- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Plume stretching in the trapped region of a reoriented potential mixer

Roseanna M. Neupauer*

James D. Meiss†

Tomás G. Dabove‡

  • *Contact author: neupauer@colorado.edu
  • †Contact author: jdm@colorado.edu
  • ‡Contact author: tomas.dabove@colorado.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 113, 065108 – Published 18 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/stql-4ltv

Abstract

The reoriented potential mixer (RPM) can enhance mixing and reaction during in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater, in which a chemical or biological amendment is introduced into a contaminant plume to react with and degrade the contaminant. Each step of the RPM consists of dipole flow between a pair of wells—one for injection and one for extraction—that is active for a dimensionless time τ. Subsequently, a different pair of wells is activated at a reorientation angle Θ. Certain {τ,Θ} pairs lead to chaotic advection, with elliptic islands embedded in a chaotic sea. Importantly, a central elliptic island encompasses a “trapped” region containing fluid that does not reach an extraction well during typical groundwater remediation timescales. Indeed for groundwater remediation, the RPM must be designed so that the contaminant remains within such a trapped region, eliminating the possibility of degrading previously uncontaminated regions of the aquifer. In our model, this trapped region consists of two parts: an inner region surrounding an elliptic fixed point within which the fluid is minimally mixed by weak shear, and an outer region with stronger shear that can produce substantial stretching of the interface between the contaminant and amendment plumes. An RPM designed to contain the contaminant and amendment plumes within the trapped region has the potential to enhance reaction during in situ remediation of contaminated groundwater, while preventing the spread of contaminated groundwater into previously uncontaminated regions of the aquifer.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. K. Guo, H. Li, and Z. Yu, In-situ heavy and extra-heavy oil recovery: A review, Fuel 185, 886 (2016).
  2. J. Chen and F. Jiang, Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy, Renew. Energy 74, 37 (2015).
  3. X. Song, Y. Shi, G. Li, R. Yang, G. Wang, R. Zheng, J. Li, and Z. Lyu, Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells, Appl. Energy 218, 325 (2018).
  4. M. Chen, Z. Jiang, G. Feng, M. Chen, and Z. Du, Improving the efficiency of in situ uranium leaching (remediation) with periodic injection and extraction: Insight from reactive transport modeling and field test, J. Hydrol. 630, 130767 (2024).
  5. L. Huo, G. Liu, X. Yang, Z. Ahmad, and H. Zhong, Surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation: Mechanisms, influences, limitations and the countermeasures, Chemosphere 252, 126620 (2020).
  6. H. Aref, Stirring by chaotic advection, J. Fluid Mech. 143, 1 (1984).
  7. J. M. Ottino, The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos, and Transport (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
  8. R. Lensvelt, M. Speetjens, and H. Nijmeijer, Fast fluid heating by adaptive flow reorientation, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 180, 107720 (2022).
  9. D. C. Mays and R. M. Neupauer, Plume spreading in groundwater by stretching and folding, Water Resour. Res. 48, W07501 (2012).
  10. A. C. Bagtzoglou and P. M. Oates, Chaotic advection and enhanced groundwater remediation, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19, 75 (2007).
  11. P. Zhang, S. L. DeVries, A. Dathe, and A. C. Bagtzoglou, Enhanced mixing and plume containment in porous media under time-dependent oscillatory flow, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6283 (2009).
  12. G. Metcalfe, D. Lester, A. Ord, P. Kulkarni, M. Rudman, M. Trefry, B. Hobbs, K. Regenaur-Lieb, and J. Morris, An experimental and theoretical study of the mixing characteristics of a periodically reoriented irrotational flow, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 2147 (2010).
  13. D. R. Lester, G. Metcalfe, M. G. Trefry, A. Ord, B. Hobbs, and M. Rudman, Lagrangian topology of a periodically reoriented potential flow: Symmetry, optimization, and mixing, Phys. Rev. E 80, 036208 (2009).
  14. J. Wu, D. Lester, M. G. Trefry, and G. Metcalfe, Lagrangian coherent structures control solute dispersion in heterogeneous poroelastic media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 044501 (2024).
  15. G. Haller, Lagrangian coherent structures, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 137 (2015).
  16. M. G. Trefry, D. R. Lester, G. Metcalfe, A. Ord, and K. Regenauer-Lieb, Toward enhanced subsurface intervention methods using chaotic advection, J. Contam. Hydrol. 127, 15 (2012).
  17. M. S. Cho, F. Solano, N. R. Thomson, M. G. Trefry, D. R. Lester, and G. Metcalfe, Field trials of chaotic advection to enhance reagent delivery, Groundwater Monit. Rem. 39, 23 (2019).
  18. M. S. Cho and N. R. Thomson, The role of rotated potential mixing protocols on the behavior of a conservative reagent, Groundwater Monit. Rem. 44, 86 (2024).
  19. M. Dentz, T. Le Borgne, A. Englert, and B. Bijeljic, Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: A brief review, J. Contam. Hydrol. 120-121, 1 (2011).
  20. R. J. Charbeneau, Groundwater Hydraulics and Pollutant Transport (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000).
  21. D. B. Grove and W. A. Beetem, Porosity and dispersion constant calculations for a fractured carbonate aquifer using the two well tracer method, Water Resour. Res. 7, 128 (1971).
  22. S. W. Jones and H. Aref, Chaotic advection in pulsed source-sink systems, Phys. Fluids 31, 469 (1988).
  23. D. R. Lester, M. Rudman, G. Metcalfe, M. G. Trefry, A. Ord, and B. Hobbs, Scalar dispersion in a periodically reoriented potential flow: Acceleration via Lagrangian chaos, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046319 (2010).
  24. M. Dentz, D. R. Lester, T. Le Borgne, and F. P. J. de Barros, Coupled continuous-time random walks for fluid stretching in two-dimensional heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. E 94, 061102(R) (2016).
  25. B. Kadoch, W. J. T. Bos, and K. Schneider, Efficiency of laminar and turbulent mixing in wall-bounded flows, Phys. Rev. E 101, 043104 (2020).
  26. S. C. Jose and O. A. Cirpka, Measurement of mixing-controlled reactive transport in homogeneous porous media and its prediction from conservative tracer test data, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 2089 (2004).
  27. J. Wu, D. Lester, M. G. Trefry, and G. Metcalfe, Lagrangian coherent structures control solute mixing in heterogeneous poroelastic media, Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, 064503 (2025).
  28. J. Nicholson, Bessel zero solver (2026), MATLAB Central File Exchange, Retrieved May 13, 2026 https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/48403-bessel-zero-solver.
  29. D. H. Kelley and N. T. Ouellette, Separating stretching from folding in fluid mixing, Nat. Phys. 7, 477 (2011).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 113, 065108– Published 18 June, 2026
  • Received 22 January 2026
  • Accepted 3 June 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation