- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Data-driven low-dimensional dynamic model of Kolmogorov flow

Carlos E. Pérez De Jesús and Michael D. Graham*

  • Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

  • *mdgraham@wisc.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 044402 – Published 10 April, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.044402

Abstract

Reduced order models (ROMs) that capture flow dynamics are of interest for decreasing computational costs for simulation as well as for model-based control approaches. This work presents a data-driven framework for minimal-dimensional models that effectively capture the dynamics and properties of the flow. We apply this to Kolmogorov flow in a regime consisting of chaotic and intermittent behavior, which is common in many flow processes and is challenging to model. The trajectory of the flow travels near relative periodic orbits (RPOs), interspersed with sporadic bursting events corresponding to excursions between the regions containing the RPOs. The first step in development of the models is use of an undercomplete autoencoder to map from the full state data down to a latent space of dramatically lower dimension. Then models of the discrete-time evolution of the dynamics in the latent space are developed. By analyzing the model performance as a function of latent space dimension, we can estimate the minimum number of dimensions required to capture the system dynamics. To further reduce the dimension of the dynamical model, we factor out a phase variable in the direction of translational invariance for the flow, leading to separate evolution equations for the pattern and phase dynamics. At a model dimension of five for the pattern dynamics, as opposed to the full state dimension of 1024 (i.e., a 32×32 grid), accurate predictions are found for individual trajectories out to about two Lyapunov times, as well as for long-time statistics. Further small improvements in the results occur as dimension is increased to nine, beyond which the statistics of the model and the true system are in very good agreement. The nearly heteroclinic connections between the different RPOs, including the quiescent and bursting timescales, are well captured. We also capture key features of the phase dynamics. Finally, we use the low-dimensional representation to predict future bursting events, finding good success.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. P. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, G. Berkooz, and C. W. Rowley, Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).
  2. B. R. Noack and H. Eckelmann, A low-dimensional Galerkin method for the three-dimensional flow around a circular cylinder, Phys. Fluids 6, 124 (1994).
  3. N. Aubry, P. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, and E. Stone, The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 192, 115 (1988).
  4. M. Sieber, C. O. Paschereit, and K. Oberleithner, Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition, J. Fluid Mech. 792, 798 (2016).
  5. H. F. S. Lui and W. R. Wolf, Construction of reduced-order models for fluid flows using deep feedforward neural networks, J. Fluid Mech. 872, 963 (2019).
  6. A. J. Linot and M. D. Graham, Data-driven reduced-order modeling of spatiotemporal chaos with neural ordinary differential equations, Chaos 32, 073110 (2022).
  7. E. Hopf, A mathematical example displaying features of turbulence, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1, 303 (1948).
  8. C. Foias, O. Manley, and R. Temam, Modelling of the interaction of small and large eddies in two dimensional turbulent flows, ESAIM: Math. Modell. Numer. Anal. 22, 93 (1988).
  9. R. Temam, Do inertial manifolds apply to turbulence? Physica D 37, 146 (1989).
  10. S. Zelik, Attractors. Then and now, arXiv:2208.12101 (2022).
  11. J. M. Lee, Smooth manifolds, in Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (Springer, New York, 2013), pp. 1–31.
  12. H. Whitney, The self-intersections of a smooth n-manifold in 2n-space, Ann. Math. 45, 220 (1944).
  13. D. Floryan and M. D. Graham, Data-driven discovery of intrinsic dynamics, Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 1113 (2021).
  14. P. A. Srinivasan, L. Guastoni, H. Azizpour, P. Schlatter, and R. Vinuesa, Predictions of turbulent shear flows using deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 054603 (2019).
  15. J. Moehlis, H. Faisst, and B. Eckhardt, A low-dimensional model for turbulent shear flows, New J. Phys. 6, 56 (2004).
  16. J. Page, M. P. Brenner, and R. R. Kerswell, Revealing the state space of turbulence using machine learning, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 034402 (2021).
  17. T. Nakamura, K. Fukami, K. Hasegawa, Y. Nabae, and K. Fukagata, Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow, Phys. Fluids 33, 025116 (2021).
  18. N. A. K. Doan, W. Polifke, and L. Magri, Auto-encoded reservoir computing for turbulence learning, in International Conference on Computational Science (Springer, Krakow, Poland, 2021), pp. 344–351.
  19. A. J. Linot and M. D. Graham, Deep learning to discover and predict dynamics on an inertial manifold, Phys. Rev. E 101, 062209 (2020).
  20. K. Zeng, A. J. Linot, and M. D. Graham, Data-driven control of spatiotemporal chaos with reduced-order neural ODE-based models and reinforcement learning, Proc. R. Soc. A 478, 20220297 (2022).
  21. C. J. Crowley, J. L. Pughe-Sanford, W. Toler, M. C. Krygier, R. O. Grigoriev, and M. F. Schatz, Turbulence tracks recurrent solutions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120665119 (2022).
  22. D. Armbruster, B. Nicolaenko, N. Smaoui, and P. Chossat, Symmetries and dynamics for 2-D Navier-Stokes flow, Physica D 95, 81 (1996).
  23. D. Armbruster, R. Heiland, E. J. Kostelich, and B. Nicolaenko, Phase-space analysis of bursting behavior in Kolmogorov flow, Physica D 58, 392 (1992).
  24. C. W. Rowley and S. T. M. Dawson, Model reduction for flow analysis and control, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 387 (2017).
  25. G. J. Chandler and R. R. Kerswell, Invariant recurrent solutions embedded in a turbulent two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow, J. Fluid Mech. 722, 554 (2013).
  26. V. I. Iudovich, Example of the generation of a secondary stationary or periodic flow when there is loss of stability of the laminar flow of a viscous incompressible fluid, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 29, 527 (1965).
  27. L. D. Meshalkin and Ia G. Sinai, Investigation of the stability of a stationary solution of a system of equations for the plane movement of an incompressible viscous liquid, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 25, 1700 (1961).
  28. J. S. A. Green, Two-dimensional turbulence near the viscous limit, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 273 (1974).
  29. A. Thess, Instabilities in two-dimensional spatially periodic flows. Part I: Kolmogorov flow, Phys. Fluids 4, 1385 (1992).
  30. P. Bartello and T. Warn, Self-similarity of decaying two-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 326, 357 (1996).
  31. N. Platt, L. Sirovich, and N. Fitzmaurice, An investigation of chaotic Kolmogorov flows, Phys. Fluids 3, 681 (1991).
  32. B. Nicolaenko and Z.-S. She, Symmetry-breaking homoclinic chaos in Kolmogorov flows, in Nonlinear World (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  33. N. B. Budanur, D. Borrero-Echeverry, and P. Cvitanović, Periodic orbit analysis of a system with continuous symmetry—A tutorial, Chaos 25, 073112 (2015).
  34. N. B. Budanur, P. Cvitanović, R. L. Davidchack, and E. Siminos, Reduction of SO(2) Symmetry for Spatially Extended Dynamical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 084102 (2015).
  35. S. Kneer, T. Sayadi, D. Sipp, P. Schmid, and G. Rigas, Symmetry-Aware Autoencoders: s-PCA and s-nlPCA, arXiv:2111.02893 (2021).
  36. M. Inubushi, M. U. Kobayashi, S.-i. Takehiro, and M. Yamada, Covariant Lyapunov analysis of chaotic Kolmogorov flows, Phys. Rev. E 85, 016331 (2012).
  37. M. Farazmand and T. P. Sapsis, A variational approach to probing extreme events in turbulent dynamical systems, Sci. Adv. 3, e1701533 (2017).
  38. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory (COLT '92) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, 1992), pp. 144–152.
  39. M. A. Nayak and S. Ghosh, Prediction of extreme rainfall event using weather pattern recognition and support vector machine classifier, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 114, 583 (2013).
  40. A. J. Linot, K. Zeng, and M. D. Graham, Turbulence control in plane couette flow using low-dimensional neural ode-based models and deep reinforcement learning, arXiv:2301.12098 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 044402– Published 10 April, 2023
  • Received 1 November 2022
  • Accepted 28 March 2023
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation