- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Sound source characteristics generated by shocklets in isotropic compressible turbulence

Daiki Terakado*

Taku Nonomura and Soshi Kawai

Hikaru Aono

Makoto Sato

Akira Oyama

Kozo Fujii

  • Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 1138656 Japan

  • Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 9808579, Japan

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Shinshu University, Ueda 3868567, Japan

  • Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Kougakuin University, Tokyo 1638677, Japan

  • Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, Sagamihara 2525210, Japan

  • Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, Sagamihara 2525210, Japan and Department of Information and Computer Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 1258585, Japan

  • *Currently at Research and Development Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Tsukuba, 3058505 Japan; terakado.daiki@jaxa.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 084605 – Published 19 August, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.084605

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of shocklets on sound source characteristics using direct numerical simulations. The sound sources are obtained from the source terms of the Lighthill equation. The highest initial turbulent Mach number Mt0 is set to be 1.0, and the strong effects of shocklets on sound sources are investigated. Results show that the occurrence of shocklets in high turbulent Mach numbers Mt0≥0.7 affects the sound generation mechanism in addition to vortical motions which are well-known sound sources in low Mach number turbulent flows. The change in mechanism influences the relationship between the Reynolds stress and entropy terms. For low turbulent Mach number flows without shocklets, the Reynolds stress and entropy terms partially show the same signs around and on vortices. However, for high turbulent Mach numbers with shocklets, the terms exhibit opposite signs across shocklets. The behaviors of the Reynolds stress and entropy terms across shocklets are explained analytically by using a one-dimensional shock relation. The change in sound source characteristics keeps velocity dependence on total sound source strength almost unchanged independent of the turbulent Mach number, though each term's sound source strength (normalized by the total sound source strength) becomes larger for the higher turbulent Mach numbers Mt0≥0.9 than those for low turbulent Mach numbers Mt0≤0.4. Besides, the applicability of the present study to predict far-field acoustic wave characteristics is discussed. The source terms based on Lilley's decomposition show that the sound sources derived by shocklets have quadruple characteristics. Also, it is shown that the given knowledge in the present study, especially for the relation between the Reynolds stress and entropy terms across shocklets, can be used to improve the source modeling for a nonlinear acoustic analogy based on the Lighthill's acoustic analogy and Burgers' equation. In addition, the paper provides a possible explanation of the contributions of the shocklets for a mechanism of crackle noise that the generated acoustic waves by shocklets propagates to the acoustic field and show high-frequency spectral characteristics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

6 September, 2022

Correction: Byline footnotes for the third and sixth authors were erroneously added during the production cycle and have been removed. Two minor wording errors in text have been fixed. A reference citation was removed from the last paragraph of the Conclusions section.

Article Text

References (59)

  1. M. J. Lighthill, On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory, Proc. R. Soc. A 211, 564 (1952).
  2. I. Proudman, The generation of noise by isotropic turbulence, Proc. R. Soc. London A 214, 119 (1952).
  3. G. M. Lilley, The radiated noise from isotropic turbulence, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 6, 281 (1994).
  4. S. Sarkar and M. Y. Hussaini, Computation of the sound generated by isotropic turbulence, ICASE Technical Report No. 93-74, NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, US, 1993.
  5. A. Witkowska, D. Juvé, and J. Brasseur, Numerical study of noise from isotropic turbulence, J. Comput. Acoust. 5, 317 (1997).
  6. G. M. Lilley, The radiated noise from isotropic turbulence with applications to the theory of jet noise, J. Sound Vib. 190, 463 (1996).
  7. C. Seror, P. Sagaut, C. Bailly, and D. Juvé, Subgrid-scale contribution to noise production in decaying isotropic turbulence, AIAA J. 38, 1795 (2000).
  8. C. Seror, P. Sagaut, C. Bailly, and D. Juvé, On the radiated noise computed by large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 13, 476 (2001).
  9. G.-W. He, M. Wang, and S. K. Lele, On the computation of space-time correlations by large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 16, 3859 (2004).
  10. R. Rubinstein and Y. Zhou, The frequency spectrum of sound radiated by isotropic turbulence, Phys. Lett. A 267, 379 (2000).
  11. J. Williams, J. Simson, and V. Virchis, “Crackle”: An annoying component of jet noise, J. Fluid Mech. 71, 251 (1975).
  12. K. L. Gee, V. W. Sparrow, M. M. James, J. M. Downing, C. M. Hobbs, T. B. Gabrielson, and A. A. Atchley, The role of nonlinear effects in the propagation of noise from high-power jet aircraft, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 4082 (2008).
  13. J. B. Freund, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, Compressibility effects in a turbulent annular mixing layer. Part 1. Turbulence and growth rate, J. Fluid Mech. 421, 229 (2000).
  14. N. D. Cacqueray, C. Bogey, and C. Bailly, Investigation of a high-Mach-number overexpanded jet using large-eddy simulation, AIAA J. 49, 2171 (2011).
  15. N. D. Cacqueray and C. Bogey, Noise of an overexpanded Mach 3.3 jet: Non-linear propagation effects and correlations with flow, Int. J. Aeroacoust. 13, 607 (2014).
  16. A. T. Anderson and J. B. Freund, Source mechanisms of jet crackle, in 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), AIAA Paper No. 2012-2251 (AIAA, 2012).
  17. J. W. Nichols, S. K. Lele, and J. T. Spyropoulos, The source of crackle noise in heated supersonic jets, in 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper No. 2013-2197 (AIAA, 2013).
  18. D. A. Buchta and J. B. Freund, The near-field pressure radiated by planar high-speed free-shear-flow turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 832, 383 (2017).
  19. D. A. Buchta and J. B. Freund, Intense sound radiation by high-speed flow: Turbulence structure, gas properties, and near-field gas dynamics, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 044605 (2019).
  20. P. Pineau and C. Bogey, Steepened Mach waves near supersonic jets: study of azimuthal structure and generation process using conditional averages, J. Fluid Mech. 880, 594 (2019).
  21. T. Passot and A. Pouquet, Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous flows in the turbulent regime, J. Fluid Mech. 181, 441 (1987).
  22. S. Lee, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, Eddy shocklets in decaying compressible turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 3, 657 (1991).
  23. R. Samtaney, D. Pullin, and B. Kosovic, Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics, Phys. Fluids 13, 1415 (2001).
  24. S. Pirozzoli and F. Grasso, Direct numerical simulations of isotropic compressible turbulence: Influence of compressibility on dynamics and structures, Phys. Fluids 16, 4386 (2004).
  25. S. Kida and S. A. Orzag, Enstrophy budget in decaying compressible turbulence, J. Sci. Comput. 5, 1 (1990).
  26. J. Wang, Y. Shi, L.-P. Wang, Z. Xiao, X. He, and S. Chen, Effect of shocklets on the velocity gradients in highly compressible isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 23, 125103 (2011).
  27. J. Wang, Y. Shi, L.-P. Wang, Z. Xiao, X. He, and S. Chen, Effect of compressibility on the small-scale structures in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 713, 588 (2012).
  28. G. Choi, Y. Li, M. Tanahashi, and T. Miyauchi, Sound generation mechanism in turbulent mixing layer, in Third Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Vol. 2 (TSFP Digital Online Library, 2003), pp. 729–734.
  29. S. A. Miller, Toward a nonlinear acoustic analogy: Turbulence as a source of sound and nonlinear propagation, NASA Technical Memorandum, Tech. Rep. No. NASA/TM2015-218706, NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, US, 2015.
  30. S. Pirozzoli, Stabilized non-dissipative approximations of Euler equations in generalized curvilinear coordinates, J. Comput. Phys. 230, 2997 (2011).
  31. T. Nonomura, D. Terakado, Y. Abe, and K. Fujii, A technique for freestream preservation of finite-difference WENO on curvilinear grid, Comput. Fluids 107, 242 (2015).
  32. X. Y. Hu, Q. Wang, and N. A. Adams, An adaptive central-upwind weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 8952 (2010).
  33. F. Ducros, V. Ferrand, F. Nicoud, C. Weber, D. Darracq, C. Gacherieu, and T. Poinsot, Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction, J. Comput. Phys. 152, 517 (1999).
  34. S. Ghosh and W. Matthaeus, Low Mach number two-dimensional hydrodynamic turbulence: Energy budgets and density fluctuations in a polytropic fluid, Phys. Fluids A 4, 148 (1992).
  35. B. Bayly, C. Levermore, and T. Passot, Density variations in weakly compressible flows, Phys. Fluids A 4, 945 (1992).
  36. X. Cai, E. E. O'Brien, and F. Ladeinde, Thermodynamic behavior in decaying, compressible turbulence with initially dominant temperature fluctuations, Phys. Fluids 9, 1754 (1997).
  37. D. Terakado and Y. Hattori, Density distribution in two-dimensional weakly compressible turbulence, Phys. Fluids 26, 085105 (2014).
  38. S. Kida and S. A. Orzag, Energy and spectral dynamics in forced compressible turbulence, J. Sci. Comput. 5, 85 (1990).
  39. R. M. Petersen and D. Livescu, Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 22, 116101 (2010).
  40. C. Federrath, J. Roman-Duval, R. S. Klessen, W. Schmidt, and M.-M. M. Low, Comparing the statistics of interstellar turbulence in simulations and observations-solenoidal versus compressive turbulence forcing, Astron. Astrophys. 512, A81 (2010).
  41. K. Lee, S. S. Girimaji, and J. Kerimo, Effect of compressibility on turbulent velocity gradients and small-scale structure, J. Turbul. 10, N9 (2009).
  42. A. Bhagatwala and S. K. Lele, Interaction of a taylor blast wave with isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 23, 035103 (2011).
  43. A. Bhagatwala and S. K. Lele, Interaction of a converging spherical shock wave with isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 24, 085102 (2012).
  44. T. Ishida, P. A. Davidson, and Y. Kaneda, On the decay of isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 564, 455 (2006).
  45. H. Miura, Excitations of vortex waves in weakly compressible isotropic turbulence, J. Turbul. 5, N10 (2004).
  46. J. E. F. Williams, The noise from turbulence convected at high speed, Proc. R. Soc. A 255, 469 (1963).
  47. M. Tanahashi, T. Miyauchi, and J. Ikeda, Identification of coherent fine scale structure in turbulence, in IUTAM Symposium on Simulation and Identification of Organized Structures in Flows, edited by J. N. Sørensen, E. J. Hopfinger, and N. Aubry, Vol. 52 (Springer, Dordrecht, 1999), p. 131.
  48. M. Tanahashi, S. Iwase, and T. Miyauchi, Appearance and alignment with strain rate of coherent fine scale eddies in turbulent mixing layer, J. Turbul. 2, N6 (2001).
  49. M. Tanahashi, S.-J. Kang, T. Miyamoto, S. Shimokawa, and T. Miyauchi, Scaling law of fine scale eddies in turbulent channel flows up to Reτ=800, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 331 (2004).
  50. M. E. Goldstein, Aeroacoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1976).
  51. N. S. Vaghefi and C. K. Madnia, Local flow topology and velocity gradient invariants in compressible turbulent mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 774, 67 (2015).
  52. J. Panda, R. G. Seasholtz, and K. A. Elam, Investigation of noise sources in high-speed jets via correlation measurements, J. Fluid Mech. 537, 349 (2005).
  53. C. Bogey and C. Bailly, An analysis of the correlations between the turbulent flow and the sound pressure fields of subsonic jets, J. Fluid Mech. 583, 71 (2007).
  54. O. M. Phillips, On the generation of sound by supersonic turbulent shear layers, J. Fluid Mech. 9, 1 (1960).
  55. G. M. Lilley, On the noise from jets, Tech. Rep. No. CP-131, AGARD (1974).
  56. T. Colonius, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, Sound generation in a mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 330, 375 (1997).
  57. G. M. Lilley, Jet noise classical theory and experiments, in aeroacoustics of flight vehicles theory and practice, Tech. Rep. No. NASA-RP-1258, Chap. 4, NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, US, 1991.
  58. D. J. Bodony and S. K. Lele, Low-frequency sound sources in high-speed turbulent jets, J. Fluid Mech. 617, 231 (2008).
  59. D. Terakado, T. Nonomura, A. Oyama, and K. Fujii, Mach number dependence on sound sources in high Mach number turbulent mixing layer, in 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper No. 2016-3015 (AIAA, 2016).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 084605– Published 19 August, 2022
  • Received 11 April 2021
  • Accepted 10 May 2022
  • Corrected 6 September 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2022 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation