- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review Fluids

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Linearized propulsion theory of flapping airfoils revisited

R. Fernandez-Feria

  • Universidad de Málaga, Andalucía Tech, E. T. S. Ingeniería Industrial, Dr Ortiz Ramos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain

PDF

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 084502 – Published 27 December, 2016Erratum Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 119901 (2017)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.084502

Abstract

A vortical impulse theory is used to compute the thrust force of a plunging and pitching airfoil in forward flight at high Reynolds numbers within the framework of linear potential flow theory. The result is significantly different from the classical one of Garrick, which considered only two effects, the leading-edge suction and the projection in the flight direction of the pressure force on the airfoil. By taking into account the complete vorticity distribution on the airfoil and the wake the mean thrust coefficient contains, in addition to the pressure force projection term, a new term that generalizes the leading-edge suction term in Garrick's theory. This term depends on Theodorsen function C(k) and on a new complex function C1(k) of the reduced frequency k. The main qualitative difference with Garrick's theory is that the propulsive efficiency, or ratio of the mean thrust power and the mean input power required to drive the airfoil, tends to zero as the reduced frequency increases to infinity (as k−1), in contrast to Garrick's propulsive efficiency that tends to a constant (1/2). Consequently, for pure pitching and combined pitching and plunging motions, the maximum of the propulsive efficiency is not reached as k→∞ like in Garrick's theory, but at a finite value of the reduced frequency that depends on the remaining nondimensional parameters. The present analytical results are in good agreement, for small amplitude oscillations, with numerical results from unsteady panel methods, and with experimental data and numerical results from the Navier-Stokes equations, except for small reduced frequencies where viscous effects are obviously important.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Erratum

Erratum: Linearized propulsion theory of flapping airfoils revisited [Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 084502 (2016)]

R. Fernandez-Feria
Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 119901 (2017)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. M. Platzer, K. Jones, J. Young, and J. Lai, Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges, AIAA J. 46, 2136 (2008).
  2. W. Shyy, H. Aono, C. K. Kang, and H. Liu, An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).
  3. H. Glauert, The force and moment on an oscillating airfoil, Technical Report R and M-1242, Aeronautical Research Committee (1929).
  4. T. Theodorsen, General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, Technical Report TR 496, NACA (1935).
  5. Th. von Kármán and W. R. Sears, Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion, J. Aeronaut. Sci. 5, 370 (1938).
  6. Th. von Kármán and J. M. Burgers, General aerodynamic theory: Perfect fluids, in Aerodynamic Theory, edited by W. F. Durand (Springer, Berlin, 1935), Vol. II, Sec. V.A.9.
  7. I. E. Garrick, Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil, Technical Report TR 567, NACA (1936).
  8. J. C. S. Lai and M. F. Platzer, Jet characteristics of a plunging airfoil, AIAA J. 37, 1529 (1999).
  9. J. Young and J. C. S. Lai, Oscillation frequency and amplitude effects on the wake of a plunging airfoil, AIAA J. 42, 2042 (2004).
  10. S. Heathcote and I. Gursul, Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J. 45, 1066 (2007).
  11. J. Young and J. C. S. Lai, Mechanisms influencing the efficiency of oscillating airfoil propulsion, AIAA J. 45, 1695 (2007).
  12. M. A. Asraf, J. Young, and J. C. S. Lai, Oscillation frequency and amplitude effects on plunging airfoil propulsion and flow periodicity, AIAA J. 50, 2308 (2012).
  13. J. Lighthill, An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).
  14. P. G. Saffman, Vortex Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992).
  15. J. Z. Wu, H. Y. Ma, and M. D. Zhou, Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics (Springer, New York, 2006).
  16. M. H. Dickinson and K. G. Götz, Unsteady aerodynamics performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers, J. Exp. Biol. 174, 45 (1993).
  17. C. P. Ellington, C. van den Berg, A. P. Willmott, and A. L. R. Thomas, Leading-edge vortices in insect flight, Nature (London) 384, 626 (1996).
  18. Z. J. Wang, Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping fight, J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323 (2000).
  19. F. O. Minotti, Unsteady two-dimensional theory of a flapping wing, Phys. Rev. E 66, 051907 (2002).
  20. T. Maxworthy, The formation and maintenance of a leading-edge vortex during the forward motion of an animal wing, J. Fluid Mech. 587, 471 (2007).
  21. W. Shyy and H. Liu, Flapping wings and aerodynamic lift: The role of the leading-edge vortex, AIAA J. 45, 2817 (2007).
  22. Y. S. Baik, L. P. Bernal, K. Granlund, and M. V. Ol, Unsteady force generation and vortex dynamics of pitching and plunging aerofoils, J. Fluid Mech. 709, 37 (2012).
  23. C. W. Pitt and H. Babinsky, Lift and the leading-edge vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 720, 280 (2013).
  24. A. Martín-Alcántara, R. Fernandez-Feria, and E. Sanmiguel-Rojas, Vortex flow structures and interactions for the optimum thrust efficiency of a heaving airfoil at different mean angles of attack, Phys. Fluids 27, 073602 (2015).
  25. J. Li and Z. N. Wu, Unsteady lift for the Wagner problem in the presence of additional leading/edge vortices, J. Fluid Mech. 769, 182 (2015).
  26. H. Wagner, Uber die Enstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 5, 17 (1925).
  27. F. W. J. Olver and L. C. Maximon, Bessel functions, in NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, 2010), pp. 215–286.
  28. I. E. Garrick, On some reciprocal relations in the theory of nonstationary flows, Technical Report TR 629, NACA (1938).
  29. R. Dudley, The Biomechanics of Insect Flight (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000).
  30. G. C. Lewin and H. Haj-Hariri, Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow, J. Fluid Mech. 492, 339 (2003).
  31. J. Young, Numerical simulation of the unsteady aerodynamics of flapping airfoils, Ph.D. thesis, School of Aerospace, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Camberra, Australia, 2005.
  32. T. Y. Wu, Hydromechanics of swimming propulsion. Part 2. Some optimum shape problems, J. Fluid Mech. 46, 521 (1971).
  33. A. Das, R. K. Shukla, and R. N. Govardhan, Existence of a sharp transition in the peak propulsive efficiency of a low-Re pitching foil, J. Fluid Mech. 800, 307 (2016).
  34. A. W. Mackowski and H. K. Williamson, Direct measurement of thrust and efficiency of an airfoil undergoing pure pitching, J. Fluid Mech. 765, 524 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 084502– Published 27 December, 2016
  • Received 4 July 2016

©2016 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation