Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Unsteady flow structure and loading of a pitching low-aspect-ratio wing

Miguel R. Visbal*

  • Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433, USA

  • *miguel.visbal@us.af.mil

Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 024703 – Published 24 February, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.024703

Abstract

This study addresses the flow structure and unsteady loading arising over a pitching low-aspect-ratio rectangular wing under low-Reynolds-number conditions of interest in small unmanned aerial vehicle operation and gust interactions. Simulations are performed employing a high-fidelity computational approach capable of accurately capturing the complex unsteady transitional flows. The wing is pitched about its quarter-chord axis to a maximum incidence of 45 over time intervals ranging from four to 16 convective time scales. The Reynolds number based on the wing chord varied from 103 to 4×104. For the highest pitch rate, good agreement between the computed three-dimensional (3D) flow structure and recent experimental measurements is demonstrated. The 3D dynamic stall process is characterized by the formation of an initially spanwise-oriented leading-edge vortex which evolves into an arch-type structure with legs anchored to the wing surface. The normal vorticity in the arch vortex legs establishes a low-pressure region and swirling pattern on the wing surface. A distinct characteristic of the arch vortex is its upstream propagation and persistence over the wing, postulated to be the result of the self-induced velocity of the vortex and its image underneath the plate. Increasing either pitch rate or Reynolds number promotes a more coherent arch vortex and circulation pattern, and delays the onset of stall to a higher angle of attack. Even for the lowest pitch rate considered, a significant increase in maximum lift is achieved relative to the static situation.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. W. J. McCroskey, Unsteady airfoils, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 285 (1982).
  2. L. Carr, Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall, J. Aircr. 25, 6 (1988).
  3. M. R. Visbal, On some physical aspects of airfoil dynamic stall, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non-Unsteady Fluid Dynamics, edited by J. Miller and D. Telionis (ASME, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1990), Vol. 92.
  4. T. J. Mueller, Low Reynolds number vehicles, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Report AGARD-AG-288, 1985.
  5. J. Ekaterinaris and M. Platzer, Computational prediction of airfoil dynamic stall, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 33, 759 (1997).
  6. M. R. Visbal and J. S. Shang, Investigation of the flow structure around a rapidly pitching airfoil, AIAA J. 27, 1044 (1989).
  7. M. R. Visbal, On the formation and control of the dynamic stall vortex on a pitching airfoil, AIAA Paper 1991-0006, 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 1991 (AIAA, Reston, 1991).
  8. P. G. Choudhuri, D. D. Knight, and M. R. Visbal, Two-dimensional unsteady leading-edge separation on a pitching airfoil, AIAA J. 32, 673 (1994).
  9. M. R. Visbal, High-fidelity simulation of transitional flows past a plunging airfoil, AIAA J. 47, 2685 (2009).
  10. M. R. Visbal, Numerical investigation of deep dynamic stall of a plunging airfoil, AIAA J. 49, 2152 (2011).
  11. D. J. Garmann and M. R. Visbal, Numerical investigation of transitional flow over a rapidly pitching plate, Phys. Fluids 23, 094106 (2011).
  12. J. Eldredge and C. Wang, High-fidelity simulations and low-order modeling of a rapidly pitching plate, AIAA Paper 2010-4281, 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, June 2010 (AIAA, Reston, 2010).
  13. G. E. Torres and T. J. Mueller, Low-aspect-ratio wing aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J. 42, 865 (2004).
  14. P. Freymuth, F. Finaish, and W. Bank, Visualization of wing tip vortices in accelerating and steady flow, J. Aircr. 23, 730 (1986).
  15. P. Freymuth, F. Finaish, and W. Bank, The wing tip vortex system in a starting flow, ZFW 10, 116 (1986).
  16. P. Freymuth, Visualizing the connectivity of vortex systems for pitching wings, J. Fluids Eng. 111, 217 (1989).
  17. K. Von Ellenrieder, K. Parker, and J. Soria, Flow structures behind a heaving and pitching finite-span wing, J. Fluid Mech. 490, 129 (2003).
  18. J. Buchholz and A. Smits, On the evolution of the wake structure produced by a low-aspect-ratio pitching panel, J. Fluid Mech. 546, 433 (2006).
  19. T. O. Yilmaz and D. Rockwell, Three-dimensional flow structure on a maneuvering wing, Exp. Fluids 48, 539 (2009).
  20. D. E. Calderon, Z. J. Wang, and I. Gursul, Effect of wing geometry on the lift of a plunging finite wing, AIAA Paper 2010-4459, 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, June 2010 (AIAA, Reston, 2010).
  21. T. O. Yilmaz and D. Rockwell, Flow structure on finite-span wings due to pitch-up motion, J. Fluid Mech. 691, 518 (2011).
  22. D. E. Calderon, Z. J. Wang, I. Gursul, and M. R. Visbal, Volumetric measurements and simulations of the vortex structures generated by low aspect ratio plunging wings, AIAA Paper 2012-0914, 50th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, TN, January 2012 (AIAA, Reston, 2012).
  23. C. Hartloper, M. Kinzel, and D. Rival, On the competition between leading-edge and tip-vortex growth for a pitching plate, Exp. Fluids 54, 1447 (2013).
  24. K. Taira and T. Colonius, Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 623, 187 (2009).
  25. K. Taira and T. Colonius, On the effect of tip vortices in low-reynolds-number post-stall flow control, AIAA Paper 2009-376, 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, January 2009 (AIAA, Reston, 2009).
  26. M. R. Visbal, Three-dimensional flow structure on a heaving low-aspect-ratio wing, AIAA Paper 2011-219, 49th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, FL, January 2011 (AIAA, Reston, 2011).
  27. M. Visbal, T. Yilmaz, and D. Rockwell, Three-dimensional vortex formation on a heaving low-aspect-ratio wing: Computations and experiments, J. Fluids Struct. 38, 58 (2013).
  28. M. R. Visbal and D. P. Rizzetta, Large-eddy simulation on curvilinear grids using compact differencing and filtering schemes, J. Fluids Eng. 124, 836 (2002).
  29. M. R. Visbal, P. E. Morgan, and D. P. Rizzetta, An implicit LES approach based on high-order compact differencing and filtering schemes, AIAA Paper 2003-4098, 16th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, June 2003 (AIAA, Reston, 2003).
  30. M. Vinokur, Conservation equations of gasdynamics in curvilinear coordinate systems, J. Comput. Phys. 14, 105 (1974).
  31. J. L. Steger, Implicit finite-difference simulation of flow about arbitrary two-dimensional geometries, AIAA J. 16, 679 (1978).
  32. D. A. Anderson, J. C. Tannehill, and R. H. Pletcher, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984).
  33. S. Stolz and N. Adams, An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 11, 1699 (1999).
  34. J. Mathew, R. Lechner, H. Foysi, J. Sesterhenn, and R. Friedrich, An explicit filtering method for LES of compressible flows, Phys. Fluids 15, 2279 (2003).
  35. M. R. Visbal and D. V. Gaitonde, High-order accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows, AIAA J. 37, 1231 (1999).
  36. D. V. Gaitonde and M. R. Visbal, High-order schemes for Navier-Stokes equations: Algorithm and implementation into FDL3DI, Technical Report No. AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3060, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1998.
  37. S. K. Lele, Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution, J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16 (1992).
  38. M. R. Visbal and D. V. Gaitonde, On the use of high-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 181, 155 (2002).
  39. D. V. Gaitonde, J. S. Shang, and J. L. Young, Practical aspects of higher-order numerical schemes for wave propagation phenomena, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45, 1849 (1999).
  40. P. Alpert, Implicit filtering in conjunction with explicit filtering, J. Comput. Phys. 44, 212 (1981).
  41. D. V. Gaitonde and M. R. Visbal, Further development of a Navier-Stokes solution procedure based on higher-order formulas, AIAA Paper 99-0557, 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1999 (AIAA, Reston, 1999).
  42. P. E. Morgan, M. R. Visbal, and D. P. Rizzetta, A parallel high-order flow solver for large-eddy and direct numerical simulation, AIAA Paper 2002-3123, 32nd Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, St. Louis, MO, June 2002 (AIAA, Reston, 2002).
  43. S. Sherer and M. Visbal, Implicit large eddy simulations using a high-order overset grid solver, AIAA Paper 2004-2530, 34th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Portland, OR, June 2004 (AIAA, Reston, 2004).
  44. M. Visbal and D. Gaitonde, Very high-order spatially implicit schemes for computational acoustics on curvilinear meshes, J. Comput. Acoust. 9, 1259 (2001).
  45. J. Eldredge, C. Wang, and M. Ol, A computational study of a canonical pitch-up, pitch-down maneuver, AIAA Paper 2009-3687, 39th Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Antonio, TX, June 2009 (AIAA, Reston, 2009).
  46. M. R. Visbal and D. J. Garmann, Flow structure above stationary and oscillating low-aspect-ratio wing, Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, FEDSM2012-72405, Puerto Rico, USA, July 2012 (ASME, 2012).
  47. N. T. Gresham, Z. Wang, and I. Gursul, Low reynolds number aerodynamics of free-to-roll low aspect ratio wings, Exp. Fluids 49, 11 (2010).
  48. R. K. Cohn and M. M. Koochesfahani, Effect of boundary conditions on axial flow in a concentrated vortex core, Phys. Fluids A 5, 280 (1993).
  49. M. Visbal, S. Gogineni, and D. Gaitonde, Direct numerical simulation of a forced transitional plane wall jet, AIAA Paper 98-2643, 29th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Albuquerque, NM, June 1998 (AIAA, Reston, 1998).
  50. J. Jeong and F. Hussain, On the identification of a vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69 (1995).
  51. D. J. Garmann, M. R. Visbal, and P. D. Orkwis, Three-dimensional flow structure and aerodynamic loading on a revolving wing, Phys. Fluids 25, 034101 (2013).
  52. M. R. Visbal, Onset of vortex breakdown above a pitching delta wing, AIAA J. 32, 1568 (1994).
  53. J.-C. Lin and D. Rockwell, Transient structure of vortex breakdown on a delta wing, AIAA J. 33, 6 (1995).
  54. I. Gursul, Review of unsteady vortex flows over slender delta wings, J. Aircr. 42, 299 (2005).
  55. M. R. Visbal and R. E. Gordnier, Pitch rate and pitch-axis location effects on vortex breakdown onset, J. Aircr. 32, 929 (1995).
  56. N. Lambourne, D. Bryer, and J. Maybrey, The behaviour of the leading-edge vortices over a delta wing following a sudden change of incidence, Aeronautical Research Council, Report & Memoranda No. 3645, 1969.
  57. J. Bertin and M. Smith, Aerodynamics for Engineers (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979).
  58. M. R. Visbal, Dynamic stall of a constant-rate pitching airfoil, J. Aircr. 27, 400 (1990).
  59. E. J. Jumper, S. J. Shreck, and R. L. Dimmick, Lift-curve characteristics of an airfoil pitching at constant rate, J. Aircr. 24, 680 (1987).
  60. T. Yilmaz, M. Ol, and D. Rockwell, Scaling of flow separation on a pitching low aspect ratio plate, J. Fluids Struct. 26, 1034 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation