Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Aerodynamically driven rupture of a liquid film by turbulent shear flow

Melissa Kozul1,*, Pedro S. Costa2,3, James R. Dawson1, and Luca Brandt1,3

  • 1Department of Energy and Process Eng., NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
  • 2Faculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science, 107 University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
  • 3Linné FLOW Centre and SeRC (Swedish e-Science Research Centre), KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

  • *melissa.kozul@ntnu.no

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 124302 – Published 16 December, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.124302

Abstract

The rupture of a liquid film due to coflowing turbulent shear flows in the gas phase is studied using a volume-of-fluid method. To simulate this multiphase problem, we use a simplified numerical setup where the liquid film is “sandwiched” between two fully developed boundary layers from a turbulent channel simulation. The film deforms and eventually ruptures within the shear zone created by the coflows. This efficient setup allows systematic variation of physical parameters to gauge their role in the aerodynamically driven deformation and rupture of a liquid film under fully developed sheared turbulence. This work presents a detailed study of the developing pressure field over the deforming film and related aerodynamic effects, as previously suggested by other authors, in particular the role of the inviscid lift and drag forces. A cumulative lift force is introduced to capture the effect of the alternating pressure minima and maxima forming over the film, which amplify and eventually rupture the film. A velocity scale derived from the lift-induced drag force reflects the state of the turbulent boundary layer over the film and collapses the temporal development of this cumulative lift force as well as the amplitude of film deformation with some success for the different film thicknesses and Reynolds numbers.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. A. H. Lefebvre and D. R. Ballal, Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels and Emissions (CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 2010).
  2. O. Desjardins and H. Pitsch, Detailed numerical investigation of turbulent atomization of liquid jets, Atom. Sprays 20, 311 (2010).
  3. M. Aigner and S. Wittig, Swirl and counterswirl effects in prefilming airblast atomizers, J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 110, 105 (1988).
  4. H. B. Squire, Investigation of the instability of a moving liquid film, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 4, 167 (1953).
  5. E. Villermaux, Fragmentation versus cohesion, J. Fluid Mech. 898, P1 (2020).
  6. R. H. Rangel and W. A. Sirignano, The linear and nonlinear shear instability of a fluid sheet, Phys. Fluids 3, 2392 (1991).
  7. X. Li and R. S. Tankin, On the temporal instability of a two-dimensional viscous liquid sheet, J. Fluid Mech. 226, 425 (1991).
  8. A. Lozano, F. Barreras, G. Hauke, and C. Dopazo, Longitudinal instabilities in an air-blasted liquid sheet, J. Fluid Mech. 437, 143 (2001).
  9. T. Otto, M. Rossi, and T. Boeck, Viscous instability of a sheared liquid-gas interface: Dependence on fluid properties and basic velocity profile, Phys. Fluids 25, 032103 (2013).
  10. S. S. Deshpande, S. R. Gurjar, and M. F. Trujillo, A computational study of an atomizing liquid sheet, Phys. Fluids 27, 082108 (2015).
  11. P. Marmottant and E. Villermaux, On spray formation, J. Fluid Mech. 498, 73 (2004).
  12. A. Agarwal and M. F. Trujillo, A closer look at linear stability theory in modeling spray atomization, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 109, 1 (2018).
  13. I. S. Carvalho and M. V. Heitor, Liquid film break-up in a model of a prefilming airblast nozzle, Exp. Fluids 24, 408 (1998).
  14. A. Mansour and N. Chigier, Dynamic behavior of liquid sheets, Phys. Fluids A 3, 2971 (1991).
  15. O. Tammisola, A. Sasaki, F. Lundell, M. Matsubara, and L. D. Söderberg, Stabilizing effect of surrounding gas flow on a plane liquid sheet, J. Fluid Mech. 672, 5 (2011).
  16. S. Gepperth, D. Guildenbecher, R. Koch, and H.-J. Bauer in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS–Europe, Naples, Italy, 2010).
  17. D. Duke, D. Honnery, and J. Soria, Experimental investigation of nonlinear instabilities in annular liquid sheets, J. Fluid Mech. 691, 594 (2012).
  18. G. Chaussonnet, S. Gepperth, S. Holz, R. Koch, and H.-J. Bauer, Influence of the ambient pressure on the liquid accumulation and on the primary spray in prefilming airblast atomization, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 125, 103229 (2020).
  19. B. Déjean, P. Berthoumieu, and P. Gajan, Experimental study on the influence of liquid and air boundary conditions on a planar air-blasted liquid sheet, part II: prefilming zone length, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 79, 214 (2016).
  20. U. Shavit, Gas-liquid interaction in the liquid breakup region of twin-fluid atomization, Exp. Fluids 31, 550 (2001).
  21. A. Kourmatzis and A. R. Masri, Air-assisted atomization of liquid jets in varying levels of turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 764, 95 (2015).
  22. J. Park, K. Y. Huh, X. Li, and M. Renksizbulut, Experimental investigation on cellular breakup of a planar liquid sheet from an air-blast nozzle, Phys. Fluids 16, 625 (2004).
  23. Y. Ling, D. Fuster, G. Tryggvason, and S. Zaleski, A two-phase mixing layer between parallel gas and liquid streams: Multiphase turbulence statistics and influence of interfacial instability, J. Fluid Mech. 859, 268 (2019).
  24. D. Jiang and Y. Ling, Destabilization of a planar liquid stream by a co-flowing turbulent gas stream, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 122, 103121 (2020).
  25. D. Zuzio, J.-L. Estivalèzes, and B. DiPierro, An improved multiscale Eulerian-Lagrangian method for simulation of atomization process, Comput. Fluids 176, 285 (2018).
  26. K. Warncke, A. Sadiki, and J. Janicka in Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS–Europe, Naples, Italy, 2019).
  27. P. K. Wu and G. M. Faeth, Aerodynamic effects on primary breakup of turbulent liquids, Atom. Sprays 3, 265 (1993).
  28. S. Ii, K. Sugiyama, S. Takeuchi, S. Takagi, Y. Matsumoto, and F. Xiao, An interface capturing method with a continuous function: The THINC method with multi-dimensional reconstruction, J. Comput. Phys. 231, 2328 (2012).
  29. A. Zandian, W. A. Sirignano, and F. Hussain, Understanding liquid-jet atomization cascades via vortex dynamics, J. Fluid Mech. 843, 293 (2018).
  30. A. Lozano, A. Garcıa-Olivares, and C. Dopazo, The instability growth leading to a liquid sheet breakup, Phys. Fluids 10, 2188 (1998).
  31. P. Trontin, S. Vincent, J. L. Estivalezes, and J. P. Caltagirone, Direct numerical simulation of a freely decaying turbulent interfacial flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 36, 891 (2010).
  32. M. E. Rosti, F. De Vita, and L. Brandt, Numerical simulations of emulsions in shear flows, Acta Mech. 230, 667 (2019).
  33. J. U. Brackbill, D. B. Kothe, and C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys. 100, 335 (1992).
  34. P. Costa, A FFT-based finite-difference solver for massively-parallel direct numerical simulations of turbulent flows, Comput. Math. Appl. 76, 1853 (2018).
  35. D. Fuster, J. P. Matas, S. Marty, S. Popinet, J. Hoepffner, A. Cartellier, and S. Zaleski, Instability regimes in the primary breakup region of planar coflowing sheets, J. Fluid Mech. 736, 150 (2013).
  36. G. Tryggvason, R. Scardovelli, and S. Zaleski, Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas-liquid Multiphase Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).
  37. M. Kang, R. P. Fedkiw, and X.-D. Liu, A boundary condition capturing method for multiphase incompressible flow, J. Sci. Comput. 15, 323 (2000).
  38. K. A. Sallam, C. Aalburg, and G. M. Faeth, Breakup of round nonturbulent liquid jets in gaseous crossflow, AIAA J. 42, 2529 (2004).
  39. N. Bremond, C. Clanet, and E. Villermaux, Atomization of undulating liquid sheets, J. Fluid Mech. 585, 421 (2007).
  40. H. Lhuissier and E. Villermaux, Crumpled water bells, J. Fluid Mech. 693, 508 (2012).
  41. A. Lozano and F. Barreras, Experimental study of the gas flow in an air-blasted liquid sheet, Exp. Fluids 31, 367 (2001).
  42. G. Agbaglah, R. Chiodi, and O. Desjardins, Numerical simulation of the initial destabilization of an air-blasted liquid layer, J. Fluid Mech. 812, 1024 (2017).
  43. S. Perrard, A. Lozano-Durán, M. Rabaud, M. Benzaquen, and F. Moisy, Turbulent windprint on a liquid surface, J. Fluid Mech. 873, 1020 (2019).
  44. N. Scapin, P. Costa, and L. Brandt, A volume-of-fluid method for interface-resolved simulations of phase-changing two-fluid flows, J. Comput. Phys. 407, 109251 (2020).
  45. A. Paquier, F. Moisy, and M. Rabaud, Viscosity effects in wind wave generation, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 083901 (2016).
  46. M.-Y. Lin, C.-H. Moeng, W.-T. Tsai, P. P. Sullivan, and S. E. Belcher, Direct numerical simulation of wind-wave generation processes, J. Fluid Mech. 616, 1 (2008).
  47. G. Singh, A. Kourmatzis, A. Gutteridge, and A. R. Masri, Instability growth and fragment formation in air assisted atomization A29, J. Fluid Mech. 892 (2020).
  48. D. Yang and L. Shen, Direct-simulation-based study of turbulent flow over various waving boundaries, J. Fluid Mech. 650, 131 (2010).
  49. M. J. Cooker and D. H. Peregrine, Pressure-impulse theory for liquid impact problems, J. Fluid Mech. 297, 193 (1995).
  50. M. Själander, M. Jahre, G. Tufte, and N. Reissmann, EPIC: An energy-efficient, high-performance GPGPU computing research infrastructure, arXiv:1912.05848 [cs.DC].
  51. J. Lu and G. Tryggvason, Multifluid flows in a vertical channel undergoing topology changes: Effect of void fraction, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 084301 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation