Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Wall-modeled large eddy simulations using the volume-filtering framework

M. Hausmann* and B. van Wachem

  • *Contact author: max.hausmann@ovgu.de

Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 044604 – Published 28 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.044604

Abstract

In the present paper, we apply the framework of volume filtering, initially proposed by [T. B. Anderson and R. Jackson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 6, 524 (1967)] for particle-laden flows, to large eddy simulations (LES) of wall-bounded flows leading to a new perspective on wall-modeled LES (WMLES) that we refer to as volume-filtered WMLES (VF-WMLES). In contrast to existing wall models, the VF-WMLES framework does not rely on temporal averaging, does not make a priori assumptions on the pressure gradient, and can be used with a uniform spatial filter, which avoids the appearance of commutation closures in spatial derivatives of the filtered momentum and continuity equation. Volume filtering is well defined, even close to the wall, and it is shown that a nonzero slip and penetration velocity at the wall is a direct consequence of volume filtering the flow. With the VF-WMLES concept, new wall models can be directly assessed in a priori and a posteriori studies by comparing the predicted slip and penetration velocities at the wall with the velocities from explicitly volume-filtered direct numerical simulations (DNS). Based on the VF-WMLES concept, we derive an LES modeling strategy that is based on the recently proposed physically consistent immersed boundary method [M. Hausmann et al., J. Comput. Phys. 519, 113448 (2024)], a modeling framework based on volume filtering allowing to couple the flow with arbitrarily shaped solid boundaries using relatively coarse Cartesian fluid meshes. The proposed VF-WMLES is validated with two cases, a turbulent channel flow and a turbulent flow over periodic hills, and we show it accurately predicts the wall-boundary conditions known from explicitly volume-filtered DNS.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. J. Fröhlich, C. P. Mellen, W. Rodi, L. Temmerman, and M. A. Leschziner, Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions, J. Fluid Mech. 526, 19 (2005).
  2. J. W. Deardorff, A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 453 (1970).
  3. U. Schumann, Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli, J. Comput. Phys. 18, 376 (1975).
  4. H. Choi and P. Moin, Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman's estimates revisited, Phys. Fluids 24, 011702 (2012).
  5. S. T. Bose and G. I. Park, Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 535 (2018).
  6. U. Piomelli, J. Ferziger, P. Moin, and J. Kim, New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows, Phys. Fluids 1, 1061 (1989).
  7. E. Balaras, C. Benocci, and U. Piomelli, Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations, AIAA J. 34, 1111 (1996).
  8. W. Cabot and P. Moin, Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high reynolds number flow, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 63, 269 (2000).
  9. M. Wang and P. Moin, Dynamic wall modeling for large-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows, Phys. Fluids 14, 2043 (2002).
  10. S. T. Bose and P. Moin, A dynamic slip boundary condition for wall-modeled large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 26, 015104 (2014).
  11. H. J. Bae, A. Lozano-Durán, S. T. Bose, and P. Moin, Dynamic slip wall model for large-eddy simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 859, 400 (2019).
  12. S. Ghosal and P. Moin, The basic equations for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometry, J. Comput. Phys. 118, 24 (1995).
  13. F. van der Bos and B. J. Geurts, Commutator errors in the filtering approach to large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 17, 035108 (2005).
  14. R. D. Moser, S. W. Haering, and G. R. Yalla, Statistical properties of subgrid-scale turbulence models, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 53, 255 (2021).
  15. G. R. Yalla, T. A. Oliver, S. W. Haering, B. Engquist, and R. D. Moser, Effects of resolution inhomogeneity in large-eddy simulation, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 074604 (2021).
  16. A. Bhattacharya, A. Das, and R. D. Moser, A filtered-wall formulation for large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulence, Phys. Fluids 20, 115104 (2008).
  17. T. B. Anderson and R. Jackson, A fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 6, 527 (1967).
  18. M. Hausmann, V. Chéron, F. Evrard, and B. van Wachem, Study and derivation of closures in the volume-filtered framework for particle-laden flows, J. Fluid Mech. 996, A41 (2024).
  19. M. Hausmann, H. Elmestikawy, and B. van Wachem, Physically consistent immersed boundary method: A framework for predicting hydrodynamic forces on particles with coarse meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 519, 113448 (2024).
  20. F. Roman, V. Armenio, and J. Fröhlich, A simple wall-layer model for large eddy simulation with immersed boundary method, Phys. Fluids 21, 101701 (2009).
  21. F. Capizzano, Turbulent wall model for immersed boundary methods, AIAA J. 49, 2367 (2011).
  22. P.-H. Chang, C.-C. Liao, H.-W. Hsu, S.-H. Liu, and C.-A. Lin, Simulations of laminar and turbulent flows over periodic hills with immersed boundary method, Comput. Fluids 92, 233 (2014).
  23. P. Sagaut, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2005).
  24. H. J. Bae, A. Lozano-Durán, S. T. Bose, and P. Moin, Turbulence intensities in large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded flows, Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 014610 (2018).
  25. P. H. van Cittert, Zum Einfluß der Spaltbreite auf die Intensitätsverteilung in Spektrallinien. II, Z. Phys. 69, 298 (1931).
  26. S. Stolz and N. A. Adams, An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 11, 1699 (1999).
  27. J. Graham, K. Kanov, X. I. A. Yang, M. Lee, N. Malaya, C. C. Lalescu, R. Burns, G. Eyink, A. Szalay, R. D. Moser, and C. Meneveau, A Web services accessible database of turbulent channel flow and its use for testing a new integral wall model for LES, J. Turbul. 17, 181 (2016).
  28. H. Werner and H. Wengle, Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over and around a cube in a plate channel, in Turbulent Shear Flows 8, edited by F. Durst, R. Friedrich, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt, U. Schumann, and J. H. Whitelaw (Springer, Berlin, 1993), pp. 155–168.
  29. A. Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, Adv. Geophys. 18, 237 (1975).
  30. S. Liu, C. Meneveau, and J. Katz, On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet, J. Fluid Mech. 275, 83 (1994).
  31. P. L. Johnson, Energy transfer from large to small scales in turbulence by multiscale nonlinear strain and vorticity interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 104501 (2020).
  32. V. Borue and S. A. Orszag, Local energy flux and subgrid-scale statistics in three-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 366, 1 (1998).
  33. K. Horiuti, Roles of nonaligned eigenvectors of strain-rate and subgrid-scale stress tensors in turbulence generation, J. Fluid Mech. 491, 65 (2003).
  34. B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, Large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer using the Clark model, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 309 (1996).
  35. B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 339, 357 (1997).
  36. D. Zhou and H. J. Bae, Sensitivity analysis of wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for separated turbulent flow, J. Comput. Phys. 506, 112948 (2024).
  37. A. W. Vreman, An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: Algebraic theory and applications, Phys. Fluids 16, 3670 (2004).
  38. F. Denner and B. van Wachem, Fully-coupled balanced-force VOF framework for arbitrary meshes with least-squares curvature evaluation from volume fractions, Numer. heat. Transf. B 65, 218 (2014).
  39. P. Bartholomew, F. Denner, M. Abdol-Azis, A. Marquis, and B. van Wachem, Unified formulation of the momentum-weighted interpolation for collocated variable arrangements, J. Comput. Phys. 375, 177 (2018).
  40. F. Denner, F. Evrard, and B. van Wachem, Conservative finite-volume framework and pressure-based algorithm for flows of incompressible, ideal-gas and real-gas fluids at all speeds, J. Comput. Phys. 409, 109348 (2020).
  41. F. Denner and B. van Wachem, TVD differencing on three-dimensional unstructured meshes with monotonicity-preserving correction of mesh skewness, J. Comput. Phys. 298, 466 (2015).
  42. L. Temmerman, M. A. Leschziner, C. P. Mellen, and J. Fröhlich, Investigation of wall-function approximations and subgrid-scale models in large eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 157 (2003).
  43. B. Krank, M. Kronbichler, and W. A. Wall, Direct numerical simulation of flow over periodic hills up to ReH=10,595, Flow, Turbul. Combust. 101, 521 (2018).
  44. M. Hausmann and B. van Wachem, Data for the Paper “Wall-modeled large eddy simulations using the volume filtering framework” (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.15094241.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation