Information geometry of transitions between quantum nonequilibrium steady states
Artur M. Lacerda, Laetitia P. Bettmann, and John Goold
Phys. Rev. E 112, L022101 (2025) - Published 15 August, 2025
Sebastian Deffner, Douglas J. Durian, Wolfgang Losert, and Narayanan Menon
Phys. Rev. E 112, 020001 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
The leadership of APS Division of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics celebrates its division status and reflects on the state of the art.
Rakesh Khanna A., Raymond E. Goldstein, Adriana I. Pesci, and Nir S. Gov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024401 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
In this quantitative study of cicada dawn choruses across various natural habitats, the authors analyze their temporal dynamics and sensitivity to changing light. They find that choruses begin at a specific solar elevation and reach full intensity within 60 seconds, reflecting coordinated acoustic decision making.
#TheoryExperiment #AdvancingField #Interdisciplinary
De-Ming Liu, Yi-Yang Liu, Zhi-Xi Wu, and Jian-Yue Guan
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024404 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
This work investigates how alternating high-dose and low-dose chemotherapy could affect development of drug resistance. The authors study a three-component tumor system and find that alternating administration of high-dose and low-dose therapy can significantly delay the development of drug resistance compared to separate administration of either therapy, an outcome akin to Parrondo’s paradox.
#BiophysicsSpotlight #TimelyTopic #BroadlyAccessible
Abdulkadir Canatar and SueYeon Chung
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025301 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Placed at the intersection of theoretical neuroscience, machine learning, and statistical physics, this work extends earlier approaches to continuous decoding, presenting a geometric analysis of discriminability under neural variability. The results help understand how representational geometry governs task performance.
Igor M. Sokolov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024101 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
In a continuous-time random walk a walker waits between steps, with a given distribution of the waiting times and step lengths. The author studies the distribution of the number of steps a walker has taken in order to be found at a certain position at a given long time. The results show universal behavior, and are different for the cases of subdiffusion and normal diffusion.
#UniversalBehavior #AdvancingField
Gabriele Costa and Santi Prestipino
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024108 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Particles on the surface of a sphere can self-assemble to form various patterns, depending on the particle interactions and external conditions. In this paper, lattice gases on spherical grids are analyzed, and a number of possible patterns are found. The results may be relevant for the synthesis of patchy colloidal microparticles.
#BroadlyAccessible #AdvancingField
Brayden Kell and Andreas Hilfinger
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024403 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
This numerical study shows that the trade-off between efficiency and fluctuations in molecular assembly holds across a much broader range of systems than previously known. It also identifies distinct control of subunit production with feedback as a necessary condition to avoid large fluctuations at high efficiency.
#OpenDebate #AdvancingField #BiophysicsSpotlight
Yi-fan Wang, Chun-lai Ren, and Yu-qiang Ma
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024412 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Aging of biomolecular condensates, a phenomenon increasingly recognized in recent experiments, is a multiscale phenomenon that can impact the condensate’s biological function. The authors employ coarse-grained simulations integrated with machine learning techniques to analyze structural and sequence-specific effects underlying the liquid-to-solid transition associated with the aging process.
#TimelyTopic #BiophysicsSpotlight
Nils O. Winkler, Oliver M. Drozdowski, Falko Ziebert, and Ulrich S. Schwarz
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024413 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
Using a one-dimensional active gel model of cell migration with two myosin II isoforms, A and B, this study reproduces the experimentally observed polarization of the isoforms and identifies a pitchfork bifurcation yielding three distinct migration modes, thereby linking molecular properties to large-scale cell behavior.
#TheoryExperiment #BiophysicsSpotlight #Well-Structured
Oliver Mathiak, Lars Reichwein, and Alexander Pukhov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025208 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
The separation of matter and antimatter in a plasma can be driven by the growth of the Weibel instability. The authors show this effect in a plasma of protons and antiprotons with a relativistic stream of electrons and positrons, by means of particle-in-cell simulations supported by analytical considerations.
#AdvancingField #OpenDebate
Minjiang Zhu, Derrick M. Sanders, Yun Seong Kim, Rohan Shah, Mohammad Tanver Hossain, Randy H. Ewoldt, Sameh H. Tawfick, and Philippe H. Geubelle
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025410 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
This work demonstrates that concave polymerization fronts exhibit higher temperatures and faster propagation speeds, while convex fronts slow down and can quench beyond a critical curvature. These numerical estimates, validated experimentally, establish how front geometry governs reaction kinetics and curing efficiency in thermoset polymers.
#TheoryExperiment #SoftMatterSpotlight
Ilian Pihlajamaa, Lotte S. van Gessel, Corentin C. L. Laudicina, Luc J. van Burik, and Liesbeth M. C. Janssen
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025417 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Contrary to existing assumptions, this study shows that particle-size-dependent relaxation dynamics in supercooled polydisperse liquids differ significantly between two and three dimensions. In three dimensions, small and large particles relax at distinct rates, while in two dimensions, their dynamics remain coupled, indicating a dimensional dependence in microscopic relaxation behavior.
#WellStructured #ClearMotivation #TechnicalAdvancement
Artur M. Lacerda, Laetitia P. Bettmann, and John Goold
Phys. Rev. E 112, L022101 (2025) - Published 15 August, 2025
Zefeng Cai, Chunhua Zeng, and Yuhui Luo
Phys. Rev. E 112, L022201 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Thomas Robiglio, Leonardo Di Gaetano, Ada Altieri, Giovanni Petri, and Federico Battiston
Phys. Rev. E 112, L022301 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Jason R. Picardo, V. Jemseena, and K. Vijay Kumar
Phys. Rev. E 112, L022401 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Iván Calvo, José Luis Velasco, Per Helander, and Félix I. Parra
Phys. Rev. E 112, L023201 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Shabbir A. Khan and Atsushi Fukuyama
Phys. Rev. E 112, L023202 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
Corentin Delacour, M. Mahmudul Hasan Sajeeb, João P. Hespanha, and Kerem Y. Camsari
Phys. Rev. E 112, L023301 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
Biswajit Das, Sreekanth K. Manikandan, Shuvojit Paul, Avijit Kundu, Supriya Krishnamurthy, and Ayan Banerjee
Phys. Rev. E 112, L023401 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Igor M. Sokolov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024101 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
In a continuous-time random walk a walker waits between steps, with a given distribution of the waiting times and step lengths. The author studies the distribution of the number of steps a walker has taken in order to be found at a certain position at a given long time. The results show universal behavior, and are different for the cases of subdiffusion and normal diffusion.
#UniversalBehavior #AdvancingField
Amirhossein Rezaei, Mahmood Hasani, Alireza Rezaei, and Seyyed M. H. Halataei
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024102 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
Karel Proesmans, Gianmaria Falasco, Atul Tanaji Mohite, Massimiliano Esposito, and Étienne Fodor
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024103 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Soumya Kanti Pal and Shamik Gupta
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024104 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Hailong Liu and Xudong Wang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024105 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
B. Sriram Shastry
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024106 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Kamilla Faizullina and Evgeni Burovski
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024107 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Gabriele Costa and Santi Prestipino
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024108 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Particles on the surface of a sphere can self-assemble to form various patterns, depending on the particle interactions and external conditions. In this paper, lattice gases on spherical grids are analyzed, and a number of possible patterns are found. The results may be relevant for the synthesis of patchy colloidal microparticles.
#BroadlyAccessible #AdvancingField
Jonas Glatthard, Guillem Aznar-Menargues, José P. Palao, Daniel Alonso, and Luis A. Correa
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024109 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Gustavo A. L. Forão, Fernando S. Filho, and Pedro V. Paraguassú
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024110 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Chen Tang, Konstantinos Sfairopoulos, Wanzhou Zhang, and Chengxiang Ding
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024111 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Claudio Bonati and Ivan Calero Soler
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024112 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
Mariel Kempa, Markus Kraft, Jiaozi Wang, and Robin Steinigeweg
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024113 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
Souvik Sadhukhan, Mustansir Barma, and Saroj Kumar Nandi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024114 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Antonio Malpica-Morales, Miguel A. Durán-Olivencia, and Serafim Kalliadasis
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024115 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Pierre Nazé
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024116 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
M. A. Fasihi, R. Jafarzadeh Bahrbeig, B. Mojaveri, and R. Haji Mohammadzadeh
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024117 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Rihito Nagase and Takahiro Sagawa
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024118 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Janik Schüttler, Rosalba Garcia-Millan, Michael E. Cates, and Sarah A. M. Loos
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024119 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Petar Jolakoski, Lasko Basnarkov, Ljupco Kocarev, Aleksandra Popovska-Mitrovikj, Verica Bakeva, and Trifce Sandev
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024120 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Shrabani Mondal and Bidhan Chandra Bag
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024121 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Devanshu Shekhar and Pragya Shukla
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024122 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Devanshu Shekhar and Pragya Shukla
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024123 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Juliana Caspers and Matthias Krüger
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024124 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Claudio Bonati, Haralambos Panagopoulos, and Ettore Vicari
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024125 (2025) - Published 19 August, 2025
E. Can Artun and A. Nihat Berker
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024126 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
T. Koide and F. Nicacio
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024127 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
P. L. Krapivsky and Baruch Meerson
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024128 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Shun-Cai Zhao, Zi-Ran Zhao, and Ni-Ya Zhuang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024129 (2025) - Published 22 August, 2025
Benedikt M. Reible and Luigi Delle Site
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024130 (2025) - Published 22 August, 2025
Filipe C. Thewes and Peter Sollich
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024131 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
William de Castilho and S. R. Salinas
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024132 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
B. A. Tay and Yee Shean H'ng
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024133 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Pedro V. Paraguassú and Thiago Guerreiro
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024134 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Li-Ming Fan, Ming-Gen Li, Tian-Fu Gao, and Jing-Dong Bao
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024135 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Michele Caraglio
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024136 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
Aditya Kumar Dutta, Matthieu Mangeat, Heiko Rieger, Raja Paul, and Swarnajit Chatterjee
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024137 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Saravanan A and Allen Lobo
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024138 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Aleksandr V. Kukharskii and Sergey G. Abaimov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024139 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
David S. Dean, Rashed Aljasmi, and Satya N. Majumdar
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024140 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Guangle Du, Bing Miao, and David S. Dean
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024141 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Miguel Gonzalez, Miguel A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, and Jorge G. Hirsch
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024201 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
Xueqin Wang, Dong Yu, Tianyu Li, Xuening Li, Ying Xie, and Ya Jia
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024202 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
Pierre Beck, Jeremy P. Parker, and Tobias M. Schneider
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024203 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
B. B. Baizakov, B. A. Malomed, and M. Salerno
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024204 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Nimrod Bratspiess, Leo R. M. Maas, and Eyal Heifetz
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024205 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Wenqi Fang, Qian-Yuan Tang, Chao Chen, Yongkui Yang, and Zheng Wang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024206 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Somnath Roy, Chitrak Bhadra, and Dhrubajyoti Biswas
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024207 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Zuchuan Yu and Hua Zhang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024208 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Kyu-Won Park, Soojoon Lee, and Kabgyun Jeong
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024209 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Weiqiang Ma, Fei Meng, Run Cheng, and Jun Wang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024210 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Dragan Marković and Mihailo Čubrović
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024211 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Zheng Zheng, Pierre Beck, Tian Yang, Omid Ashtari, Jeremy P. Parker, and Tobias M. Schneider
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024212 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Benjamin M. Alessio and Ankur Gupta
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024213 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
Kordian Makulski, Mateusz J. Samsel, Michał Łepek, Agata Fronczak, and Piotr Fronczak
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024301 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Elad Korngut and Michael Assaf
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024302 (2025) - Published 15 August, 2025
Corbit R. Sampson, Juan G. Restrepo, and Mason A. Porter
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024303 (2025) - Published 19 August, 2025
Seong-Gyu Yang (양성규) and Hye Jin Park (박혜진)
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024304 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Xie He, Philip S. Chodrow, and Peter J. Mucha
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024305 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Alessandro Salvatore, Fabián Aguirre-López, and Ruben Zakine
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024306 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Hasti Narimanzadeh, Takayuki Hiraoka, and Mikko Kivelä
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024307 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Mateusz J. Samsel, Agata Fronczak, and Piotr Fronczak
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024308 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Nanrong He, Qiang Wang, and Xiaojie Chen
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024309 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Anna Chmiel and Julian Sienkiewicz
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024310 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Rakesh Khanna A., Raymond E. Goldstein, Adriana I. Pesci, and Nir S. Gov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024401 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
In this quantitative study of cicada dawn choruses across various natural habitats, the authors analyze their temporal dynamics and sensitivity to changing light. They find that choruses begin at a specific solar elevation and reach full intensity within 60 seconds, reflecting coordinated acoustic decision making.
#TheoryExperiment #AdvancingField #Interdisciplinary
Junyeong L. Kim, Sean D. Lawley, and Aidan I. Brown
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024402 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Brayden Kell and Andreas Hilfinger
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024403 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
This numerical study shows that the trade-off between efficiency and fluctuations in molecular assembly holds across a much broader range of systems than previously known. It also identifies distinct control of subunit production with feedback as a necessary condition to avoid large fluctuations at high efficiency.
#OpenDebate #AdvancingField #BiophysicsSpotlight
De-Ming Liu, Yi-Yang Liu, Zhi-Xi Wu, and Jian-Yue Guan
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024404 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
This work investigates how alternating high-dose and low-dose chemotherapy could affect development of drug resistance. The authors study a three-component tumor system and find that alternating administration of high-dose and low-dose therapy can significantly delay the development of drug resistance compared to separate administration of either therapy, an outcome akin to Parrondo’s paradox.
#BiophysicsSpotlight #TimelyTopic #BroadlyAccessible
Martina Nicoletti, Anna Crispino, Alessandro Loppini, Alessio Gizzi, Letizia Chiodo, Christian Cherubini, and Simonetta Filippi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024405 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Yannick A. D. Omar, Zachary G. Lipel, and Kranthi K. Mandadapu
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024406 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Yannick A. D. Omar, Zachary G. Lipel, and Kranthi K. Mandadapu
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024407 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Olivia Vincent, Aparna Sreekumari, Manoj Gopalakrishnan, Vishwas V. Vasisht, and Bibhu Ranjan Sarangi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024408 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Zhilong Liu, Fei Xu, Hong Qi, Jun Jin, Jiaju Jiang, Jianwei Shuai, and Xiang Li
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024409 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Ana P. S. Koltun, José Trobia, Moises S. Santos, Enrique C. Gabrick, Diogo L. M. Souza, Murilo S. Baptista, Kelly C. Iarosz, and Antonio M. Batista
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024410 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Silja Borring Låstad and Namiko Mitarai
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024411 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Yi-fan Wang, Chun-lai Ren, and Yu-qiang Ma
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024412 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Aging of biomolecular condensates, a phenomenon increasingly recognized in recent experiments, is a multiscale phenomenon that can impact the condensate’s biological function. The authors employ coarse-grained simulations integrated with machine learning techniques to analyze structural and sequence-specific effects underlying the liquid-to-solid transition associated with the aging process.
#TimelyTopic #BiophysicsSpotlight
Nils O. Winkler, Oliver M. Drozdowski, Falko Ziebert, and Ulrich S. Schwarz
Phys. Rev. E 112, 024413 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
Using a one-dimensional active gel model of cell migration with two myosin II isoforms, A and B, this study reproduces the experimentally observed polarization of the isoforms and identifies a pitchfork bifurcation yielding three distinct migration modes, thereby linking molecular properties to large-scale cell behavior.
#TheoryExperiment #BiophysicsSpotlight #Well-Structured
Azeddine Zaidni and Philip J. Morrison
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025101 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
Enrico Corato, David van Assche, Ola Jakobsson, Wei Qiu, and Per Augustsson
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025102 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Brandon E. Morgan
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025103 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Ryuta X. Suzuki, Takahiko Ban, Manoranjan Mishra, and Yuichiro Nagatsu
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025104 (2025) - Published 12 August, 2025
Chung-Hao Chen, Zong-Rou Jiang, and Tzay-Ming Hong
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025105 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Zhiwei Song and Zijing Ding
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025106 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
L. Ansia, P. Velarde, M. Fajardo, and G. O. Williams
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025201 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
H. P. Le, E. V. Marley, and H. A. Scott
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025202 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
M. J. MacDonald, H. A. Scott, K. H. Ma, S. R. Klein, T. F. Baumann, R. W. Falcone, K. B. Fournier, C. M. Huntington, E. Johnsen, C. C. Kuranz, E. V. Marley, A. M. Saunders, M. P. Springstead, P. A. Sterne, M. R. Trantham, and T. Döppner
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025203 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
A. V. Bernatskiy, I. I. Draganov, N. A. Dyatko, I. V. Kochetov, V. V. Lagunov, and V. N. Ochkin
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025204 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Michael F. Zhang, Seth Davidovits, and Nathaniel J. Fisch
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025205 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Feiyu Li, Seth Dorfman, and Xiangrong Fu
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025206 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Zachary A. Johnson, Nathaniel R. Shaffer, and Michael S. Murillo
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025207 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Oliver Mathiak, Lars Reichwein, and Alexander Pukhov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025208 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
The separation of matter and antimatter in a plasma can be driven by the growth of the Weibel instability. The authors show this effect in a plasma of protons and antiprotons with a relativistic stream of electrons and positrons, by means of particle-in-cell simulations supported by analytical considerations.
#AdvancingField #OpenDebate
R. Schlickeiser and M. Kröger
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025209 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
A. A. Shelkovoy and S. A. Uryupin
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025210 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
J. A. S. Lima and M. H. Benetti
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025211 (2025) - Published 26 August, 2025
Abdulkadir Canatar and SueYeon Chung
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025301 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Placed at the intersection of theoretical neuroscience, machine learning, and statistical physics, this work extends earlier approaches to continuous decoding, presenting a geometric analysis of discriminability under neural variability. The results help understand how representational geometry governs task performance.
Run Yan Teh, Manushan Thenabadu, and Peter D. Drummond
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025302 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Quy-Dong To and Christian Soize
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025303 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Federica Gerace, Negar Rostamzadeh, and Luca Saglietti
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025304 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
Elisa Bellantoni, Fabio Guglietta, Francesca Pelusi, Mathieu Desbrun, Kiwon Um, Mihalis Nicolaou, Nikos Savva, and Mauro Sbragaglia
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025305 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Jannis Eckseler, Max Pieper, and Jürgen Schnack
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025306 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Robert de Mello Koch and Animik Ghosh
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025307 (2025) - Published 12 August, 2025
Barzan Shahmoradi, Mostafa Varmazyar, and Arash Mohammadi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025308 (2025) - Published 12 August, 2025
Elizabeth Eldhose, Auroop R. Ganguly, Snigdhansu Chatterjee, Tejasvi Chauhan, Vikram Chandel, and Subimal Ghosh
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025309 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Xiao Hu Ji, Jin Peng Liu, Henry E. Montgomery, Jr., Yew Kam Ho, Aihua Liu, and Li Guang Jiao
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025310 (2025) - Published 18 August, 2025
Thomas Gregorczyk, Song Zhao, and Pierre Boivin
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025311 (2025) - Published 22 August, 2025
Junren Hou, Shunli Jiang, Yugao Ma, and Shanfang Huang
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025312 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
A. Aramini, G. Napoli, and S. Turzi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025401 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
H. Y. Wang and Gary W. Slater
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025402 (2025) - Published 1 August, 2025
Subhanker Howlader, Sayantan Mondal, and Prasenjit Das
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025403 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Lin Zhan, Siyu Wang, Rui Xiao, Shaoxing Qu, and Paul Steinmann
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025404 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Marlo Kunzner, Christopher Mayo, Matthias Sperl, and Jan Philipp Gabriel
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025405 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Nobu C. Shirai and Naoyuki Sakumichi
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025406 (2025) - Published 4 August, 2025
Vanshika Saini, Ashish Kumar Singh, and Awaneesh Singh
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025407 (2025) - Published 5 August, 2025
Hibiki Oda and Jun-ichi Fukuda
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025408 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Denis Horvath and Gregor Bánó
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025409 (2025) - Published 6 August, 2025
Minjiang Zhu, Derrick M. Sanders, Yun Seong Kim, Rohan Shah, Mohammad Tanver Hossain, Randy H. Ewoldt, Sameh H. Tawfick, and Philippe H. Geubelle
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025410 (2025) - Published 7 August, 2025
This work demonstrates that concave polymerization fronts exhibit higher temperatures and faster propagation speeds, while convex fronts slow down and can quench beyond a critical curvature. These numerical estimates, validated experimentally, establish how front geometry governs reaction kinetics and curing efficiency in thermoset polymers.
#TheoryExperiment #SoftMatterSpotlight
H. J. H. Brouwers
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025411 (2025) - Published 8 August, 2025
Tianshun Shen and Ruo-Yu Dong
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025412 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025
Santi Prestipino, Davide Pini, Dino Costa, Gianpietro Malescio, and Gianmarco Munaò
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025413 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
David Fertig and Mathijs Janssen
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025414 (2025) - Published 14 August, 2025
Sean McNamara and Renaud Delannay
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025415 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
F. Adersh, M. Muhsin, and M. Sahoo
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025416 (2025) - Published 20 August, 2025
Ilian Pihlajamaa, Lotte S. van Gessel, Corentin C. L. Laudicina, Luc J. van Burik, and Liesbeth M. C. Janssen
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025417 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Contrary to existing assumptions, this study shows that particle-size-dependent relaxation dynamics in supercooled polydisperse liquids differ significantly between two and three dimensions. In three dimensions, small and large particles relax at distinct rates, while in two dimensions, their dynamics remain coupled, indicating a dimensional dependence in microscopic relaxation behavior.
#WellStructured #ClearMotivation #TechnicalAdvancement
Anna Braghetto, Sumanta Kundu, Marco Baiesi, and Enzo Orlandini
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025418 (2025) - Published 21 August, 2025
Supervised machine learning methods are emerging as valid alternatives to standard mathematical methods for identifying knots in polymers. The authors demonstrate the ability of a hybrid supervised-generative machine learning algorithm to capture different topological features of entangled filaments and to exploit this knowledge to faithfully reconstruct or produce new knotted configurations without simulations.
#MachineLearningSpotlight #Interdisciplinary
Yoshitaka Miyahara and Taiki Haga
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025419 (2025) - Published 22 August, 2025
Germán Varas and Valérie Vidal
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025420 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
P. S. Terceiro, F. L. S. Cuppo, Dennys Reis, and A. M. Figueiredo Neto
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025421 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Vadim V. Atrazhev, Dmitry V. Dmitriev, and Vadim I. Sultanov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025422 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Marie-Julie Dalbe, Pierre Jodlowski, and Nicolas Vandenberghe
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025423 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Hiroki Ifuku, Ryohei Kojima, Hirotaka Okabe, Shinya Kawano, Kazuhiro Hara, and Yoshiki Hidaka
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025424 (2025) - Published 27 August, 2025
Ilya R. Denisenko, Artur D. Nasyrov, and Nikita P. Kryuchkov
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025425 (2025) - Published 28 August, 2025
Roni Chatterjee, Monoj Adhikari, and Smarajit Karmakar
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025427 (2025) - Published 29 August, 2025
Pouria Feyzi Oskouei and Henning Struchtrup
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025501 (2025) - Published 12 August, 2025
Jesús M. Marcos, Yifan Li, Mark Fasano, Javier A. Diez, Linda J. Cummings, Ofer Manor, and Lou Kondic
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025502 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Pablo Sánchez-Puga, Javier Tajuelo, Fernando Martínez-Pedrero, Eduardo Guzmán, Francisco Ortega, and Miguel A. Rubio
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025503 (2025) - Published 13 August, 2025
Zhenwei Yao
Phys. Rev. E 112, 025504 (2025) - Published 25 August, 2025
Mahmoud Abdelshafy and Marcos Rigol
Phys. Rev. E 112, 029901 (2025) - Published 11 August, 2025