Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Rapid wetting of shear-thinning fluids

Susumu Yada1, Kazem Bazesefidpar1, Outi Tammisola1, Gustav Amberg1,2, and Shervin Bagheri1

  • 1FLOW Centre, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Södertörn University, SE-141 89 Stockholm, Sweden

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 043302 – Published 14 April, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.043302

Abstract

Using experiments and numerical simulations, we investigate the spontaneous spreading of droplets of aqueous glycerol (Newtonian) and aqueous polymer (shear-thinning) solutions on smooth surfaces. We find that in the first millisecond the spreading of the shear-thinning solutions is identical to the spreading of water, regardless of the polymer concentration. In contrast, aqueous glycerol solutions show a different behavior, namely, a significantly slower spreading rate than water. In the initial rapid spreading phase, the dominating forces that can resist the wetting are inertial forces and contact-line friction. For the glycerol solutions, an increase in glycerol concentration effectively increases the contact-line friction, resulting in increased resistance to wetting. For the polymeric solutions, however, an increase in polymer concentration does not modify contact-line friction. As a consequence, the energy dissipation at the contact line cannot be controlled by varying the amount of additives for shear-thinning fluids. The reduction of the spreading rate of shear-thinning fluids on smooth surfaces in the rapid-wetting regime can only be achieved by increasing solvent viscosity. Our results have implications for phase-change applications where the control of the rapid spreading rate is central, such as anti-icing and soldering.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. G. Lu, X.-D. Wang, and Y.-Y. Duan, A critical review of dynamic wetting by complex fluids: From Newtonian fluids to non-Newtonian fluids and nanofluids, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 236, 43 (2016).
  2. H. Ma and M. D. Graham, Theory of shear-induced migration in dilute polymer solutions near solid boundaries, Phys. Fluids 17, 083103 (2005).
  3. J. Han and C. Kim, Spreading of Boger fluid on horizontal surface, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 202, 120 (2013).
  4. V. Bergeron, D. Bonn, J. Y. Martin, and L. Vovelle, Controlling droplet deposition with polymer additives, Nature (London) 405, 772 (2000).
  5. G. K. Seevaratnam, Y. Suo, E. Ramé, L. M. Walker, and S. Garoff, Dynamic wetting of shear-thinning fluids, Phys. Fluids 19, 012103 (2007).
  6. X. Wang, Q. Min, Z. Zhang, and Y. Duan, Effect of moving contact line's curvature on dynamic wetting of non-Newtonian fluids, Langmuir 34, 15612 (2018).
  7. Y. Wei, G. Seevaratnam, S. Garoff, E. Ramé, and L. Walker, Dynamic wetting of Boger fluids, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 313, 274 (2007).
  8. Y. Wei, E. Rame, L. M. Walker, and S. Garoff, Dynamic wetting with viscous Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 464126 (2009).
  9. S. Rafaï, D. Bonn, and A. Boudaoud, Spreading of non-Newtonian fluids on hydrophilic surfaces, J. Fluid Mech. 513, 77 (2004).
  10. Y. Wang, D. Q. Minh, and G. Amberg, Dynamic wetting of viscoelastic droplets, Phys. Rev. E 92, 043002 (2015).
  11. S. Rafaï and D. Bonn, Spreading of non-Newtonian fluids and surfactant solutions on solid surfaces, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 358, 58 (2005).
  12. Q. Min, Y.-Y. Duan, X.-D. Wang, Z.-P. Liang, D.-J. Lee, and A. Su, Spreading of completely wetting, non-Newtonian fluids with non-power-law rheology, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 348, 250 (2010).
  13. X. D. Wang, D. J. Lee, X. F. Peng, and J. Y. Lai, Spreading dynamics and dynamic contact angle of non-Newtonian fluids, Langmuir 23, 8042 (2007).
  14. D. E. Weidner and L. W. Schwartz, Contact-line motion of shear-thinning liquids, Phys. Fluids 6, 3535 (1994).
  15. P. Neogi and R. M. Ybarra, The absence of a rheological effect on the spreading of small drops, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 7811 (2001).
  16. Z.-P. Liang, X.-D. Wang, Y.-Y. Duan, Q. Min, C. Wang, and D.-J. Lee, Dynamic wetting of non-Newtonian fluids: Multicomponent molecular-kinetic approach, Langmuir 26, 14594 (2010).
  17. R. de Ruiter, P. Colinet, P. Brunet, J. H. Snoeijer, and H. Gelderblom, Contact line arrest in solidifying spreading drops, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 043602 (2017).
  18. L. H. Tanner, The spreading of silicone oil drops on horizontal surfaces, J. Phys. D 12, 1473 (1979).
  19. M. Do-Quang, J. Shiomi, and G. Amberg, When and how surface structure determines the dynamics of partial wetting, Europhys. Lett. 110, 46002 (2015).
  20. T. D. Blake, The physics of moving wetting lines, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 299, 1 (2006).
  21. D. Bonn, J. Eggers, J. Indekeu, J. Meunier, and E. Rolley, Wetting and spreading, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 739 (2009).
  22. J. H. Snoeijer and B. Andreotti, Moving contact lines: Scales, regimes, and dynamical transitions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 269 (2013).
  23. J.-L. Barrat and L. Bocquet, Influence of wetting properties on hydrodynamic boundary conditions at a fluid/solid interface, Faraday Discuss. 112, 119 (1999).
  24. D. Duvivier, D. Seveno, R. Rioboo, T. D. Blake, and J. De Coninck, Experimental evidence of the role of viscosity in the molecular kinetic theory of dynamic wetting, Langmuir 27, 13015 (2011).
  25. Q. Vo and T. Tran, Contact line friction of electrowetting actuated viscous droplets, Phys. Rev. E 97, 063101 (2018).
  26. J. Hong, Y. K. Kim, K. H. Kang, J. M. Oh, and I. S. Kang, Effects of drop size and viscosity on spreading dynamics in dc electrowetting, Langmuir 29, 9118 (2013).
  27. Y. Xia and P. H. Steen, Dissipation of oscillatory contact lines using mode scanning, npj Microgravity 6, 3 (2020).
  28. A. Carlson, G. Bellani, and G. Amberg, Universality in dynamic wetting dominated by contact-line friction, Phys. Rev. E 85, 045302 (2012).
  29. Y. Lee, N. Matsushima, S. Yada, S. Nita, T. Kodama, G. Amberg, and J. Shiomi, Revealing how topography of surface microstructures alters capillary spreading, Sci. Rep. 9, 7787 (2019).
  30. M. M. Haring, The theory of rate processes, J. Chem. Educ. 19, 249 (1942).
  31. S. Yada, B. Allais, W. van der Wijngaart, F. Lundell, G. Amberg, and S. Bagheri, Droplet impact on surfaces with asymmetric microscopic features, Langmuir 37, 10849 (2021).
  32. C. F. Carlborg, T. Haraldsson, K. Öberg, M. Malkoch, and W. van der Wijngaart, Beyond pdms: Off-stoichiometry thiol-ene (oste) based soft lithography for rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices, Lab Chip 11, 3136 (2011).
  33. A. M. Karim, K. Fujii, and H. P. Kavehpour, Contact line dynamics of gravity driven spreading of liquids, Fluid Dyn. Res. 53, 035503 (2021).
  34. D. E. Kataoka and S. M. Troian, Patterning liquid flow on the microscopic scale, Nature (London) 402, 794 (1999).
  35. E. Rolley and C. Guthmann, Dynamics and Hysteresis of the Contact Line Between Liquid Hydrogen and Cesium Substrates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 166105 (2007).
  36. G. Rondepierre, F. De Soete, N. Passade-Boupat, F. Lequeux, L. Talini, L. Limat, and E. Verneuil, Dramatic slowing down of oil/water/silica contact line dynamics driven by cationic surfactant adsorption on the solid, Langmuir 37, 1662 (2021).
  37. A. Carlson, M. Do-Quang, and G. Amberg, Dissipation in rapid dynamic wetting, J. Fluid Mech. 682, 213 (2011).
  38. D. Jacqmin, Contact-line dynamics of a diffuse fluid interface, J. Fluid Mech. 402, 57 (2000).
  39. H. Abels, H. Garcke, and G. Grün, Thermodynamically consistent, frame indifferent diffuse interface models for incompressible two-phase flows with different densities, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22, 1150013 (2012).
  40. B. Yesilata, C. Clasen, and G. McKinley, Nonlinear shear and extensional flow dynamics of wormlike surfactant solutions, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 133, 73 (2006).
  41. K. Bazesefidpar, L. Brandt, and O. Tammisola, A dual resolution phase-field solver for wetting of viscoelastic droplets, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 94, 1517 (2022).
  42. U. Lācis, P. Johansson, T. Fullana, B. Hess, G. Amberg, S. Bagheri, and S. Zaleski, Steady moving contact line of water over a no-slip substrate, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1897 (2020).
  43. U. Lācis, M. Pellegrino, J. Sundin, G. Amberg, S. Zaleski, B. Hess, and S. Bagheri, Nanoscale sheared droplet: Volume-of-fluid, phase-field and no-slip molecular dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 940, A10 (2022).
  44. P. Yue and J. J. Feng, Wall energy relaxation in the Cahn–Hilliard model for moving contact lines, Phys. Fluids 23, 012106 (2011).
  45. A. Carlson, M. Do-Quang, and G. Amberg, Modeling of dynamic wetting far from equilibrium, Phys. Fluids 21, 121701 (2009).
  46. P. Yue and J. J. Feng, Phase-field simulations of dynamic wetting of viscoelastic fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 189-190, 8 (2012).
  47. A. Eddi, K. G. Winkels, and J. H. Snoeijer, Short time dynamics of viscous drop spreading, Phys. Fluids 25, 013102 (2013).
  48. J. Wang, M. Do-Quang, J. J. Cannon, F. Yue, Y. Suzuki, G. Amberg, and J. Shiomi, Surface structure determines dynamic wetting, Sci. Rep. 5, 8474 (2015).
  49. S. Yada, S. Bagheri, J. Hansson, M. Do-Quang, F. Lundell, W. van der Wijngaart, and G. Amberg, Droplet leaping governs microstructured surface wetting, Soft Matter 15, 9528 (2019).
  50. A. Bouillant, P. J. Dekker, M. A. Hack, and J. H. Snoeijer, Rapid viscoelastic spreading, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 123604 (2022).
  51. L. Fang, H. Hu, and R. G. Larson, Dna configurations and concentration in shearing flow near a glass surface in a microchannel, J. Rheol. 49, 127 (2005).
  52. Z. Fu and M. M. Santore, Kinetics of competitive adsorption of PEO chains with different molecular weights, Macromolecules 31, 7014 (1998).
  53. J. C. Dijt, M. A. Stuart, and G. J. Fleer, Competitive adsorption kinetics of polymers differing in length only, Macromolecules 27, 3219 (1994).
  54. M. A. C. Stuart and G. J. Fleer, Adsorbed polymer layers in nonequilibrium situations, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26, 463 (1996).
  55. B. B. Sauer and H. Yu, Adsorption kinetics of poly(ethylene oxide) at the air/water interface, Macromolecules 22, 786 (1989).
  56. T. Gilányi, I. Varga, M. Gilányi, and R. Mészáros, Adsorption of poly(ethylene oxide) at the air/water interface: A dynamic and static surface tension study, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 301, 428 (2006).
  57. G. Amberg, R. Tönhardt, and C. Winkler, Finite element simulations using symbolic computing, Math. Comp Simul. 49, 257 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation