- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Constrained interactions and sublinear multifractality in multiscale systems

Madhur Mangalam*

Damian G. Kelty-Stephen†

  • *Contact author: mmangalam@unomaha.edu.
  • †Contact author: keltystd@newpaltz.edu.
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024215 – Published 17 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/vnl1-v81t

Abstract

Multifractal formalisms characterize complex interactions across scales in natural and behavioral systems. They capture an excess form of power-law scaling beyond the single power-law relationship between fluctuation and scale in monofractality. Because monofractality fits neatly within the general linear model via fractional integration, multifractality can provide evidence of nonlinear correlations across scales. That is, multifractality might reflect variability exceeding the correlations articulable by the best linear model. The classic expectation under nonlinear correlations across scales is that multifractal spectra for the original series, Δαorig, will show statistically significantly greater width than multifractal spectrum widths for linear surrogates, Δαsurr, yielding large positive t statistics, tMF. Thus, Δαorig≫Δαsurr supports the conclusion of nonlinear correlations across scales consistent with multiplicative cascade dynamics. By contrast, the interpretation of sublinear multifractality—Δαorig≪Δαsurr, and hence negative tMF—has been less clear, including whether it reflects or rules out nonlinear correlations across scales consistent with multiplicative cascades. We identify five distinct mechanisms by which random multiplicative cascades and related linear processes can in principle produce nonlinear correlations with significantly negative tMF, that is, Δαorig≪Δαsurr, and we characterize which mechanisms do so robustly under stringent surrogate-testing protocols. We show how various nonmultiplicative constraints on the nonlinear correlations across scales of a multiplicative cascade might produce sublinear multifractality. These constraints may serve as analogues to the physical limits characteristic of homeostatic regulation and feedback control in complex systems. Altogether, this framework builds expectations for how cascade dynamics collaborate with regulatory processes in physics, biology, and engineered systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (107)

  1. A. Chhabra and R. V. Jensen, Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1327 (1989).
  2. A. B. Chhabra, C. Meneveau, R. V. Jensen, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum and its application to fully developed turbulence, Phys. Rev. A 40, 5284 (1989).
  3. T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B. I. Shraiman, Fractal measures and their singularities: The characterization of strange sets, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1141 (1986).
  4. B. B. Mandelbrot, Fractals and Scaling in Finance: Discontinuity, Concentration, Risk (Springer, New York, NY, 2013).
  5. D. Schertzer and I. Tchiguirinskaia, A century of turbulent cascades and the emergence of multifractal operators, Earth Space Sci. 7, e2019EA000608 (2020).
  6. J. W. Kantelhardt, S. A. Zschiegner, E. Koscielny-Bunde, S. Havlin, A. Bunde, and H. E. Stanley, Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series, Physica A 316, 87 (2002).
  7. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, K. Palatinus, E. Saltzman, and J. A. Dixon, A tutorial on multifractality, cascades, and interactivity for empirical time series in ecological science, Ecol. Psych. 25, 1 (2013).
  8. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, E. Lane, L. Bloomfield, and M. Mangalam, Multifractal test for nonlinearity of interactions across scales in time series, Behav. Res. 55, 2249 (2023).
  9. E. A. F. Ihlen, Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in Matlab, Front. Physiol. 3, 141 (2012).
  10. B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1982).
  11. C. W. J. Granger and R. Joyeux, An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing, J. Time Ser. Anal. 1, 15 (1980).
  12. B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. Van Ness, Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968).
  13. D. Schertzer, I. Tchiguirinskaia, S. Lovejoy, and P. Hubert, No monsters, no miracles: In nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! Hydrol. Sci. J. 55, 965 (2010).
  14. B. B. Mandelbrot, Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: Divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier, J. Fluid Mech. 62, 331 (1974).
  15. D. Veneziano, G. E. Moglen, and R. L. Bras, Multifractal analysis: Pitfalls of standard procedures and alternatives, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1387 (1995).
  16. D. G. Kelty-Stephen and M. Mangalam, Additivity suppresses multifractal nonlinearity due to multiplicative cascade dynamics, Physica A 637, 129573 (2024).
  17. M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal perturbations to multiplicative cascades promote multifractal nonlinearity with asymmetric spectra, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064212 (2024).
  18. M. Mangalam, A. D. Likens, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal nonlinearity as a robust estimator of multiplicative cascade dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 111, 034126 (2025).
  19. C. A. Bell, N. S. Carver, J. A. Zbaracki, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Non-linear amplification of variability through interaction across scales supports greater accuracy in manual aiming: Evidence from a multifractal analysis with comparisons to linear surrogates in the Fitts task, Front. Physiol. 10, 998 (2019).
  20. L. Bloomfield, E. Lane, M. Mangalam, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Perceiving and remembering speech depend on multifractal nonlinearity in movements producing and exploring speech, J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20210272 (2021).
  21. N. Jacobson, Q. Berleman-Paul, M. Mangalam, D. G. Kelty-Stephen, and C. Ralston, Multifractality in postural sway supports quiet eye training in aiming tasks: A study of golf putting, Hum. Mov. Sci. 76, 102752 (2021).
  22. D. G. Kelty-Stephen and J. A. Dixon, Interwoven fluctuations during intermodal perception: Fractality in head sway supports the use of visual feedback in haptic perceptual judgments by manual wielding, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 2289 (2014).
  23. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, I. C. Lee, N. S. Carver, K. M. Newell, and M. Mangalam, Multifractal roots of suprapostural dexterity, Hum. Mov. Sci. 76, 102771 (2021).
  24. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, J. Lee, K. R. Cole, R. K. Shields, and M. Mangalam, Multifractal nonlinearity moderates feedforward and feedback responses to suprapostural perturbations, Percept. Mot. Skills 130, 622 (2023).
  25. M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multiplicative-cascade dynamics supports whole-body coordination for perception via effortful touch, Hum. Mov. Sci. 70, 102595 (2020).
  26. Z. Palatinus, D. G. Kelty-Stephen, J. Kinsella-Shaw, C. Carello, and M. T. Turvey, Haptic perceptual intent in quiet standing affects multifractal scaling of postural fluctuations, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 1808 (2014).
  27. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal evidence of nonlinear interactions stabilizing posture for phasmids in windy conditions: A reanalysis of insect postural-sway data, PLoS One 13, e0202367 (2018).
  28. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, M. Mangalam, M. Guillaume, and C. T. Bonnet, Whole-body multifractal synergies support cognitive visual word search, Ecol. Psychol. 38, 91 (2026).
  29. D. G. Stephen and J. A. Dixon, Strong anticipation: Multifractal cascade dynamics modulate scaling in synchronization behaviors, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 44, 160 (2011).
  30. R. M. Ward and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Bringing the nonlinearity of the movement system to gestural theories of language use: Multifractal structure of spoken English supports the compensation for coarticulation in human speech perception, Front. Physiol. 9, 1152 (2018).
  31. J. Theiler, S. Eubank, A. Longtin, B. Galdrikian, and J. D. Farmer, Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data, Physica D 58, 77 (1992).
  32. T. Schreiber and A. Schmitz, Surrogate time series, Physica D 142, 346 (2000).
  33. S. Jaffard, B. Lashermes, and P. Abry, Wavelet leaders in multifractal analysis, in Wavelet Analysis and Applications, edited by T. Qian, M. I. Vai, and Y. Xu (Springer, Birkhäuser Basel, Switzerland, 2006), pp. 201–246.
  34. S. Seuret, Detecting and creating oscillations using multifractal methods, Math. Nachr. 279, 1195 (2006).
  35. T. C. Halsey, K. Honda, and B. Duplantier, Multifractal dimensions for branched growth, J. Stat. Phys. 85, 681 (1996).
  36. B. B. Mandelbrot, Negative fractal dimensions and multifractals, Physica A 163, 306 (1990).
  37. M. Zamir, Critique of the test of multifractality as applied to biological data, J. Theor. Biol. 225, 407 (2003).
  38. M. Alber and J. Peinke, Improved multifractal box-counting algorithm, virtual phase transitions, and negative dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5489 (1998).
  39. R. Leonarduzzi, P. Abry, H. Wendt, S. Jaffard, and H. Touchette, A generalized multifractal formalism for the estimation of nonconcave multifractal spectra, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 67, 110 (2018).
  40. S. Drożdż, J. Kwapień, P. Oświecimka, and R. Rak, Quantitative features of multifractal subtleties in time series, Europhys. Lett. 88, 60003 (2009).
  41. S. Drożdż and P. Oświecimka, Detecting and interpreting distortions in hierarchical organization of complex time series, Phys. Rev. E 91, 030902(R) (2015).
  42. J. Kwapień, P. Blasiak, S. Drożdż, and P. Oświęcimka, Genuine multifractality in time series is due to temporal correlations, Phys. Rev. E 107, 034139 (2023).
  43. J. Wang, P. Shang, and K. Dong, Effect of linear and nonlinear filters on multifractal analysis, Appl. Math. Comput. 224, 337 (2013).
  44. J. Churruca, L. Vigil, E. Luna, J. Ruiz-Galiana, and M. Varela, The route to diabetes: Loss of complexity in the glycemic profile from health through the metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 1, 3 (2008).
  45. I. M. De la Fuente, N. Benítez, A. Santamaría, J. M. Aguirregabiria, and J. Veguillas, Persistence in metabolic nets, Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 573 (1999).
  46. K. Nakamura, Central circuitries for body temperature regulation and fever, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Intgr. Comp. Physiol. 301, R1207 (2011).
  47. J. Werner, System properties, feedback control and effector coordination of human temperature regulation, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 109, 13 (2010).
  48. M. Di Rienzo, G. Parati, A. Radaelli, and P. Castiglioni, Baroreflex contribution to blood pressure and heart rate oscillations: Time scales, time-variant characteristics and nonlinearities, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 1301 (2009).
  49. J. Hayano and E. Yuda, Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability, J. Physiol. Anthropol. 38, 3 (2019).
  50. P. G. Guyenet and D. A. Bayliss, Neural control of breathing and CO2 homeostasis, Neuron 87, 946 (2015).
  51. C.-K. Peng, J. E. Mietus, Y. Liu, C. Lee, J. M. Hausdorff, H. E. Stanley, A. L. Goldberger, and L. A. Lipsitz, Quantifying fractal dynamics of human respiration: Age and gender effects, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30, 683 (2002).
  52. T. Höfer, L. Venance, and C. Giaume, Control and plasticity of intercellular calcium waves in astrocytes: A modeling approach, J. Neurosci. 22, 4850 (2002).
  53. M. C. Peterson and M. M. Riggs, A physiologically based mathematical model of integrated calcium homeostasis and bone remodeling, Bone 46, 49 (2010).
  54. C. Constantinidis, G. V. Williams, and P. S. Goldman-Rakic, A role for inhibition in shaping the temporal flow of information in prefrontal cortex, Nat. Neurosci. 5, 175 (2002).
  55. J. S. Isaacson and M. Scanziani, How inhibition shapes cortical activity, Neuron 72, 231 (2011).
  56. V. S. Sohal, F. Zhang, O. Yizhar, and K. Deisseroth, Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance, Nature (London) 459, 698 (2009).
  57. R. Tremblay, S. Lee, and B. Rudy, Gabaergic interneurons in the neocortex: From cellular properties to circuits, Neuron 91, 260 (2016).
  58. M. M. Halassa and S. Kastner, Thalamic functions in distributed cognitive control, Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1669 (2017).
  59. K. McAlonan, J. Cavanaugh, and R. H. Wurtz, Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus, Nature (London) 456, 391 (2008).
  60. L. Gabernet, S. P. Jadhav, D. E. Feldman, M. Carandini, and M. Scanziani, Somatosensory integration controlled by dynamic thalamocortical feed-forward inhibition, Neuron 48, 315 (2005).
  61. F. Pouille and M. Scanziani, Enforcement of temporal fidelity in pyramidal cells by somatic feed-forward inhibition, Science 293, 1159 (2001).
  62. M. Carandini and D. J. Heeger, Normalization as a canonical neural computation, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 51 (2012).
  63. D. J. Heeger, Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex, Vis. Neurosci. 9, 181 (1992).
  64. R. T. Canolty and R. T. Knight, The functional role of cross-frequency coupling, Trends Cognit. Sci. 14, 506 (2010).
  65. A. B. L. Tort, R. W. Komorowski, J. R. Manns, N. J. Kopell, and H. Eichenbaum, Theta–gamma coupling increases during the learning of item–context associations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20942 (2009).
  66. R. L. Buckner, J. R. Andrews-Hanna, and D. L. Schacter, The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1124, 1 (2008).
  67. M. E. Raichle, A. M. MacLeod, A. Z. Snyder, W. J. Powers, D. A. Gusnard, and G. L. Shulman, A default mode of brain function, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 676 (2001).
  68. A. Lüthi, Sleep spindles: Where they come from, what they do, Neuroscientist 20, 243 (2014).
  69. M. Steriade, Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems, Neuroscience 137, 1087 (2006).
  70. W. Klimesch, Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information, Trends Cognit. Sci. 16, 606 (2012).
  71. O. Jensen and A. Mazaheri, Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 186 (2010).
  72. A. Hyafil, A.-L. Giraud, L. Fontolan, and B. Gutkin, Neural cross-frequency coupling: Connecting architectures, mechanisms, and functions, Trends Neurosci. 38, 725 (2015).
  73. P. Lakatos, A. S. Shah, K. H. Knuth, I. Ulbert, G. Karmos, and C. E. Schroeder, An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex, J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1904 (2005).
  74. L. A. Lipsitz, J. Mietus, G. B. Moody, and A. L. Goldberger, Spectral characteristics of heart rate variability before and during postural tilt. Relations to aging and risk of syncope, Circulation 81, 1803 (1990).
  75. L. A. Lipsitz and A. L. Goldberger, Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging: Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence, JAMA 267, 1806 (1992).
  76. L. A. Lipsitz, Dynamics of stability: The physiologic basis of functional health and frailty, J. Gerontol. Ser. A 57, B115 (2002).
  77. N. Stergiou, R. T. Harbourne, and J. T. Cavanaugh, Optimal movement variability: A new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy, J. Neurol. Phys. Therapy 30, 120 (2006).
  78. N. Stergiou and L. M. Decker, Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: Is there a connection?, Hum. Mov. Sci. 30, 869 (2011).
  79. N. Stergiou, J. A. Kent, and D. McGrath, Human movement variability and aging, Kinesiology Rev. 5, 15 (2016).
  80. M. P. Furmanek, M. Mangalam, D. G. Kelty-Stephen, and G. Juras, Postural constraints recruit shorter-timescale processes into the non-Gaussian cascade processes, Neurosci. Lett. 741, 135508 (2021).
  81. D. G. Kelty-Stephen, M. P. Furmanek, and M. Mangalam, Multifractality distinguishes reactive from proactive cascades in postural control, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 142, 110471 (2021).
  82. D. G. Kelty-Stephen and M. Mangalam, Turing's cascade instability supports the coordination of the mind, brain, and behavior, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 141, 104810 (2022).
  83. M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Hypothetical control of postural sway, J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20200951 (2021).
  84. M. Mangalam, I.-C. Lee, K. M. Newell, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Visual effort moderates postural cascade dynamics, Neurosci. Lett. 742, 135511 (2021).
  85. O. Kardan, K. C. S. Adam, I. Mance, N. W. Churchill, E. K. Vogel, and M. G. Berman, Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG, NeuroImage 211, 116622 (2020).
  86. O. Kardan, A. J. Stier, E. A. Layden, K. W. Choe, M. Lyu, X. Zhang, S. L. Beilock, M. D. Rosenberg, and M. G. Berman, Improvements in task performance after practice are associated with scale-free dynamics of brain activity, Network Neurosci. 7, 1129 (2023).
  87. J. R. Anastas, D. G. Kelty-Stephen, and J. A. Dixon, Executive function as an interaction-dominant process, Ecol. Psych. 26, 262 (2014).
  88. J. A. Dixon, J. G. Holden, D. Mirman, and D. G. Stephen, Multifractal dynamics in the emergence of cognitive structure, Top. Cognit. Sci. 4, 51 (2012).
  89. D. G. Stephen, J. R. Anastas, and J. A. Dixon, Scaling in cognitive performance reflects multiplicative multifractal cascade dynamics, Front. Physiol. 3, 22624 (2012).
  90. D. G. Kelty-Stephen and M. Mangalam, Fractal and multifractal descriptors restore ergodicity broken by non-Gaussianity in time series, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 163, 112568 (2022).
  91. D. G. Kelty-Stephen and M. Mangalam, Multifractal descriptors ergodically characterize non-ergodic multiplicative cascade processes, Physica A 617, 128651 (2023).
  92. M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Point estimates, Simpson's paradox, and nonergodicity in biological sciences, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 125, 98 (2021).
  93. M. Mangalam and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Ergodic descriptors of non-ergodic stochastic processes, J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220095 (2022).
  94. M. Mangalam, R. Metzler, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Ergodic characterization of nonergodic anomalous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023144 (2023).
  95. N. S. Carver, D. Bojovic, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal foundations of visually-guided aiming and adaptation to prismatic perturbation, Hum. Mov. Sci. 55, 61 (2017).
  96. M. Mangalam, N. S. Carver, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Global broadcasting of local fractal fluctuations in a bodywide distributed system supports perception via effortful touch, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 135, 109740 (2020).
  97. M. Mangalam, N. S. Carver, and D. G. Kelty-Stephen, Multifractal signatures of perceptual processing on anatomical sleeves of the human body, J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200328 (2020).
  98. K. J. Åström and R. Murray, Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2021).
  99. D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, D. A. Mellichamp, and F. J. Doyle III, Process Dynamics and Control (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2016).
  100. E. de Bézenac, A. Pajot, and P. Gallinari, Deep learning for physical processes: Incorporating prior scientific knowledge, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 124009.
  101. S. Li, X. Jin, Y. Xuan, X. Zhou, W. Chen, Y.-X. Wang, and X. Yan, Enhancing the locality and breaking the memory bottleneck of transformer on time series forecasting, Adv. Neural Info. Proc. Syst. 32 (2019).
  102. J. Merel, M. Botvinick, and G. Wayne, Hierarchical motor control in mammals and machines, Nat. Commun. 10, 5489 (2019).
  103. A. Tero, S. Takagi, T. Saigusa, K. Ito, D. P. Bebber, M. D. Fricker, K. Yumiki, R. Kobayashi, and T. Nakagaki, Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design, Science 327, 439 (2010).
  104. A. L. Goldberger, L. A. N. Amaral, J. M. Hausdorff, P. C. Ivanov, C.-K. Peng, and H. E. Stanley, Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2466 (2002).
  105. J. S. Perkiömäki, T. H. Mäkikallio, and H. V. Huikuri, Fractal and complexity measures of heart rate variability, Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 27, 149 (2005).
  106. B. Haider, M. Häusser, and M. Carandini, Inhibition dominates sensory responses in the awake cortex, Nature (London) 493, 97 (2013).
  107. A. M. Large, N. W. Vogler, S. Mielo, and A.-M. M. Oswald, Balanced feedforward inhibition and dominant recurrent inhibition in olfactory cortex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2276 (2016).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024215– Published 17 August, 2026
  • Received 14 December 2025
  • Accepted 3 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation