, please be sure to mention the offer in your cover letter.
If you are requesting to add or remove an author from the paper, please see the Editorial Policy and Practice on adding or removing authors.
After Acceptance
Proofreading and Copyediting
APS partners with external vendors to copyedit and format accepted papers according to the APS Journals Style Guide and in collaboration with the relevant journal’s Editorial Team. This service improves the quality of papers by ensuring they are clear and readable, and that they carry the signature Physical Review brand.
Proofs
Authors should expect to see proofs of their manuscript with marked changes within approximately two weeks of acceptance. Proofs are sent to the Corresponding Author, who is responsible for coordinating changes with all authors and directing them to the production vendor.
Proof corrections
The production process generally requires two rounds of proofs; more rounds may be necessary for lengthy papers or papers that deviate significantly from Physical Review style.
Production status
Authors can find the status of their paper on the APS Manuscript Status page. You’ll need your 7-digit Accession Code and the last name of one of the first three authors on the paper.
Common Proof Corrections
The Important Notice to Authors provides essential instructions on how to check your proof. Authors should check the following:
Author names
Are they all present, in the correct order, and spelled correctly?
ORCID iDs
Do the links go to the correct records? To avoid delays, APS does not add ORCIDs to papers after the first set of proofs is returned.
Funder information
Review grant numbers for accuracy.
Equations and tables
APS converts the original source file to XML, which is used to create the online version and the PDF. This conversion works well for most cases, but please check equations and tables carefully.
Post-publication contact author
Ensure there is a byline footnote giving the email address of the author to whom correspondence should be addressed (Contact author: author@email.com).
Post-Publication Corrections and Changes
The journals offer a variety of ways to correct the scientific record after publication, including Corrections and Author Name Changes. Visit the Post Publication section of the Policies and Practices for details.
Promotion and Engagement
APS helps authors promote their work to peers in the research community and to the general public.
Opportunities for Visibility
Author Summaries
To ensure your paper is considered for promotion, consider sending a plain-text, nontechnical summary to explain your results and why they are of interest. See Guidelines for writing and submitting a summary.
Editors’ Suggestions
The Physical Review Fluids editors select papers as Editors’ Suggestions to direct readers to interesting, important, and well-written articles in areas of research beyond their usual interests. Papers selected for Editors’ Suggestions benefit from extra promotion on the main journal website, on social media, and in email alerts.
Social media
The Physical Review Fluids editors regularly feature Letters and Editors’ Suggestions and other information about the journal or the fluids community of interest to our readers on X (formerly known as Twitter) @PhysRevFluids .
Physics Magazine
Physics Magazine provides daily news and commentary about a selection of papers from the Physical Review collection, including those published in Physical Review Fluids.
Frenkiel Award for Fluid Mechanics
This annual award recognizes significant contributions to the field by early-career scientists. Named for François Naftali Frenkiel, the award is sponsored and administered by the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics and presented at its annual meeting. Since 2017, the Frenkiel Award has been given to authors in the early stages of their career who have published an outstanding paper in Physical Review Fluids. The award previously honored papers in Physics of Fluids, the journal Frenkiel founded in 1958 and from which Physical Review Fluids evolved in 2016. Read more details about the award.
Press Office and Embargo Policy
APS issues a weekly tip sheet for reporters that highlights upcoming newsworthy research from the APS portfolio of journals. Unless otherwise noted, papers submitted to APS journals are not embargoed. Visit this information page about the APS Press Office to find out more about the tip sheet and the APS Embargo Policy.
Publication Charges and Reprints
The APS journals provide authors with an online, web-based interface, SciPris™, to pay for various author charges, including article publication charges, charges for color figures, and reprints. Upon acceptance, authors will receive a unique link to the SciPris™ platform.
Article Publication Charge Pricing
For more information about APCs in the hybrid and fully open-access Physical Review journals, see APC Pricing.