- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Elongation enhances migration through hydrodynamic shear

R. N. Bearon*

W. M. Durham

  • Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZL, United Kingdom

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom

  • *rbearon@liverpool.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 033101 – Published 29 March, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.033101

Abstract

Many species of plankton migrate through the water column to avoid predation and acquire resources available only at depth. These vertical migrations, however, can be thwarted by flow which is ubiquitous in the ocean and acts to reorient the motility of swimming plankton in different directions. The torques exerted on an organism by hydrodynamic shear are a strong function of its shape—while spherical organisms only experience the overturning effect of vorticity, more elongated organisms experience additional torques that tend to align them in the direction of principal strain. Recent simulations of directed migration through turbulence indicate that organisms with larger aspect ratios are capable of faster vertical migration, however, the underlying physical processes are not well understood. Here, we use simple models of flow to study how elongation affects the capacity of a swimmer to vertically migrate through shear. We explore how the orientation of a migrating swimmer in simple shear depends both on its aspect ratio and nondimensional stability, highlighting where a unique stable upward equilibrium is globally attracting, and where particles can undergo periodic orbits. In addition, we identify that stable up and down equilbria can coexist when there is a nonzero vertical component of vorticity. We go on to investigate how elongation affects the transport and spatial distribution of a migrating swimmer in an inhomogeneous Kolmogorov shear flow. Our results show that a swimmer's shape can profoundly affect its mean-field behavior in flow and tendency to aggregate in regions of high shear. These findings reveal how flow can select for the elongated morphologies commonly found in marine plankton and may also provide insights to rationally design microrobots to navigate ambient flows.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. G. B. Jeffery, The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid, Proc. R. Soc. London A 102, 161 (1922).
  2. L. G. Leal and E. J. Hinch, The rheology of a suspension of nearly spherical particles subject to Brownian rotations, J. Fluid Mech. 55, 745 (1972).
  3. M. N. Ardekani, G. Sardina, L. Brandt, L. Karp-Boss, R. N. Bearon, and E. A. Variano, Sedimentation of inertia-less prolate spheroids in homogenous isotropic turbulence with application to non-motile phytoplankton, J. Fluid Mech. 831, 655 (2017).
  4. Marcos, J. R. Seymour, M. Luhar, W. M. Durham, J. G. Mitchell, A. Macke, R. Stocker, and J. P. Gollub, Microbial alignment in flow changes ocean light climate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3860 (2011).
  5. G. C. Hays, A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations, Hydrobiologia 503, 163 (2003).
  6. S. M. Bollens, G. Rollwagen-Bollens, J. A. Quenette, and A. B. Bochdansky, Cascading migrations and implications for vertical fluxes in pelagic ecosystems, J. Plankton Res. 33, 349 (2011).
  7. J. P. Ryan, M. A. McManus, and J. M. Sullivan, Interacting physical, chemical and biological forcing of phytoplankton thin-layer variability in Monterey Bay, California, Cont. Shelf Res. 30, 7 (2010).
  8. R. Hemmersbach and D.-P. Häder, Graviresponses of certain ciliates and flagellates, FASEB J. 13, S69 (1999).
  9. J. O. Kessler, Hydrodynamic focusing of motile algal cells, Nature (London) 313, 218 (1985).
  10. A. Sengupta, F. Carrara, and R. Stocker, Phytoplankton can actively diversify their migration strategy in response to turbulent cues, Nature (London) 543, 555 (2017).
  11. S. O'Malley and M. A. Bees, The orientation of swimming biflagellates in shear flows, Bull. Math. Biol. 74, 232 (2012).
  12. www.flickr.com/photos/rogeliomorenog.
  13. L. Zhang, J. J. Abbott, L. Dong, B. E. Kratochvil, D. Bell, and B. J. Nelson, Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 064107 (2009).
  14. T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, The orientation of spheroidal microorganisms swimming in a flow field, Proc. R. Soc. London B 231, 47 (1987).
  15. Y. Almog and I. Frankel, The motion of axisymmetric dipolar particles in homogeneous shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 289, 243 (1995).
  16. W. M. Durham, J. O. Kessler, and R. Stocker, Disruption of vertical motility by shear triggers formation of thin phytoplankton layers, Science 323, 1067 (2009).
  17. F. Santamaria, F. De Lillo, M. Cencini, and G. Boffetta, Gyrotactic trapping in laminar and turbulent Kolmogorov flow, Phys. Fluids 26, 111901 (2014).
  18. M. Cencini, G. Boffetta, M. Borgnino, and F. De Lillo, Gyrotactic phytoplankton in laminar and turbulent flows: A dynamical systems approach, Eur. Phys. J. E 42, 31 (2019).
  19. S. I. H. Richardson, A. W. Baggaley, and N. A. Hill, Gyrotactic suppression and emergence of chaotic trajectories of swimming particles in three-dimensional flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 023102 (2018).
  20. W. M. Durham, E. Climent, and R. Stocker, Gyrotaxis in a Steady Vortical Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 238102 (2011).
  21. M. A. Bees, Advances in bioconvection, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 449 (2020).
  22. S. Lovecchio, E. Climent, R. Stocker, and W. M. Durham, Chain formation can enhance the vertical migration of phytoplankton through turbulence, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw7879 (2019).
  23. M. Borgnino, G. Boffetta, F. De Lillo, and M. Cencini, Gyrotactic swimmers in turbulence: Shape effects and role of the large-scale flow, J. Fluid Mech. 856, R1 (2018).
  24. T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic microorganisms, J. Fluid Mech. 212, 155 (1990).
  25. T. J. Pedley and J. O. Kessler, Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 313 (1992).
  26. J. M. Sullivan, E. Swift, P. L. Donaghay, and J. E. Rines, Small-scale turbulence affects the division rate and morphology of two red-tide dinoflagellates, Harmful Algae 2, 183 (2003).
  27. W. Clavano, E. Boss, and L. Karp-Boss, Inherent optical properties of non-spherical marine-like particles, from theory to observation, Oceanography and marine biology 45, 1 (2007).
  28. W. M. Durham, E. Climent, M. Barry, F. D. Lillo, G. Boffetta, M. Cencini, and R. Stocker, Turbulence drives microscale patches of motile phytoplankton, Nat. Commun. 4, 2148 (2013).
  29. W. Clifton, R. N. Bearon, and M. A. Bees, Enhanced sedimentation of elongated plankton in simple flows, IMA J. Appl. Math. 83, 743 (2018).
  30. R. M. Mazo, Brownian Motion: Fluctuations, Dynamics, and Applications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002).
  31. C. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1985).
  32. P. A. Jumars, J. H. Trowbridge, E. Boss, and L. Karp-Boss, Turbulence-plankton interactions: A new cartoon, Marine Ecol. 30, 133 (2009).
  33. M. J. Doubell, H. Yamazaki, H. Li, and Y. Kokubu, An advanced laser-based fluorescence microstructure profiler (TurboMAP-L) for measuring bio-physical coupling in aquatic systems, J. Plankton Res. 31, 1441 (2009).
  34. D. Krishnamurthy, H. Li, F. Benoit du Rey, P. Cambournac, A. G. Larson, E. Li, and M. Prakash, Scale-free vertical tracking microscopy, Nat. Methods 17, 1040 (2020).
  35. E. C. Orenstein, D. Ratelle, C. Briseño-Avena, M. L. Carter, P. J. S. Franks, J. S. Jaffe, and P. L. D. Roberts, The Scripps Plankton camera system: A framework and platform for in situ microscopy, Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 18, 681 (2020).
  36. M. D. Ohman, R. E. Davis, J. T. Sherman, K. R. Grindley, B. M. Whitmore, C. F. Nickels, and J. S. Ellen, Zooglider: An autonomous vehicle for optical and acoustic sensing of zooplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 17, 69 (2019).
  37. E. Aparicio Medrano, B. van de Wiel, R. Uittenbogaard, L. Dionisio Pires, and H. Clercx, Simulations of the diurnal migration of Microcystis aeruginosa based on a scaling model for physical-biological interactions, Ecol. Modell. 337, 200 (2016).
  38. D. M. Lewis, A. Brereton, and J. T. Siddons, A large eddy simulation study of the formation of deep chlorophyll/ biological maxima in un-stratified mixed layers: The roles of turbulent mixing and predation pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 2277 (2017).
  39. T. J. Pedley, N. A. Hill, and J. O. Kessler, The growth of bioconvection patterns in a uniform suspension of gyrotactic micro-organisms, J. Fluid Mech. 195, 223 (1988).
  40. C. Zhan, G. Sardina, E. Lushi, and L. Brandt, Accumulation of motile elongated micro-organisms in turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 739, 22 (2014).
  41. K. Gustavsson, F. Berglund, P. R. Jonsson, and B. Mehlig, Preferential Sampling and Small-Scale Clustering of Gyrotactic Microswimmers in Turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 108104 (2016).
  42. R. Schuech, T. Hoehfurtner, D. J. Smith, and S. Humphries, Motile curved bacteria are pareto-optimal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 14440 (2019).
  43. O. J. Meacock, A. Doostmohammadi, K. R. Foster, J. M. Yeomans, and W. M. Durham, Bacteria solve the problem of crowding by moving slowly, Nat. Phys. 17, 205 (2021).
  44. Ò. Guadayol, K. L. Thornton, and S. Humphries, Cell morphology governs directional control in swimming bacteria, Sci. Rep. 7, 2061 (2017).
  45. M. J. Zirbel, F. Veron, and M. I. Latz, The reversible effect of flow on the morphology of Ceratocorys horrida (peridiniales, dinophyta), J. Phycol. 36, 46 (2000).
  46. E. Selander, H. H. Jakobsen, F. Lombard, and T. Kiørboe, Grazer cues induce stealth behavior in marine dinoflagellates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4030 (2011).
  47. A. Zöttl and H. Stark, Nonlinear Dynamics of a Microswimmer in Poiseuille Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 218104 (2012).
  48. S. A. Berman, J. Buggeln, D. A. Brantley, K. A. Mitchell, and T. H. Solomon, Transport barriers to self-propelled particles in fluid flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, L012501 (2021).
  49. K. Belharet, D. Folio, and A. Ferreira, Simulation and planning of a magnetically actuated microrobot navigating in the arteries., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60, 994 (2013).
  50. S. Colabrese, K. Gustavsson, A. Celani, and L. Biferale, Flow Navigation by Smart Microswimmers via Reinforcement Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 158004 (2017).
  51. K. Gustavsson, L. Biferale, A. Celani, and S. Colabrese, Finding efficient swimming strategies in a three-dimensional chaotic flow by reinforcement learning, Eur. Phys. J. E 40, 110 (2017).
  52. R. N. Bearon, Program code and data for “Elongation enhances migration through hydrodynamic shear” [Data Collection], University of Liverpool Data Repository (2023), doi: 10.17638/datacat.liverpool.ac.uk/2157.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 033101– Published 29 March, 2023
  • Received 18 October 2021
  • Accepted 6 February 2023
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2023 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation